After two decades of markets exalting belief over balance sheets, the pendulum is swinging back toward the ground, underground, in fact. Until now, we’ve lived in an era where belief and vision routinely outperform reality. It was the triumph of ideology. Markets rewarded charisma over cash flow, tokens over tonnage, software over substance. Crypto, SPACs, Web3, WeWork – each iteration more untethered than the last.
But as an invisible hand, the gravitational pull of the real world is providing unavoidable headwinds.
From belief systems to balance sheets
Ideology is not the enemy. It’s necessary. Every major technological or political movement begins with belief. But belief without backing, a tether to physics, geology, or thermodynamics, will eventually devolve into vaporware.
Bitcoin without energy and hardware infrastructure is vapor. EVs without lithium, copper and critical minerals are theater. ESG mandates without metal are moral cosplay.
The market, finally, is beginning to remember this.
Asset-backed ideology > Pure ideology
Too often, the push and pull between the idea economy and the hard asset economy is presented as a false dichotomy. This either/or framework is a mistake. The recent pendulum shift isn’t about eschewing ideas and returning exclusively to hard assets. It’s a transition from unbacked ideas to anchored ones. Ideas may drive the bus, but now we’re asking whether there’s a chassis, an engine, and fuel.
Tesla may have started by selling a idyllic vision of a post-oil future. But as it matured, Tesla has had to move upstream, locking in critical mineral supply. Apple didn’t develop into a nearly $4 trillion market behemoth by just designing software. It integrated its software with its own chips, devices, and other hardware. Nvidia didn’t just ride the AI ideology, it built the hardware stack that makes the ideological AI vision tangible and real.
This is the underlying logic of a hard-asset renaissance. You can’t digitize a mine. You can’t decentralize a transformer. Someone, somewhere, has to pour concrete, dig ore, or build a substation.
Ideology is unbelievably powerful and transformative. But to be sustainable, it needs a passport stamped by reality.
The reckoning of untethered ideology
It is no mystery why political establishments push ideological appeals. They have an unparalleled capacity to captivate and inspire the masses. The economic establishment was happy to follow. Investors poured into idea companies with nominal cash flow, minimal hard assets, and zero grounding. The result? Torched capital. SVB. Wework. Luna. FTX. It became a veritable VC-themed roulette table, where any wins are short lived because the odds always favor the house.
Due to a recent rash of geopolitical and economic shockwaves, the market psychology is shifting: from dreamland to discipline. From putting a premium on raw dynamic storytelling to putting a premium on narrative with tangible substance. The rise of asset-backed stablecoin crypto products, refocus on the “critical” component of critical minerals, and the resurrection of mining equities are all signals of this recalibration.
We’re witnessing the early stages of a necessary rebalancing. Not the death of ideology and belief, rather a resurgence of ballast.
In this new environment, it’s not simply Bitcoin vs. gold. It’s the instant portability and low transactional friction of crypto + gold backing. Not just “green energy”, but the copper, cobalt, and REEs to make functional products. It is not a departure from the age of ideas. It is adding some metallurgy slides to the pitch deck.
A revived tangibility premium
For investors, this changes the evaluation filter. Instead of asking “What’s the story?”, we need to begin asking “What’s the substance within the story?” Who owns the ground, the throughput, the inputs?
The most investable ideas going forward will be those with with physical exposure (land, mineral rights, cash-flowing infrastructure), operational realism (grid-aware, resource secure, logistically viable), and ideology (vision) backed by income statements.
Virtue lies in the mean
Both the tech idealists and the hard-assets bulls can both benefit from Aristotle’s admonition that virtue is to be found in the mean between the extremes. The pendulum swing from ideological vision to hard asset realism is not regressive. It is healthy. Tech doesn’t need to shed its ideals. It just needs to also put on work boots. There’s no EV future without copper. No AI explosion without silicon. No net-zero transition without metals.
Mining may have been maligned, sometimes justly, but it remains the skeletal framework of progress. The industry needs technological innovation just as tech needs a hard-asset renaissance. Ideas still drive us forward. But without a foundation of mining, they collapse under their own weight.
* Erik Groves is Corporate Strategy and In-House Counsel at Morgan Companies.
The views and opinions expressed in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of MINING.COM or The Northern Miner Group.