Sharma has previously said the Liberals should reconsider the Coalition agreement if the party cannot reconcile with the Nationals hardline position on climate action.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe best credentials you can have are meeting the targets that you set for yourself,\u201d Sharma said today.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe\u2019re saying let\u2019s be realistic about what is achievable based on the technology.\u201d<\/p>\n
On Sunday, the Liberal and National party rooms will meet to agree on the formal Coalition position on climate emissions. The Nationals have already ditched the net zero target, while insisting they will not walk away from the Paris Agreement.<\/p>\n
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said earlier on Thursday morning that the Liberals were seeking to \u201cgo backwards\u201d on climate action.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat we know is that the pace of change in society is fast if you stand still, the world moves past you,\u201d Albanese said.<\/p>\n
The prime minister pointed to net zero being a policy adopted by the Morrison government, and ridiculed the opposition for becoming \u201cmore right-wing, more sceptical, more in denial about climate change,\u201d after successive election losses in 2022 and 2025.<\/p>\n
The peak representative groups of Australia\u2019s mining, gas, manufacturing and energy sectors told this masthead that they remain committed to the goal of net zero emissions by 2050, as did the nation\u2019s largest individual polluter AGL and major employers Coles and Woolworths.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere\u2019s no industry interest in going backward on net zero. Reopening that debate is akin to asking Australian businesses to stop investing and stand by to watch the political equivalent of a refight of the Battle of Stalingrad. It serves no good purpose,\u201d Australian Industry Group chief Innes Willox said.<\/p>\n
Loading<\/p>\n
Climate Council chief executive Amanda McKenzie said abandoning net zero would mean the Liberal Party was aligning with global action that would see the world\u2019s temperature rise more than 3 degrees above industrial levels, resulting in more deaths and higher costs from floods, fires and heatwaves.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis is a plan to let climate change rip,\u201d she said. \u201cWhat the Coalition is really advocating for is a more dangerous future for all Australians.\u201d<\/p>\n
More to come…<\/p>\n