This came after a man was bitten by a shark<\/a> on Monday evening, while surfing at Manly, on Sydney\u2019s northern beaches. He suffered major wounds to his leg and was rushed to Royal North Shore hospital in a critical condition. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n Only a few hours earlier, a shark knocked an 11-year-old boy into the water at Dee Why \u2013 just north of Manly \u2013 and bit a chunk out of his surfboard. And on Sunday afternoon, a 12-year-old boy was bitten by what authorities believe was a bull shark<\/a> while swimming at a popular beach in Sydney Harbour. He is still in a critical condition in hospital. <\/p>\n It can be tempting to blame these incidents on sharks alone. But there\u2019s emerging evidence the pollutants, pesticides and parasites we send into the ocean from land could shape not just where and when sharks and people cross paths \u2013 but also shark behaviour.<\/p>\n Recognising this bigger picture helps shift the focus from blaming sharks to addressing human impacts, supporting smarter policies that protect both public safety and ocean health.<\/p>\n Australian Shark Incident Database, NSW Government SharkSmart<\/a><\/p>\n A deeper reality<\/p>\n When shark attacks occur, the pain is real and profound. People are injured, families are shattered, and lives are changed forever. No discussion about ecology should ever minimise the human cost. Fear and anger in these moments are entirely understandable.<\/p>\n Yet public debate often moves quickly from grief to blame, with sharks portrayed as the problem to be removed. <\/p>\n This framing offers a sense of control. But it can also obscure a deeper reality: we still know surprisingly little<\/a> about the many pressures shaping shark health and behaviour. <\/p>\n What happens on land doesn\u2019t stay on land. When heavy rain washes into the ocean, it doesn\u2019t just carry pollutants and microorganisms with it. It also changes the water itself. Salinity shifts, visibility drops, oxygen levels change and temperatures can fluctuate. <\/p>\n Think about how unsettled you would feel if the air you breathe, the water you drink and the streets you walk suddenly changed overnight. Marine animals experience similar disruption. <\/p>\n Heavy rainfall and heightened risk<\/p>\n The four recent shark incidents in New South Wales followed an intense rainstorm<\/a> that flushed runoff from land into the state\u2019s coastal waters, reducing visibility and carrying pollution and waste into the sea. <\/p>\n A 2019 study<\/a> found tiger and white sharks are more likely to attack after heavy rainfall. <\/p>\n This is partly because heavy rainfall flushes out more nutrients to sea, which leads to higher fish populations near the shore. In turn, this attracts sharks. <\/p>\n Heavy rainfall also creates a very turbid, silty environment. Runoff-driven changes in water quality can disrupt the sensory cues sharks rely on, potentially increasing stress and altering behaviour, while reduced visibility also limits people\u2019s ability to assess risk.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Pollutants and parasites<\/p>\n On land, scientists have long recognised that environmental pollutants can interfere with how the nervous system works. <\/p>\n For example, exposure to certain pesticides is linked<\/a> to neurological diseases in people, such as Parkinson\u2019s disease, because these chemicals can disrupt nerve cell function, energy production and brain signalling pathways. <\/p>\n Emerging research shows similar processes occur in animals. For example, experiments in laboratory rats exposed to a common chemical used in pesticides displayed significant long-term deficits<\/a> in mood, anxiety, depression and aggressive traits. While these findings don\u2019t automatically translate to wildlife in the ocean, they help explain how chemicals can affect the brain.<\/p>\n There\u2019s also growing evidence<\/a> that pollutants and pharmaceutical contaminants can alter swimming behaviour, aggression, memory and stress responses in freshwater fish<\/a> such as Nile tilapia and zebrafish. <\/p>\n Although we know far less about these effects in marine species, the pattern is clear: chemicals entering aquatic environments can influence animal behaviour.<\/p>\n Pollution isn\u2019t the only thing moving from land into the ocean. Microorganisms do too. One of the most striking examples is Toxoplasma gondii, a microscopic parasite best known for infecting humans and domestic animals. On land, it\u2019s shed by cat faeces, and its hardy eggs can survive for months in soil and water. <\/p>\n Research<\/a> shows these parasite stages can be washed into rivers, estuaries and coastal waters, where they\u2019re taken up by fish and other marine animals. Toxoplasma has been detected in species ranging from fish to dolphins and sea otters. <\/p>\n What makes this parasite particularly important is its ability to influence behaviour. In studies on land<\/a>, toxoplasma infection has been shown to reduce fear responses, increase risk-taking and alter how the brain processes threats. <\/p>\n![\"A](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/file-20260120-56-bb8vxh.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n