Amanda Porretto isn\u2019t sure she\u2019ll ever have children.<\/p>\n
At 27, she is the average age of new mothers in the United States, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. She\u2019s feeling the pressure as an only child. Her father wants to be a grandfather and her mother, before she died, always told Porretto that she would eventually want to be a mom.<\/p>\n
\u201cSome people think it\u2019s a bad thing\u201d not to have a child, said Porretto, who works in advertising. \u201cI just don\u2019t think I need to bring more people into (the world) when there\u2019s so much here currently that we need to fix.\u201d<\/p>\n
Younger generations of Americans are increasingly citing climate change<\/a> as making them reticent to have children, according to several studies. They are worried about bringing children into a world with increasing and more intense extreme weather events, a result of climate change, which is caused by the release of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide when oil, gas coal are burned. And they are concerned about the impact their offspring will have on the planet.<\/p>\n In a 2024 Lancet study<\/a> of people 16 to 25 years old, the majority of respondents were \u201cvery\u201d or \u201cextremely\u201d worried about climate change. The study also found that 52% said they were hesitant to have children because of climate change. Adults under 50 years old without children were four times more likely than adults over 50 without children to say that climate plays a factor in their decision, according to<\/a> a Pew Research Center report published last year. And a study<\/a> published this year in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found more than half of respondents said \u201cyes\u201d or \u201cmaybe\u201d to whether climate change made them question having children.<\/p>\n Climate impact of children<\/p>\n Parenthood and climate change are related not just because of fears for a child\u2019s well-being, but also by concern for the planet\u2019s well-being.<\/p>\n Compared to the carbon emissions of all the other decisions, \u201chaving a child is by far, by orders of magnitude, larger,\u201d said Nandita Bajaj, executive director of Population Balance, which is a nonprofit focused on humans\u2019 environmental impact.<\/p>\n Unlike other choices, procreation comes with something that bioethics professor Travis Rieder of Johns Hopkins University calls \u201ccarbon legacy.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cYou\u2019re not only doing carbon expensive activities like buying a larger house and a larger car and diapers and all that,\u201d said Rieder. \u201cYou\u2019re also creating someone who is going to have their own carbon footprint for the rest of their lives.\u201d<\/p>\n That child might have children, and those children might have children, creating an impact that lasts generations, Rieder added. Of course, the logical extreme of minimizing an environmental footprint means having no children, Rieder said, which he is not advocating.<\/p>\n It\u2019s tricky to quantify the impact of a child. That\u2019s because there\u2019s no consensus on what percentage of their impact is the parent\u2019s responsibility, and partly because the impact of that child depends on their parents\u2019 lifestyle.<\/p>\n \u201cOne of the best predictors of how carbon-expensive they\u2019ll be is how wealthy you are,\u201d Rieder said. <\/p>\n For example, the U.S. emits 123 times more carbon emissions than Ghana, according to the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research. Adjusted for population size, that means the average American emits more than 12 times as much as the average Ghanan.<\/p>\n Why is it taboo to talk about?<\/p>\n Procreation might have the largest climate impact, but when it comes to actions people can take to reduce their personal contribution to global warming, having fewer children often isn\u2019t discussed.<\/p>\n Researchers who study climate change and family planning give two reasons.<\/p>\n \u201cIf a person tells you that they\u2019re expecting or that they are pregnant, the immediate response is to offer some kind of support, congratulate them, that sort of thing,\u201d said Trevor Hedberg, who teaches moral philosophy at the University of Arizona.<\/p>\n The other factor, said Rieder: the impact of procreation sometimes is tied to conversations about overpopulation. The environmental movement in the 1970s expressed fears that there were too many people for the planet\u2019s resources, which led to racism and eugenics, which garnered severe backlash. <\/p>\n Taboo or not, climate is factoring into people\u2019s choices<\/p>\n Ash Sanders, 43, knew when she was young that she didn\u2019t want to have a baby. Then she got pregnant.<\/p>\n \u201cI didn\u2019t want to add another person to the world and have them have more of an impact on a world that was already overstressed and strained by the number of humans that were here,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n Sanders, a freelance writer who covers religion and environment, wanted an abortion but felt pressure by her Mormon upbringing and by the father to have the baby. She said she was called a bad person for not wanting a kid.<\/p>\n She placed her child in an open adoption and sees her regularly. Today she feels conflicted about her decision.<\/p>\n \u201cI feel guilt for bringing her into the world. I mean she likes the world, she\u2019s a happy kid, she\u2019s very cool. I\u2019m a big fan. But I feel guilt all the time,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n Juan Jaramillo said the environment was always a factor in his parenthood calculus, even when he was a teenager in the 1970s. He later went to school to become a marine biologist.<\/p>\n \u201cPollution and climate change was not an issue just yet, but all of the rest of the problems that we have now were there back then,\u201d he said. <\/p>\n Plus, he just didn\u2019t want kids. So he got a vasectomy and hasn\u2019t regretted the decision. His decision not to have children and his environmental concerns lined up.<\/p>\n That\u2019s not the case for Rieder, the bioethics professor, who has spent years studying that impact, and still very much wanted to be a dad.<\/p>\n \u201cHaving children is a deeply meaningful and important activity to people. It\u2019s also carbon expensive,\u201d he said. \u201cSo how do you weigh these things out?\u201d<\/p>\n For Rieder, finding that balance meant having just one child.<\/p>\n ___<\/p>\n Eds: This story has been updated to correct the spelling of a subject\u2019s name to Trevor Hedberg, not Hedbert. <\/p>\n ___<\/p>\n The Associated Press\u2019 climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP\u2019s standards<\/a> for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Amanda Porretto isn\u2019t sure she\u2019ll ever have children. At 27, she is the average age of new mothers…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":257790,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[151893,520,64,63,6045,17881,68,75,5444,482,137,151895,514,128,151894,488],"class_list":{"0":"post-257789","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-environment","8":"tag-amanda-porretto","9":"tag-anxiety","10":"tag-au","11":"tag-australia","12":"tag-climate","13":"tag-climate-and-environment","14":"tag-climate-change","15":"tag-environment","16":"tag-environmental-science","17":"tag-general-news","18":"tag-health","19":"tag-juan-jaramillo","20":"tag-mental-health","21":"tag-science","22":"tag-trevor-hedberg","23":"tag-u-s-news"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257789","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=257789"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257789\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/257790"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=257789"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=257789"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=257789"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}