Updated April 24, 2026 — 10:57am,first published April 24, 2026 — 9:59am

Save

You have reached your maximum number of saved items.

Remove items from your saved list to add more.

Save this article for later

Add articles to your saved list and come back to them anytime.

Got it

AAA

Watch the hearing live here from 10.15 AM via the Federal Court.

Kyle Sandilands’ barrister has told the Federal Court that his conduct may not have been pleasant, but that the owners of the KIIS network knew exactly what they were getting and took responsibility for it via a specially customised contract.

Sandilands’ barrister Scott Robertson, SC argued that “if you buy Kyle, you get Kyle” and that ARN profited off his conduct while outlining his client’s arguments during a case management hearing on Friday morning.

Broadcaster Kyle Sandilands’ lawyer has admitted his conduct was not nice, but argued it was in line with his contract.Broadcaster Kyle Sandilands’ lawyer has admitted his conduct was not nice, but argued it was in line with his contract.Sam Mooy

“The kind of conduct in which he engaged was conduct that was desired, contractually designed. That’s the word of the contract, and indeed was monetised, evidence will demonstrate,” Robertson told the court. He said that applied even where Sandilands’ conduct occurred off-air, but in the broadcast studio where everything was recorded.

He urged Federal Court Justice Angus Stewart to hear his case as soon as possible in June, arguing that ARN is “throwing the kitchen sink” at the case via one of the largest law firms in the world.

Sandilands’ lawyer admitted that a judge may “like” the conduct Sandilands is accused of, but that it does not amount to a breach of his contract. He added that Sandilands “appears highly likely” to admit to having “engaged in the poor conduct that is alleged”.

Robertson said that as a citizen himself “I look at it and say ‘this is not nice conduct, this is not the kind of conduct that I think someone should engage in’,” he said it does not amount to conduct of which ARN could tear up Sandilands’ contract, which had a special clause to protect the foul-mouthed radio host.

Sandiland’s team do not want his own case against ARN to be heard at the same time as that of his former co-host Jackie ‘O’ Henderson – who is also suing the radio network over her scrapped contract – if it means it slows down the whole process.

Sandilands arrived at the Federal Court of Australia in a black Rolls-Royce an hour earlier, calling his legal dispute with KIIS network owner ARN Media “pretty ugly”.

The former top-rating radio host told a packed media scrum on Friday morning he wanted to sort the dispute out to get back on air and boost ARN’s share price.

Sandilands, ever the showman, pulled up outside the court in the luxury vehicle, bearing the number plate KS20, and was trailed into the building by dozens of reporters, photographers and videographers.

Sandilands said he hadn’t spoken to Henderson since their dramatic on-air separation in February, admitting to reporters that things were “already pretty ugly”. “Put me back on the radio. Let’s get the share price back up,” he said.

Kyle Sandilands was thronged by the media on his arrival at the Federal Court on Friday.Kyle Sandilands was thronged by the media on his arrival at the Federal Court on Friday.Sitthixay Ditthavong

The Federal Court in Sydney today is also hosting a clutch of other high-profile cases including the consumer watchdog’s case against Woolworths and a defamation case against actor Rebel Wilson.

ARN tore up Henderson’s contract in early March this year after she allegedly refused to work with Sandilands because of his conduct towards her. Two weeks later, it scrapped his contract as well after he was unable to “remedy” what it said was serious misconduct on his part, stemming from his on and off-air behaviour toward his former co-host of 25 years.

Related ArticleA little over two years ago, Kyle Sandilands and Jackie ‘O’ Henderson seemed to have got everything they wanted out of their bosses at ARN. Now it’s become a legal drama.

Not long after, both stars sued the company in separate attempts to claw back the majority of the $200 million contracts they had each signed, which began just over 14 months ago.

As ARN filed its defence to the court to both matters on Tuesday this week, this masthead also revealed the company is also suing both former employees and their private companies in a pair of counter claims, citing lost revenue and profits as a result of the show blowing up, largely due to alleged “systemic bullying” on behalf of Sandilands toward Henderson.

Sandilands’ 2004 Series 1 Rolls-Royce Phantom is worth, by some estimates, about $1 million.

The Business Briefing newsletter delivers major stories, exclusive coverage and expert opinion. Sign up to get it every weekday morning.

Save

You have reached your maximum number of saved items.

Remove items from your saved list to add more.

Kishor Napier-RamanKishor Napier-Raman is a senior business writer for The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age. Previously he worked as a CBD columnist and reporter in the federal parliamentary press gallery.Connect via X or email.Calum JaspanCalum Jaspan is a media writer for The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age, based in Melbourne. Reach him securely on Signal @calumjaspan.10Connect via X or email.From our partners