Support CleanTechnica’s work through a Substack subscription or on Stripe.
Or support our Kickstarter campaign!
Will the Chinese use Canada as their North American beachhead?
This story has been updated with additional details and recalculation of the forecasts.
As Chinese electric vehicle manufacturers look beyond Europe and Southeast Asia, Canada is quietly emerging as the most realistic entry point into North America. It combines stringent safety and environmental regulations, a consumer base already primed for electrification, and—crucially—slightly more regulatory flexibility than the United States.
Industry pundits agree that the initial 49,000 units entering Canada will not open the floodgates to Chinese-made vehicles that may eventually inundate the more sane part of North America. But inundate is such a big word. Unlike the other country in the Commonwealth where Chinese cars are permitted, Canada does have Ford, Honda, General Motors (GM), Stellantis, and Toyota assembling cars there, which together assembled about 1.3 million light vehicles last year.
So the 49,000-unit allocation is only about 3.77% of the market size. However, given the global performance of the major Chinese brands, the real question is no longer whether these brands could succeed in Canada. For BYD, that debate may well be settled. In 2024 alone, BYD sold 4.27 million new energy vehicles worldwide, capturing roughly 18% of the global EV market. Its scale, vertical integration, and pricing power make it the benchmark.
The more interesting—and unresolved—question is which other Chinese automakers have the institutional depth to follow, using Canada as a proving ground before any broader North American ambitions.
Who could do what, and in what numbers
This Cleantechnica analysis is based on information provided by anonymous automotive industry sources in China, cross-checked and vetted by journalist colleagues with long-term, on-the-ground experience covering the sector. The assessment is not about hype or short-term export spikes. It reflects structural readiness: industrial scale, regulatory competence, global operating experience, and the ability to survive outside China without subsidies or political insulation.
What follows is an indicative (educated, but still speculative) market-logic allocation of Canada’s 49,000-unit annual Chinese EV quota, grounded primarily in China domestic sales as a proxy for capacity, then adjusted for export maturity and Canadian market fit. Listed in alphabetical order. Do not use this information for investment purposes.
BAIC kick off (≈1%)
BAIC Group would likely account for around 1% of the quota, or roughly 490 vehicles annually, primarily through its Arcfox electric portfolio.
The brand–BAIC, formerly as Beijing Automotive Industry Corporation is now Beijing Automotive Group Co., Ltd. headquartered in Shunyi, Beijing. The state-owned automobile manufacturer was founded in 1958 and is the sixth largest automobile manufacturer in China, with sales nearing 2 million.
BAIC possesses the industrial scale and regulatory experience to enter Canada, particularly given its long-standing joint ventures with Mercedes-Benz. However, its EV brands remain relatively China-centric, and a Canada entry would likely be conservative, exploratory, and tightly scoped rather than volume-driven.
BYD as the structural baseline (≈30%)
Any realistic allocation begins with BYD, which would still command roughly 33% of the quota, or about 16,170 vehicles per year.
This is not preferential treatment; it is industrial gravity. BYD remains the only Chinese automaker that combines vehicle manufacturing, battery production, power electronics, and key materials processing at scale. That vertical integration matters in Canada, where cold-weather performance, battery reliability, and long-distance driving place real stress on EV systems.
BYD’s pricing power is equally important. It can compete aggressively without relying on loss-leading exports or opaque subsidies, making it politically easier for Canadian regulators to defend its presence. If Canada is running a controlled experiment, BYD remains the baseline test case—even at a reduced share.
Changan credible entry (≈3%)
Changan Automobile would plausibly account for around 3% of the quota, not as a volume challenger but as a structurally credible entrant. Changan’s EV and hybrid portfolio is anchored by Deepal (Shenlan), its export-oriented BEV and EREV brand; Avatr, a premium EV line co-developed with Huawei and CATL; Qiyuan/Nevo, which covers mass-market EVs and hybrids; and Lumin, a compact urban EV.
Changan lacks BYD’s vertical integration, but it compensates with breadth, improving export execution, and growing regulatory competence, including overseas production and exports from Southeast Asia into Europe. That makes a limited Canadian presence plausible without overstating readiness.
Chery’s experience over hype (≈10%)
Chery would likely secure around 10% of the quota, or about 4,900 vehicles annually.
Long before EVs became geopolitically sensitive, Chery was exporting vehicles into complex markets across Latin America, the Middle East, Eastern Europe, and Africa. In 2024, it recorded 2.6 million global vehicle sales, with exports reaching 1.144 million units, making it China’s top passenger car exporter for the 22nd consecutive year.
That experience aligns well with Canada’s risk profile. Chery lacks the software-forward branding of newer EV players, but its strengths—durability, cost discipline, and serviceability—fit Canadian buyer priorities, particularly outside major urban centres.
Dongfeng’s quiet industrial depth (≈3%)
Dongfeng would likely account for around 3% of the quota, or roughly 1,470 vehicles per year.
Decades of joint-venture experience with Nissan have given Dongfeng deep familiarity with global quality systems, compliance processes, and platform engineering. While its EV brands lack international visibility, its manufacturing competence is not in question.
In Canada, Dongfeng’s role is more likely to emerge through fleet sales, contract manufacturing, or behind-the-scenes supply relationships rather than retail showrooms. Moreover, Nissan does not assemble vehicles in Canada. Dongfeng is well suited to build an assembly plant in Canada if needed.
FAW legitimacy before volume (≈1%)
FAW Group, through its Hongqi and Bestune brands, would likely account for about 1% of the quota, or roughly 490 vehicles annually. This estimation is premised on two assumptions. One, Bestune will not be a brand that can pass the Canada Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (CMVSS) mostly because of its size and body engineering. The second assumption is that Honqi will pass every test but will always be a very limited, niche luxury vehicle. After all it is the official vehicle of Xi Jin Ping.
This is not a reflection of technical weakness. Hongqi’s EVs are among the most over-engineered in China, positioned closer to established luxury marques than to mass-market disruptors. However, brand unfamiliarity, premium pricing, and limited global dealer exposure naturally constrain volume in a cautious market like Canada.
For FAW, Canada would function less as a sales opportunity than as a legitimacy test: regulatory certification, winter performance validation, and reputational positioning in a Western luxury context. At this scale, FAW gains insight without political or commercial overreach.
GAC: the quiet mainstream entrant (≈3%)
GAC would account for roughly 1,470 vehicles annually. It occupies a distinct position among Chinese automakers. With long-standing joint ventures with Toyota and Honda, and a rapidly scaled EV portfolio under its Aion brand, GAC emphasizes manufacturing discipline, build quality, and regulatory compliance over aggressive price competition.
Its existing presence in tightly regulated markets such as Australia and parts of Europe reduces homologation risk. In Canada, GAC would likely appeal to buyers transitioning from Japanese brands, positioning itself as a conservative, reliability-first EV alternative rather than a disruptor.
Geely’s platform power over brand flash (≈15%)
Geely would plausibly take around 15% of the quota, or approximately 7,350 vehicles annually.
In 2024, Geely Holding Group sold 3.34 million vehicles globally, with overseas sales reaching 1.22 million units. More importantly, Geely is already embedded inside Western automotive ecosystems through Volvo, Polestar, and Lotus.
That embedded legitimacy matters in Canada, where brand trust, safety perceptions, and regulatory transparency carry more weight than novelty pricing. Geely’s strength lies not in exporting “Chinese EVs,” but in deploying globally normalized vehicles with Chinese cost structures.
Great Wall Motors’ EV wedge (≈3%)
Great Wall Motors would likely command around 3% of the quota, or roughly 1,470 vehicles annually, primarily through its ORA electric sub-brand.
Unlike many Chinese EV manufacturers, Great Wall has already demonstrated sustained success in regulated right-hand-drive markets such as Australia and the United Kingdom. The ORA lineup, particularly the ORA Cat, targets urban and suburban consumers with approachable design, manageable size, and pricing aligned with entry-level EV segments.
In Canada, GWM would likely function as a consumer-facing wedge—less about volume leadership than about normalizing Chinese-branded EVs in everyday retail environments.
Jiangling Motors and the commercial EV sleeper (≈1%)
Jiangling Motors would likely command around 2% of the quota, or roughly 490 vehicles annually, almost entirely in commercial segments.
Through its long-standing partnership with Ford Motor Company, JMC has internalized Western standards for safety, durability, and fleet engineering. Its EV portfolio focuses on vans, pickups, and light trucks and pick-ups rather than consumer passenger cars.
In Canada, where fleet electrification is often advancing faster than private adoption, JMC’s relevance could exceed its visibility—even at reduced volume.
NIO and brand ambition with structural limits (≈5%)
NIO would likely be capped at around 4% of the quota, or roughly 2,450 vehicles per year.
Its battery-swapping ecosystem and software-centric design are innovative but capital-intensive and infrastructure-dependent. Outside dense, policy-aligned urban environments, the model becomes difficult to scale.
NIO can succeed selectively in Canada, but mass penetration remains unlikely without sustained incentives and partnerships.
SAIC Motor as the quiet global incumbent (≈20%)
SAIC, primarily through MG, would likely take around 20% of the quota, or about 9,800 vehicles annually.
MG’s success in Europe, Australia, and Southeast Asia highlights SAIC’s core advantage: institutional memory. Decades of joint ventures with Volkswagen and General Motors have ingrained Western compliance, dealer management, and warranty expectations into its operating culture.
Even under steep EU tariffs, SAIC achieved 1.08 million overseas sales in 2024. In Canada’s politically sensitive environment, that low execution risk is a major asset.
XPENG’s technology-led growth (≈5%)
XPENG would likely capture around 5% of the quota, or roughly 2,450 vehicles per year.
Its appeal lies in advanced driver assistance, fast-charging architectures, and a strong software narrative. XPENG already operates across much of Europe and collaborates with Volkswagen on electronic architecture.
However, Canada’s dispersed geography and service expectations constrain its near-term scale. Its role is more likely influential than dominant.
Zeekr as an reader’s request
Zeekr already has enough EV depth to be taken seriously. In this article update a reader sent a private message asking me to add Zeekr to the list. I explained that Zeekr is a brand under Geely Holdings, Inc.
Its lineup spans performance-oriented sedans and wagons, family-size SUVs, and MPVs, all built on Geely’s SEA (Sustainable Experience Architecture) platform. That platform maturity matters: it underpins not just Zeekr, but also Polestar and other Geely EVs, giving Zeekr access to proven battery thermal management, high-voltage fast-charging systems, and scalable vehicle electronics. Zeekrs are engineered for cold-weather resilience, long-distance driving–perfect for North Canada’s climate.
The numbers still add up
What separates Chinese automakers that can succeed in Canada—and potentially North America—from those that cannot is not innovation alone—it is institutional depth. The numbers presented here, while highly speculative, are grounded in actual production scale, export performance, and regulatory track record.
BYD dominates because it combines scale, integration, and profitability. SAIC and Geely follow because they already know how to operate inside foreign regulatory systems. Chery endures because it has learned to survive volatility. GAC, FAW, and Great Wall matter because they normalize Chinese participation without disruption.
The global EV market is no longer searching for novelty. It is searching for companies that can stay. Canada may be the test case that determines who actually can.
Editor’s note
This analysis reflects a further refinement of the assumed 49,000-unit annual cap on Chinese EV imports into Canada.
BYD’s indicative share has been adjusted downward to approximately 33% down to 30% to accommodate the inclusion of Great Wall Motors (≈3%), alongside previously added allocations for GAC (≈3%) and FAW’s Hongqi and Bestune brands (≈1%).
Jiangling Motors’ share has been modestly reduced to reflect a more conservative commercial-vehicle uptake assumption. These adjustments preserve the article’s core thesis while better capturing the breadth of institutionally prepared Chinese automakers likely to test Canada as a North American entry point.
Support CleanTechnica via Kickstarter
Sign up for CleanTechnica’s Weekly Substack for Zach and Scott’s in-depth analyses and high level summaries, sign up for our daily newsletter, and follow us on Google News!
Advertisement
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Sign up for our daily newsletter for 15 new cleantech stories a day. Or sign up for our weekly one on top stories of the week if daily is too frequent.
CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.