Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J. & Befort, B. L. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20260–20264 (2011).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Foley, J. A. et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 337–342 (2011).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Oliveira, E. M. et al. Effects of conventional, organic and conservation agriculture on soil physical properties, root growth and microbial habitats in a long-term field experiment. Geoderma 447, 116927 (2024).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Global Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Debating Nature’s Value (IPBES, 2019).

Gomiero, T., Pimentel, D. & Paoletti, M. G. Environmental impact of different agricultural management practices: conventional vs. organic agriculture. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 30, 95–124 (2011).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Tuck, S. L. et al. Land-use intensity and the effects of organic farming on biodiversity: a hierarchical meta-analysis. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 746–755 (2014).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Reganold, J. P. & Wachter, J. M. Organic agriculture in the twenty-first century. Nat. Plants 2, 15221 (2016).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Status of the World’s Soil Resources (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2015).

Smith, P. et al. Global change pressures on soils from land use and management. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 1008–1028 (2016).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Pretty, J. et al. Global assessment of agricultural system redesign for sustainable intensification. Nat. Sustain. 1, 441–446 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Qiao, L. et al. Soil quality both increases crop production and improves resilience to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 574–580 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Toda, M., Walder, F. & van der Heijden, M. G. A. Organic management and soil health promote nutrient use efficiency. J. Sustain. Agric. Environ. 2, 215–224 (2023).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Krause, H. M. et al. Organic cropping systems balance environmental impacts and agricultural production. Sci. Rep. 14, 25537 (2024).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Farm to Fork Strategy (EU Commission, 2020).

de la Cruz, V. Y. V., Tantriani, Cheng, W. & Tawaraya, K. Yield gap between organic and conventional farming systems across climate types and sub-types: a meta-analysis. Agric. Syst. 211, 103732 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Seufert, V., Ramankutty, N. & Foley, J. A. Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature 485, 229–232 (2012).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Ponisio, L. C. et al. Diversification practices reduce organic to conventional yield gap. Proc. R. Soc. B 282, 20141396 (2015).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Muller, A. et al. Strategies for feeding the world more sustainably with organic agriculture. Nat. Commun. 8, 1290 (2017).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Godfray, H. C. J. et al. Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327, 812–818 (2010).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Barbieri, P. et al. Global option space for organic agriculture is delimited by nitrogen availability. Nat. Food 2, 363–372 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Gong, S. et al. Biodiversity and yield trade-offs for organic farming. Ecol. Lett. 25, 1699–1710 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Barral, M. P., Rey Benayas, J. M., Meli, P. & Maceira, N. O. Quantifying the impacts of ecological restoration on biodiversity and ecosystem services in agroecosystems: a global meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 202, 223–231 (2015).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Jiao, S., Lu, Y. & Wei, G. Soil multitrophic network complexity enhances the link between biodiversity and multifunctionality in agricultural systems. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 140–153 (2022).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Ostandie, N. et al. Multi-community effects of organic and conventional farming practices in vineyards. Sci. Rep. 11, 11979 (2021).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Tiwari, S., Singh, C. & Singh, J. S. Land use changes: a key ecological driver regulating methanotrophs abundance in upland soils. Energy Ecol. Environ. 3, 355–371 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Anthony, M. A., Bender, S. F. & van der Heijden, M. G. A. Enumerating soil biodiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2304663120 (2023).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Kremen, C. & Miles, A. Ecosystem services in biologically diversified versus conventional farming systems: benefits, externalities, and trade-offs. Ecol. Soc. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26269237 (2012).

Rehberger, E., West, P. C., Spillane, C. & McKeown, P. C. What climate and environmental benefits of regenerative agriculture practices? An evidence review. Environ. Res. Commun. 5, 052001 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Wittwer, R. A. et al. Organic and conservation agriculture promote ecosystem multifunctionality. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg6995 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Knapp, S. & van der Heijden, M. G. A. A global meta-analysis of yield stability in organic and conservation agriculture. Nat. Commun. 9, 3632 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Allan, E. et al. Interannual variation in land-use intensity enhances grassland multidiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 308–313 (2014).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Microbial diversity drives multifunctionality in terrestrial ecosystems. Nat. Commun. 7, 10541 (2016).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

de Graaff, M. A., Hornslein, N., Throop, H. L., Kardol, P. & van Diepen, L. T. A. in Advances in Agronomy 1–44 (Elsevier, 2019).

Armas, C., Ordiales, R. & Pugnaire, F. I. Measuring plant interactions: a new comparative index. Ecology 85, 2682–2686 (2004).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Lal, R. Restoring soil quality to mitigate soil degradation. Sustainability 7, 5875–5895 (2015).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

George, P. B. L. et al. Evaluation of mesofauna communities as soil quality indicators in a national-level monitoring programme. Soil Biol. Biochem. 115, 537–546 (2017).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Lopezosa, P., Soliveres, S., Serra, L., Constán-Nava, S. & Berdugo, M. Land use determines Mediterranean ecosystems’ multifunctionality more than plant richness or habitat composition. J. Appl. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14568 (2024).

Schall, P. et al. Can multi-taxa diversity in European beech forest landscapes be increased by combining different management systems? J. Appl. Ecol. 57, 1363–1375 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Neyret, M. et al. Landscape management strategies for multifunctionality and social equity. Nat. Sustain. 6, 391–403 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Clark, M. & Tilman, D. Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 064016 (2017).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Krajewski, S., Žukovskis, J., Gozdowski, D., Cieśliński, M. & Wójcik-Gront, E. Evaluating the path to the European Commission’s organic agriculture goal: a multivariate analysis of changes in EU countries (2004–2021) and socio-economic relationships. Agriculture 14, 064016 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

The World of Organic Agriculture: Statistics and Emerging Trends 2022 (FiBL and IFOAM – Organics International, 2022).

Sapbamrer, R. & Thammachai, A. A systematic review of factors influencing farmers’ adoption of organic farming. Sustainability 13, 3842 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

van der Esch, S. et al. Exploring Future Changes in Land Use and Land Condition and the Impacts on Food, Water, Climate Change and Biodiversity (PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, 2017).

Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Soil microbial communities drive the resistance of ecosystem multifunctionality to global change in drylands across the globe. Ecol. Lett. 20, 1295–1305 (2017).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

de Vries, F. T. & Shade, A. Controls on soil microbial community stability under climate change. Front. Microbiol. 4, 265 (2013).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Gomiero, T. Soil degradation, land scarcity and food security: reviewing a complex challenge. Sustainability 8, 281 (2016).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

García-Velázquez, L. et al. Dataset from: Optimizing biodiversity, multifunctionality and yield when transitioning to organic farming. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27302391 (2026).

Bligh, E. G. & Dyer, W. J. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 37, 911–917 (1959).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Ellis, S. & Ritz, K. A modified high-throughput analysis of PLFAs in soil. MethodsX 5, 1491–1497 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Oostenbrink, M. in Nematology (eds Sasser, J. N. & Jenkins, W. R.) 85–102 (Univ. North Carolina Press, 1960).

Yeates, G. W., Bongers, T., De Goede, R. G. M., Freckman, D. W. & Georgieva, S. S. Feeding habits in soil nematode families and genera—an outline for soil ecologists. J. Nematol. 25, 315–331 (1993).

CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Macfadyen, A. Improved funnel-type extractors for soil arthropods. J. Anim. Ecol. 30, 171–184 (1961).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Longepierre, M. et al. Limited resilience of the soil microbiome to mechanical compaction within four growing seasons of agricultural management. ISME Commun. 1, 44 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. https://doi.org/10.14806/ej.17.1.200 (2011).

Rognes, T., Flouri, T., Nichols, B., Quince, C. & Mahé, F. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 4, e2584 (2016).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Bengtsson-Palme, J. et al. metaxa2: improved identification and taxonomic classification of small and large subunit rRNA in metagenomic data. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 15, 1403–1414 (2015).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Bengtsson-Palme, J. et al. Improved software detection and extraction of ITS1 and ITS2 from ribosomal ITS sequences of fungi and other eukaryotes for analysis of environmental sequencing data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 914–919 (2013).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Gamfeldt, L., Hillebrand, H. & Jonsson, P. R. Multiple functions increase the importance of biodiversity for overall ecosystem functioning. Ecology 89, 1223–1231 (2008).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Maestre, F. T. et al. Plant species richness and ecosystem multifunctionality in global drylands. Science 335, 214–218 (2012).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Henry, S. et al. Quantification of denitrifying bacteria in soils by nirK gene targeted real-time PCR. J. Microbiol. Methods 59, 327–335 (2004).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Throbäck, I. N., Enwall, K., Jarvis, Å & Hallin, S. Reassessing PCR primers targeting nirS, nirK and nosZ genes for community surveys of denitrifying bacteria with DGGE. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 49, 401–417 (2004).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Domeignoz-Horta, L. A. et al. Peaks of in situ N2O emissions are influenced by N2O-producing and reducing microbial communities across arable soils. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 360–370 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Harris, D., Horwáth, W. R. & van Kessel, C. Acid fumigation of soils to remove carbonates prior to total organic carbon or CARBON-13 isotopic analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65, 1853–1856 (2001).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Schimel, J. P. & Bennet, J. Nitrogen mineralization: challenges of a changing paradigm. Ecology 85, 591–602 (2004).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Sollins, P., Paul, E. A., Heil, J. W. & Elliott, E. T. in Standard Soil Methods for Long-term Ecological Research (eds Robertson, G. P. et al.) 89–106 (Oxford Univ. Press, 1991).

Ochoa Esteban, V. Soil N transformation rates protocol. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10354902 (2023).

Olsen, S., Cole, C., Watanabe, F. & Dean, L. Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate USDA Circular No. 939 (US Government Printing Office, 1954).

Fernández, J. A., Niell, F. X. & Lucena, J. A rapid and sensitive automated determination of phosphate in natural waters. Limnol. Oceanogr. 30, 227–230 (1985).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Dick, R. P. et al. Cross-laboratory comparison of fluorimetric microplate and colorimetric bench-scale soil enzyme assays. Soil Biol. Biochem. 121, 240–248 (2018).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Keuskamp, J. A., Dingemans, B. J. J., Lehtinen, T., Sarneel, J. M. & Hefting, M. M. Tea Bag Index: a novel approach to collect uniform decomposition data across ecosystems. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 1070–1075 (2013).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Tongway, D. & Hindley, N. Landscape Function Analysis Manual : Procedures for Monitoring and Assessing Landscapes with Special Reference to Minesites and Rangelands (CSIRO, 2004); http://hdl.handle.net/102.100.100/186491?index=1

Robertson, G. P., Coleman, D. C., Bledsoe, C. S. & Sollins, P. (eds) Standard Soil Methods for Long-Term Ecological Research (Oxford Univ. Press, 1999).

Mills, A., Fey, M., Donaldson, J., Todd, S. & Theron, L. Soil infiltrability as a driver of plant cover and species richness in the semi-arid Karoo, South Africa. Plant Soil 320, 321–332 (2009).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Wang, L., Xin, J., Nai, H. & Zheng, X. Effects of different fertilizer applications on nitrogen leaching losses and the response in soil microbial community structure. Environ. Technol. Innov. 23, 101608 (2021).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Johnson, D., Schmidt, K., Scholz, C. & Chowdhury, L. Valuation of soil-mediated contributions to people (SmCPs) – a systematic review of values and methods. Ecosyst. People 20, 2401945 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Allan, E. et al. Land use intensification alters ecosystem multifunctionality via loss of biodiversity and changes to functional composition. Ecol. Lett. 18, 834–843 (2015).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Sánchez-Cueto, P. et al. Impacts of climate, organic management, and degradation status on soil biodiversity in agroecosystems worldwide. Glob. Change Biol. 31, e70486 (2025).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Oksanen, A. J. et al. Package ‘vegan’. Community ecology package. CRAN https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/vegan.pdf (2020).

Wickham, H. Reshaping data with the reshape package. J. Stat. Softw. 21, 1–20 (2007).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020); https://www.r-project.org/