There are reasons to believe chaos might ensue when the lights go out in Melbourne. F1 has implemented new chassis and engine regulations, both of which could greatly influence the start sequence.<\/p>\n
Engine-wise, the removal of the MGU-H makes it harder for cars to reach the turbo\u2019s right operational window for the start; this has fallen to the internal combustion engine, with drivers reaching higher revs for a longer period of time before the actual launch. The tricky process means cars can easily suffer slow getaways or even go into anti-stall.<\/p>\n
Read Also:<\/p>\n
Additionally, on the chassis side, Oscar Piastri<\/a>\u00a0questioned the potential use of active aerodynamics before Turn 1: \u201cA pack of 22 cars with a couple hundred points less downforce sounds like a\u00a0recipe for disaster\u00a0to me.\u201d<\/p>\n Hence Gasly\u2019s comment, though he cautiously refrained from elaborating on his statement that \u201cit could be one that everybody remembers\u201d, adding: \u201cWe’ll find out, I’m not too sure myself. But yeah, it is definitely going to be more tricky than it used to be.\u201d<\/p>\n Pierre Gasly, Alpine<\/p>\n Photo by: Sam Bagnall \/ Sutton Images via Getty Images<\/p>\n The Alpine<\/a> driver actually believes all F1 teams will figure out how to take proper starts \u201cin the space of a couple of weeks or months\u201d.<\/p>\n \u201cBut as it stands now, after only two weeks of testing, we can see that it’s not going to be easy in Australia,\u201d Gasly insisted.<\/p>\n \u201cBut that’s part of the list, among a lot of other situations, which might not be easy. That’s why I think in Australia, reliability and getting to the end of the race [are] going to be challenge number one and priority number one. And as simple as it sounds, because it’s not something we would have said in the past with the previous cars, these cars are extremely complex.\u201d<\/p>\n Drivers needing to rev the engine for a long time for an optimal getaway might be an issue for backmarkers in particular, as the last drivers to reach the starting grid may not enjoy as much time as they wish before lights out.<\/p>\n Asked if backmarkers could be in trouble and the procedure might require tweaks ahead of the season opener, Haas\u2019 Esteban Ocon<\/a> replied: \u201cI think it would be nice if they kept it the same.<\/p>\n Esteban Ocon, Haas F1 Team<\/p>\n Photo by: Andy Hone\/ LAT Images via Getty Images<\/p>\n \u201cWe are obviously working on that with the team. It’s clear that the turbo lag is a very big topic, but we have to adapt to what the rules are, and it would not be nice I think for the top three to wait like 1m30s until the cars are stopped, and have cold tyres into Turn 1.<\/p>\n \u201cI think you are going to see a lot more struggling of starts and a lot more differences compared to how the years before were, where the worst start was losing one or two positions on the grid \u2013 now you could lose the whole lot,\u201d the Frenchman added, echoing Oscar Piastri\u2019s opinion on the matter<\/a>.<\/p>\n \u201cSo, we are improving step by step. It’s still early days and unfortunately [Bahrain] is not the best track to do starts as well, because the grip is very low, so that helps the engine. But, yeah, it’s interesting. It’s not like the old rally cars or the old cars with simple turbos where you can get it up to spin quite easily. What we do as drivers doesn’t have much of an input on that. It’s very strange. But, I think it’s the same for all of us.\u201d<\/p>\n We want your opinion!<\/p>\n What would you like to see on Motorsport.com?<\/p>\n![\"Pierre](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/1771343770_66_pierre-gasly-alpine.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"Esteban](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/1771343770_848_esteban-ocon-haas-f1-team.jpg\")
<\/p>\n