Court documents filed by the ACCC allege the company knowingly overstated the likelihood that cleaner fuels \u2013 such as gases made from organic waste or green hydrogen \u2013 could soon be used for heating, cooking and hot water, when in reality it was \u201chighly uncertain\u201d if and when it would be possible to overcome an array of technical and economic challenges to produce them at scale.<\/p>\n
Loading<\/p>\n
At the same time as it rolled out the ads, the company was also applying to regulators for the ability to charge customers more money to recoup its investment over a shorter period due to doubts around the future of its business and \u201cwhether gas networks will be in business at all\u201d in 2050.<\/p>\n
In 2022, Victoria began consulting on a strategy to speed up households\u2019 shift from gas, and in 2023, it banned new gas connections in all new homes. This was followed by the Commonwealth announcing $1 billion in funding to support household gas-to-electric switching.<\/p>\n
Board minutes and corporate marketing plans obtained by the ACCC indicate Australian Gas Networks wanted its ads to \u201cinfluence customers to get connected to the gas network, stay connected and add more natural gas appliances to their homes\u201d and to \u201cmaintain market confidence and reduce switching in Victoria\u201d, the court files say.<\/p>\n
\u201cAustralian Gas Networks was concerned that its revenue might decrease due to lower household demand for gas, and that its significant gas transmission and distribution assets may become stranded,\u201d says the ACCC.<\/p>\n
Loading<\/p>\n
In the energy sector, stranded assets are those that become uneconomic due to green technological advances, consumer preference shifts or sudden changes in government policy.<\/p>\n
Australian Gas Networks generates revenue via pipeline usage charges, meaning its business model will come under intensifying pressure if there are not enough homes and companies using gas to heat their premises.<\/p>\n
Australian Gas Networks declined to comment on the proceedings. In a statement provided to the court it denies that its ads conveyed that renewable gas would be available within a generation, but says there were reasonable grounds to make such a claim at the time.<\/p>\n
It argues there were multiple viable pathways to supply households with renewable gas, and it was \u201ctechnically feasible\u201d to do so, while pointing to \u201csignificant government support\u201d for renewable gas production.<\/p>\n
\u201cSeveral state governments had adopted hydrogen policies and commitments,\u201d it says. \u201cThere was a significant volume of studies, analysis and work programs in respect of renewable gases and their development.\u201d<\/p>\n
Australian Gas Networks says it has a target of delivering 10 per cent renewable gas by 2030 and a \u201cstretch target\u201d for 100 per cent by 2040. However, other than a small demonstration program blending 5 per cent hydrogen with gas to a few thousand homes in South Australia, the fuel distributed in its pipelines in 2022-23 was entirely natural gas.<\/p>\n
The case is listed in the Federal Court for a case management hearing on Friday.<\/p>\n