Apple is piloting an artificial intelligence system designed to record, transcribe, and summarize conversations between staff and customers at its retail stores, a move the company says will free employees from note-taking but one that has already triggered internal unease over surveillance and performance reviews.

The test, reported by Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman in his Power On newsletter, is operating under the name “Live Notes” at a limited number of Apple Store locations. The tool captures audio during Genius Bar appointments, runs it through an AI engine to produce a transcript and summary, and then stores the text inside Apple’s internal service system. Both the employee and the customer must opt in before any recording begins, and Apple has told staff that the raw audio files are not retained.

“The goal is to let employees focus on customer service rather than taking notes,” Gurman wrote. The transcript and summary appear inside the record of the repair session on the employee’s work iPad, allowing the worker to edit the text before it is saved. Managers, the company has indicated, do not receive the transcripts.

Despite those guardrails, the pilot has stirred anxiety among some Apple Store workers. Employees worry that the recordings could eventually be used to coach staff or feed into performance evaluations, according to the Bloomberg report. The concern echoes a broader wave of workforce monitoring tools that have swept through corporate America, often marketed as productivity aids but perceived by workers as digital oversight.

Gurman noted that the system remains voluntary and that it is “unclear” whether Apple plans to expand Live Notes to more stores, make it mandatory, or alter how the transcripts are handled in the future. The ambiguity itself is fueling nervousness, since early-stage tests can evolve into permanent infrastructure with different rules.

Apple’s privacy track record adds another layer of sensitivity. In 2018, CEO Tim Cook called privacy a “fundamental human right” and voiced support for European-style data protection regulations. Yet in 2019, the company was caught letting contractors listen to Siri recordings to grade the assistant’s accuracy—a practice Apple acknowledged was a mistake only after it was exposed. The episode led to a class-action settlement and a public apology in which the company said, “we realize we haven’t been fully living up to our high ideals, and for that we apologize.”

The Live Notes pilot arrives as workplace monitoring is becoming more pervasive across industries. JPMorgan Chase recently deployed a digital system that pulls video call data, meeting schedules, and keystroke information to generate reports comparing junior bankers’ actual output with their stated output. The bank described the tool as a self-awareness aid rather than an enforcement mechanism, likening it to a weekly smartphone screen-time summary. Critics, however, have called such comparisons strained, arguing that tools built by employers carry an inherent power imbalance that screen-time reports do not.

For Apple, the tension lies between operational efficiency and the trust of its retail workforce. Genius Bar employees currently juggle technical troubleshooting with manual note-taking during appointments that can stretch from a few minutes to over an hour. Automating that paperwork could speed up service and improve the accuracy of repair logs. But if employees suspect that every word they speak might someday be parsed by a manager or an algorithm, the same tool could chill the informal rapport that often defines the in-store experience.

Apple has not publicly commented on the test. The company declined to provide a timeline for any broader rollout or to specify how many stores are participating. For now, Live Notes remains an opt-in experiment—one that sits squarely at the intersection of AI utility and workplace privacy, a debate that is only beginning to unfold across the tech industry.