{"id":566368,"date":"2026-03-26T21:06:11","date_gmt":"2026-03-26T21:06:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/566368\/"},"modified":"2026-03-26T21:06:11","modified_gmt":"2026-03-26T21:06:11","slug":"tom-pohlad-on-spending-winning-and-the-future-of-the-twins","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/566368\/","title":{"rendered":"Tom Pohlad on Spending, Winning, and the Future of the Twins"},"content":{"rendered":"

On Nov. 10, 2001, the StarTribune published an op-ed article by a member of the Pohlad family. It concerned a recent decision by Major League Baseball to remove two financially struggling teams from the league, one of which was assumed to be the Twins. The op-ed was a ringing defense of a family and a patriarch who had owned the team for 17 years, through the highs of two World Series and the lows of failed efforts to escape the plasticized Metrodome. The article is quaint, almost endearing, save for how the rhetoric feels so eerily applicable today.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cPeople say we are unwilling to spend money to get good players,\u201d the author wrote. \u201cIf you recall in 1994, a stable time for baseball, my family paid Kirby Puckett the highest salary Major League Baseball had ever seen. Now in an unstable time, there is no money to spend; the organization does not make enough revenue to field the kind of team you want, and no owners pay salaries out of their own pocket. We are a baseball team stuck in a rundown football stadium.\u201d<\/p>\n

The piece closed with a banger: \u201cWe have tried to make things right for the people of Minnesota and now we will make things right for our family.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Twins survived and eventually got that new ballpark, but they still struggle to win or make money. Twenty-five seasons later, they remain a franchise navigating ire between the family that owns them and the fans that want to love them. \u201cI admit my family has not always made the best decisions,\u201d Pohlad wrote. \u201cWe have always had good intentions, though.\u201d<\/p>\n

Tom Pohlad, 46, sits, legs crossed, in the owners\u2019 box at Hammond Stadium in Fort Myers. It\u2019s an unseasonably warm February day in southwest Florida, though he looks cool and collected in white slacks turned up at the ankles, a gray polo, white lace-ups, and no socks. His auburn hair, the identical shade of his tan, is combed back. Tall, with a patrician air, Pohlad evokes his uncle Jim, whom he just replaced as the team\u2019s official ownership representative with Major League Baseball.<\/p>\n

He wrote those words as a student at Boston College, 17 years after his grandfather, Carl, bought the Twins. Tom may not have foreseen that 25 Decembers later he would be the focus of a hastily called press conference in the home clubhouse at Target Field. He had, until that week, been chairman of the family\u2019s corporate holdings: PaR Systems, Northmarq, United Properties, among others. He looked a little shell-shocked<\/a>; after all, it was his younger brother Joe who had made the Twins his life\u2019s work.<\/p>\n

\"TomPohlad is introduced to the media, December \u201925.<\/p>\n

The motivation for swapping Tom for Joe wasn\u2019t stated, but the timing alone\u2014in December MLB approved the sale of roughly a third of the team (according to media reports) to limited partners\u2014offered clues that the two events were not unrelated. Three years earlier, Joe had been introduced to the media: he was to transition into his uncle Jim\u2019s role. Joe had been part of the org since 2007, and many observers expected him to be named team president eventually. Soft-spoken and affable like his uncle, he seemed set to stay the course. But there were problems behind the scenes.<\/p>\n

The team had accumulated over $400 million in debt, mostly during the Covid years, when it declined to furlough staff who had little to do while revenues were nil or slightly north of nil. In 2023, the team won its first playoff series since 2002, but it was followed by retrenchment\u2014a \u201cright sizing\u201d of the payroll is how Joe put it\u2014and a PR disaster that arguably engendered two successive dismal seasons.\u00a0<\/p>\n

After 2024, it was announced that president of baseball operations Derek Falvey would succeed Dave St. Peter as president, perhaps because that winter the family announced its intention to sell the team. The Pohlads later changed course, announcing they would seek out minority investors to pay off the debt. Those transactions closed just before Tom\u2019s ascendancy.<\/p>\n

The Twins are \u201cmy sole focus,\u201d he told TCB in an exclusive interview. \u201cI left my role at Pohlad Cos. I think that\u2019s what\u2019s required right now. I want to be an active owner. I am not just looking to sit in the owners\u2019 box and hope and pray. I want to roll my sleeves up and do my part.\u201d<\/p>\n

A new look<\/p>\n

Fans should expect a change in tempo. \u201cTom and Joe are completely different people, with different visions,\u201d says an associate who knows both men. \u201cTom is more aggressive and assertive than Joe. I expect him to have an outsized presence relative to the [distance with which] the Pohlads have operated the team.\u201d<\/p>\n

Family businesses are emotionally complicated organisms, and Tom Pohlad acknowledged to the media in December that supplanting his brother had created strain that the family might not have taken on under different circumstances. It would be na\u00efve not to assume the new board is setting a strategic vision for the franchise.<\/p>\n

\u201cEverything is on the table. After the first board meeting it became evident that is the fact.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u2014Craig Leipold, Wild owner\/Twins investor<\/p>\n

Tom had led the investor search, creating a bond of trust with the new partners. \u201cWe were focused on bringing a capital infusion to pay down the debt and stabilize the organization,\u201d he recalls. \u201cBut equally important was who we were partnering with. We wanted true alignment on what\u2019s going to drive success. We ended up with three partners who bring a lot of experience that is going to help us be successful.\u201d<\/p>\n

One of those investors is Minnesota Wild<\/a> owner Craig Leipold. \u201cTom\u2019s a very smart guy,\u201d Leipold told TCB. \u201cHe is looking for advice and ideas. Everything is on the table. After the first board meeting it became evident that is the fact.\u201d<\/p>\n

In early February, just as management was about to leave for spring training, Pohlad announced Falvey would be leaving his job of nine years. Pohlad says he felt he needed to run and be the face of the team\u2019s business operations, which had been handed to Falvey just 10 months earlier.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s perhaps easier to critique the work of your predecessors, but Pohlad makes no bones about the situation the team finds itself in: \u201cIt\u2019s been a rough two or three years for Twins baseball. A lot of things have created headwinds in the world and the community, but we also haven\u2019t run as good an organization as we would have hoped. The failure to communicate through those challenges created a vacuum with our fans. The sale process called into question our family\u2019s commitment. We have to . . . prove that we\u2019re committed and competent in building out a championship caliber organization.\u201d<\/p>\n

Though Pohlad may one day hire an executive to lead business operations, he plans to operate as CEO through at least the 2026 season. \u201cI want to play the role I\u2019m playing right now. I want to play an active role. I believe I should be the face of the organization\u2019s leadership. I\u2019m finding a lot of value in being heavily involved and learning our business. In the short to medium term, that\u2019s going to pay dividends for us. It earns me trust here and will help me know what to look for when we begin that search.\u201d<\/p>\n

Pohlad suggests it was perhaps less than optimal to place executives who lacked control of financial strategy as the public face of those choices over a period of decades.<\/p>\n

Leipold learned a similar lesson when he owned the Nashville Predators NHL team from 1997 to 2007, before he bought the Wild in 2008. \u201cMy decisions now versus Nashville are focused much more on how the community views things,\u201d he says. \u201cEvery decision we make, we talk about how it will be viewed by fans, community, and media. You have to think about image, you have to be involved, and let people know you are involved.<\/p>\n

\u201cI can\u2019t outsource earning back the trust of our fans, players, staff, and the community at large.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u2014Tom Pohlad<\/p>\n

\u201cI go to all the games, we\u2019re active in the Chamber, and so are the Pohlads,\u201d Leipold continues. \u201cThey are a quiet family, but they make an impact. They may want to be more public about what they are doing.\u201d<\/p>\n

Pohlad concurs: \u201cI can\u2019t outsource earning back the trust of our fans, players, staff, and the community at large.\u201d<\/p>\n

As the face of the business, he will inevitably face criticism\u2014from fans, sportswriters, and clients. \u201cI\u2019ve lived with it for 40-some years. It comes with the territory. Is it fun to see family members or your last name spoken about in the manner we have been spoken about? It is hard.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"JoeStarting pitcher Joe Ryan with Pohlad in the Hammond Stadium dugout, spring training \u201926
\nThe payroll conundrum\u00a0<\/p>\n

The most consistent critique of the Twins, from Carl Pohlad\u2019s era to today is they don\u2019t miss an opportunity to save a buck. Despite Tom Pohlad\u2019s December statement that the Twins have not had positive cash flow since Covid (and more of a break-even operation in the early Target Field era, 2010\u20132019), fans and media continue to insist that the family is profiting from the team, and if they are not doing it through black ink, they are doing it through accounting gimmicks.<\/p>\n

Another narrative is that because of the family\u2019s immense wealth, the Twins should not be concerned with breaking even but should go for broke signing players, as is the case with big-spending New York Mets owner Steve Cohen or the LA Dodgers. (That the Pohlads had leveraged the\u00a0 business by nearly a third is apparently insufficient evidence of their commitment.)<\/p>\n

\u201cWe can\u2019t compete with the Steve Cohens of the world,\u201d Pohlad says. \u201cThey are unicorns, and it\u2019s an unfair example. [With the] majority of sports teams, the disparity in what they spend is a function of market size and the revenues they generate, not the owner\u2019s wealth. There is a belief in the fan base that owners are putting their own money in every year, but by and large that is not true.<\/p>\n

(It is tough to verify team finances. This March, CNBC estimated the Twins are the fourth least valuable team in MLB, at $1.65 billion. CNBC said the team ranked 18th of 30 MLB teams in revenue, with 2025 receipts of $352 million and EBITDA of $20 million, down from $356 million and $41 million in 2024. So it is conceivable that all earnings were consumed by debt service. CNBC said 12% of the team was leveraged\u2014it\u2019s unclear if that\u2019s current.)<\/p>\n

\u201cI think we\u2019ve got to be disciplined about when we make investments,\u201d Pohlad continues. \u201cThere are going to be times when it makes sense to go for it, but when you do that, you\u2019ve got to believe there\u2019s going to be a return, and that will be greater success on the field, which will drive fan engagement and drive revenue so you can spend more money. But there are times you have to be realistic about where the team is at or the organization and say \u2018Is this the best year to go all-in, and if we do, are we sacrificing the long term?\u2019 \u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cIf always being competitive comes at the cost of truly being able to compete for a world championship, then I have to question that approach.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u2014Tom Pohlad, Twins CEO<\/p>\n

Pohlad says his primary goal is sustainable success, not peaks and valleys. \u201cWinning the World Series once [in the future will not] solve the revenue issue. Being consistently competitive solves the revenue issue,\u201d he says. \u201cFans believing ownership is committed to competitiveness creates loyalty that drives revenue.\u201d<\/p>\n

Pohlad is focused right now on revenue, and attendance remains an MLB team\u2019s primary revenue stream. Recently announced season-long beer and ice cream promotions are tactical: \u201cI am pushing our organization to get creative on how we bring people back to the ballpark. I want people to go on the journey with us. Help us build this together. It\u2019s not going to happen in one season. [I asked] if they\u2019re going to come on the journey, what can we do as an olive branch\u2014$2 beer or free ice cream? There are plenty of teams across the league that don\u2019t have a great record for winning, [yet] draw 2 million fans. So we are interested in what are those teams doing to drive fan engagement and [saying] let\u2019s do a better job with that as well.\u201d<\/p>\n

Still, he is quick to reaffirm, \u201cAt the end of the day people want us to win.\u201d<\/p>\n

Which brings him to the most prominent sore point: 2023. \u201cIf we go back to 2023, we unfortunately made a decision not to invest in the team, and on paper there was some rationale because of the debt and revenue not growing,\u201d he recalls, which led to \u201cright-sizing\u201d the payroll after that playoff run. \u201cHindsight being 20\/20, what we failed to take into consideration was the long-term impact of what it signaled to the fan base and its potential impact on revenue in 2024 up to today. You can\u2019t place a value on what we\u2019ve lost as a result of that decision; it was the wrong decision.\u201d<\/p>\n

There is a certain mindset sports owners need to adopt, Craig Leipold says. (His Wild are currently valued at about where the Twins are.) \u201cYou have to believe the asset will be going up and up and up, so you can\u2019t look at yearly swings in profitability as make-or-break.\u201d He says, based on his conversations with the Pohlads, they get this. \u201cPeople don\u2019t think the Pohlads are committed or willing to spend, but it\u2019s not true.\u201d<\/p>\n

Early innings<\/p>\n

Tom Pohlad says he would like to shift the culture at One Twins Way. \u201cI think culture plays a role in how the organization handles moments of adversity. We have depth of talent. And we have a new culture this year that I think is going to make us more resilient.\u201d<\/p>\n

Though he had no role in his hire, he sees new manager Derek Shelton as emblematic of said culture. \u201c \u2018Shelty\u2019 has a different mindset than previous managers,\u201d says Pohlad. \u201cHe is intense and he wants to win, but he\u2019s a clubhouse guy who believes in communication and accountability. We lucked out with him. He and I are aligned in how we think about things. Many of the same things he\u2019s trying to instill in the clubhouse, I\u2019m trying to instill in the organization. We\u2019ve got to manage everything within our control.\u201d<\/p>\n

He believes his training at Pohlad Cos. prepares him for the unforgiving role. \u201cI don\u2019t think sports is so unique that all the things that work running the other family businesses we have don\u2019t apply here.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"TwinsTwins manager Derek Shelton and Pohlad, spring training \u201926
\nA new landscape<\/p>\n

There has been lot of discourse about market imbalances in the economics of baseball, the sudden loss of broadcast revenue due to the collapse of the regional sports network model, and in Minneapolis, the downtown headwinds since Covid. Leipold points to the NHL, which established a salary cap and floor, which mostly equalized spending among markets.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe difference between NHL payrolls 10 years ago ranged from $25 million to $80 million. All the high-payroll teams were in the playoffs,\u201d he recalls. \u201cWhen we implemented a hard cap and floor, within two to three years every team became competitive. Only two or three are not competitive this season. [A cap] enables smaller-market teams to compete. Attendance goes up, [TV] ratings go up. And the next year, players get 50% of our revenue so they earn more. Eighty percent of our teams [spend to] the cap. Certainly [MLB\u2019s next] collective bargaining agreement will have a major impact on whether teams are profitable.\u201d<\/p>\n

Pohlad promises he will not use these factors as a crutch. \u201cWe have enough work in front of us within our control that worrying about the economic system is not my first concern. Big picture, do I think there are other systems that would give markets like us a better chance,\u201d he asks, without answering. \u201cBut I don\u2019t think our system right now precludes the Twins from being successful.\u201d<\/p>\n

What does success look like? \u201cI think we thought we owed it to the fans to always be competitive,\u201d he says, alluding to the question of whether teams must go through winning droughts to achieve full-throated success.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf always being competitive comes at the cost of truly being able to compete for a world championship, then I have to question that approach. Also, what is competitive? Is it getting to the postseason? That\u2019s been our [philosophy]. My definition is: \u201cLet\u2019s build a team that can truly compete in the postseason, rather than, \u2018let\u2019s see if we get lucky.\u2019 \u201d<\/p>\n

There has been speculation the Pohlads are short-timers now, that the minority investor recruitment was a prelude to a full sale. Pohlad shakes his head at the idea. \u201cWe\u2019re long-term owners,\u201d he says. \u201cThere\u2019s a perception that we\u2019re waiting for financial reform to happen in Major League Baseball and then we\u2019re going to sell the team. That\u2019s simply not true. We have unfinished business, and that\u2019s to bring a championship to the city.\u201d<\/p>\n

If he has the right stuff to finish the job his grandfather started, there may not be a need for the Pohlads to write any more op-eds. At least not about baseball.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"On Nov. 10, 2001, the StarTribune published an op-ed article by a member of the Pohlad family. It…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":566369,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[558],"tags":[64,63,591,85],"class_list":["post-566368","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-mlb","tag-au","tag-australia","tag-mlb","tag-sports"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/566368","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=566368"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/566368\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/566369"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=566368"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=566368"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=566368"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}