{"id":353641,"date":"2025-12-17T09:58:12","date_gmt":"2025-12-17T09:58:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/353641\/"},"modified":"2025-12-17T09:58:12","modified_gmt":"2025-12-17T09:58:12","slug":"a-year-after-newjeans-illit-clash-copyright-conundrum-still-engulfs-k-pop","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/353641\/","title":{"rendered":"A year after NewJeans-ILLIT clash, copyright conundrum still engulfs K-pop"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Girl <\/p>\n

Girl groups NewJeans, top, and ILLIT [ADOR, BELIFT LAB]<\/p>\n

\u00a0
While a Seoul court\u2019s recent ruling in favor of ADOR prompted NewJeans members to return to their estranged agency, an underlying conclusion in the decision carries its own weight: The court found that ILLIT, \u201cdespite partial similarities,\u201d did not plagiarize NewJeans.
\u00a0
The finding cuts to the heart of one of the most contentious points in last year\u2019s high-profile feud between ADOR and its former CEO, Min Hee-jin \u2014 whether ILLIT copied NewJeans\u2019s overall concepts, visuals and choreography.
\u00a0
And the debate it sparked continues to ripple through the industry, where the boundaries between inspiration, imitation and infringement remain poorly defined.
Copycat allegations a constant
\u00a0
In a bombshell press conference in April of last year, Min claimed that HYBE\u2019s girl group, ILLIT, copied NewJeans in aesthetics, concept, promotional methods and choreography.
\u00a0
\u201cWhy did you [HYBE] use our choreography?\u201d said Min. \u201cI asked them, and they didn’t answer us. Our choreographers are so angry. It would be wrong for us not to say anything. They’re ruining ILLIT, too.\u201d
\u00a0
\"Girl <\/p>\n

Girl group NewJeans at the Inspire Arena in Incheon on July 21, 2024 [NEWS1]<\/p>\n

\u00a0
Choreographers also weighed in, including NewJeans performance director Kim Eun-ju, who said in May that ILLIT\u2019s new release was \u201cjust copy and paste.\u201d
\u00a0
Min\u2019s accusations led to a series of legal actions, including a lawsuit against her claiming defamation and obstruction of business filed by ILLIT’s agency, Belift Lab, as well as a separate court battle over the validity of exclusive contracts of NewJeans members with ADOR, which recently ended in the label’s favor.
\u00a0
In the latest ruling, the court concluded that \u201cdespite partial similarities in concept ideation and photo shoots, they are insufficient to determine that [ILLIT] copied [NewJeans\u2019s] concept, and there is no further evidence to support such a claim.\u201d
\u00a0
\"Girl <\/p>\n

Girl group ILLIT poses for photos during a showcase for the release of its 3rd EP, \u201cbomb,\u201d at the Yes24 Live Hall in eastern Seoul on June 16. [DANIELA GONZALEZ PEREZ]<\/p>\n

\u00a0
Fan wars, however, continue to take place online. Footage of ILLIT’s recent performance of “jellyous” at the Music Bank Global Festival on Saturday went viral on social media, prompting some NewJeans fans to accuse the group of once again borrowing heavily from NewJeans, citing its retro-leaning remix and vivid, brightly colored outfits. ILLIT’s defenders countered that the performance had no substantive resemblance to NewJeans’s concept, arguing that neither the sound nor aesthetics were ever exclusive to NewJeans to begin with \u2014 a familiar back-and-forth that has been repeated numerous times in the debate.
\u00a0
Such disputes are hardly new in K-pop, a genre defined by hybrid influences and a fast production cycle often likened to factory-style manufacturing.
\u00a0
First-gen girl group Fin.K.L. once faced plagiarism allegations over its visual elements, said to resemble Japanese girl group Morning Musume, a claim some dismissed as a reflection of prevailing fashion trends at the time.
\u00a0
More recently, in 2021, JYP Entertainment issued an apology after a Twice member appeared in an outfit with traditional vibes that fans said resembled Blackpink\u2019s customized outfit designs inspired by hanbok (traditional Korean outfits).
\u00a0
\"Twice's <\/p>\n

Twice’s Dahyun, left, and Blackpink’s Jisoo [SCREEN CAPTURE]<\/p>\n

\u00a0
In 2022, girl group NMIXX was accused of plagiarizing boy band Ateez\u2019s pirate-themed world-building due to shared imagery centered on voyage and adventure-related design elements.
\u00a0
Yet these cases rarely reach definitive conclusions unless agencies yield to online backlash. Under copyright law, broad concepts \u2014 such as fashion styles or aesthetic themes \u2014 are generally considered ideas rather than protected expressions. Only concrete creative output, such as music, lyrics or album covers, qualifies for protection.
Choreography copyrights still unresolved
\u00a0
Meanwhile, choreography, one of the major points of contention in the ADOR-Min feud, was not directly addressed in the latest ruling, which focused on overall visual concepts. Still, choreographers who began to speak out last year continue to push for stronger recognition of their creative rights.
\u00a0
\"A <\/p>\n

A comparison of the choreography for ILLIT’s \u2033Magnetic\u2033 (2024) and NewJeans’ \u2033Ditto\u2033 (2022) [SCREEN CAPTURE]<\/p>\n

\u00a0
In late April of last year, the Korea Choreography Copyright Association (KCCA) was launched, with famed choreographer Lia Kim, founder of 1Million Dance Studio, serving as the inaugural president.
\u00a0
The group\u2019s demands include mandatory crediting of choreographers for K-pop performances, similar to how composers and lyricists are credited, and greater recognition of choreographers\u2019 ownership of their work.
\u00a0
\u201cThe most ideal direction is to have a system that distributes profits generated from choreography in the same way royalties work for songs with, for example, secondary commercial uses,\u201d said Kim Min-ja, director of the KCCA.
\u00a0
\u201cEarning revenue from viral dance challenges is still a distant goal. For now, the priority is ensuring fair compensation.\u201d
\u00a0
\" <\/p>\n

From left: former volleyball player Kim Yo-han; 1Million Dance Studio founder Lia Kim; K-pop choreographer Choi Young-jun; Rep. Jin Jong-oh; and former rhythmic gymnast Shin Soo-ji feature as panelists for \u201cThe 1st Move: The Next Stage\u201d talk show hosted by Korea Choreography Copyright Association (KCCA) and Korean Sports Development Association held in western Seoul Dec. 4. [YONHAP]<\/p>\n

\u00a0
In September, lawmaker Rep. Jin Jong-oh of the conservative People Power Party proposed a bill to explicitly include choreography as a protected creative work under the Copyright Act, which is currently pending in the parliamentary committee.
\u00a0
While choreography is technically protected under existing law, choreographers are rarely credited or allowed to retain copyrights, making the amendment a symbolic move.
\u00a0
The proposal, however, is not without backlash. In February, music industry organizations including the Korea Management Federation (KMF) warned that granting exclusive rights to choreography \u201ccould discourage producers from using dance performances, ultimately reducing the combined benefits of choreographers in the industry.\u201d
Law, perception and fandom collide
\u00a0
Questions over intellectual property ownership extend beyond agencies and artists into fandom culture, where disputes often play out before any legal assessments.
\u00a0
A recent example involved boy band The Boyz and girl band QWER, whose agencies clashed over similarities in their official light stick designs \u2014 a core symbol of fandom identity.
\u00a0
\"Light <\/p>\n

Light sticks of boy band The Boyz, left, and rock band QWER, right, that have similar megaphone designs [SCREEN CAPTURE]<\/p>\n

\u00a0
\u201cThe [K-pop industry] is highly exposed to public scrutiny and attention, which makes such conflicts particularly damaging,\u201d said a source from the music industry who wished to remain anonymous.
\u00a0
But it is difficult to set universal guidelines, because \u201ceven though such plagiarism scandals appear similar, each case is fundamentally different.\u201d
\u00a0
The Boyz\u2019s agency, One Hundred Label, said it had requested a design change after identifying similarities and hinted at possible legal action in September. As of December, the agency is currently in discussions with legal experts on a possible response, its spokesperson said.
\u00a0
\"Boy <\/p>\n

Boy band The Boyz [ONE HUNDRED LABEL]<\/p>\n

\u00a0
QWER\u2019s label countered immediately, saying that legal consultations found no copyright infringement.
\u00a0
The KMF soon stepped in to mediate the situation, noting that property disputes are particularly difficult to adjudicate because the line between reference and plagiarism is often subjective and difficult to define.
\u00a0
\u201cThe dispute sparked by this light stick can be seen as an example of the various conflicts that may arise more sharply in the industry as it becomes increasingly sophisticated,\u201d said the KMF. \u201cFor the sustained growth of K-wave in the future, all stakeholders need to take a responsible approach and work together to refine the system and establish a fair order.\u201d
\u00a0
\"Girl <\/p>\n

Girl group QWER [TAMAGO PRODUCTION]<\/p>\n

BY SHIN HA-NEE [[email\u00a0protected]<\/a>]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Girl groups NewJeans, top, and ILLIT [ADOR, BELIFT LAB] \u00a0 While a Seoul court\u2019s recent ruling in favor…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":353642,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28],"tags":[64,63,134,136],"class_list":{"0":"post-353641","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-music","8":"tag-au","9":"tag-australia","10":"tag-entertainment","11":"tag-music"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353641","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=353641"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353641\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/353642"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=353641"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=353641"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=353641"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}