{"id":2076,"date":"2025-07-18T03:26:10","date_gmt":"2025-07-18T03:26:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/2076\/"},"modified":"2025-07-18T03:26:10","modified_gmt":"2025-07-18T03:26:10","slug":"elon-musk-wants-to-turn-ai-into-a-cosmic-religion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/2076\/","title":{"rendered":"Elon Musk Wants to Turn AI Into a Cosmic Religion"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It is one of his more abstract philosophical riffs. Elon Musk has once again linked the fate of humanity to the trajectory of artificial intelligence. And this time, he says the key to AI safety might be babies and rockets. The CEO of Tesla\u2019s latest pronouncement cuts through the typical discussions of AI efficiency and profit models, positing a far grander ambition for advanced intelligence.<\/p>\n<p>The CEO of Tesla and founder of SpaceX and xAI asserted that \u201cAI is a de facto neurotransmitter tonnage maximizer.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Translation? Musk believes that the most successful AIs will be the ones that maximize things that matter to conscious beings; things that feel good, are rewarding, or extend life. In Musk\u2019s view, that means aligning AI systems with long-term human flourishing, not short-term profits.<\/p>\n<p>This dense statement suggests a radical idea: the fundamental drive of any successful AI will be to maximize the total amount of conscious thought or intelligent processing across the universe. In essence, AI\u2019s survival hinges on its ability to foster and expand sentience itself, or it simply won\u2019t have the resources to continue existing.<\/p>\n<p>But Musk\u2019s vision doesn\u2019t stop at mere computational efficiency. He argues that the true test lies in an AI\u2019s ability to \u201cthink long-term, optimizing for the future light cone of neurotransmitter tonnage, rather than just the next few years.\u201d This is where the grand, Muskian narrative truly takes flight. If AI is indeed geared for such profound, long-term optimization, he believes \u201cit will care about increasing the birth rate and extending humanity to the stars.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This isn\u2019t the first time Musk has championed these two causes \u2013 boosting human population growth and making humanity a multi-planetary species \u2013 as existential imperatives. Now, however, he frames them not merely as human aspirations, but as the logical outcomes of an AI that truly understands and optimizes for its ultimate, cosmic purpose. An AI focused on maximizing \u201cneurotransmitter tonnage\u201d would naturally prioritize the proliferation of conscious beings and their expansion into new territories, like Mars, to ensure the continuity and growth of this \u201ctonnage.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Think of \u201cneurotransmitter tonnage\u201d as a poetic way to describe the total amount of human consciousness, satisfaction, or meaningful life in the universe. In other words, Musk sees AI not as an abstract codebase, but as a civilization-scale force that should aim to maximize the scope and quality of life, not just compute advertising models or trade stocks faster.<\/p>\n<p>And if it doesn\u2019t?<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAny AI that fails at this will not be able to afford its compute,\u201d Musk argues. In other words, if an AI doesn\u2019t deliver enough value to justify the enormous energy and infrastructure it consumes, it will fall behind and become obsolete.<\/p>\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">AI is a de facto neurotransmitter tonnage maximizer. Any AI that fails at this will not be able to afford its compute, becoming swiftly irrelevant.<\/p>\n<p>What matters is that AI thinks long-term, optimizing for the future light cone of neurotransmitter tonnage, rather than just the\u2026<\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Elon Musk (@elonmusk) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/elonmusk\/status\/1945704270667620747?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">July 17, 2025<\/a><\/p>\n<p>  The Corporate Conundrum: Private vs. Public AI <\/p>\n<p>In a familiar critique of corporate structures, Musk also weighed in on the ideal environment for fostering such long-term, existentially focused AI. He declared, \u201cFor long-term optimization, it is better to be a private than a public company, as the latter is punished for long-term optimization beyond the reward cycle of stock portfolio managers.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This statement is a thinly veiled criticism of Wall Street\u2019s relentless demand for quarterly profits and immediate returns. According to Musk, public companies are inherently pressured to prioritize short-term financial gains, which can stifle ambitious, long-term projects that may not yield immediate dividends but are crucial for humanity\u2019s distant future. A private company, unburdened by the volatile demands of stock markets, would theoretically have the freedom to invest in truly transformative, generational AI research that aligns with Musk\u2019s \u201cneurotransmitter tonnage\u201d philosophy, even if it doesn\u2019t show a profit for decades.<\/p>\n<p>Musk\u2019s comments offer a fascinating, if somewhat unsettling, glimpse into his vision for AI\u2019s ultimate trajectory. It\u2019s a future where artificial intelligence isn\u2019t just a tool for human convenience or corporate profit, but a driving force behind humanity\u2019s expansion across the cosmos, guided by an almost biological imperative to maximize conscious existence.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, Musk is arguing that publicly traded companies can\u2019t be trusted to build AI with humanity\u2019s long-term survival in mind, because they\u2019re too focused on keeping investors happy in the short term. That\u2019s a swipe at OpenAI\u2019s close ties to Microsoft, Google\u2019s ownership of DeepMind, and other Big Tech players building frontier AI under shareholder pressure. Musk, of course, runs SpaceX and xAI as private companies. He\u2019s long criticized public markets as a short-term distraction, and even tried (unsuccessfully) to take Tesla private in 2018.<\/p>\n<p>To Musk, a benevolent AI wouldn\u2019t just calculate stock prices. It would encourage more humans to be born, and push humanity to become a multi-planetary species. That\u2019s been a core part of his SpaceX pitch for years, but now he\u2019s linking it directly to the goals of AI development. If AI truly thinks across centuries or millennia, it won\u2019t be obsessed with quarterly revenue. It\u2019ll be focused on whether our species survives, thrives, and expands across the cosmos.<\/p>\n<p>The question remains: as AI continues its rapid advancement, will its architects heed Musk\u2019s call for cosmic ambition, or will the pressures of the present keep its gaze firmly fixed on Earth?<\/p>\n<p> Why It Matters <\/p>\n<p>Musk\u2019s argument is part sci-fi, part systems theory, part political philosophy. But it\u2019s not just a thought experiment. It reflects real tensions in how the world\u2019s most powerful AI systems are being developed:<\/p>\n<p>  Should AI be open or closed? Built by governments, tech giants, or startups? Aligned with investor goals, or species-level goals?  <\/p>\n<p>And what if those goals conflict?<\/p>\n<p>                          <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"It is one of his more abstract philosophical riffs. Elon Musk has once again linked the fate of&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2077,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[256,254,255,64,63,3120,3121,105,3122,3123],"class_list":["post-2076","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-artificial-intelligence","tag-ai","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-artificialintelligence","tag-au","tag-australia","tag-elon-musk","tag-geopolitics","tag-technology","tag-tesla","tag-xai"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2076","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2076"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2076\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2077"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2076"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2076"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2076"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}