{"id":621065,"date":"2026-04-21T09:17:14","date_gmt":"2026-04-21T09:17:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/621065\/"},"modified":"2026-04-21T09:17:14","modified_gmt":"2026-04-21T09:17:14","slug":"married-at-first-sight-laura-byrne-talks-danny-gia-tyson-and-what-she-learned-from-mafs-after-the-dinner-party","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/621065\/","title":{"rendered":"Married at First Sight: Laura Byrne talks Danny, Gia, Tyson and what she learned from MAFS: After the Dinner Party"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Save<\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-d1b14060-4 JmUoF\">You have reached your maximum number of saved items.<\/p>\n<p>Remove items from your <a href=\"https:\/\/www.smh.com.au\/goodfood\/saved\" class=\"sc-3f16ee48-12 sc-d1b14060-2 jyLmZI iQLtAb\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">saved list<\/a> to add more.<\/p>\n<p>AAA<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s been almost a decade since Laura Byrne first appeared on Australian screens, as a contestant on the 2017 season of The Bachelor. This year she returned to reality TV in a very different capacity.<\/p>\n<p>For the new companion series <a class=\"inline-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.smh.com.au\/culture\/tv-and-radio\/we-are-not-there-to-be-sycophants-the-mafs-spin-off-promised-nothing-was-off-limits-did-it-deliver-20260218-p5o3bk.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">MAFS: After the Dinner Party<\/a>, co-hosting with Brittany Hockley and Jules Lund, Byrne was on the other side of the drama: unpacking the week\u2019s biggest moments on Married at First Sight and interviewing the season\u2019s most contentious stars. She was at the heart of every controversy playing out in real-time, and \u2013 as a first-time TV show host \u2013 she became known for her ability to call out bad behaviour while also bringing empathy and a sense of calm.<\/p>\n<p>Related Article<a href=\"https:\/\/www.smh.com.au\/culture\/tv-and-radio\/we-are-not-there-to-be-sycophants-the-mafs-spin-off-promised-nothing-was-off-limits-did-it-deliver-20260218-p5o3bk.html\" tabindex=\"-1\" class=\"sc-cba76dee-0 hdiTqm\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Laura Byrne, Jules Lund and Brittany Hockley host Stan\u2019s new Married at First Sight spin-off, After the Dinner Party.\u00a0\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/2577cb2d8c8e66fce45606f66d3acd7fdfb12d47.jpeg\"  class=\"sc-d34e428-1 ioInpc\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Deputy TV editor Meg Watson spoke to Byrne about her anxieties about the series, why she disagrees with Tanya Plibersek\u2019s take on the show, and why fans who also \u201cfed the beast\u201d should now \u201clead with kindness\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Congrats on the end of the season! How are you feeling now you\u2019re free from MAFS? <\/p>\n<p>I\u2019m feeling great. It\u2019s nice to see my kids and my husband again! It\u2019s been really full on. Even though we only did one episode a week, I feel like I\u2019ve been stuck to my TV [watching the series]. Plus keeping up with all the TikTok, social media and media stories. We really wanted to reflect what the audience was saying and thinking about each step of the experiment.<\/p>\n<p>How did the show come about for you? <\/p>\n<p>I got approached for it. Britt also got approached. Then we did a chemistry test \u2013 with other people as well, not just with each other. Britt and I have worked together for almost eight years now, so it felt like a really organic progression of what we already do. MAFS is such a juggernaut. It takes over the media cycle for the entire season, and we\u2019ve always had conversations about it on our podcast Life Uncut. For us, this felt like a bit of a no-brainer.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Brittany Hockley and Laura Byrne, co-hosts of MAFS: After the Dinner Party.\" loading=\"eager\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/ad24763bfe9571730d8502ce775ec8b71981691f.jpeg\"  class=\"sc-d34e428-1 ldCIuB\"\/>Brittany Hockley and Laura Byrne, co-hosts of MAFS: After the Dinner Party.Stan<\/p>\n<p>At first, we thought it was going to be more of a recap show. But all the behind-the-scenes content adds so much more. There is this level of accountability with the way in which participants tell a story after the show\u2019s finished. They can\u2019t blame all of their behaviours on production or \u201ca bad edit\u201d. There were actually things so much worse that people had done off-screen that didn\u2019t make the cut \u2013 even worse than what we aired on our show.<\/p>\n<p>That behind-the-scenes video of Danny talking about Bec was obviously a big bombshell dropped on After the Dinner Party. What kind of additional clips didn\u2019t make the cut?<\/p>\n<p>I think when [any contestant\u2019s] bad behaviour has been established, there\u2019s no benefit in showing more of the same bad behaviour. People already understand. We made the call to not have a pile-on situation on certain participants.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Rachel and Bec were confronted by Danny\u2019s shocking behind-the-scenes footage on MAFS: After the Dinner Party.\" loading=\"eager\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/806ab50d0ddf89972f75fdeea1980a84d53df960.jpeg\"  class=\"sc-d34e428-1 ldCIuB\"\/>Rachel and Bec were confronted by Danny\u2019s shocking behind-the-scenes footage on MAFS: After the Dinner Party.Stan<\/p>\n<p>MAFS has been a big conversation-starter on Life Uncut, but this series (aired by Stan, which is owned by Nine*) has an association with the show itself. Were you worried about being able to keep your authentic voice and independence when discussing a series which can be so controversial?<\/p>\n<p>The only reason Britt and I said yes to this is because we were told \u2013 and it was absolutely the truth \u2013 that we were chosen to do the show is because they wanted our opinions. Good or bad. We had every right to challenge the participants, to challenge the experiment in different ways. We could speak the way that we wanted to speak about it. <\/p>\n<p>My biggest apprehension about the show wasn\u2019t about maintaining my own integrity, it was about the interview aspect. We\u2019ve done hundreds of interviews for Life Uncut, but I\u2019ve never been in a situation where I\u2019ve had to interview someone where I really don\u2019t believe in their values. I went into this wondering how I\u2019m going to go with someone like a Tyson or a Danny. But actually, I think it\u2019s the thing I enjoyed the most.<\/p>\n<p>I really enjoyed being in those situations where there was a debate or a discussion \u2013 and figuring out how to navigate those types of conversations with accountability, but also with empathy.<\/p>\n<p>That interview with Tyson, where he talked about wanting a \u201csubmissive\u201d woman, was a flashpoint of the series. I think everyone agrees you did a great job holding him to account. But there was a big debate about the amplification of his comments. Social services minister Tanya Plibersek even weighed in, playing footage of your interview on social media, and saying <a class=\"inline-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.smh.com.au\/politics\/federal\/plibersek-blasts-mafs-for-featuring-contestant-who-wanted-a-woman-obedient-like-a-dog-20260304-p5o7c5.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">this kind of rhetoric shouldn\u2019t be on our TV networks at all.<\/a> What was your response to that?<\/p>\n<p>I don\u2019t know if I agree with that for a couple of reasons. I understand why we say this, and I understand why people have a strong reaction to MAFS. But I don\u2019t agree when people say, \u201cOh, it\u2019s promoting bullying or XYZ.\u201d I actually think it does the opposite. It creates so much online conversation around why something is problematic behaviour.<\/p>\n<p>Related Article<a href=\"https:\/\/www.smh.com.au\/politics\/federal\/plibersek-blasts-mafs-for-featuring-contestant-who-wanted-a-woman-obedient-like-a-dog-20260304-p5o7c5.html\" tabindex=\"-1\" class=\"sc-cba76dee-0 hdiTqm\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Minister for Social Services Tanya Plibersek.\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/5cc874c25c01783bd2f5b2f44eb7632455881698.jpeg\"  class=\"sc-d34e428-1 ioInpc\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The reality is, people like Tyson who have those belief systems are out there. They are real men who speak like this in everyday life all the time. People are dating them. They\u2019re walking among us. The producers don\u2019t have to look hard to find those people. So I think it\u2019s important for a social experiment like this to show the full breadth of different types of personality traits and belief systems. It brings those conversations to the forefront.<\/p>\n<p>I think for younger audiences that are watching it, or people who are dating, it gives them an understanding of certain behaviours. It\u2019s like, \u201cOh, that\u2019s the red flag I\u2019m going to look out for.\u201d That\u2019s why we all can relate so much while watching MAFS. Yes, we watch it for the drama. But we also relate to at least one couple or experience on there.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Bec Zacharia (left) looks shocked as Tyson Gordon faces off with Laura Byrne, Brittany Hockley and Jules Lund on MAFS: After the Dinner Party, which screens on Stan.\" loading=\"eager\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/1772597712_781_337cb99e1bcf417a1222b06e3dc4d274bee2de7e.jpeg\"  class=\"sc-d34e428-1 ldCIuB\"\/>Bec Zacharia (left) looks shocked as Tyson Gordon faces off with Laura Byrne, Brittany Hockley and Jules Lund on MAFS: After the Dinner Party, which screens on Stan.<\/p>\n<p>Where do you think the line should be drawn, though? It\u2019s one thing to have problematic language or beliefs, but then there are issues like broader coercive control. And last season there was a physical incident with <a class=\"inline-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.smh.com.au\/culture\/tv-and-radio\/toxic-and-unacceptable-backlash-grows-as-police-probe-mafs-incident-20250303-p5lges.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">one groom punching the wall<\/a>. Is there a line for what should be up for discussion in this \u201csocial experiment\u201d? <\/p>\n<p>Absolutely. There is a line \u2013 and I don\u2019t think that line has been crossed. But also, it\u2019s not scripted. The production has not sat down and been like, \u201cThis is what\u2019s going to happen.\u201d There are also so many safety protocols on these shows, so I do believe that they have a good duty of care for their participants.<\/p>\n<p>If you had to put a percentage on it, having now met them, how many MAFS contestants are there for love and how many are there for the drama and fame?<\/p>\n<p>Honestly, I don\u2019t know! It\u2019s really hard to tell. Sometimes people go on these sorts of shows genuinely wanting to meet someone, but then if they don\u2019t meet a great match, then their fallback is fame \u2013 to get something out of it. It\u2019s the next best thing.<\/p>\n<p>We do still see incredible relationships, like Stella and Filip. They\u2019re engaged, living together and so happy. There\u2019s been quite a few success stories of people who are now married and have beautiful babies, but that sometimes gets lost among the drama.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Filip and Stella were the successful love story of Married at First Sight this year.\" loading=\"eager\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/97e4a361a1ff5f84f8d63952a78ef3390437c23d.jpeg\"  class=\"sc-d34e428-1 ldCIuB\"\/>Filip and Stella were the successful love story of Married at First Sight this year.Stan<\/p>\n<p>As a former reality star yourself, do you feel like viewers are too hard on contestants?<\/p>\n<p>I think that audiences see contestants as two-dimensional people. An edit can portray someone that way. But we\u2019re not characters. We\u2019re not all bad or all good. That doesn\u2019t exist. People are complex. And I think the thing that was so great about our show is sitting down and having conversations about people\u2019s faults and vulnerabilities and insecurities. <\/p>\n<p>Audiences love to have a villain \u2013 and there is such little empathy for the fact that they\u2019re also a human. The pile-on is way worse than anything that that person did on the screen 99.9% of the time. Some of these contestants receive death threats afterwards. They get told that their lives are not worth living. There\u2019s nothing that anyone has done on this season of the show that warrants that.<\/p>\n<p>Sometimes people need to step away from a little bit and be like, OK, you know what? These people entertained us for the last eight weeks. Love them or hate them, you were entertained. You watched every episode. You fed the beast as well. Leave them alone.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Danny makes a surprise appearance on the last epsiode of MAFS: After the Dinner Party, hosted by Laura Byrne and Brittany Hockley.\" loading=\"eager\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/b7895521e1bd5b327ec3eec0242aaaf6082f565d.jpeg\"  class=\"sc-d34e428-1 ldCIuB\"\/>Danny makes a surprise appearance on the last epsiode of MAFS: After the Dinner Party, hosted by Laura Byrne and Brittany Hockley.Stan<\/p>\n<p>It doesn\u2019t make me keen to go on a reality show &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s a gamble! There is really awesome stuff that does come out of it, for some of these people, like Filip and Stella, and there will be people whose lives are forever changed. The contestants from this year are still in the washing machine of figuring out what life will hold for them. And I think that we can all probably lead with a bit of kindness towards it on social media.<\/p>\n<p>Will you be back next season?<\/p>\n<p>We don\u2019t know yet! We have no idea whether it\u2019s being commissioned for next season but yeah, watch this space. People have such an appetite for more.<\/p>\n<p>MAFS: After The Dinner Party is streaming now on Stan*.<\/p>\n<p>*Stan is owned by Nine, which also owns this masthead. <\/p>\n<p>Want more TV? We\u2019ve got you.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Save You have reached your maximum number of saved items. Remove items from your saved list to add&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":621066,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[64,63,134],"class_list":{"0":"post-621065","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-entertainment","8":"tag-au","9":"tag-australia","10":"tag-entertainment"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/621065","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=621065"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/621065\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/621066"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=621065"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=621065"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=621065"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}