A Four Corners investigation into the secret lives of the alleged Bondi shooters in the lead-up to the nation\u2019s worst terrorist attack will go to air on Monday night despite a preemptive claim by Asio that the episode contains \u201csignificant errors of fact\u201d.<\/p>\n
Path to Terror<\/a> examines whether there were failures in intelligence<\/a> and counter-terrorism leading up to the antisemitic massacre on Bondi beach on 14 December, and tracks the paths to radicalisation of father and son Sajid and Naveed Akram.<\/p>\n Asio took the unusual step on Sunday of releasing the statement<\/a> it provided to the ABC in response to multiple questions the investigative program put to the intelligence agency ahead of broadcast.<\/p>\n The ABC confirmed the agency had not seen the program but has made a series of assumptions based on the detailed questions put to them, including an allegation that the ABC used an unreliable source.<\/p>\n Asio has also denied that it received intelligence about Sajid being part of a group that discussed a plan to establish a pro-Islamic State community in T\u00fcrkiye and that Naveed was \u201ca close associate\u201d of known terrorists.<\/p>\n \u201cIf the ABC chooses to publish claims it cannot substantiate \u2013 particularly ones it has been told are untrue \u2013 we will reserve our right to take further action,\u201d the Asio statement said.<\/p>\n Sign up: AU Breaking News email<\/a><\/p>\n The ABC confirmed Asio\u2019s intervention would not affect the planned 8.30pm broadcast and defended the program as a \u201ccomprehensive\u201d seven-week investigation.<\/p>\n \u201cFour Corners spoke to numerous people and provides a number of sources of information for a detailed picture of the Akrams\u2019 actions and associations in the years leading up to the Bondi attack,\u201d an ABC spokesperson said.<\/p>\n \u201cDetailed questions were put to Asio and its response is reflected in the story. The public will be able to watch the full investigation tonight.\u201d<\/p>\n Reporter Sean Rubinsztein-Dunlop told the ABC in interviews on Monday the investigation has uncovered new information about the years leading up to the attack and asks whether Asio\u2019s assessment of Naveed not being a threat was the \u201cright call\u201d.<\/p>\n \u201cTonight, we present an astonishing inside account of the Akrams\u2019 connections to an Islamic State network in Sydney dating back several years and revealing some of what authorities were told, and when Naveed Akram, as a 17-year-old, was associating with members of an Isis terror cell,\u201d Rubensztein-Dunlop said<\/a>.<\/p>\n Asio assessed Naveed, then 17, in October 2019 for alleged associations with individuals involved in a reported Islamic State cell but concluded he was not an ongoing threat.<\/p>\n In the immediate aftermath of the attack, the prime minister, Anthony Albanese, was the first to indicate something might have gone awry, saying that \u201cquite clearly\u201d there were issues.<\/p>\n \u201cWe need to examine exactly the way that systems work,\u201d Albanese said<\/a>. \u201cWe need to look back at what happened in 2019 when this person was looked at, the assessment that was made,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n