To do so, you need to convince people that what appears to be a measure aimed at the top 0.5% of taxpayers will one day hit average workers, due to the proposed bill not indexing the $3m for either inflation or wage growth.<\/p>\n
With no shortage of Div 296 opponents, the past few weeks have seen all manner of experts creating models that have today\u2019s Generation Z accumulating fabulous wealth in superannuation, well beyond $3m by the time they retire.<\/p>\n
Why let others have all the fun?\u00a0 I thought I\u2019d join the modelling blitzkrieg to see where my numbers land.<\/p>\n
\u2018Joshua\u2019s\u2019 super journey<\/p>\n
Joshua is the archetypal 25-year-old Australian male.\u00a0 So typical is Josh that his was the most popular name for male babies born in the year 2000.<\/p>\n
Josh is a typical 25-year-old male in every other way as well.\u00a0 He went to uni, has an outstanding HECS\/HELP debt of around $30,000 and currently earns $80,000 per year, on which his employer now pays super guarantee at the rate of 12%, effective 1 July this year.\u00a0 He makes no other contributions to super.<\/p>\n
Josh intends to work until the age of 60, without any career breaks or interruptions.<\/p>\n
To be consistent with Treasury\u2019s long-term assumptions<\/a>, I will assume that Josh\u2019s income grows at 3.7% per year between now and 2060.\u00a0 That\u2019s the rate (so-called \u2018AWE\u2019) at which I\u2019ll compound 2025 dollars into 2060 dollars, or discount 2060 dollars back into today\u2019s equivalent.<\/p>\n I will assume that Josh\u2019s superannuation balance is currently $17,500, which is the approximate median super balance for males aged between 25 and 29, according to Australian Tax Office stats.<\/p>\n Finally, I\u2019ll assume that Josh\u2019s super earns a return of 7.2% per year until 2060, the historical 33-year return for the median \u2018balanced\u2019 option, net of investment fees and tax, according to super researcher SuperRatings.<\/p>\n To favour Josh, I\u2019ll exclude administration fees, insurance premiums and other charges, giving him every chance of hitting that magic $3m mark in retirement.<\/p>\n How much super does Josh have as he approaches the age of 60 in the year 2060?<\/p>\n Source: Author\u2019s calculations<\/p>\n Unfortunately, despite 35 years of employer super contributions, growing at 3.7% per year and returning 7.2% annually, Josh falls short of the $3m target by more than $570,000.<\/p>\n His $2.4-odd million in 2060 is equivalent to a balance of around $654,000 in 2025 dollars.<\/p>\n Treasury modelling<\/p>\n My modelling sees Josh fall well short of the $3m Div 296 tax threshold.<\/p>\n Could it be that my assumptions were inappropriate?\u00a0\u00a0If so, I\u2019ve unfairly left Josh short when he, like the rest of his generation, might easily attain $3m in super at retirement.<\/p>\n What does Treasury, the government department responsible for modelling long-term superannuation outcomes, have to say on the matter?<\/p>\n In 2019, Treasury prepared an \u2018Information Note<\/a>\u2019 titled \u201cSuperannuation balances at retirement\u201d.<\/p>\n Using its Model of Australian Retirement Incomes and Assets (MARIA), Treasury effectively conducted the very same exercise, modelling super balances out to 2060, using very similar assumptions (the main difference being a slightly higher long-term wage growth assumption of 4% per year).<\/p>\n What did this Treasury modelling suggest?\u00a0 The chart below is taken from that Information Note.<\/p>\n Source: Treasury (2019)<\/p>\n The numbers in the chart above are in 2019 dollars, so we need to compound them out to 2060.\u00a0 When you do, the $500,000 equivalent comes in at around $2.5m.\u00a0 Which you\u2019ll note is past the middle point (50% on the vertical axis), and so a little higher than the average outcome.<\/p>\n So yeah, Treasury\u2019s modelling broadly lines up with mine.<\/p>\n Long story short, it is likely that Josh, or any other average income Gen Z for that matter,<\/p>\n will not be impacted by the Div 296 tax based on employer super contributions alone.\u00a0 <\/p>\n The elephant in the retirement room<\/p>\n Like most Gen Zers, Josh would someday like to own a property.\u00a0 That\u2019s no small challenge on his income, with the average capital city house price recently tipping over the $1m mark<\/a>.<\/p>\n Josh and his partner are saving, hoping to enter the property market around age 37, the median age for first homebuyers today.\u00a0<\/p>\n To round out this thought experiment, I\u2019ve modelled house prices out to 2060, using a dataset of average capital city prices going back to 1980.\u00a0 I\u2019ll use the compound growth rate for the 42 years between 1980 and 2022 of 7.4% per year.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n What would a mere 0.2% difference per year in growth be between Josh\u2019s super and house prices?<\/p>\n Author\u2019s calculations.<\/p>\n Turns out the $3m\u00a0 Div 296 tax isn\u2019t the biggest problem Josh has as he ages. It\u2019s not even close.<\/p>\n At 7.4% per year, Josh will be facing an average house price of around $2.2m as he and his partner try to get that all-important first foot on the property ladder.<\/p>\n While first-home buyers generally purchase under the average price, I\u2019ll leave you to work out an 80% mortgage on a property of say $1.9m, for a couple whose combined gross income might (in the year 2037) be around $250,000.<\/p>\n Josh and his partner will likely upgrade once or twice, very possibly also upsizing their mortgage as they do.\u00a0 As they approach retirement,<\/p>\n their house may be worth more than $11m, and almost certainly still significantly mortgaged.<\/p>\n If that seems far-fetched, bear in mind that in 1980 median capital city house prices were $68,850 in Sydney (now $1,210,000), $39,500 in Melbourne (now $796,000) and $35,475 in Brisbane (now $926,000).<\/p>\n Josh, his partner and the rest of Gen Z have challenges ahead, but paying Div 296 tax on super is unlikely to be their burning issue, even in the remote event that the $3m remains unadjusted for the next 35 years.<\/p>\n On the balance of probabilities, it is housing affordability and mortgage debt that will, absent some significant policy reform.<\/p>\n![\"Joshua's](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Joshuas-super-2060.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"Treasury](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Treasury-super-information-note.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"Projected](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Projected-house-prices-2060.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
![\"Harry](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Harry-Chemay-1-200x200.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n