Bicycle Industries Australia, Tasmania Police and Bicycle Network teamed up during Bike Week to explain to MPs the problem of e-bikes on our roads that don\u2019t meet the road rules and what\u2019s needed to get rid of them.<\/p>\n
Hosted by the Parliamentary Friends of Cycling group in the Tasmanian Parliament, the presentation gave MPs an idea of what\u2019s happening in other states to tackle what are essentially unroadworthy motorbikes.<\/p>\n
MP for Clarke and co-chair of the friends group, Helen Burnet, introduced the session, pointing out that we don\u2019t want to deter people from riding legal e-bikes because of all their benefits.<\/p>\n
Peter Bourke from BIA has been leading the charge to have the federal government fix the loophole in import controls that\u2019s allowed so many bikes into the country that can\u2019t be legally ridden on roads.<\/p>\n
\u201cOur biggest challenge is not e-bikes, its motorbikes masquerading as e-bikes,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
Harmonising e-bike definition<\/p>\n
\u201cLoopholes have been created through import, through sales regulations and handballing the responsibility to the states to try and manage a problem which really should be controlled at a federal level.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIn 2021 the federal government decided to streamline the importation process and in doing so they said it was up to the states to manage use more than it was up to them to control the product coming into the country so they withdraw the EN15194 standard (definition of an e-bike).\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe\u2019ve gone from one definition to now seven definitions of an e-bike across the country, the technical term we use to describe this is a \u2018dog\u2019s breakfast\u2019.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat we\u2019ve seen in the last two months is a reversal of the federal government position, on 17 December 2025, after a huge amount of lobbying including from the state transport ministers, it reinserted the EN15194 standard into the Road Vehicles Standards Act and Australian Design Rules.<\/p>\n
Law lags behind reality<\/p>\n
Tasmania Police\u2019s Inspector Justin Lawson outlined the enforcement barriers the police are facing in confiscating bikes that are not legal on our roads.<\/p>\n
Notably, that they don\u2019t have the power to seize the bikes if the riders are not doing anything wrong, this contrasts with some other states where police are able to remove a vehicle that is not legal to ride on the road.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe Police Offences Act allows us to intercept, seize a vehicle and\/or clamp or confiscate it, those laws were in relation to motor cycles or motor cars. These types of vehicles have developed so quickly that the legislation has been left behind,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
Police also won\u2019t chase riders because of the risk involved.<\/p>\n
\u201cIn a snapshot, you\u2019ve got a 15-16 year old riding one of these things down Sandy Bay Road, I try to intercept him, he finds it frightening and puts the throttle down. If I try to engage in a chase or pursuit and he comes off the liability rests with me and over an incident that really doesn\u2019t deserve a fatal or serious injury outcome.\u201d<\/p>\n
Inspector Lawson said police will use drones to follow riders but it depends on having that equipment available on the ground.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe use it for stolen motor vehicles and any other use where we can minimise the risk to the rider, driver, police and members of the public, then that\u2019s absolutely a win for us but there are just challenges of being there at the right time. \u201c<\/p>\n
Like our articles?<\/p>\n
Become a Member and help fund our advocacy work.<\/p>\n