Is Australia giving away its gas resources, virtually for free? <\/p>\n
That question is at the centre of this week\u2019s parliamentary inquiry<\/a> into the taxation of gas resources.<\/p>\n Over the last decade, Australia has become one of the world\u2019s largest exporters<\/a> of liquefied natural gas.<\/p>\n But while the gas is extracted from beneath Australian soils, the profits go almost entirely to large multinational companies. Research suggests gas companies have made roughly $A149 billion<\/a> from exports in just four years. Only a small percentage of this profit has been taxed.<\/p>\n That\u2019s why some politicians<\/a>, think tanks and environmental groups are pushing for a 25% tax<\/a> on gas exports.<\/p>\n Modelling by the Australia Institute suggests this tax could raise up to $17 billion<\/a> a year and potentially lower<\/a> domestic fuel prices by incentivising producers to sell more gas into the Australian market.<\/p>\n How is gas currently taxed?<\/p>\n Currently, Australia\u2019s main tax on gas exports is the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax<\/a>.<\/p>\n Profits made by companies running oil and gas projects are taxed at up to 40%. At present, this tax mainly applies<\/a> to offshore producers.<\/p>\n While this sounds good, the tax is less effective in practice. Energy companies have access to generous tax deductions as well as \u201cuplifts\u201d, which allow companies to use the losses from one year to offset the amount of tax they pay the next year. The rationale for allowing uplifts was to incentivise companies to invest in Australian oil and gas projects by letting them recover costs. <\/p>\n The problem is this system allows oil and gas companies to pay little, if any, tax on their profits. As a result, economists and policy analysts have argued<\/a> this tax is no longer fit for purpose, particularly given how much gas<\/a> we export.<\/p>\n Read more: Onshore liquefied natural gas producers in Queensland are exempt, but are still required to pay the standard 30% company tax rate. <\/p>\n But oil and gas companies are often able to reduce<\/a> how much they pay here too, using various deductions and accounting practices. This is because the money they spend on construction, drilling and infrastructure is immediately deductible.<\/p>\n The governments of states where onshore gas companies are active can also impose royalties<\/a>. These are payments which mining companies must make to the owner of the natural resources \u2013 the state government in most cases \u2013 for the right to extract them. <\/p>\n Read more: Royalties are different from taxes in that they are payments for the right to exploit a public resource. The royalty rate is based on the raw value<\/a> of the oil and gas produced, rather than profit. Companies must pay royalties even if a project is losing money. In Queensland, gas producers pay between 5% and 10%<\/a> of their revenue in tax. This can generate significant income, but nowhere near as much as a profit-based tax designed with fewer loopholes. That\u2019s because royalties do not scale with profitability. <\/p>\n Australia\u2019s gas export industry has long been under-regulated, particularly on the east coast. For many years producers have simply exported as much gas as possible. <\/p>\n But this is gradually changing. In 2023, the government introduced a mandatory gas code requiring producers to first offer gas domestically on fair, transparent terms. From 2027, the government will require producers to reserve some gas<\/a> for the domestic market. <\/p>\n Looking overseas<\/p>\n Nations such as Norway<\/a> tax their natural resource exports much more robustly. <\/p>\n The Norwegian government applies two taxes to petroleum profits \u2013 a 22% company tax and a 56% special petroleum tax \u2013 which mean companies are taxed on roughly 78% of their profits. Its taxation rules are stricter and more standardised, meaning companies have less scope to carry forward large deductions. The funds raised go to the Government Pension Fund Global, previously known as the Petroleum Fund of Norway<\/a>, now worth more than $3 trillion<\/a>. The fund was established in 1990 to shield the economy<\/a> from oil industry volatility.<\/p>\n Gas giant Qatar<\/a> also has a high-taxation system giving it a large share of oil and gas profits. Qatar uses these funds<\/a> to subsidise health care, education and public infrastructure.<\/p>\n Even countries with limited domestic energy resources use these taxes. In 1978, Japan introduced a tax<\/a> on oil and gas imports. This tax generates significant revenue, raising roughly $8 billion in 2025 alone. <\/p>\n In March, a proposal to introduce a 25% gas tax was defeated in the Australian Senate. But advocates aren\u2019t giving up<\/a>. They point to high public support<\/a> amid soaring energy prices<\/a>. <\/p>\n Read more: Why tax gas exports?<\/p>\n A 25% tax on gas exports would be applied as a flat tax on the value of gas exports, rather than the profits gas companies make from those exports. It\u2019s similar to a royalty, but instead would be calculated as a percentage of the exported product.<\/p>\n This approach would simplify<\/a> the tax system and could not be minimised in the same way as the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax and company tax.<\/p>\n An exports tax would also raise significant public revenue, estimated at $17 billion<\/a> annually. That\u2019s enough to provide free childcare or tertiary education for Australians. The revenue could also help reduce government debt, which reached a record $1.6 trillion<\/a> in 2025.<\/p>\n Backers argue the tax would boost domestic gas supply<\/a>, as it would encourage producers to avoid the tax by selling more<\/a> gas locally. This could help lower domestic energy prices, an urgent concern<\/a> for many businesses and households.<\/p>\n Read more: What are the downsides?<\/p>\n Critics argue the tax would discourage<\/a> companies from investing in new gas projects, which could reduce gas availability and affect regional jobs.<\/p>\n Opponents also claim the tax would undermine<\/a> Australia\u2019s reputation as a stable and predictable country to invest in.<\/p>\n Another concern is a 25% tax could make Australia less competitive in global energy markets, particularly compared to lower-cost producers such as Qatar. It may also cause legal issues<\/a> if applied to existing export agreements.<\/p>\n The bottom line<\/p>\n For decades, we\u2019ve allowed foreign companies to earn billions of dollars from our gas sector, and to be taxed very little.<\/p>\n So despite concerns it may affect gas industry employment and investment, introducing a 25% gas exports tax would ensure all Australians benefit from these public, state-owned resources<\/a>.<\/p>\n
\n Is there really untold oil wealth in Queensland\u2019s Taroom Trough? Here\u2019s why scepticism is warranted<\/a><\/p>\n
\n Heading north: how the export boom is shaking up Australia\u2019s gas market<\/a><\/p>\n
\n More Australian LNG to Singapore flagged as Albanese looks to strengthen oil supply chain<\/a><\/p>\n
\n Why Middle East gas field attacks could send energy prices soaring<\/a><\/p>\n