{"id":1107,"date":"2025-07-17T18:56:14","date_gmt":"2025-07-17T18:56:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/1107\/"},"modified":"2025-07-17T18:56:14","modified_gmt":"2025-07-17T18:56:14","slug":"a-sensitive-moke-and-optical-hall-effect-technique-at-visible-wavelengths-insights-into-the-gilbert-damping","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/1107\/","title":{"rendered":"A sensitive MOKE and optical Hall effect technique at visible wavelengths: insights into the Gilbert damping"},"content":{"rendered":"

The experimental setup is based on the polar MOKE geometry illustrated in Fig.\u00a01b<\/a>. It consists of two orthogonally aligned linear polarizers having an extinction ratio, \\({ER}\\), better than \\(1:{10}^{6}\\) and a \\(40\\,{mW}\\) CW laser operating at \\(440\\,{nm}\\). The modulated external magnetic field \\({B}_{z}\\left(t\\right)\\) is generated using permanent magnets placed on a spinning disc having an out-of-plane magnetic field along \\(\\hat{{{\\boldsymbol{z}}}}\\) required for the polar geometry. A motorized translation stage controls the sample-magnet distance \\(l\\) while the voltage-drop on the photodetector \\({V}_{{PD}}\\) is measured using a lock-in amplifier. The incident electrical field is linearly polarized in \\(\\hat{{{\\boldsymbol{y}}}}\\) (\\(s\\)-polarization) and induces an electronic displacement along \\(\\hat{{{\\boldsymbol{x}}}}\\) which generates the \\(p\\)-polarization by the Lorentz force as illustrated schematically in Fig.\u00a01c<\/a>. An example of the generated \\({B}_{z}\\left(t,l\\right)\\) for \\(l=1\\),\\(3\\), and \\(5\\,{mm}\\) is presented in Fig.\u00a01d<\/a>. At a given position, \\({B}_{z}\\left(t,l\\right)\\) can be described by the sum of an all-positive sine wave of amplitude \\({B}_{{AC}}(l)\\), a small DC bias level \\({b}_{0}\\left(l\\right)\\), and additional higher harmonics such that \\({B}_{z}\\,\\left(l,t\\right)={b}_{0}\\,\\left(l\\right)+\\frac{1}{2}{B}_{{AC}}\\,\\left(l\\right)\\cdot \\left(1+\\sin \\left({\\omega }_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}t\\right)\\right)+{{\\rm{higher}}}\\,{{\\rm{harmonics}}}\\) with \\({\\omega }_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}\\) being the modulation angular frequency. The amplitude of the higher harmonics is small and their contribution to the measured signal is further suppressed by the lock-in amplifier. More details of the experimental setup are presented in \u2018Methods\u2019 section.<\/p>\n

We start by comparing the Ferris MOKE measurement of Py to a more conventional implementation having a static external magnetic field, \\({B}_{{DC}}\\), and an on-off modulated laser beam (more details in \u2018Methods\u2019). \\({B}_{{DC}}\\) was applied by fixing the rotating disc at the maximal field of one of its magnets and was varied by scanning over \\(l\\). Both experiments were carried out with the same optical alignment and lock-in amplifier settings. The in-plane magnetized film was \\(50\\,{nm}\\) thick and was capped with \\(2.5\\,{nm}\\) of TaN (more details in \u2018Methods\u2019 section). The measured photodiode voltages \\({V}_{{PD},{B}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}^{{Py}}\\) and \\({V}_{{PD},{L}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}^{{Py}}\\) of the Ferris and the conventional MOKE experiments, respectively, are presented in Fig.\u00a02a<\/a> (sub-indices \\({B}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}\\) and \\({L}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}\\) indicate quantities measured with \\({B}_{z}\\)- and laser- modulations, respectively, and upper indices indicate the probed material). A quadratic dependence on \\({B}_{{AC}}\\) and \\({B}_{{DC}}\\) is measured in both cases and is typical of the maximal extinction cross-polarized arrangement26<\/a>. At low \\({B}_{{AC}}\\) and \\({B}_{{DC}}\\), \\({V}_{{PD},{B}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}^{{Py}}\\) approaches lower values as compared to \\({V}_{{PD},{L}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}^{{Py}}\\). In contrast, at high magnetic fields both signals display a similar dependence on \\({B}_{{AC}}\\) and \\({B}_{{DC}}\\) besides a constant shift of \\({V}_{{PD},{L}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}^{{Py}}\\) to higher values. These observations indicate a higher noise floor of the light-modulated MOKE that stems from stray laser light and imperfections of the polarizers. Since the transverse polarization is proportional to \\({B}_{z}\\) and the detected photocurrent is proportional to the optical power, \\({V}_{{PD}}\\) can be fitted to \\({V}_{{PD},{X}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}=a\\cdot {x}^{2}+b\\) with \\(x={B}_{{AC}}\\), \\({B}_{{DC}}\\). Accordingly, we define \\({\\widetilde{V}}_{{PD},{X}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}} \\, \\triangleq \\, a\\cdot {x}^{2}\\) where \\({\\sqrt{\\widetilde{V}}}_{{PD},{X}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}\\) is proportional to the amplitude of the generated transverse electrical field. To mitigate the contributions of the noise floor, the fitting procedure was carried out in the range of \\({B}_{{AC}}\\), \\({B}_{{DC}} > 200\\,{mT}\\). Figure\u00a02b<\/a> presents \\({\\sqrt{\\widetilde{V}}}_{{PD},{X}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}\\) illustrating a linear dependence on \\({B}_{{AC}}\\) (\\({B}_{{DC}}\\)) with \\({a}_{{B}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}^{1\/2,{Py}}=90.5\\,m{V}^{1\/2}\/T\\) (\\({a}_{{L}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}^{1\/2,{Py}}=91.2 \\, m{V}^{1\/2}\/T\\)).<\/p>\n

Fig. 2: Comparison between the Ferris MOKE and light-modulated MOKE measurements in Py.\"figure<\/a><\/p>\n

a \\({{{\\boldsymbol{V}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{PD}}},{{{\\boldsymbol{B}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{mod}}}}}\\) (solid blue) and \\({{{\\boldsymbol{V}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{PD}}},{{{\\boldsymbol{L}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{mod}}}}}\\) (solid red) vs. \\({{{\\boldsymbol{B}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{AC}}}}\\) and \\({{{\\boldsymbol{B}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{DC}}}}\\), respectively. Dashed black lines represent the parabolic fit. b \\({\\sqrt{\\widetilde{{{\\boldsymbol{V}}}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{PD}}},{{{\\boldsymbol{B}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{mod}}}}}^{{{\\boldsymbol{Py}}}}\\) and \\({\\sqrt{\\widetilde{{{\\boldsymbol{V}}}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{PD}}},{{{\\boldsymbol{L}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{mod}}}}}^{{{\\boldsymbol{Py}}}}\\) vs. \\({{{\\boldsymbol{B}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{AC}}}}\\) and \\({{{\\boldsymbol{B}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{DC}}}}\\), respectively, and the corresponding magnitude of the complex Kerr angle \\(\\left|{{{\\boldsymbol{\\Phi }}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{K}}}}\\right|\\). Dashed lines represent linear fit for data in the range of \\({{{\\boldsymbol{B}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{AC}}}}\\), \\({{{\\boldsymbol{B}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{DC}}}} > {{\\boldsymbol{200}}}{{\\boldsymbol{mT}}}\\).<\/p>\n

\\({V}_{{PD}}\\) measures the transverse \\(p\\)-polarization, which originates from the Kerr rotation, \\({\\theta }_{k}\\), and ellipticity, \\({\\epsilon }_{k}\\). These parameters can be measured separately by using a balanced detection scheme that includes a controllable retarder as described by Ortiz et al. and Gomez et al. in refs. 27<\/a>,28<\/a>,29<\/a>. In the maximal extinction cross-polarized detection line, only the magnitude of the complex magneto-optical Kerr angle, \\({\\Phi }_{K}={\\theta }_{k}+i{\\epsilon }_{k}\\) can be measured. \\(\\left|{\\Phi }_{K}\\right|\\) indicates the strength of the MOKE and is useful for quantitative comparison with other reports and materials. To describe the relation between \\(\\left|{\\Phi }_{K}\\right|\\) and \\({V}_{{PD}}\\), we use the Jones calculus and follow the derivation by Gomez et al.27<\/a> (see Supplementary Note\u00a01<\/a>). The Jones matrix of the sample is given by: \\({{\\boldsymbol{S}}}=\\left[\\begin{array}{cc}{r}_{{pp}} & {r}_{{ps}}\\\\ {r}_{{sp}} & {r}_{{ss}}\\end{array}\\right]\\). \\({r}_{{pp}}\\) and \\({r}_{{ss}}\\) are the complex Fresnel reflection coefficients for the \\(s\\) and \\(p\\) polarizations, respectively, and the MOKE response is manifested by the off-diagonal elements, \\({r}_{{ps}}\\) and \\({r}_{{sp}}\\). For an \\(s\\)-polarized incident field, \\({\\Phi }_{K}=\\frac{{r}_{{ps}}}{{r}_{{ss}}}\\). In the maximal extinction cross-polarized configuration, \\({V}_{{PD}}=\\frac{1}{2}\\cdot c{\\epsilon }_{0}{\\rho }_{0}{|{E}_{0}^{i}|}^{2}\\cdot {|{r}_{{ps}}|}^{2}\\), where \\({E}_{0}^{i}\\) is the amplitude of the incident laser field, \\({\\rho }_{0}\\) is the optical responsivity, and \\(c\\) and \\({\\epsilon }_{0}\\) are the speed of light and permittivity in vacuum, respectively. \\({V}_{{PD}}\\propto {|{r}_{{ps}}|}^{2}\\), therefore, it can be detected at the fundamental tone, \\({\\omega }_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}\\), or at \\(2{\\omega }_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}\\) (see Supplementary Note\u00a02<\/a>). Since \\(|{r}_{{ps}}|\\ll |{r}_{{ss}}|\\), \\({V}_{{PD}}^{0}\\) corresponding to the measurement of \\(|{r}_{{ss}}\\)\u2009|\u2009, was determined by placing the photodiode immediately after the sample (see \u2018Methods\u2019). Following a calibration process (see Supplementary Note\u00a01<\/a>), |\\({\\Phi }_{K}|\\) was extracted and is also presented in Fig.\u00a02b<\/a>. At the maximal field, \\(|{\\Phi }_{K}|\\) \\( \\sim 20\\,{mdeg}\\) and is comparable to previously reported values30<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Often, \\({V}_{{PD}}\\) is found to be linear in the applied magnetic field, \\(B\\), whereas, here, it is quadratic in \\(B\\) (for simplicity we use the general notation \\(B\\) rather than \\({B}_{{DC}}\\), \\({B}_{{AC}}\\)). The relationship between \\({V}_{{PD}}\\) and \\(B\\) depends on the implementation of the detection line, the precise angle of the analyzer, and the type of modulation. For an analyzer that deviates from perfect extinction by an angle \\(\\phi \\), \\({V}_{{PD}}\\) is given by:<\/p>\n

$${V}_{{PD}}=\t \\frac{1}{2}\\cdot c{\\epsilon }_{0}{\\rho }_{0}{\\left|{E}_{0}^{i}\\right|}^{2}\\cdot \\left[{\\sin }^{2}\\phi {\\left|{r}_{{ss}}\\right|}^{2}+{\\cos }^{2}\\phi {\\left|{r}_{{ps}}\\right|}^{2} \\right. \\\\ \t \\left.+2\\cos \\phi \\sin \\phi \\cdot {\\mathrm{Re}}\\left\\{{r}_{{ss}}{r}_{{ps}}^{*}\\right\\}\\right]$$<\/p>\n

\n (1)\n <\/p>\n

(see Supplementary Note\u00a01<\/a>). \\({r}_{{ss}}\\) is independent of \\(B\\) whereas \\({r}_{{ps}}\\) is linear in \\(B\\) since the Kerr rotation is linear in the induced magnetization. Therefore, in the \\(B\\)-modulation case, only the second and third terms will be detected. Of the two terms, for a slight deviation of \\(\\phi \\) from \\({0}^{\\circ }\\), the third intermixing term will dominate since \\(|{r}_{{ss}}|\\gg |{r}_{{ps}}|\\). Consequently, the response will become linear in \\({B}_{{AC}}\\). In the case of laser-modulation, all terms will be detected by the lock-in amplifier. Therefore, \\({V}_{{PD}}\\) will additionally be shifted by the leading \\(B\\)-independent term which increases rapidly with \\(\\phi \\). Measurements of the \\(B\\)- and \\(L\\)- modulation for slight deviations of \\(\\phi \\) are presented in Supplementary Note\u00a03<\/a>. These measurements readily illustrate that the transition from a parabolic response to linear relationship is reached already for \\(\\phi \\approx 60\\,{mdeg}\\). When a balanced detector is used to detect the Kerr rotation27<\/a>,28<\/a>, only the third intermixing term is measured, always resulting in a linear relationship on \\(B\\) independent of the modulation type (see Supplementary Note\u00a04<\/a>). The agreement between Eq. (1<\/a>) and the additional measurements presented in Figs.\u00a0S3<\/a> and S4<\/a> indicates that the quadratic relationship stems from the MOKE-induced polarization rotation. It is possible that additional effects take place such as magnetostriction which couples the mechanical and spin degrees of freedom. This was demonstrated by Jiang et al.31<\/a> in a suspended 2D magnetic CrI3 membrane by correlating the magnetic circular dichroism signal with the mechanical resonance frequency. In contrast, the sample in our case is much thicker and was deposited directly on a rigid substrate, therefore, the elasticity is significantly smaller.<\/p>\n

The lower noise floor of the Ferris MOKE calls to examine the OHE response in normal metals (NMs). To this end, we first compare the Ferris MOKE and light-modulated MOKE responses of a \\(50\\,{nm}\\) Cu film. The film was capped as well with \\(2.5\\,{nm}\\) of TaN to prevent native surface oxidation and its thickness is much larger than the optical penetration depth. Figure\u00a03a<\/a> presents the measured \\({V}_{{PD},{B}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}^{{Cu}}\\) and \\({V}_{{PD},{L}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}^{{Cu}}\\). The high noise floor of the light-modulated MOKE prevents detecting any meaningful response. In contrast, \\({V}_{{PD},{B}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}^{{Cu}}\\) is much lower and reveals a clear parabolic dependence on \\({B}_{{AC}}\\). Figure\u00a03b<\/a> presents \\({\\sqrt{\\widetilde{V}}}_{{PD},{B}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}^{{Cu}}\\) which is linear in \\({B}_{{AC}}\\) at the higher fields yielding \\({a}_{{B}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}^{1\/2,{Cu}}=7.88\\,m{V}^{1\/2}\/T\\). The comparison of Cu and Py is of much interest since Py consists of 81% Ni which is the nearest neighbor to Cu in the periodic table. Hence, Ni and Cu share a variety of properties including the crystal structure, a close atomic weight, and a weak SOC. Here, we find the ratio \\({a}_{{B}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}^{1\/2,{Py}}\/{a}_{{B}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}^{1\/2,{Cu}}=11.48\\) which agrees with the general notion that the Hall voltage in DC transport measurements is \\( \\sim 10\\) times larger in FM as compared to NMs4<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Fig. 3: Optical Hall measurements of Cu.\"figure<\/a><\/p>\n

a Measurement of \\({{{\\boldsymbol{V}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{PD}}},{{{\\boldsymbol{B}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{mod}}}}}^{{{\\boldsymbol{Cu}}}}\\) (blue solid line) and \\({{{\\boldsymbol{V}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{PD}}},{{{\\boldsymbol{L}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{mod}}}}}^{{{\\boldsymbol{Cu}}}}\\) (red solid line) vs. \\({{{\\boldsymbol{B}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{AC}}}}\\) and \\({{{\\boldsymbol{B}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{DC}}}}\\), respectively. b Measurement of \\({\\sqrt{\\widetilde{{{\\boldsymbol{V}}}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{PD}}},{{{\\boldsymbol{B}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{mod}}}}}^{{{\\boldsymbol{Cu}}}}\\) vs. \\({{{\\boldsymbol{B}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{AC}}}}\\). Dashed blue line represents a linear fit for data in the range of \\({{{\\boldsymbol{B}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{AC}}}} > {{\\bf{200}}}{{\\boldsymbol{mT}}}\\). c Schematic illustration of the modeled interaction. The transmitted field, \\({{{\\boldsymbol{E}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{y}}}}^{{{\\boldsymbol{t}}}}\\left({{\\boldsymbol{z}}}\\right)\\), propagates in the metal and generates the reflected field \\({{{\\boldsymbol{E}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{x}}}}^{{{\\boldsymbol{r}}}}\\).<\/p>\n

To the lowest order, the OHE can be modeled by considering the un-bound charge carriers within the framework of Newtonian physics9<\/a>,32<\/a>. To this end, we determine the transverse reflected electrical field \\({E}_{x}^{r}\\) generated by the electrons\u2019 displacement \\({{\\boldsymbol{r}}}\\). In metals, the cyclotron frequency is typically in the microwaves and is much smaller than the optical frequency \\({\\omega }_{{opt}}\\) such that \\({r}_{x}\\ll {r}_{y}\\). For a plasma excitation having a resonance frequency of \\({\\omega }_{p}\\) and a Drude scattering time, \\(\\tau \\), the equation of motion is \\({m}^{ * }\\ddot{{{\\boldsymbol{r}}}}=q\\left({{{\\boldsymbol{E}}}}^{{{\\boldsymbol{t}}}}-\\dot{{{\\boldsymbol{r}}}}\\times \\hat{{{\\boldsymbol{z}}}}\\cdot {B}_{z}\\right)-{m}^{ * }{\\omega }_{p}^{2}{{\\boldsymbol{r}}}-\\frac{{m}^{ * }}{\\tau }\\dot{{{\\boldsymbol{r}}}}\\), where \\({{{\\boldsymbol{E}}}}^{{{\\boldsymbol{t}}}}={E}_{y}^{t}\\left(z\\right){e}^{-i{\\omega }_{{opt}}t}\\hat{{{\\boldsymbol{y}}}}\\) is the driving evanescent electrical field in the metal, and \\({m}^{ * }\\), and \\(q\\) are the effective mass of the electron, and the elementary charge, respectively. Core-level transitions are neglected as they occur in the X-ray range. In steady state, \\({{\\boldsymbol{r}}}=\\left({r}_{x}\\hat{{{\\boldsymbol{x}}}}+{r}_{y}\\hat{{{\\boldsymbol{y}}}}\\right){e}^{-i{\\omega }_{{opt}}t}\\) with<\/p>\n

$${r}_{x}=\\frac{i{\\omega }_{{opt}}{q}^{2}}{{{m}^{ * }}^{2}{\\left({\\omega }_{p}^{2}-{\\omega }_{{opt}}^{2}-i{\\omega }_{{opt}}\/\\tau \\right)}^{2}-{\\omega }_{{opt}}^{2}{q}^{2}{B}_{z}^{2}}\\cdot {E}_{y}^{t}\\left(z\\right)\\cdot {B}_{z}.$$<\/p>\n

\n (2)\n <\/p>\n

As \\({{{\\boldsymbol{E}}}}^{{{\\boldsymbol{t}}}}\\) penetrates the film, it excites the transverse polarization which adds to \\({E}_{x}^{r}\\) as illustrated schematically in Fig.\u00a03c<\/a>. Along \\(\\hat{{{\\boldsymbol{z}}}}\\), \\({E}_{y}^{t}\\) is expressed by \\({E}_{y}^{t}\\left(z\\right)={t}_{12}\\cdot {E}_{0}^{i}{e}^{{in}{k}_{0}z}\\) where \\(n\\) is the complex index of refraction, \\({t}_{12}\\) is the Fresnel transmission coefficient, and \\({k}_{0}={\\omega }_{{opt}}\/c\\). Following the planar charge oscillations approximation33<\/a> and Eq. (2<\/a>), the contribution of an infinitesimal sheet of polarization located at \\({z}^{{\\prime} }\\) to the reflected field at the interface \\({E}_{x}^{r}\\left(z=0\\right)\\) can be expressed by \\({{dE}}_{x}^{p}\\left(z=0,t,{z}^{{\\prime} }\\right)={t}_{21}\\frac{{n}_{i}\\cdot d{z}^{{\\prime} }\\cdot q}{2{\\epsilon }_{0}c\/n}\\cdot \\frac{\\partial {r}_{x}}{\\partial t}\\), where \\({t}_{21}\\) is the metal-to-air Fresnel transmission coefficient. Accordingly, \\({E}_{x}^{r}\\left(0\\right)={\\int }_{{z}^{{\\prime} }=0}^{\\infty }{{dE}}_{x}^{p}\\left(0,t,{z}^{{\\prime} }\\right)\\) resulting in:<\/p>\n

$${V}_{{PD}}={C}_{0}\\cdot {\\left(\\frac{{\\omega }_{{opt}}{q}^{3}{E}_{0}^{i}}{2{\\epsilon }_{0}}\\cdot \\frac{{n}_{i}}{{{m}^{*}}^{2}{\\left({\\omega }_{p}^{2}-{\\omega }_{{opt}}^{2}\\right)}^{2}-{\\omega }_{{opt}}^{2}{q}^{2}{B}_{z}^{2}}\\right)}^{2}{B}_{z}^{2}\\cdot {\\left|A\\left(n\\right)\\right|}^{2}$$<\/p>\n

\n (3)\n <\/p>\n

where \\(A\\left(n\\right)\\,\\triangleq \\,\\frac{n}{{n}^{*}}\\cdot \\frac{n}{{(1+n)}^{2}}\\) and accounts for all index-related contributions such as reflectance and absorption of the material. \\({C}_{0}\\) is a constant factor identical for all samples that depends on a variety of parameters including the quantum efficiency of the photodiode, the impedance of free space, attenuation of the polarizers, responsivity of the photodiode, and the electrical characteristics of the detector. In Eq. (3<\/a>) we assume that the electrons are decelerated before electron scattering and decoherence takes place since \\(\\tau \\) is of few hundreds of femtoseconds. Using Eq. (3<\/a>), we arrive to the expression |\\({\\Phi }_{K}|=\\left|\\frac{{n}^{2}}{{n}^{*}\\left(1-{n}^{2}\\right)}\\right|\\left(\\frac{{\\omega }_{{opt}}{q}^{3}}{2{\\epsilon }_{0}}\\cdot \\frac{{n}_{i}}{{{m}^{*}}^{2}{\\left({\\omega }_{p}^{2}-{\\omega }_{{opt}}^{2}\\right)}^{2}-{\\omega }_{{opt}}^{2}{q}^{2}{B}_{z}^{2}}\\right){B}_{z}\\) which shows the expected linear relationship between the Kerr rotation and \\({B}_{z}\\) for optical frequencies below the plasma frequency.<\/p>\n

We evaluate the Lorentz-Drude theory by comparing the model to the OHE responses of Cu, Au, Al, Ta, and Pt. To this end, additional \\(50\\,{nm}\\) films were grown. X-ray diffraction data indicated that the Pt, Al, Au, and Cu samples grew in the preferred (111) crystal orientation while the Ta film was grown in the \\(\\beta \\)-phase. The surface morphology was characterized using atomic force microscopy. The RMS surface roughness values, \\({R}_{q}\\), of the samples were \\({R}_{q}^{{Pt}}=3.84{{\\text{\\AA }}}\\), \\({R}_{q}^{{Ta}}=2.7\\,{{\\text{\\AA }}}\\), \\({R}_{q}^{{Al}}=35\\,{{\\text{\\AA }}}\\), \\({R}_{q}^{{Au}}=5.5\\,{{\\text{\\AA }}}\\), and \\({R}_{q}^{{Cu}}=7.1\\,{{\\text{\\AA }}}\\) indicating proper film quality. The measured resistivities were characterized by DC Hall transport and were \\({\\rho }^{{Pt}}=19.2\\), \\({\\rho }^{{Ta}}=173\\), \\({\\rho }^{{Al}}=24.1\\), \\({\\rho }^{{Au}}=3.9\\), and \\({\\rho }^{{Cu}}=3.3\\) \\(\\mu \\Omega \\cdot {cm}\\). These values are consistent with previous reports while \\({\\rho }^{{Ta}}\\) further indicates that the Ta film was grown in the \\(\\beta \\)-phase. Film characterization data is available in Supplementary Note\u00a05<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The OHE measurements of the additional films are presented in Fig.\u00a04a<\/a> and display a quadratic dependence on \\({B}_{{AC}}\\) as well. Generally, the quadratic regime is beneficial as it probes solely the off-diagonal magneto-optical response and has a lower noise figure, unlike the linear regime, which results from intermixing with the primary polarization \\({r}_{{ss}}\\). The ability to detect the quadratic term depends on the strength of the magneto-optical effect relative to the detection noise. The latter is affected by the amount of light reaching the detector, which depends on the extinction ratio of the polarizers and the analyzer-polarizer arrangement. Following the derivation by Jin et al. for the optical contrast in a wide-field sensitive magneto-optical imaging system34<\/a>, Supplementary Note\u00a06<\/a> presents a detailed analysis of the shot noise in typical FMs and NMs and different \\({ER}\\) and \\(\\phi \\) angles. This analysis indicates that maximal extinction (\\(\\phi={0}^{\\circ }\\)) with high \\({ER}\\) are necessary to measure the quadratic response in NMs. This is also expected to apply to atomically thin 2D ferromagnets, such as those studied in refs. 7<\/a>,8<\/a>,35<\/a>,36<\/a>, where the magneto-optical response is significantly weaker as compared to that of 3D ferromagnets.<\/p>\n

Fig. 4: Ferris MOKE measurements of Cu, Au, Al, Ta, and Pt.\"figure<\/a><\/p>\n

a Measured \\({{{\\boldsymbol{V}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{PD}}},{{{\\boldsymbol{B}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{mod}}}}}\\). Dashed lines represent the parabolic fit. b Measured \\(\\surd {\\widetilde{{{\\boldsymbol{V}}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{PD}}},{{{\\boldsymbol{B}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{mod}}}}}\\) vs. \\({{{\\boldsymbol{B}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{AC}}}}\\) (solid lines). Dashed lines represent the linear fit of \\({\\sqrt{\\widetilde{{{\\boldsymbol{V}}}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{PD}}},{{{\\boldsymbol{B}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{mod}}}}}\\). Close triangles represent the theoretically calculated \\({\\sqrt{\\widetilde{{{\\boldsymbol{V}}}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{PD}}}}\\). c \\(|{{{\\boldsymbol{\\Phi }}}}_{{{\\bf{K}}}}|\\) of Pt, Ta, Al, Au, and Cu. d Extracted \\(\\surd {\\widetilde{{{\\boldsymbol{V}}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{Noise}}}}\\) traces as a function of \\({{{\\boldsymbol{B}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{AC}}}}\\). e \\({\\sqrt{\\widetilde{{{\\boldsymbol{V}}}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{RMS}}},{{\\boldsymbol{norm}}}}\\) as a function of \\({{{\\boldsymbol{a}}}}_{{{{\\boldsymbol{B}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{mod}}}}}^{{{\\boldsymbol{1}}}\/{{\\boldsymbol{2}}}}\\). f \\({\\sqrt{\\widetilde{{{\\boldsymbol{V}}}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{RMS}}},{{\\boldsymbol{norm}}}}\\) as a function of \\({{{\\boldsymbol{\\alpha }}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{sp}}}}^{{{\\boldsymbol{YIG}}}}\\). Values were taken from ref. 25<\/a>. Inset: noise-damping correlation in Py\/NM bilayers. In e, f black dashed line represents a linear fit. In all panels, traces of Cu, Au, Al, Ta, and Pt are indicated by red, yellow, gray, green, and blue colors, respectively.<\/p>\n

Figure\u00a04b<\/a> presents \\({\\sqrt{\\widetilde{V}}}_{{PD},{B}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}\\) data which are linear in \\({B}_{{AC}}\\). Accordingly, \\({a}_{{B}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}^{1\/2,{Al}}=6.99m{V}^{1\/2}\/T\\), \\({a}_{{B}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}^{1\/2,{Au}}=8.18\\) \\(m{V}^{1\/2}\/T\\), \\({a}_{{B}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}^{1\/2,{Ta}}=8.94\\) \\(m{V}^{1\/2}\/T\\), and \\({a}_{{B}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}^{1\/2,{Pt}}=12.36\\) \\(m{V}^{1\/2}\/T\\) are extracted. Figure\u00a04c<\/a> presents the OHE measurements in terms of \\(\\left|{\\Phi }_{K}\\right|\\) revealing rotation angles in the range of \\({10}^{-1}\\,{mdeg}\\) which are comparable to the previously reported values10<\/a>,19<\/a>,20<\/a>,37<\/a> (see Supplementary Note\u00a01<\/a> for detailed comparison). To calculate the theoretical \\({V}_{{PD}}\\), \\({n}_{i}\\) values were determined from the electrical DC Hall measurements and are summarized in Table\u00a01<\/a> (see \u2018Methods\u2019 section for more details). The negative \\({n}_{i}\\) of Ta stems from its hole-like charge transport which cannot be sensed optically. Values for \\({\\omega }_{p}\\), \\(n\\), and \\({m}^{ * }\\) were extracted from the experimental data of refs. 38<\/a>,39<\/a>,40<\/a>,41<\/a>,42<\/a>,43<\/a>. and are also summarized in Table\u00a01<\/a>. Figure\u00a04b<\/a> presents the calculated \\({\\sqrt{V}}_{{PD}}\\) data indicated by closed triangles where \\({C}_{0}\\) was arbitrarily chosen in accordance with the response of Pt. Since \\({\\omega }_{{opt}}^{2}{q}^{2}{B}_{z}^{2}{\\ll {{m}^{*}}^{2}\\left({\\omega }_{p}^{2}-{\\omega }_{{opt}}^{2}\\right)}^{2}\\) for all samples, the calculated \\({\\sqrt{V}}_{{PD}}\\) is essentially linear in \\({B}_{z}\\). It is seen that the Lorentz-Drude model correctly predicts the relative OHE response of Ta but fails to do so simultaneously for Au, Cu, and Al. Nevertheless, it seems that the relative OHE of Au, Cu and Al is predicted correctly. The Pt-Ta and Au-Cu-Al samples are distinguished by \\({\\omega }_{p}\\) suggesting that a more detailed description of the connection between the plasma dynamics and the OHE is required to properly account for the measured results. Additionally, the Lorentz-Drude model accounts only for the intraband transitions, whereas interband transitions are also known to have a significant effect. Uba et al. investigated in detail the role of 3d and 5d interband transitions in Cu, Au, and Pt10<\/a>,37<\/a> which enabled to explain the spectral features of the magneto-optic response. For example, the interband transitions in Cu and Au take place at \\(\\sim 2.1-2.4\\,{eV}\\) and \\( \\sim 2.5\\,{eV}\\), respectively, which lie close to the laser excitation energy of \\(2.8\\,{eV}\\) used in our experiments. Rather than using the previously reported values, \\({\\omega }_{p}\\) can be estimated according to the parabolic band approximation by \\({\\omega }_{p}=\\sqrt{{n}_{i}{q}^{2}\/{\\epsilon }_{0}{m}^{ * }}\\). Table\u00a01<\/a> summarizes the calculated \\({\\omega }_{p}\\) based on the measured \\({n}_{i}\\) and the reported \\({m}^{ * }\\) values. The calculated \\({\\omega }_{p}\\) differ significantly from the experimentally measured \\({\\omega }_{p}\\). The deviation stems from the actual band structure that is non-parabolic and anisotropic44<\/a>. Alternatively, for a given \\({C}_{0}\\), \\({\\omega }_{p}\\) can be extracted from the measured OHE data. The fitted \\({\\omega }_{p}\\) are also presented in Table\u00a01<\/a> readily illustrating that the extracted \\({\\omega }_{p}\\) values are closer to the previously reported values.<\/p>\n

Table 1 \\({{{\\boldsymbol{m}}}}^{*}\\), \\({{{\\boldsymbol{n}}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{i}}}}\\), and \\({{\\boldsymbol{n}}}\\) values for Cu, Au, Al, Ta, and Pt in addition to the experimentally reported, calculated, and fitted \\({{{\\boldsymbol{\\omega }}}}_{{{\\boldsymbol{p}}}}\\) values<\/p>\n

Operation at maximal extinction turns out to be advantageous in terms of the noise introduced to the measurements. The low intensity reaching the detector mitigates the detection shot noise, and the measurement resolution increases which is well-suited for detecting weak noise signals (see Supplementary Note\u00a07<\/a> for further considerations). Figure\u00a04a<\/a> reveals an interesting phenomenon related to the noise. It is readily seen that the noise amplitude in the heavier Ta and Pt metals is greater than in the lighter Cu metal. To examine this behavior, the noise signal, \\({\\sqrt{\\widetilde{V}}}_{{Noise}}\\), was extracted by subtracting the linear fit from \\({\\sqrt{\\widetilde{V}}}_{{PD},{B}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}\\) and is presented in Fig.\u00a04d<\/a>. It is seen that the noise ascends in the order: Cu \u2192 Au \u2192 Al \u2192 Ta \u2192 Pt. This trend is described quantitatively by the root mean square (RMS) of each trace, \\({\\sqrt{\\widetilde{V}}}_{{RMS}}\\), and is summarized in Table\u00a02<\/a>. Additionally, to account for the differences in the absolute optical power reaching the photodetector, \\({\\sqrt{\\widetilde{V}}}_{{RMS}}\\) was normalized to \\(|A\\left(n\\right)|\\) and is also indicated in the table by \\({\\sqrt{\\widetilde{V}}}_{{RMS},{norm}}\\). Apart from Al, \\({\\sqrt{\\widetilde{V}}}_{{RMS},{norm}}\\) seems to correlate with the strength of the OHE response. This is illustrated by plotting \\({\\sqrt{\\widetilde{V}}}_{{RMS},{norm}}\\) vs. \\({a}_{{B}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}^{1\/2}\\) in Fig.\u00a04e<\/a>. The correlation with the OHE responses implies that the noise is generated by processes such as carrier-carrier and carrier-lattice scattering. However, there are two issues with this picture. Firstly, \\({\\omega }_{{opt}}\\gg 1\/\\tau \\), therefore, Drude scattering is understood to be negligible. Secondly, this picture suggests that the noise should increase with \\({B}_{{AC}}\\) which is evidently not the case. Therefore, we conclude that the noise is attributed to a different mechanism. Heavy metals are characterized by large SOC. It seems that the noise amplitude scales with the SOC of these metals as well. SOC is responsible for the transfer of angular momentum from the spin to the lattice. In magnetic materials, it stands behind the loss of spin angular momentum described by \\(\\alpha \\). It is well known that \\(\\alpha \\) is enhanced when NMs are introduced at the interface of magnetic systems. The enhancement of \\(\\alpha \\) by Cu, Au, Ta, and Pt was systematically studied in Y3Fe5O12 (YIG)\/NM bilayers in ref. 25<\/a>. These films were grown as well by DC magnetron sputtering on Gd3Ga5O12 substrates. The YIG and the NM layers were \\(20\\,{nm}\\) and \\(5\\,{nm}\\) thick, respectively, resulting in saturation magnetization of \\(1.4\\times {10}^{5}\\,A\/m\\). In ref. 25<\/a>, \\(\\alpha \\) was quantified by spin-pumping measurements from the inverse spin Hall effect voltage. From these measurements, the enhancement of \\(\\alpha \\) by the NMs, \\({\\alpha }_{{sp}}^{{YIG}},\\) was extracted by subtracting the intrinsic \\(\\alpha \\) of YIG from the measured \\(\\alpha \\) of the bilayer. This data is also summarized in Table\u00a02<\/a>. A significantly better correlation between \\({\\alpha }_{{sp}}^{{YIG}}\\) and \\({\\sqrt{\\widetilde{V}}}_{{RMS},{norm}}\\) is readily seen as illustrated in Fig.\u00a04f<\/a>. An excellent linear fit is found having an R-square determination parameter of \\(0.997\\) further supporting the SOC origin of the noise. In contrast, the R-square value of the fit to \\({a}_{{B}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}^{1\/2}\\) in Fig.\u00a04e<\/a> is only \\(0.64\\). It is possible that SOC also affects \\({a}_{{B}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}^{1\/2}\\), however, Uba et al. showed that the large SOC of Au, for example, has little effect on its OHE response10<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Table 2 Noise correlation data. \\({\\sqrt{\\widetilde{V}}}_{{RMS}}\\), \\({\\sqrt{\\widetilde{V}}}_{{RMS},{norm}}\\), \\({a}_{{B}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}^{1\/2}\\), \\({\\alpha }_{{sp}}^{{YIG}}\\), and \\({\\alpha }_{{sp}}^{{Py}}\\) values for the different samples<\/p>\n

YIG exhibits extremely low \\(\\alpha \\) which is well-suited for probing the losses of spin angular momentum in the adjacent NM. It is possible that the trend does not persist in other garnets that possess considerably higher damping, e.g., TmIG45<\/a>, EuIG46<\/a> or in other FMs. In these garnets, the spin mixing conductivity may be affected by proximity effects which were shown to induce interfacial ferromagnetism47<\/a>. Therefore, additional \\({\\alpha }_{{sp}}\\) measurements were carried out for the complete set of NM\/Py bilayers. These bilayers consisted of \\(25{NM|}10{Py}\\) (units in \\({nm}\\)), and the \\({\\alpha }_{{sp}}\\) measurements were carried out using an optically probed spin-torque ferromagnetic resonance technique23<\/a> (see Supplementary Note\u00a08<\/a> for additional details). In the Py-based bilayers, \\({\\alpha }_{{sp}}^{{Py}}\\) is defined as \\({\\alpha }_{{NM}\/{Py}}-{\\alpha }_{{Py}}\\), where \\({\\alpha }_{{NM}\/{Py}}\\) is the measured damping of the bilayer and \\({\\alpha }_{{Py}}\\) is the intrinsic damping of Py, determined by measuring a bare \\(10\\,{nm}\\) Py film25<\/a>. The extracted \\({\\alpha }_{{sp}}^{{Py}}\\) values are also summarized in Table\u00a02<\/a> and are plotted in the inset of Fig.\u00a04f<\/a>. A good correlation with \\({\\sqrt{\\widetilde{V}}}_{{RMS},{norm}}\\) is found having an R-square determination parameter of \\(0.947\\). The slight reduction in the correlation as compared to the YIG-based case can be attributed to the higher intrinsic \\(\\alpha \\) of Py making it a less ideal for quantifying the NM-induced enhancement of the Gilbert damping. Additionally, in contrast to the YIG-based samples of ref. 25<\/a>, the Py layer was deposited on top of the NM layer which may have resulted in some variation of the intrinsic damping of Py from sample to sample.<\/p>\n

The same measurements were repeated using a red \\(638{nm}\\) laser and are presented in Supplementary Note\u00a09<\/a>, where a similar noise behavior is observed. As compared to the measurements at \\(440\\,{nm}\\), the \\(\\left|{\\Phi }_{K}\\right|\\) values at \\(638\\,{nm}\\) are smaller, and the ordering of the magneto-optical responses is also altered. In Cu and Au, for example, this behavior may be related to the features of the energy band and to the smaller contribution of the 3d and 5d interband transitions. The correlation of the noise with \\({\\alpha }_{{sp}}\\) persisted also at \\(638\\,{nm}\\) resulting in an R-square determination parameter of \\(0.915\\). No correlation with \\({a}_{{B}_{{\\mathrm{mod}}}}^{1\/2}\\) was observed given the new ordering of the responses.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The experimental setup is based on the polar MOKE geometry illustrated in Fig.\u00a01b. It consists of two orthogonally…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1108,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24],"tags":[64,63,1705,1320,1706,1321,292,128],"class_list":{"0":"post-1107","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-physics","8":"tag-au","9":"tag-australia","10":"tag-characterization-and-analytical-techniques","11":"tag-humanities-and-social-sciences","12":"tag-magnetic-properties-and-materials","13":"tag-multidisciplinary","14":"tag-physics","15":"tag-science"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1107","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1107"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1107\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1108"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1107"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1107"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1107"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}