Save this article for later<\/p>\n
Add articles to your saved list and come back to them anytime.<\/p>\n
Got it<\/p>\n
AAA<\/p>\n
\u201cThere\u2019s always a surprise in a credit cycle,\u201d JPMorgan Chase\u2019s Jamie Dimon told his investors this week.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis time around, it might be software, because of AI [artificial intelligence].\u201d<\/p>\n
The Wall Street boss made his comments as the US sharemarket experienced a sharp sell-off \u2013 which stabilised overnight \u2013 as fears from earlier this month resurfaced about the potential of AI to wipe out software-as-a-service companies.<\/p>\n
![\"JP](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/6d71c3103d64f377b1177c709d32f6830020f5b1.jpeg\")
JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon warns that markets are getting a bit too confident betting on AI and its returns.AP<\/p>\n
That bout of turbulence coincided with a different set of concerns about the potential dangers lurking within the private credit sector after one of the bigger private credit lenders, Blue Owl Capital<\/a>, was forced to freeze payouts from one of its funds after a wave of redemptions.<\/p>\n Bizarrely, another factor in Monday\u2019s market jitters was a Substack post at the weekend<\/a> in a popular finance blog that outlined a fictional scenario under which AI leads to mass unemployment and declines in wages, causing a steep fall in consumer spending, with companies increasing their investment in AI in what it described as \u201ca feedback loop with no natural brake\u201d.<\/p>\n In turn, that would precipitate a massive crisis for private credit and mortgage lending and a market crash late next year that wipes out 57 per cent of the S&P 500\u2019s value, the post went on.<\/p>\n \u2018My own view is people are getting a little comfortable that this is real: these high asset prices and high volumes, and that we won\u2019t have any problems.\u2019<\/p>\n Jamie Dimon<\/p>\n The scenario is, of course, hypothetical. What it did, however, was provide extra focus on the vulnerability of software companies and private credit providers.<\/p>\n Dimon\u2019s comments, while centred on AI, were broader.<\/p>\n \u201cUnfortunately, we did see this in \u201905, \u201806 and \u201907, almost the same thing \u2013 the rising tide was lifting all boats, everyone was making a lot of money.\u201d he said.<\/p>\n Related Article \u201cMy own view is people are getting a little comfortable that this is real: these high asset prices and high volumes, and that we won\u2019t have any problems,\u201d the influential banker warned.<\/p>\n \u201cI don\u2019t know how long it\u2019s going to be great for everybody. I see a couple of people doing some dumb things.\u201d<\/p>\n Inevitably, he said, the economic cycle would turn and there would be a wave of borrower defaults that would broadly affect lenders and impact industries few people expected.<\/p>\n Given that this particular sharemarket cycle has been running for more than three years and has been largely driven by the excitement about AI \u2013 it really kicked off when OpenAI launched ChatGPT in late 2022, with the market rising more than 40 per cent since then \u2013 it isn\u2019t surprising that investors are becoming more cautious and more sensitive to perceived threats, or that a banker like Dimon, who led JPMorgan through the 2008 global financial crisis, is conscious of the potential for a repeat episode.<\/p>\n What\u2019s particularly interesting about the events at the start of this week is that they bring together different strands of an AI-focused story, one latent with threats to the stability not just of the sharemarket, but both non-bank and bank balance sheets.<\/p>\n Related Article Dimon said he was starting to see parallels to the era ahead of the 2008 financial crisis, with some lenders making riskier loans to boost their incomes.<\/p>\n If there were to be another financial crisis, it would probably have an AI epicentre. That\u2019s because the tremors within private credit relate largely to the sector\u2019s significant exposures to not just software companies<\/a>, but increasingly to the AI developers and their infrastructure that are threatening the software sector.<\/p>\n The software and data centre risks also come via leveraged loans to private equity firms, which brings another strand of the financial system into play.<\/p>\n It\u2019s also the case that banks have been growing their lending to private credit firms and private equity firms, so there are conduits into the regulated core of the financial system.<\/p>\n The speed at which the AI sector has been developing has caught investors and lenders by surprise, unprepared for the disruption that AI might cause, so early in its development, to existing businesses.<\/p>\n The Blue Owl fund\u2019s experience is instructive. Private credit funds, and the exchange-traded funds that have grown their exposures to private equity credit, hold illiquid assets.<\/p>\n That doesn\u2019t faze institutional investors, who invest for the long term and welcome that the assets\u2019 values aren\u2019t \u2013 unlike listed assets \u2013 marked to market in real time.<\/p>\n The growth in retail funds with private equity and credit exposures \u2013 funds that promise liquidity despite the illiquidity of the underlying assets \u2013 has, however, created the potential for mismatches between what their investors expect and what they can deliver, and therefore the potential for the kind of run that led to Blue Owl\u2019s cutting of redemptions from its fund.<\/p>\n It\u2019s not just the potential for disruption of existing funds and businesses, however, that might be a threat to financial stability.<\/p>\n Related Article The sums involved in AI are unprecedented. Companies, some \u2013 like the \u201chyperscalers\u201d \u2013 valued at trillions of dollars and others many hundreds of billions, are investing around $US700 billion ($990 billion) in AI this year and plan to spend even more on training, chips and data centres next year and beyond.<\/p>\n Where the first phase of AI was funded with equity, some from private equity and venture capital firms, the companies are increasingly tapping debt markets and private credit to fund projects whose returns and timing are extremely uncertain.<\/p>\n At this phase of AI\u2019s development, it is a heavily cashflow-negative sector, even if some of the biggest spenders \u2013 companies like Meta, Amazon, Google and Microsoft \u2013 are subsidising their investments from cashflows from their legacy operations.<\/p>\n It would take very little to trigger an implosion in AI valuations, cutting off access to both equity and debt markets, and triggering meltdowns in equity values and in the value of existing loans.<\/p>\n It is the overlaps between the AI companies, their investors and lenders and the multitude of companies engaged in building the massive data centres and energy and water infrastructure to support them that could turn what might appear to be a sectoral issue into one with threatening systemic and economic implications.<\/p>\n Anthropic\u2019s chief executive Dario Amodei has described the risk-reward equation confronting AI companies by saying that the escalation in the costs of the computing power now required for AI could be \u201cruinous\u201d if companies got their timing wrong \u2013 if they invested too much too early and weren\u2019t generating the revenue required to support their investments. It was Anthropic\u2019s release of its Claude Code tools<\/a> earlier this month that ignited the sell-off in software stocks.<\/p>\n Amodei\u2019s comment applies not just to those AI companies building their large language models and the infrastructure to train them, but to all those exposed, directly or indirectly, to their activity.<\/p>\n The sheer scale of the numbers involved means that a relatively small mismatch in the timing of the spending and revenues could trigger contagion within the sector, which would then infect the other segments of the system with AI exposure.<\/p>\n Related Article There doesn\u2019t have to be any judgement of the merits and eventual worth of the investments in AI and its infrastructure to recognise that investors\u2019 capitalisation of the sector\u2019s prospects has been so aggressive that it has stepped up its vulnerability to any misstep or disappointment.<\/p>\n Add to that the concentration of exposures to the sector from apparently diverse segments of the financial system \u2013 private equity, private credit, institutional and retail investors and the banking system \u2013 and you could have a threat to systemic stability developing just as the Trump administration\u2019s deregulation of finance and banking encourages more risk-taking.<\/p>\n It may not come to that. Hopefully, it won\u2019t.<\/p>\n But there is now an increasingly fine line between AI success and failure. And there\u2019s a lot riding on which side of that line we end up \u2013 including the fates of investors and lenders to the sector, those threatened by AI, and the stability of the entire financial system.<\/p>\n The Business Briefing newsletter delivers major stories, exclusive coverage and expert opinion. Sign up to get it every weekday morning<\/a>.<\/p>\n Save<\/p>\n You have reached your maximum number of saved items.<\/p>\n Remove items from your saved list<\/a> to add more.<\/p>\n![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/675af1ef3b4d5df3585840b45291ed794b31b805.jpeg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"WiseTech](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/1771996634_19_70420903623b826c7c1e71a5381419634ebe6dc9.jpeg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"Anthropic](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/1771413790_579_696e0605109495e7a67d47ca38e0eeffd642ade5.jpeg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"Spending](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/f8f21c208c4a42a4eb41ffbbfa33cc08fbfa192b.jpeg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"Stephen](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/6a91e35c720253d1f10c275576e4b1125cea8b68.png\")
Stephen Bartholomeusz<\/a> is one of Australia\u2019s most respected business journalists. He was most recently co-founder and associate editor of the Business Spectator website and an associate editor and senior columnist at The Australian.Connect via email<\/a>.From our partners<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"February 25, 2026 \u2014 12:03pm Save You have reached your maximum number of saved items. Remove items from…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":502457,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[64,63,99],"class_list":{"0":"post-502456","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-business","8":"tag-au","9":"tag-australia","10":"tag-business"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/502456","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=502456"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/502456\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/502457"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=502456"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=502456"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=502456"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}