The Greater Toronto Hockey League (GTHL) has launched a sweeping lawsuit against four of its member clubs, alleging they secretly inflated the cost of ice time for years, siphoning off hundreds of thousands of dollars from a not-for-profit system funded by the families of players.

In a statement of claim filed Jan. 14 in Ontario Superior Court in Toronto, the GTHL accuses the City of Vaughan Hockey Association (operating as the Vaughan Rangers), the Vaughan Panthers Minor Hockey Association, and two Markham-based organizations, operating as the Markham Majors and Markham Islanders, of charging undisclosed “premiums” on arena ice used for league games, money the league says was never disclosed, authorized, or agreed to.

The league is seeking at least $700,000 in damages and interest, alleging breach of fiduciary duty, deceit, negligent misrepresentation, breach of contract, unjust enrichment and equitable fraud.

The GTHL is seeking $300,000 from the Rangers, $150,000 from the Panthers, and $250,000 from the Majors and Islanders combined.

The 28-page claim alleges that the hockey organizations have been procuring ice time from municipalities for decades and then charging the GTHL an inflated price for it.

The GTHL said it estimated it had paid some $566,920 in undisclosed premiums over the past 20 years, money it says flowed from families paying registration fees across the league.

By failing to disclose premiums, the league alleges, the clubs breached duties of loyalty and good faith, made false representations by omission, and earned “secret profits” that must be returned.

“This practice by the clubs of charging the GTHL undisclosed premiums for GTHL game ice has been ongoing for many years, perhaps 20 years or more, since each of the clubs first joined the GTHL in the mid to late 1990s or early 2000s,” the league alleges.

The clubs have not yet filed statements of defence and none of the allegations have been tested in court. The Toronto Police Service is not actively investigating the allegations, TPS spokesperson Ashley Visser wrote in a statement to TSN.

“We do not have any reports on file at this time,” Visser wrote.

Toronto lawyer Michael Mazzuca, who represents the organizations accused of fraud, wrote in an email to TSN that the allegations made by the GTHL are “entirely frivolous, vexatious and without merit.”

“These claims are denied and will be vigorously defended by the member hockey clubs,” Mazzuca wrote. “The member hockey clubs are owed monies for unpaid ice fees that the GTHL has expressly agreed to pay to the member hockey clubs. The member hockey clubs intend to issue their own court claims/counterclaims for these amounts against the GTHL.”

Mazzuca wrote that the cost of game ice provided by the member hockey clubs to the GTHL has included administrative fees for decades.

“This was not an issue until about a year ago when the GTHL wanted to claim back these long-known and agreed-upon fees,” he wrote. “The member hockey clubs welcome the opportunity to now adjudicate this dispute in a transparent and independent forum through the courts as opposed to dealing with this ongoing dispute through the GTHL’s institutionally biased and flawed processes…”

The GTHL is the world’s largest minor hockey organization, made up of 54 organizations and more than 40,000 registered players. Its programs span everything from recreational house league to elite A, AA, and AAA competition. According to its financial statements, the league generates more than $10 million in annual revenue. Current NHL stars who played in the GTHL include Connor McDavid, Mitch Marner, and John Tavares.

The organization’s lawsuit has been filed against a backdrop of growing scrutiny of how minor hockey in Ontario is governed, financed and policed.

The GTHL said it would investigate allegations of financial misconduct after TSN’s reporting in 2003 revealed instances of organizations allegedly being illegally bought and sold. In September 2023, the Canada Revenue Agency said it would review allegations of fraud in the league.

The GTHL said in its lawsuit that it is responsible for securing and paying for ice for league games. In most cases, it contracts directly with municipalities and rink operators. But when several large clubs left the Ontario Minor Hockey Association in the late 1990s and early 2000s to join the GTHL, they maintained their own long-standing relationships with their municipalities.

As a result, the Vaughan and Markham organizations continued to procure ice directly from their cities for league games, then invoice the GTHL for reimbursement, the GTHL’s lawsuit said.

For years, the league said, it paid those invoices on the understanding that they reflected the clubs’ actual costs.

But in August 2023, the GTHL’s auditors suggested the league ask its clubs to share information about the rates they were being charged by their respective municipalities, the lawsuit said.

“The clubs did not honour and ignored or avoided the GTHL’s request for this information despite follow-up requests later in 2023 and in 2024,” the lawsuit said.

The GTHL allegedly discovered that each of the four clubs had invoiced the league for more than it paid its municipality for the same ice during the 2023–24 season, meaning a premium had been added.

“None of the invoices rendered by the clubs to the GTHL… indicated that the clubs were charging the GTHL a premium,” the league alleges. “The GTHL never, at any time, agreed to pay a premium for GTHL game ice.”

The league wrote in its lawsuit that it learned that the practice of charging a premium was still occurring as recently as the 2024–25 season.

For 2023–24 alone, the GTHL alleges it paid $28,346 in undisclosed premiums: about $12,785 to the Rangers, $6,408 to the Panthers, $2,835 to the Majors and $6,317 to the Islanders. The hourly markups ranged from roughly $15 to $20.

The GTHL said in its lawsuit that it paid outstanding invoices in November 2024 only after deducting the alleged premiums. Since then, it has refused to pay any markup and has reimbursed clubs solely at municipal rates.

According to the lawsuit, the GTHL began disciplinary proceedings against the four clubs on or about Dec. 17, 2024, for alleged misconduct.

“Through the disciplinary proceeding, the GTHL intends to redress what it believes was unethical misconduct on the part of the clubs by charging undisclosed premiums to the GTHL for GTHL game ice, in breach of GTHL bylaws, rules and regulations,” the lawsuit said. “In the event it is determined in the future that the GTHL has no jurisdiction to seek redress against the clubs through the disciplinary proceeding… the GTHL seeks redress through this action.”

What elevates the dispute from a bookkeeping quarrel to a systemic allegation is the league’s claim that the practice stretches back decades.

In submissions to the GTHL’s disciplinary proceeding, the clubs acknowledged charging premiums.

The Vaughan Rangers and the Panthers said the practice began in 2007–08, according to the lawsuit, while the Markham organizations said they began charging the GTHL a premium for ice in 2017. (The Markham organizations later acknowledged charging premiums between 2004 and 2010 through a related organization.)

In each instance, the GTHL said the organizations provided no back-up documentation to confirm the amounts, which the GTHL has disputed as understated and unsupported.

During a discipline hearing on Sept. 30, 2025, the Panthers confirmed they had been charging the GTHL premiums for game ice since 1995.

During that same hearing, the organizations accused of fraud alleged that former GTHL president John Gardner had agreed on behalf of the GTHL to pay premiums, the lawsuit said. Gardner died in 2019.

“The GTHL denies any knowledge of the charging of premiums on the part of Mr. Gardner or the GTHL,” the GTHL wrote.

The claim also alleged that because the organizations were buying ice time on behalf of the GTHL, they had a fiduciary duty to the league.

Because the clubs alone negotiated with municipalities and controlled access to rate information, the league says it was “peculiarly vulnerable” and dependent on the clubs’ honesty.