The NCAA has already informed Sorsby\u2019s legal team that it will not negotiate a settlement to get Sorsby back on the field, per sources. Getting the injunction would mean Sorsby could play while his case is in court. But to land it, his lawyers will have to prove a likelihood that he\u2019d win the case, and the rules around NCAA athletes and gambling are pretty black and white here (and they have Sorsby\u2019s admission).<\/p>\n
If the court denies the injunction, I\u2019d expect Sorsby to enter the NFL\u2019s supplemental draft ahead of the league\u2019s June 22 deadline to apply.<\/p>\n
As we reported last week<\/a>, the NFL has given Sorsby\u2019s camp a window of July 5 to 12 to work out for teams should he enter the supplemental draft. The expectation would then be that he\u2019d have a pro day in the Dallas area and perhaps do a couple of private workouts for teams that show interest. The draft would be in late July.<\/p>\n This is only getting more interesting, especially with a number of teams that didn\u2019t spend top-50 picks on quarterbacks in April having their eyes on the 2027 class<\/a>, and a few, like the Steelers and Colts, still could take a swing here.<\/p>\n If Sorsby is in the supplemental draft, another question will be whether the NFL takes any action against him, like it did against Terrelle Pryor in 2011.<\/p>\n Minnesota Vikings<\/p>\n The Vikings\u2019 GM search is reaching its final stages, with interim GM Rob Brzezinski and Bills assistant GM Terrance Gray having interviewed on Tuesday, and Seahawks assistant GM Nolan Teasley, Broncos assistant GM Reed Burckhardt and Rams assistant GM John McKay scheduled for Wednesday and Thursday. After that, it\u2019ll be decision time.<\/p>\n One thing that\u2019s been ruminated on is the potential that the Vikings could go to a Lions and Rams type of model, essentially splitting the job, with Brzezinski running the operations side (like Mike Disner in Detroit or Tony Pastoors in Los Angeles), and one of the external candidates running the scouting side (like Brad Holmes in Detroit or Les Snead in Los Angeles). But there is a complication with that.<\/p>\n Somewhere along the line, the Vikings would have to declare who ultimately is in charge of the primary football operation. So, say Minnesota wants to promote Brzezinski to president of football ops and tab a GM from that pool of four candidates. If that made Brzezinski the primary football exec, then those candidates could, theoretically, be blocked by their current teams from going to Minnesota. I don\u2019t think those teams would do that, but they could.<\/p>\n I\u2019d also add that I think communication with ownership is going to be key for whomever winds up in charge. The Wilfs live in New Jersey and want someone they can trust who will serve their best interests in heading up the team. Which is one area where Brzezinski, who has worked for the team since before the Wilfs bought it in 2005, has an edge, and why the family would almost certainly want to keep him aboard in a prominent role, regardless of the structure.<\/p>\n A.J. Brown<\/p>\n We touched on the looming A.J. Brown trade in the takeaways Monday<\/a>, with the expectation it\u2019ll come next week.<\/p>\n And I still believe the throughway to satisfying the Eagles\u2019 desire for a first-round pick is pushing that return into 2028. Philadelphia GM Howie Roseman has been amenable to such compromises in the past\u2014he took a 2026 third-rounder for Haason Reddick in March 2024\u2014because he has the job security to do so. Also, such a compromise was already discussed between the Eagles and a team other than the Patriots a couple of months ago, at which point Philly would\u2019ve been accepting a pick three drafts away.<\/p>\n It\u2019s a small difference, but the 2028 first-rounder is now two drafts away, which creates a parallel to what the Jets received for Quinnen Williams\u2014the Cowboys centered their package for Williams, in fall 2025, around a 2027 first-round pick\u2014that Roseman was using as a trade comp in the first place.<\/p>\n Anyway, Roseman has been smart and patient, allowing time to smoke out any suitors over the past couple of months in case unforeseen circumstances arise elsewhere. But I think in the end, as I said in the Monday column, this will wrap up the way we all expect it to.<\/p>\n Browns defensive end Myles Garrett set the NFL record for sacks in a single season with 23 in 2025. | Joseph Maiorana-Imagn Images<\/p>\n Cleveland Browns<\/p>\n I was asked on Cleveland radio again on Tuesday about the possibility of the Browns trading Myles Garrett. The breadcrumbs have been there for a while. Two months ago, the team and Garrett\u2019s camp agreed to delay the execution of a $29.2 million option bonus from late March to a week before the regular season begins, making a trade more feasible in that Cleveland got more runway to send the entirety of his 2026 compensation away with him. Then, last week, Todd Monken told reporters that he hadn\u2019t yet met with Garrett.<\/p>\n Obviously, you can add those two realities to the fact that, come June 1, the cap damage can be spread over two years, and you might think something is up.<\/p>\n I wouldn\u2019t rule anything out. And I\u2019ve said this before, I think it makes sense for Cleveland to move Garrett now. He\u2019s still a great player<\/a>, and he\u2019d bring a massive haul. But his timeline doesn\u2019t really align with those of the 2025 and 2026 draft classes that Cleveland hopes will lay the foundation for the franchise moving forward. Which means the Browns have to be honest with themselves about where they are, and how likely it is that those guys come of age, and a quarterback is entrenched, while Garrett\u2019s still in his prime.<\/p>\n Where you don\u2019t want to be is in a place where Garrett falls off, or his trade value tumbles because you waited too long, just as all the young talent comes together. So I\u2019d look at it, for sure. And I wouldn\u2019t be stunned if, quietly, they have.<\/p>\n The NFL needs to be careful about compromising its Sunday schedule. | Kirby Lee-Imagn Images<\/p>\n NFL schedule<\/p>\n I agree with Jason Kelce\u2019s take<\/a> on the sanctity of Sunday football, and believe the NFL needs to be careful about deconstructing Sunday afternoons as aggressively as it has.<\/p>\n First, I\u2019ll give you the numbers. In the afternoon windows, there are 13 total games in only two of the 18 weeks of the season. There are 12 games in the two windows on four occasions, 11 on six occasions, 10 on four Sundays, and then nine (Week 12) and eight (Week 17) on the two holiday weekends. By comparison, in 2006, 11 games were the low-water mark, and it was only that low twice. Fans got 12 afternoon games on nine of the 17 Sundays, with two weeks of 13 and four of 14.<\/p>\n Then, there\u2019s the reality that better games are going to Monday and Thursday nights now than was the case then (2006 was the year that Sunday Night Football became the bigger ticket package than MNF), better games are going to the holidays, and you have flex scheduling used primarily to enhance the appeal of standalone games.<\/p>\n That\u2019s how you end up with this on the Sunday after Christmas: Patriots at Jets, Browns at Ravens, Chargers at Dolphins, and Cardinals at Saints at 1 p.m. ET; and Titans at Raiders, and 49ers at Chiefs (I do like that one) at 4-ish p.m. ET, with the two least appealing games to fall out of a Saturday grouping into this Sunday slate.<\/p>\n So why am I with Kelce on this? I learned to consume the NFL a certain way, and remember coming home from mass on Sunday to a buffet of games at 1 p.m. ET, knowing that I\u2019d get John Madden and Pat Summerall on Joe Montana\u2019s 49ers or an NFC East showdown later. Maybe I\u2019m drunk on nostalgia, but I think that formula works, because if you get stuck with a bad game (or a good matchup that turns into a bad game) on Sunday afternoon, there\u2019d always be another one to turn to. Tear that down, and you risk people changing their viewing habits.<\/p>\n And excuse me if I\u2019m missing something, but I\u2019m not so sure the NBA or NHL having a game on every night ever gave them an edge over the NFL that had scarcity on its side. I\u2019d actually argue that it did the opposite. So, as someone who cares about the health of football, from my humble perch, I\u2019d say: be careful, NFL, about simply clearing every nickel off the table.<\/p>\n Los Angeles Chargers<\/p>\n Chargers safety Derwin James\u2019s three-year, $75.6 million extension<\/a> is well-deserved, and for more than one reason.<\/p>\n First, James has been the tip of the spear for Jim Harbaugh as he\u2019s built his sort of culture in Los Angeles the past couple of years. I remember being at Chargers camp two summers ago, and the running joke was that Harbaugh wanted everyone to do as Derwin would because he saw in James what he wanted in a football player. So program-wise, he\u2019s an incredible fit.<\/p>\n Second, as a player, and scheme-wise, he\u2019s what Kyle Hamilton\u2019s become in Baltimore, and what Nick Emmanwori was in the playoffs for Seattle\u2014the freakish, supersized safety that effectively allows the Chargers to treat their nickel as a base defense. In the Super Bowl, the Seahawks, in another Ravens-style scheme, had three safeties on the field for 70 or 71 snaps, because, with Emmanwori out there as a hybrid, the Patriots couldn\u2019t run them out of the scheme. James gives the Chargers that sort of edge every week.<\/p>\n Third, and this is more of a personal thing\u2014given the catastrophic injuries James had in college, it\u2019s just really cool to see him get to a third contract on the doorstep of his 30th birthday. Fighting through what he has to make it, to me, is another good sign that this money, way above what any other safety has made, will prove to be very well-spent.<\/p>\n Tennessee Titans<\/p>\n I\u2019ve seen some buzz around Titans rookie Carnell Tate, and I can add a little something to it. I had someone there tell me something to the effect of, \u201cEither he\u2019s really, really good, or we\u2019re in trouble at receiver.\u201d Yeah, the comment was made a little tongue-in-cheek. But it also reflects a real belief that Tate should become a focal point in Brian Daboll\u2019s passing game, and for Cam Ward, relatively quickly.<\/p>\n Packers running back Josh Jacobs has been charged with battery\/domestic abuse, criminal damage to property\/domestic abuse, disorderly conduct\/domestic abuse, strangulation and suffocation and intimidation of a victim. | Mike Dinovo-Imagn Images<\/p>\n Green Bay Packers<\/p>\n Obviously, the allegations against Josh Jacobs<\/a> are very serious and go well beyond football. But there is a football component to this<\/a>, and absent Jacobs, the Packers\u2019 leading returning rusher from last year would be Jordan Love. The rest of the running backs on the roster combined for 106 yards on 27 carries without a touchdown, and all of that production belonged to fourth-year man Chris Brooks.<\/p>\n Kansas City Chiefs<\/p>\n![\"Cleveland](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/01ksmzw05rn8zpcg62f3.jpg\" "\\"Cleveland")
<\/p>\n![\"NFL](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/01ksn0001n7cndgkmprk.jpg\" "\\"NFL")
<\/p>\n![\"Green](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/01ksmzpxzraw16v0px7g.jpg\" "\\"Green")
<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/assets.minutemediacdn.com\/platform\/google_discover_icon.svg\"){kind=icon}
Add us as a preferred source on Google