Paul Ingrassia, a 29-year-old attorney nominated by President Donald Trump to lead the US Office of Special Counsel, faces fierce backlash over alleged far-right and Nazi-style remarks.
Photo : AP
President Donald Trump’s nomination of Paul Joseph Ingrassia to lead the US Office of Special Counsel (OSC) has triggered bipartisan alarm, with critics accusing the administration of placing an inexperienced and ideologically extreme figure at the helm of a critical oversight agency.
According to The Washington Post, Ingrassia, a 29-year-old attorney and former White House liaison to the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security, was officially nominated on May 29, 2025. The OSC is a non-partisan body responsible for enforcing the Hatch Act, investigating political coercion, and protecting federal whistle-blowers — duties that traditionally require independence from partisan politics.
Limited Experience, Far-Right Associations Raise Red Flags
As AP News reported, Ingrassia was admitted to the New York Bar in July 2024, less than a year before his nomination. His limited courtroom experience has become a flashpoint in confirmation debates. More damaging, however, are resurfaced statements that have circulated online. The Daily Beast highlighted posts in which Ingrassia referred to federal workers as “lazy” and “stupid,” and echoed themes critics compared to far-right or Nazi-inspired language.
Ingrassia has also publicly praised online influencers Andrew Tate and Nick Fuentes, both controversial for extremist views. Civil-rights groups, quoted by Politico, said the pattern “reflects a deeply troubling mindset for anyone overseeing government ethics.”
A Flashpoint in Washington’s Debate Over Oversight and Power
Supporters within Trump’s orbit argue that Ingrassia’s worldview aligns with the president’s effort to “clean house” across the federal bureaucracy. But opposition lawmakers warn that his appointment could erode OSC’s independence, turning the watchdog into a political instrument.
“The Office of Special Counsel must be above ideology,” one Senate Democrat told The Washington Post. “Paul Ingrassia’s record suggests the opposite.”
The Senate confirmation hearing is expected later this year. For now, Ingrassia’s nomination has become a symbol of Washington’s deeper struggle over how — and by whom — accountability in government should be enforced.