Exclusive: After years of posting generic sentiments during Pride Month, New Zealand’s diplomatic posts were silent this year following a directive from the foreign affairs minister.
Minister of foreign affairs Winston Peters personally intervened to stop New Zealand’s diplomatic posts around the world from posting about Pride Month on social media, documents show.
New Zealand’s embassies and high commissions around the world have regularly posted about Pride Month in the past, sharing New Zealand milestones such as being the first country to grant women the vote and to have openly transgender MPs, as well as celebrating legislative freedoms like marriage equality.
The posts on Facebook and other social media often included photos or footage of key diplomatic staff marching in Pride parades.
But when a batch of similar social media drafts were circulated with the minister’s office for “awareness” earlier this year, Peters’ office intervened – leading to a new directive being issued to all posts (embassies and high commissions) about social media use, including a warning regarding posting about Pride Month from official Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (Mfat) accounts.
Documents released to The Spinoff under the Official Information Act show the draft social media posts themselves were fairly anodyne and similar to the material posted in the years prior.
One draft post, featuring a photo of a Pride gathering, read: “It’s #PrideMonth and we are sharing our history. Pride festivals and fairs began in New Zealand in the 1970s and 1980s. Many of these festivals were a response to the global late-stage HIV pandemic and enabled the community to come together.”
One of the social media posts planned for Pride Month
The posts were included in a document pack prepared by Mfat’s central communications division, which noted that New Zealand’s support for rainbow community rights was one of “seven thematic human rights focus areas”.
“New Zealand’s support for rainbow communities is grounded in the core human rights principles of equality, dignity, and non-discrimination,” the document read.
“Demonstrating that support through the Ministry’s social media accounts is a strand of New Zealand’s ‘soft diplomacy’. In some countries, especially minimally restrictive countries where the host country has made some positive steps, demonstrating our visible commitment to the human rights of rainbow communities can build connection and understanding with community groups or government stakeholders, potentially opening the door to further discussion on these issues.”
The minister’s office did not respond for several weeks, but after a prompting on WhatsApp, senior advisor Michael Appleton wrote back on May 27, explaining the minister’s discomfort. His exact guidance was redacted but the directive is clear from surrounding statements – a halt to the proposed posts.
“…in line with earlier guidance issued by DCE-P, he [Peters] made the point that he views Mfat’s social media channels as being primarily for use to communicate New Zealand’s positions on foreign and trade policy issues and to document our engagement with other countries,” Appleton wrote. “I accept this is not a binary, black and white, either/or choice – but I am seeking to locate [the minister of foreign affairs] MFA’s preference on Pride Month content in the wider context of his views on the proper / appropriate scope of the Ministry’s social media content.”
The email continued: “I hasten to add that the guidance above should not be read as having wider implications for our human rights diplomacy […] or for what activities / events our Post network choose to undertake/attend (which will be context-specific and driven by Post judgments, overseen by regional divisions, about how to promote New Zealand interests).”
This email resulted in a directive to all posts on “UPDATING MINISTRY SOCIAL MEDIA GUIDELINES” – sent three days later on May 30, just before Pride Month began.
The summary notes that MFAT is updating its social media guidelines and that this update will be “informed closely by MFA’s [Peters] direction that social media platforms should be focused on the communication and advancement of New Zealand’s foreign and trade policy positions.”
It is noted that “this will impact the Ministry’s social media engagement, most immediately, in relation to Pride Month.”
The exact way this applies to Pride Month is detailed in two redacted paragraphs, which were redacted under section 9(2)(g)(i) of the Act, meaning “to maintain the effective conduct of public affairs through the free and frank expression of opinions”.
The redacted paragraphs are followed by a statement that “this should not be read as having wider implications for our human rights diplomacy more broadly”.
Another of the planned social media posts
No posts concerning Pride Month in 2025 appeared on any of the dozen Mfat social media channels reviewed by The Spinoff. One post about global trade tensions did feature a rainbow umbrella.
The Spinoff asked Peters to detail his exact direction to posts and why he intervened. “The minister believes New Zealand’s diplomatic network should be focused on advancing New Zealand’s interests,” a spokesperson responded.
“The minister naturally has views about how New Zealand should conduct its diplomacy. One of those views is that social media content published by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade and its post network should primarily be focused on communicating New Zealand’s positions on foreign and trade policy issues, in line with our policy priorities agreed by cabinet, and on documenting our engagement with other countries.”
Peters’ own legislative record stands in direct contrast to many of the milestones championed by past social media posts – he voted against legalising gay sex between men in 1986, and against same-sex marriage in 2013. The Spinoff asked if this history had any part to play in the decision, but did not receive a direct response.
His office was also asked what its message would be to any queer diplomats who were angered by the decision. The spokesperson said Peters’ record of support for diplomats spoke for itself.
“The minister has the utmost respect for New Zealand’s diplomats and the important work they do on behalf of all New Zealanders. This has been consistently demonstrated over three terms as foreign minister in Mr Peters’ public remarks and his approach to foreign affairs resourcing.”