![\"How](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Rissveds-Lenzerheide.png\")
<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
Mountain Bike<\/a><\/p>\n World Cup XC courses are no longer just about testing riders. They\u2019re designed for TV, built under tight constraints, and shaped by forces most fans will never see.<\/p>\n Piper Albrecht, Scott-SRAM<\/p>\n Cross-country mountain biking is such a vivid spectacle on TV; riders hurl through forests, over rocks, and sprint up climbs as if they\u2019ve struck a deal with gravity. But what fans rarely see is the invisible hand, shaping every climb, jump, and camera placement. Behind the trail lies a tangle of rules, politics, and broadcast pressures \u2013 all decided before an ounce of dirt is moved.<\/p>\n The 2025\u00a0 World Cup calendar expanded to 10 rounds across familiar, established tracks. But 2026 brings three new stops \u2013 South Korea, La Thuile (Italy), and Soldier Hollow (USA) \u2013\u00a0each promising a fresh taste of XC racing. To see how these courses come to life, I spoke with Simon Burney, a longtime former team manager and UCI mountain bike coordinator and now head of mountain biking at Warner Bros Discovery (WBD), which owns the series’ worldwide broadcast rights); Paul Beales, WBD’s sport manager for endurance mountain bike racing; and Lenzerheide course builder Benji Otto.<\/p>\n As we\u2019ll learn, modern XC courses aren\u2019t simply created with the aim of testing riders \u2013 they are becoming increasingly engineered to produce specific racing narratives for broadcast.<\/p>\n Who really shapes the race?<\/p>\n While WBD and local course builders are responsible for delivering each World Cup, no design work begins without first satisfying the regulations set out by the UCI. These rules exist to protect the core identity of cross-country racing and ensure consistency across the season, but they are not fixed. Instead, they have continually evolved alongside the sport.<\/p>\n As Burney explained, \u201cWe only have to go back a few years, and the lap length was between six and eight kilometres.\u201d In the following years, this has come down to between four and six kilometres, settling now on a minimum of 3.5 km.\u00a0<\/p>\n Shorter laps aren\u2019t just an aesthetic choice; they solved a timing problem. Eight-kilometre circuits could balloon past target durations in bad conditions; shorter laps make race timing more predictable. As XC World Cups shifted from two-hour endurance tests to sub-90-minute races, tighter control over total race time drove the change.<\/p>\n At experienced venues like Nov\u00e9 M\u011bsto, small tweaks can help to drive specific outcomes. \u201cIf we need a lap 30 seconds longer to give us another few minutes on a race, the builders understand how to do that,\u201d Burney explained.\u00a0<\/p>\n This post is for paying subscribers only Already have an account? Sign in<\/a><\/p>\n Did we do a good job with this story?<\/p>\n \n \ud83d\udc4dYep![\"Alex](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Alex-Hunt-150x150.png\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/NM-Climb-.png\")
Course designers at Nov\u00e9 M\u011bsto can tweak the course with accuracy that allows for a lap to grow or shrink in time as needed. <\/p>\n
\n Subscribe now<\/a><\/p>\n
\n \ud83d\udc4eNope\n <\/p>\n