Lidl-Trek boss Luca Guercilena is calling for a new approach to safety in professional cycling: riders should take calculated risks, supported by data, infrastructure, and protective technology\u2014not arbitrary gear limits.<\/p>\n
\u201cLimiting rims or other materials won\u2019t solve the problem,\u201d Guercilena said to bici.pro<\/a>. \u201cIf you impose 35-mm rims, engineers will make them just as fast as 90-mm ones. Restrictions are never a long-term solution.\u201d<\/p>\n Riders\u2019 union president: \u2018Pro cycling is a dangerous sport\u2019<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n He also highlighted road safety, noting that protective infrastructure could make a big difference. Costly as it may be, targeted barriers and safer courses would reduce accidents more effectively than arbitrary equipment bans.<\/p>\n On taking\u00a0 risks<\/p>\n Guercilena warned that age and experience in the peloton affect risk-taking. Younger riders, he said, often act boldly, while seasoned professionals know when to hold back. \u201cEighteen-year-olds take risks that older riders would avoid,\u201d he explained.<\/p>\n For his own team, he encourages controlled risk. \u201cIf the choice is being sidelined for three months or finishing second, finish second,\u201d he said. He stressed that calculated risks are appropriate for key moments, like sprint finishes, but unnecessary danger should be avoided.<\/p>\n The manager called for scientific, data-driven analyses of crashes, involving teams, riders\u2019 associations, and experts. Early data suggest the overall number of crashes hasn\u2019t risen, but more riders are affected when accidents occur in tight groups.<\/p>\n What works and what doesn\u2019t: And where is the data?<\/p>\n There\u2019s been lots of talk about gear limits too. Back in October, the UCI was caught off guard when the Belgian Competition Authority temporarily blocked its planned maximum gear restrictions, which were set to debut at the Tour of Guangxi. The suspension, prompted by a challenge from cycling component maker SRAM and joined by nine pro teams, argued the new rule was unfair and unlikely to improve rider safety. The governing body expressed surprise at the intervention, noting the test was intended to analyse the impact of gear ratios on speed and safety, and said it regrets that safety concerns don\u2019t seem to be shared by those opposing the measure.<\/p>\n I didn\u2019t wear a helmet\u2026and felt safer<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n