Latest Videos From
(Image credit: Zipp)By the numbers
You may like
Zipp’s graph of performance versus price (Image credit: Zipp)Analysis: Performance on a budget
Analysis: Performance on a budgetWill Jones
Social Links Navigation
If we take the figures as presented these wheels do represent quite an astounding price:performance ratio. On the face of it, getting Roval or Scope performance (purely in aero terms) in a wheelset under £1,000 is a real headline grabber, but I think the fact these wheels are coming in under £1k speaks more to the overall SRAM family strategy.
Zipp comes under the greater SRAM umbrella, and SRAM itself has seen significant success in recent years in gaining something of a stranglehold on the entry level component market, leaving Shimano playing catchup. Most new gravel bikes come with SRAM now; it’s easy to live with and easy to explain on the shop floor (digital or otherwise), and the brand seems fun in a way its Japanese counterpart doesn’t. If you capture more people at the entry level you’re more likely to retain them when they go on to upgrade their bikes down the line. Apex and Rival customers eventually become Force and Red customers.
The thousand-ish quid wheelset is The Big Upgrade a lot of new cyclists actually work towards. The ‘first carbon wheels’ to get that road bike really on song, and I suspect this more competitive pricing is a bid to get more fresh cyclists under the Zipp umbrella early on, and perhaps also to help trickle down hookless technology to more of a mass market. It’s telling that these aren’t marked as ‘hookless’, a term that has attracted much ire, but rather ‘TSS’ (Tubeless Straight Sides), which is exactly the same thing but with a name less prone to lighting up the comments section.