![\"Drone](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Drone-radar-reveals.jpg\")
<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
\n Silhouetted against the blue sky, a drone carrying a ground-penetrating radar instrument lifts off from Galena Creek Rock Glacier in Wyoming. \u2014 Jack W. Holt <\/p>\n
Understanding how to explore hidden glaciers on Mars begins not in a laboratory, but in remote field camps across Alaska and Wyoming.<\/p>\n
Armed with mosquito repellent, bear spray and drone batteries charged by a generator the night before, a team of researchers at the University of Arizona spent long days driving off-road, hiking rugged terrain and launching drones.<\/p>\n
In a study published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, the team demonstrated that ground-penetrating radar mounted on drones can map the thickness of rocky debris covering glaciers on Earth. These results could help future astronauts locate accessible water locked in buried ice on the Red Planet.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Drone-radar-reveals1-1024x528.png\")
<\/p>\n
Bulk thickness and supraglacial debris thickness in the lower section of Sourdough Rock Glacier. (a) Bulk thickness retrieved from DGPR, surveyed in 2022. (b) Bulk thickness retrieved from surface-based ground-penetrating radar (GPR) centered at 50 and 100 MHz, surveyed in 2019 and 2021. Bulk thickness values in panels a and b were depth-corrected with an electromagnetic wave speed of 0.149 m\/ns (\u03f5\u2019 = 4). (c) Supraglacial debris thickness retrieved from DGPR, surveyed in 2022. (d) Supraglacial debris thickness retrieved from surface-based GPR centered at 100 and 200 MHz, surveyed in 2018 and 2019. Debris thickness values in panels c and d were depth-corrected with an electromagnetic wave speed of 0.1 m\/ns (\u03f5\u2019 = 9). \u2014 JGR Planets<\/p>\n
\u201cIf you want to make decisions about where to drill on Mars, you need to know if the ice you\u2019re trying to find is under one meter of debris or 10,\u201d said Roberto Aguilar, a doctoral researcher at the University of Arizona Lunar and Planetary Laboratory and first author of the paper. \u201cThat\u2019s the kind of information a drone-based system could provide.\u201d<\/p>\n
Most people picture glaciers as massive blocks of exposed ice, dusted with bright white, powdery snow. Debris-covered glaciers, however, appear very different, with their icy core hidden by thick layers of rock and sediment. These glaciers are found in mountainous regions on Earth, including warmer areas such as Colorado and California, where debris helps insulate and keep the ice underneath from melting.<\/p>\n
On Mars, debris-covered glaciers are found in mid-latitude regions, halfway between the equator and the polar caps. According to Aguilar, some Martian ice deposits occur in craters that have been filled with ice and later covered by dust. Others form in large valleys where ice accumulated and was subsequently buried by debris. In mountainous regions, rockfall can also act as a protective layer, shielding the underlying ice from escaping into the atmosphere.<\/p>\n
\u201cSome of these deposits are large enough that radars on orbiting spacecraft can detect and estimate the amount of ice, but current technology cannot determine fine details, such as how thick the overlying debris layer is, or if there are internal, rocky layers hidden from view,\u201d Aguilar said.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Drone-radar-reveals2-1024x559.png\")
<\/p>\n
Galena Creek rock glacier (RG), Wyoming. (a) Oblique image acquired in August 2024, highlighting the cirque and the transition from an ice-cored debris-covered glacier to an ice-cemented RG in the steepest section of the glacier, and the glacier toe. (b) Satellite image acquired in 2022, map projected to WGS 84\/UTM Zone 12N. Magenta Star is the location of the weather station. The yellow box inset is the map shown in Figures 8 and 10. (c) The headwall, as observed from the cirque, marked as C in panel b. (d) DGPR operations at Galena Creek, marked as D in panel b. \u2014 JGR Planets<\/p>\n
The researchers believe drone radar could solve the problem by scouting out glacier ice and mapping rocky debris on top of it. Instead of drilling blindly through layers of rock and dust, mission planners could target sites where ice lies closest to the surface.<\/p>\n
According to Aguilar, buried ice could be one of Mars\u2019 most valuable resources. Water ice on Mars could preserve a record of past environmental conditions, support future astronauts through drinking water supplies, oxygen production and agriculture, and help guide drilling for astrobiology research.<\/p>\n
To get there, however, the team first needed to test the approach on Earth.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe already knew ground-penetrating radar works, but this was the first time we mounted it to drones and tested how we could put it into practice,\u201d said Aguilar. \u201cFor instance, we learned at what altitude and speed the drone should fly, as well as the importance of flying in the direction of the glacier\u2019s flow, and how to make sure the radar was properly aligned to detect the ice.\u201d<\/p>\n
The team focused on sites in Alaska and Wyoming, where years of research had already provided clues about glacier thickness and composition.<\/p>\n
\u201cThese debris-covered glaciers on Earth are some of the best analogs we have for similar glaciers that spacecraft have photographed on Mars,\u201d Aguilar said. \u201cWhile this ground-penetrating radar doesn\u2019t work in every terrain, we found the technology could be applied to planetary exploration, including identifying potential drilling sites on Mars.\u201d<\/p>\n
The team compared measurements obtained with radar to those from excavating and drilling into the glaciers. The measurements of debris thickness matched, validating their method as reliable and effective.<\/p>\n
Because drones can fly much closer to the surface than orbiting spacecraft, they can image the ground at much higher resolution. This allowed the researchers to not only estimate debris thickness but also assess the purity of the ice and spot any rocky layers hidden inside.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe internal layers we\u2019re seeing are important because they\u2019re a record of past climate cycles,\u201d Aguilar said. \u201cEach layer represents a different period of ice accumulation and environmental conditions over centuries or millennia, and it is likely we would see similar layers on Mars.\u201d<\/p>\n
The team also used simulations to make sure that the radar wasn\u2019t being fooled by nearby trees or boulders. They were able to confirm that the signals were coming from below the rubble.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe are filling the gap between today\u2019s orbital observations and a more distant future, where astronauts land on Mars and make observations on the ground,\u201d said Aguilar. \u201cThis gives us a way to investigate the glaciers now, from the air.\u201d<\/p>\n
Testing that future technology was rarely glamorous. In Alaska, it meant carrying gear through mosquito swarms and rough terrain. In Wyoming, the field season often meant hauling equipment deeper into the mountains. Some days, the team hiked across boulder fields to reach specific targets higher on the glacier.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s not fun walking on those rocks,\u201d Aguilar said. \u201cThat\u2019s why it\u2019s better to fly a drone.\u201d<\/p>\n