{"id":408456,"date":"2026-01-12T14:36:07","date_gmt":"2026-01-12T14:36:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/408456\/"},"modified":"2026-01-12T14:36:07","modified_gmt":"2026-01-12T14:36:07","slug":"how-the-braves-can-squeeze-more-value-out-of-their-2026-lineup","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/408456\/","title":{"rendered":"How the Braves Can Squeeze More Value Out of Their 2026 Lineup"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It\u2019s like the Atlanta Braves are out to personally ruin every newsletter I write. <\/p>\n<p>From just last week alone, Atlanta\u2019s front office responded to three different newsletters with roster moves that made the article outdated within days (or even hours) of its release. <\/p>\n<p>On Monday, we previewed the bullpen options, followed by a discussion on Wednesday about how Atlanta\u2019s remaining offseason spending was likely in a holding pattern until the medical reports on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.baseball-reference.com\/players\/j\/jimenjo02.shtml?utm_medium=linker&amp;utm_source=www.bravestoday.com&amp;utm_campaign=2026-01-11_br\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Joe Jim\u00e9nez<\/a> came back. On Saturday, they went ahead and re-signed slider god <a href=\"https:\/\/www.baseball-reference.com\/players\/k\/kinlety01.shtml?utm_medium=linker&amp;utm_source=www.bravestoday.com&amp;utm_campaign=2026-01-11_br\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Tyler Kinley<\/a> to a deal for 2026, all but guaranteeing him a bullpen slot. We then wrote about the final options off the bench on Friday, using Thursday\u2019s designation of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.baseball-reference.com\/players\/b\/brujavi01.shtml?utm_medium=linker&amp;utm_source=www.bravestoday.com&amp;utm_campaign=2026-01-11_br\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Vidal Bruj\u00e1n<\/a> for assignment as our catalyst to make <a href=\"https:\/\/www.baseball-reference.com\/players\/w\/wiselbr01.shtml?utm_medium=linker&amp;utm_source=www.bravestoday.com&amp;utm_campaign=2026-01-11_br\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Brett Wisely<\/a> the favorite for the 13th position player spot. Wisely was then designated for assignment on Friday afternoon so the Braves could claim pitcher <a href=\"https:\/\/www.baseball-reference.com\/players\/s\/soriage01.shtml?utm_medium=linker&amp;utm_source=www.bravestoday.com&amp;utm_campaign=2026-01-11_br\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">George Soriano<\/a> off of waivers from the Baltimore Orioles. <\/p>\n<p>So let\u2019s try to be a little more \u2018evergreen\u2019 here and talk about Atlanta\u2019s lineup construction. Not where <a href=\"https:\/\/www.baseball-reference.com\/players\/a\/acunaro01.shtml?utm_medium=linker&amp;utm_source=www.bravestoday.com&amp;utm_campaign=2026-01-11_br\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Ronald Acu\u00f1a Jr.<\/a> is going to bat, as he\u2019ll likely resume manning the leadoff spot, but everyone else around him. What\u2019s the optimal mix of slug and on-base ability to score runs? Let\u2019s talk about it. <\/p>\n<p>The excellent Substack \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/downonthefarm.substack.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Down on the Farm<\/a>\u201d, which mostly covers minor league baseball, <a href=\"https:\/\/open.substack.com\/pub\/downonthefarm\/p\/how-power-hitting-lineups-can-benefit?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&amp;utm_medium=web\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">did a study recently<\/a> on the positive or negative impact of a lineup composed entirely of elite power hitters (using <a href=\"https:\/\/www.baseball-reference.com\/players\/r\/raleica01.shtml?utm_medium=linker&amp;utm_source=www.bravestoday.com&amp;utm_campaign=2026-01-11_br\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Cal Raleigh<\/a> as a stand-in) and supplementing it either with a close-to-league-average power hitter (using <a href=\"https:\/\/www.baseball-reference.com\/players\/g\/greenri03.shtml?utm_medium=linker&amp;utm_source=www.bravestoday.com&amp;utm_campaign=2026-01-11_br\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Riley Greene<\/a>) or a league average on-base focused hitter (using <a href=\"https:\/\/www.baseball-reference.com\/players\/c\/croneja01.shtml?utm_medium=linker&amp;utm_source=www.bravestoday.com&amp;utm_campaign=2026-01-11_br\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Jake Cronenworth<\/a>).  <\/p>\n<p>While it\u2019s behind the paywall, the key takeaway there is that a blend is best and the proper construction, in the league-average, neutral context, is to build a power-heavy lineup and supplement it with on-base hitters rather than add even elite power hitters to on-base heavy lineups. <\/p>\n<p>Essentially, don\u2019t put Cal Raleigh on the Cleveland Guardians; put <a href=\"https:\/\/www.baseball-reference.com\/search\/search.fcgi?pid=sotoju01,soto--004jua&amp;search=Juan+Soto&amp;utm_medium=linker&amp;utm_source=www.bravestoday.com&amp;utm_campaign=2026-01-11_br\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Juan Soto<\/a> on the Atlanta Braves. <\/p>\n<p>The end result of the research came to the conclusion that four OBP hitters and five power hitters is the ideal distribution, with the caveat that the research wasn\u2019t able to completely model the interactions between roster spots.<\/p>\n<p>(The counterpoint here is that they found the max difference in a season is 71 runs, which is not nothing, but only about 10% of Atlanta\u2019s total production last season. There\u2019s utility to be gained here, sure, but it\u2019s also around a half-run per game in the theoretical when looking at the least and most-optimized lineups and likely impossible to be accurately modeled in the real world due to the myriad lineup interactions and other variables.)<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s assign each Braves hitter a category &#8211; OBP, power, or elite (marked by great stats in both categories) and discuss the ideal way to deploy them next season. To do that, we\u2019re going to pull player production from FanGraphs <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fangraphs.com\/projections?type=thebat&amp;stats=bat&amp;pos=all&amp;team=16&amp;players=0&amp;lg=all&amp;z=1768103035&amp;sortcol=10&amp;sortdir=desc&amp;pageitems=30&amp;statgroup=dashboard&amp;fantasypreset=dashboard\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">THE BAT projections<\/a> for 2026.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s put each of Atlanta\u2019s hitters into one of three groups: Elite, slug, or OBP. <\/p>\n<p>To be elite, I\u2019m deciding a hitter needs an ISO of .200 or better as well as a walk rate better than MLB average. That leaves two names: Ronald Acu\u00f1a Jr. (.209 ISO, 13.02% walk rate) and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.baseball-reference.com\/search\/search.fcgi?pid=olsonma02,olson-006mat&amp;search=Matt+Olson&amp;utm_medium=linker&amp;utm_source=www.bravestoday.com&amp;utm_campaign=2026-01-11_br\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Matt Olson<\/a> (.206 ISO, 12.1% walk rate). While I do think <a href=\"https:\/\/www.baseball-reference.com\/players\/b\/baldwdr01.shtml?utm_medium=linker&amp;utm_source=www.bravestoday.com&amp;utm_campaign=2026-01-11_br\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Drake Baldwin<\/a> can eventually get there, as he hits the absolute crap out of the ball, he\u2019s not projected for a .200 ISO just yet. <\/p>\n<p>Everyone else gets dropped into two or three buckets &#8211; I\u2019ll explain that one in a minute.<\/p>\n<p>SLUG: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.baseball-reference.com\/players\/r\/rileyau01.shtml?utm_medium=linker&amp;utm_source=www.bravestoday.com&amp;utm_campaign=2026-01-11_br\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Austin Riley<\/a>, Michael Harris, Sean Murphy, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.baseball-reference.com\/players\/y\/yastrmi01.shtml?utm_medium=linker&amp;utm_source=www.bravestoday.com&amp;utm_campaign=2026-01-11_br\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Mike Yastrzemski<\/a> (versus righties)<br \/>OBP: Drake Baldwin, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.baseball-reference.com\/players\/p\/profaju01.shtml?utm_medium=linker&amp;utm_source=www.bravestoday.com&amp;utm_campaign=2026-01-11_br\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Jurickson Profar<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.baseball-reference.com\/players\/k\/kimha01.shtml?utm_medium=linker&amp;utm_source=www.bravestoday.com&amp;utm_campaign=2026-01-11_br\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Ha-Seong Kim<\/a><\/p>\n<p>I\u2019m sure you can tell that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.baseball-reference.com\/players\/a\/albieoz01.shtml?utm_medium=linker&amp;utm_source=www.bravestoday.com&amp;utm_campaign=2026-01-11_br\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Ozzie Albies<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.baseball-reference.com\/players\/d\/dubonma01.shtml?utm_medium=linker&amp;utm_source=www.bravestoday.com&amp;utm_campaign=2026-01-11_br\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Mauricio Dub\u00f3n<\/a> are both missing here. Sadly, I\u2019ve got them in the \u201cJust A Guy\u201d category right now &#8211; Ozzie\u2019s never walked much and needs to show his power\u2019s back after this most recent broken bone, while Dub\u00f3n looks the part of an on-base focused guy against lefties (.283 average, 127 OPS+) without the actual walks (5.8% walk rate), but has watched his overall OPS+ drops for three consecutive seasons, from 97 to 87 to 78. <\/p>\n<p>Ronald\u2019s leading off. I\u2019m sorry, but that\u2019s where he is at his best, and the psychological impact of first-inning runs is too significant to give up. <\/p>\n<p>Running through all of the different permutations, the lineup that generated the most runs looks something like this: <\/p>\n<p>RF Ronald Acu\u00f1a Jr.<br \/>CF <a href=\"https:\/\/www.baseball-reference.com\/players\/h\/harrimi04.shtml?utm_medium=linker&amp;utm_source=www.bravestoday.com&amp;utm_campaign=2026-01-11_br\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Michael Harris II<\/a><br \/>C Drake Baldwin<br \/>1B Matt Olson<br \/>3B Austin Riley<br \/>LF Mike Yastrzemski<br \/>DH Jurickson Profar<br \/>2B Ozzie Albies<br \/>SS Ha-Seong Kim<\/p>\n<p>But here you see the limitations with the model. Looking at slug and on-base as the inputs, it doesn\u2019t know about the free-swinging ways of Michael Harris and how often some of his at-bats result in strikeouts due to extreme chase. So let\u2019s tweak it, keeping speed and player preference in mind, and see what we get: <\/p>\n<p>RF Ronald Acu\u00f1a Jr.<br \/>DH Jurickson Profar<br \/>1B Matt Olson<br \/>3B Austin Riley<br \/>C Drake Baldwin<br \/>SS Ha-Seong Kim<br \/>LF Mike Yastrzemski<br \/>2B Ozzie Albies<br \/>CF Michael Harris<\/p>\n<p>In my mind, this lineup hits a bunch of sweet spots: The former MVP gets the most at-bats over a season at leadoff, with Profar giving the team a second on-base threat (and decent speed) ahead of the other elite hitter in Matt Olson. Riley over Baldwin is a question of if Riley\u2019s back to his 2021-2023 form; if not, Baldwin bats cleanup and you end up with back-to-back lefties. While I\u2019m nervous about potentially putting a slow-footed roadblock in front of Kim\u2019s desire to steal more in 2026, this does layer the speed in the lineup with baserunning threats in both the top and bottom halves.<\/p>\n<p>Just for fun, I took out the constraints I imposed on the simulator (Acu\u00f1a batting leadoff, not having three consecutive hitters of the same handedness, etc.) and ran it for sheer volume of runs. It gave me Baldwin in the #8 hole. \u00af\\_(\u30c4)_\/\u00af<\/p>\n<p>Acu\u00f1a<br \/>Profar<br \/>Olson<br \/>Riley<br \/>Harris<br \/>Kim<br \/>Albies<br \/>Baldwin<br \/>Yastrzemski<\/p>\n<p>While I do like the ability of the bottom to turn over the lineup, it\u2019s just not the best place for one of your best situational hitters in Drake Baldwin. I get it. The final number came out to +14 runs over my constraints, which isn\u2019t enough to shake things up. It\u2019s the kind of gap that shows clearly in simulations but barely shows in real standings and gets erased by one week of bullpen variance.   <\/p>\n<p>Also, just for fun, I re-ran it for the worst lineup I could possibly get and here\u2019s what it came out with: <\/p>\n<p>Albies<br \/>Kim<br \/>Profar<br \/>Yastrzemski <br \/>Baldwin<br \/>Acu\u00f1a<br \/>Riley<br \/>Olson<br \/>Harris<\/p>\n<p>Best power hitters buried at the bottom, speedster stuck behind the lineup\u2019s slowest player, and a JAG leading off. Sounds about right. This lineup came out less than half the runs per game that the other simulation did, ending up at 2.56 versus 5.78.<\/p>\n<p>At the end of the day, lineup construction does matter, but not nearly as much as the individual performance. Think of this like budgeting: being frugal with your money by making coffee at home and forgoing avocado toast does virtually nothing if you make poverty wages. This is similar &#8211; optimizing the lineup doesn\u2019t accomplish much if Austin Riley isn\u2019t back to pre-injury form or Ozzie Albies and Michael Harris spend the first half of the season being two of MLB\u2019s ten worst qualified hitters again. If Ronald Acu\u00f1a Jr. gets hurt and misses time, you can\u2019t exactly make up for his missing production by re-optimizing the lineup. <\/p>\n<p>But also, as an amateur lineup nerd, I\u2019m always watching to see how many different lineups the team uses. In that magical 2023 season, Atlanta used a total of 80 different batting orders, with the most common being used twelve times. By contrast, the uber-injured 2024 roster saw 119, with the most common being used only six times. Last year was technically worse than 2024, with 120 different lineups and the most common being used just five times. <\/p>\n<p>Now that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.baseball-reference.com\/players\/w\/weisswa01.shtml?utm_medium=linker&amp;utm_source=www.bravestoday.com&amp;utm_campaign=2026-01-11_br\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Walt Weiss<\/a> is manager and he\u2019s discussed more days off for everyone without the last name \u201cOlson\u201d, as well as not having a set designated hitter, I\u2019m curious how many different lineups the Braves roll out in 2026. I\u2019m setting the O\/U at 110. <\/p>\n<p>Now, if only the season would go ahead and get here already. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"It\u2019s like the Atlanta Braves are out to personally ruin every newsletter I write. From just last week&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":408457,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[558],"tags":[64,63,591,85],"class_list":{"0":"post-408456","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-mlb","8":"tag-au","9":"tag-australia","10":"tag-mlb","11":"tag-sports"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/408456","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=408456"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/408456\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/408457"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=408456"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=408456"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=408456"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}