{"id":597863,"date":"2026-04-10T12:32:19","date_gmt":"2026-04-10T12:32:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/597863\/"},"modified":"2026-04-10T12:32:19","modified_gmt":"2026-04-10T12:32:19","slug":"how-ferrari-must-step-up-its-efforts-to-end-its-long-f1-championship-wait","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/597863\/","title":{"rendered":"How Ferrari must step up its efforts to end its long F1 championship wait"},"content":{"rendered":"

A red-and-white bolt rushed out of its starting blocks with the pace of a startled impala and approached the opening right-hand turn of the Bahrain International Circuit, now as the figurehead of the chasing pack. The Ferrari<\/a> had left its competitors in its wake; the remaining cars seemingly suspended in time as the starting lights receded into the night\u2019s sky.\u00a0<\/p>\n

It was evident during Bahrain\u2019s pre-season tests that the getaway speed of the 2026 Ferrari was effortlessly potent versus that of the non-Ferrari-powered machines, which were decidedly more ponderous in the practice starts. Even with the addition of a five-second pre-start window, one introduced to give the grid more time to spool their turbos and counteract the turbo lag present in the new powertrains, Ferrari and its \u2018customer\u2019 teams were simply quicker off the line.\u00a0<\/p>\n

This has persisted through the opening rounds of 2026. It hasn\u2019t necessarily mattered too much where the Ferraris qualify; the starts have been so strong that the two SF-26s can breeze to the front of the order like a gale-force wind. A Ferrari driver taking the early lead seemed like a near-certainty, but ultimately as inevitable as losing it a few laps later.\u00a0<\/p>\n

As widely expected at the start of the year, Mercedes<\/a> has provided the benchmark for the rest of the teams to reach. Ferrari is the only team to have presented any realistic kind of challenge over the early part of the season; reliability issues have restricted McLaren<\/a>\u2019s hopes of retaining its constructors\u2019 title thus far, though its Suzuka performance was promising, and Red Bull has lost ground to the rest of the \u2018Big Four\u2019 as it beds in its all-new powertrain.<\/p>\n

This, of course, was good news for Ferrari\u2019s long-suffering\u00a0fanbase. Perennial hopes of a first F1 title since claiming the 2008 constructors\u2019 championship have been consistently dashed: sometimes on the eve of the season, and other times \u2013 perhaps more gallingly \u2013 at the final stretch.<\/p>\n

Fernando Alonso<\/a>\u2019s thousand-yard stare as he lost the 2012 title to Sebastian Vettel<\/a> in the Brazil finale is an image that has pervaded over the past 14 years. Vettel himself experienced Ferrari heartbreak just under six years later when he was little more than a passenger in his slow waltz into the Hockenheim barrier, in a mistake that is generally considered to have been the catalyst in his failure to win a fifth world title.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Since then, the team has won races but failed to mount a consistent championship challenge. It got \u2018closest\u2019 to a drivers\u2019 title tilt in 2022, the dawn of the latest ground-effect era, but strategic errors and Red Bull\u2019s growing strengths as the weight came off its RB18 led Charles Leclerc<\/a>\u2019s early championship challenge to run out of road.<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s also not forget that Ferrari took the 2024 constructors\u2019 battle down to the wire against\u00a0McLaren, when Red Bull\u2019s pseudo one-car set-up spilled a hatful of points. But, since it didn\u2019t win, it\u2019s very easy for that to slip the mind\u2026<\/p>\n

\"Schumacher\u2019s <\/p>\n

Schumacher\u2019s win in 2000 ended Ferrari\u2019s 21-year wait for a drivers\u2019 title<\/p>\n

Photo by: Motorsport Images<\/p>\n

Ferrari has long since surpassed the length of its drought between its 1983 and 1999 constructors\u2019 championship wins. It\u2019s also fast approaching the 21-year layoff between Jody\u00a0Scheckter\u2019s drivers\u2019 title success in 1979 and Michael Schumacher<\/a>\u2019s first Ferrari championship in 2000 \u2013 after all, Kimi Raikkonen<\/a>\u2019s championship triumph in 2007 is already nearly two decades ago. How time flies.\u00a0<\/p>\n

So, can the team change that in 2026? It\u2019s not impossible \u2013 but it\u2019s going to take a little bit of work to get there.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Ferrari’s big momentum shift<\/p>\n

It\u2019s surely not too uncharitable to say that Ferrari wilted under the hype of the 2025 season. After missing out on the previous year\u2019s constructors\u2019 title by just 14 points, essentially the cost of Carlos Sainz<\/a>\u2019s late-race clash with Sergio Perez<\/a> in Baku (or one of Leclerc\u2019s lesser weekends during a difficult stretch between Montreal and Silverstone), Ferrari felt that its wide-reaching technical changes would weave more performance into its SF-25 package. Add the long-awaited signing of Lewis Hamilton<\/a> into the mix, and the Prancing Horse trotted into the new season with great expectations.\u00a0<\/p>\n

For myriad reasons, those expectations could not be delivered upon. Ferrari didn\u2019t have the luxury of time to suss out its double pull-rod suspension, and the decision to stop development as early as April put it in an increasingly difficult position. While Leclerc was able to stuff a handful of podium finishes into his pocket, Hamilton found the car an extension of his grievances with the ground-effect era.\u00a0<\/p>\n

When it became clear that the SF-25 in its early state was not likely to challenge McLaren for honours, Ferrari chose to sacrifice 2025 for a more harmonious start to 2026. It hurt the team in the short-term; the future of Fred Vasseur as team principal was put under scrutiny, as were Hamilton\u2019s longer-term prospects in F1 after a false dawn characterised by his China sprint win. \u00a0Yet the team managed to hang tight under the pressure; Vasseur\u2019s deal was renewed, and the Frenchman did his best to protect his team from criticism.\u00a0<\/p>\n

It was rather emblematic of the old F1 adage that \u2018when the flag drops, the bullshit stops\u2019 \u2013 at least, for all of about two days\u2026<\/p>\n

Perhaps Ferrari knew it was onto something with its 2026 package. When it came to the prelude to the arrival of the new regulations,\u00a0Maranello\u2019s finest were more than happy to let the other teams and manufacturers conduct their battles in public. Let\u2019s review: Mercedes assumed the limelight and tried to deflect some of it onto Red Bull amid the compression ratio furore, Honda was in strife, and Audi<\/a> was busy acquainting itself with the ramifications of its code switch. \u00a0<\/p>\n

Amid the back and forth of Mercedes\u2019 praise of Red Bull\u2019s deployment capabilities and Max Verstappen<\/a>\u2019s suggestion that the comments from within the Silver Arrows camp had a touch of the sandbag about them, Ferrari entered from stage left during testing and blew everyone away with its rocket-ship starts. It was rather emblematic of the old F1 adage that \u2018when the flag drops, the bullshit stops\u2019 \u2013 at least, for all of about two days\u2026<\/p>\n

During the earlier discussions between the teams, manufacturers and the FIA, the topic of starts had been put on the table. The deletion of the turbo-mounted MGU-H from the 2026 powertrain formula would naturally result in the emergence of turbo lag, and the reduced torque available on demand was expected to make starts more difficult. According to Vasseur, this was waved away by the other manufacturers as something that was not an immediate concern.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"Hamilton\u2019s <\/p>\n

Hamilton\u2019s SF-26 vaults into the lead at the start of the Chinese Grand Prix<\/p>\n

Photo by: James Sutton \/ Formula 1 \/ Formula Motorsport Ltd via Getty Images<\/p>\n

It\u2019s generally understood that Ferrari responded to this by producing a smaller turbocharger to compensate at the starts. By reducing the size and weight of the turbine, it requires less time for the exhaust gases to spool it up, ensuring that the torque is available at the rear axle sooner.<\/p>\n

When this manifested as a considerable advantage in testing, the other teams were alarmed at the glacial pace of their own starts. It was enough for the 5s\u00a0pre-start procedure to be introduced, one that offered the other teams more time to get their own larger turbos spooled up.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Although Ferrari was against this, its stance being that significant warning about the starts had been provided, it still maintained a palpable advantage at the lights. The opening two races were defined by a Ferrari driver taking the lead from a Mercedes: Leclerc got the holeshot on George Russell<\/a> in Australia, and Hamilton got the jump on Antonelli a week later in China. In Japan, Leclerc got past both Mercedes drivers but was beaten into the lead by Oscar Piastri<\/a>, the McLaren having started one slot ahead on row two. \u00a0<\/p>\n

But the SF-26 is no one-trick pony. Ferrari has managed to produce a genuinely quick car out of the box, one that is able to offer Mercedes some resistance in the early stages of a race. Although the car\u2019s early runs in Bahrain suggested that the rear end needed a bit of tuning, the ultimate package is driveable and one in which both Leclerc and Hamilton have found immediate comfort.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe are starting to have quite a clear picture on what are the characteristics of the car that we need to improve in order to get better,\u201d\u00a0Leclerc explained. \u201cBut I think chassis-wise, it\u2019s quite a strong car, actually. And that\u2019s probably our strength so far.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n

Where is Ferrari lacking?<\/p>\n

Leclerc continued: \u201cPower unit is where we are lacking compared to the Mercedes at the moment\u201d, something that he estimates is worth a 0.4-0.5s per lap deficit. While Ferrari\u2019s small turbo helps at the low end of the range, its limitations begin to emerge when the Prancing Horse\u2019s engine room works at its top end. Larger turbochargers produce more power at higher revs, through greater volumetric efficiency at the same boost pressure.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Mercedes has that ball in its court, plus a smidgen more across the board with its powertrain. \u201cThere is the optimisation of the power units, and that is probably the biggest difference between us and Mercedes,\u201d Leclerc added. \u201cAnd just with the optimisation, you can make a big difference. There\u2019s not only that. There\u2019s also raw power that for now we are down compared to them.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n

While Ferrari feels that it has been able to present Mercedes with a match with regards to the chassis, it cannot rest on those laurels. According to GPS data, cornering pace between the two cars is beat-for-beat, but the greater top-end speed in the Mercedes is also demonstrated here. In addition to a power advantage, general straightline speed is another area where Mercedes sits ahead. Hamilton pointed to its potency with straight mode.<\/p>\n

\"The <\/p>\n

The Ferrari chassis is reckoned to be a match for Mercedes, but the power unit needs work<\/p>\n

Photo by: Marcel van Dorst \/ EYE4images \/ NurPhoto via Getty Images<\/p>\n

Ahead of the Japanese Grand Prix, it was suggested that Mercedes had a front-wing flap that flaunted the regulations governing the transition time between straight and corner mode, but the team stated that this was not by design. Instead, it cited a reliability issue that precluded the front wing from returning to its natural cornering position in the necessary 400-millisecond window.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Regardless, Mercedes does appear to have found a way to dump a little bit more drag on the straights; Hamilton stated that when the W17s put their active aero package into use, Ferrari struggles to stay on level terms. \u201cIf you look at the races they\u2019ve been just as quick through the corners, I would say,\u201d he contended. \u201cBut mostly when they open the SM [straight mode], they\u2019ve been really pulling. So it will be interesting to see what deployment schedule they have.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n

Russell offered his own explanation, stating that \u201cit definitely seems we have a low-drag car, which is good. I don\u2019t know if it\u2019s specifically due to the SM zones or if it\u2019s the straightline [speed] itself. Obviously every straight line we\u2019ve been on so far has been an SM zone, so you can\u2019t really disconnect the two, but the general thought is probably correct.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n

Ferrari might be lacking a bit of aerodynamic efficiency, although this is where some of the team\u2019s inventiveness has come into play; the rotating \u2018macarena\u2019 wing has only been spotted in testing and practice in China, but the hope is that the 200-degree rotation of its rear-wing active aero device can deliver on the team\u2019s attempt to cut more drag from the car on the straights.<\/p>\n

Ferrari will have to put significant stock in its development capabilities, something that served it well during its 2024 constructors\u2019 challenge and allowed the squad to benefit over the final races of the year<\/p>\n

Can Ferrari challenge Mercedes over 2026?<\/p>\n

In theory, yes. Recent seasons have shown that the early pacesetting team can be toppled; McLaren, for instance, clinched the 2024 constructors\u2019 crown through studiously developing its MCL38 to move past both Red Bull and Ferrari in the performance stakes.\u00a0<\/p>\n

But the field was a bit more compressed across 2024 with a settled (and frozen) engine formula and less to find aerodynamically. Ferrari has, at best, a half-second gap to close down \u2013 but Mercedes will not be standing still in its own development curve. It depends on how much juice is left in Ferrari\u2019s 2026 car, and whether the engineers working at Maranello can ultimately extract it. \u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cWe are still very early on in the season,\u201d Leclerc said. \u201cSo yes, I do believe it\u2019s possible. \u201cIs it a huge challenge? It absolutely is. And I think also because Mercedes is not relaxing and will keep pushing massively as well. The point of focus at this moment of the season, at this moment of these regulations, there are many.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n

Ferrari will have to put significant stock in its development capabilities, something that served it well during its 2024 constructors\u2019 challenge and allowed the squad to benefit over the final races of the year. Perhaps the biggest potential opportunity hinges on the catch-up mechanics that the FIA has implemented for the new powertrain formula: the ADUO (Additional Development and Upgrade Opportunities) system.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"Ferrari\u2019s <\/p>\n

Ferrari\u2019s fight with McLaren for the 2024 constructors\u2019 crown was unrelenting<\/p>\n

Photo by: Zak Mauger \/ Motorsport Images<\/p>\n

Through the outputs registered by the\u00a0FIA\u2019s own sensors in the car, the governing body keeps tabs on every manufacturer\u2019s power level. If a power unit is between 2% and 4% down on the highest power output, the manufacturer gets a free upgrade \u2013 above 4%, they will be permitted two. \u00a0<\/p>\n

A spanner has been thrown into the works by the cancellation of the Bahrain and Saudi Arabian GPs, because the first checkpoint had been planned for the conclusion of round six. It remains unclear whether the checkpoint will stay in place between the Miami and Canadian races, or whether it will be at the conclusion of the calendar\u2019s sixth race \u2013 now the Monaco Grand Prix in June.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Should Ferrari find itself beyond the 2% mark, then it has an opportunity to close the deficit and hope that it can garner a bit more performance at the top end.<\/p>\n

Of course, the choice of turbo architecture will pose a natural disadvantage when it comes to performance on the straights, but there are plenty more opportunities for Ferrari to refine its design; presumably, the\u00a0powertrain engineers have already fleshed out a few concepts, ready to funnel out in the event that an upgrade is made available.<\/p>\n

We must not forget the implications of the compression ratio saga. You couldn\u2019t move during F1\u2019s\u00a0pre-season for the noise about Mercedes\u2019 alleged circumvention of the 16:1 ratio in hot conditions, but this is very likely to have been noise over very little. The decision to introduce mid-season tests to measure compression ratio during hotter temperatures at 130C reached unanimity, including Mercedes\u2019 vote, suggesting that this was not a vital component of its success.<\/p>\n

Indeed, Vasseur predicts that the changes in measuring compression ratio will not be a \u201cgame changer\u201d, and that Ferrari\u2019s hopes rest in being able to take advantage of an ADUO-influenced update. But, since the FIA will be measuring power output on the fly before determining which manufacturers can upgrade their engines, could Mercedes keep its power levels down just enough to deny Ferrari that opportunity? It\u2019s not impossible.<\/p>\n

Regardless, there\u2019s a quiet optimism in the camp, one that hasn\u2019t necessarily been attributed to Ferrari in quite some time. Mercedes may be a little bit out of reach in the short term, but nothing is ever unrecoverable.<\/p>\n

Leclerc believes it\u2019s possible to catch the Silver Arrows. You would bet that there\u2019s a significant contingent in Maranello who agree.<\/p>\n

\"Leclerc <\/p>\n

Leclerc has collected two podiums from the season\u2019s first three grands prix<\/p>\n

Photo by: Andy Hone\/ LAT Images via Getty Images<\/p>\n

Hamilton’s got his groove back<\/p>\n

It was disconcerting to listen to Lewis Hamilton during the latter phases of the 2025 season, when the optimism about his blockbuster move to Ferrari had long since slipped into the ether.<\/p>\n

When Hamilton is going through a rough patch, you know about it; despite the fact he is a globally recognised seven-time champion and has the commanding aura that comes with it, he\u2019s ultimately a man who wears his heart on his sleeve. His voice drops to a near-whisper when he\u2019s had a bit of a stinker, and the answers become slightly terser once he\u2019s decided he wants to disappear for a bit.\u00a0<\/p>\n

There\u2019s been a lot less of the downcast Hamilton so far in 2026, with a very simple reason for that: he has a competitive car that he seems to enjoy driving. \u00a0<\/p>\n

It\u2019s no secret that Hamilton didn\u2019t like the ground-effect regulations. Firstly, the Mercedes machines with which he was saddled were prone to bouncing in high-speed corners, a variable that he felt unable to control. \u00a0<\/p>\n

Secondly, the overall nature of the regulations made it much more difficult to coax the car through the slower corners; this was a grievance he shared with Max Verstappen, who found the car incredibly lazy in low-speed conditions. But this is where the similarity between the two ends: at the lower downforce levels produced by the 2026 cars, Hamilton feels a lot more at home.\u00a0<\/p>\n

There\u2019s more to this than simply the car. Hamilton has suggested that an off-season attitude shift has also contributed to a better start to 2026. He seemed to recognise that his mood and his performances went hand in hand and culminated in a dangerous cycle. The worse he felt, the worse it got. \u00a0<\/p>\n

\"A <\/p>\n

A much more upbeat Hamilton claims that at the age of 41 he is training harder than ever<\/p>\n

Photo by: Ferrari<\/p>\n

Even at the age of 41, Hamilton believes that he\u2019s training harder than any of his contemporaries on the grid.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s just a change of attitude,\u201d Hamilton explained in Japan. \u201cIt\u2019s just not letting all the BS that comes out of people\u2019s mouths surround me. In the way of knowing who I am and what I\u2019m able to do, I hope you saw that in the last two races, particularly the last race. \u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cI\u2019ll continue to try and show up this year. I\u2019ve not lost what I\u2019ve had. I\u2019m training harder than ever. I was in Tokyo between [Shanghai and Suzuka], I\u2019ve run like 100km. I know that none of the drivers I\u2019m racing against have trained as hard as I have and given it what I have, especially at my age as well. I love that I still have that drive within myself.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n

There were moments when Hamilton showed that he still had \u2018it\u2019 during his ground-effect Mercedes years; that win at Silverstone in 2024 being perhaps the most memorable \u2013 and feel-good \u2013 story in that era. But the high points were limited, and this seemed to continue as he grappled with his new environment in Maranello.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s been another off-season of change for Hamilton: new car, new race engineer, new attitude. For the time being, it seems to be working.<\/p>\n

This article is one of many in the monthly Autosport magazine. For more premium content, take a look at the May 2026 issue and subscribe today<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"With <\/p>\n

With the ground-effect era now behind him, Hamilton relishes the fact that he has a competitive car that he enjoys driving<\/p>\n

Photo by: Lintao Zhang \/ LAT Images via Getty Images<\/p>\n

We want to hear from you!<\/p>\n

Let us know what you would like to see from us in the future.<\/p>\n

Take our survey<\/a><\/p>\n

– The Autosport.com Team<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"A red-and-white bolt rushed out of its starting blocks with the pace of a startled impala and approached…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":597864,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[573],"tags":[64,63,817,826,813,816,291700,85],"class_list":["post-597863","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-formula-1","tag-au","tag-australia","tag-f1","tag-ferrari","tag-formula-1","tag-formula1","tag-how-ferrari-must-step-up-its-efforts-to-end-its-long-f1-championship-wait","tag-sports"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/597863","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=597863"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/597863\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/597864"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=597863"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=597863"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=597863"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}