{"id":700467,"date":"2026-05-28T17:37:16","date_gmt":"2026-05-28T17:37:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/700467\/"},"modified":"2026-05-28T17:37:16","modified_gmt":"2026-05-28T17:37:16","slug":"verstappen-and-sainz-urge-fia-to-be-tough-but-f1-manufacturers-must-look-in-the-mirror","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/700467\/","title":{"rendered":"Verstappen and Sainz urge FIA \u201cto be tough\u201d, but F1 manufacturers must look in the mirror"},"content":{"rendered":"

While Montreal produced entertaining racing on track, the paddock was dominated by one topic in particular: 2027. Ahead of the Canadian Grand Prix, the FIA announced that there is an agreement in principle to alter the split between the internal combustion engine and electrical power to 60-40<\/a>, with the aim of making the combustion engine more prominent again.<\/p>\n

As the weekend progressed, it became clear that the words \u201cin principle\u201d were doing a lot of the heavy lifting in that statement. As is so often the case in F1, the political reality proved far more complicated than it initially appeared.<\/p>\n

That also became clear to Max\u00a0Verstappen<\/a>, who spoke positively about the proposed direction on Thursday and said it would \u201cdefinitely help\u201d to keep him in Formula 1 next year. Once he realised how complicated matters behind the scenes actually are,\u00a0Verstappen warned that it would be \u201cmentally not doable\u201d for him to continue if the changes were ultimately blocked by political games.<\/p>\n

The fact that the race in Montreal \u2013 just like the one in Miami \u2013 felt more natural than the grands prix\u00a0before the April break changes nothing in that regard. Verstappen argued that the entertainment value is not a credit to the regulations and that F1 drivers could still put on a show even in rental cars.<\/p>\n

The Dutchman received support from many other drivers in the media pen. When asked by\u00a0Autosport, several explained that despite the visual improvements for fans, the underlying problems from the cockpit remain unchanged.<\/p>\n

\u201cSometimes it’s really easy to overtake a car, but then you get overtaken straight back on the next straight. It\u2019s still hard to kind of get that rhythm where you feel like you’re really racing,\u201d said Alex Albon<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt’s almost like sometimes the differences in speed [are so big] that you kind of don’t even want to defend because it almost feels dangerous to start moving around down the straight. So you kind of just stay in one position and let the other car get you back.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"The <\/p>\n

The FIA is proposing engine changes for 2027, but some manufacturers are not in favour<\/p>\n

Photo by: Guido De Bortoli \/ LAT Images via Getty Images<\/p>\n

It means that almost all drivers seem to agree that more changes are needed to make the racing feel more natural again \u2013 starting with the 60-40 split for 2027.<\/p>\n

What Sainz really meant by his appeal to the FIA<\/p>\n

Once it became clear that this issue is heavily political,\u00a0Verstappen and Carlos Sainz<\/a> were among those urging the FIA \u201cto be tough\u201d. That is easier said than done, however. The FIA was able to do so with the revised start procedure, where it could push through changes on safety grounds.<\/p>\n

The potential 2027 changes though do not appear to be a direct safety issue, even if drivers continue to argue that the closing speeds remain too extreme. But if the FIA cannot play the safety card, then the governing body appears limited in what it can do to force through changes.<\/p>\n

\u201cObviously, everyone needs to agree. But at the same time, if it’s for the good of the sport, for the good of the racing and the show, I’m a big fan of the rulers taking a very strong approach and strong stance on it”\u00a0Carlos Sainz<\/p>\n

In that case, it primarily comes down to securing a\u00a0supermajority among the power unit manufacturers, requiring support from four out of six parties. Readers may wonder why there are six manufacturers when there are currently only five different power units, but that is because General Motors (Cadillac) has officially signed up and therefore also has voting rights.<\/p>\n

When\u00a0Autosport asked Sainz what he exactly meant by telling the FIA \u201cto be tough\u201d if the governing body cannot intervene on safety grounds, he clarified:\u00a0\u201cI know. I know it is actually [difficult]. When I said that, thinking about it, I think there’s a commission where you can vote and the teams have a vote. I guess that’s where I was saying to the FIA and FOM to push it through and stay committed to it.<\/p>\n

\u201cBecause if they say it should be like that, I’m pretty sure teams that are complaining or maybe not fully aligned with them, they will have no other choice than to do it.\u00a0Obviously, everyone needs to agree. But at the same time, if it’s for the good of the sport, for the good of the racing and the show, I’m a big fan of the rulers taking a very strong approach and strong stance on it.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"Sainz, <\/p>\n

Sainz, like Verstappen, is a big critic of the 2026 regulations<\/p>\n

Photo by: Minas Panagiotakis \/ Getty Images<\/p>\n

Ultimately, it still comes down to gathering the required support, but\u00a0Sainz would at least like to see the FIA take a clear stance ahead of the vote and explain to opposing manufacturers why the changes are necessary.<\/p>\n

Why Ferrari could give the FIA a headache<\/p>\n

Although that is a valid point, several manufacturers also need to look in the mirror. To begin with, it is important to acknowledge that political interests exist on all sides \u2013 including among those supporting the changes.<\/p>\n

Red Bull and Mercedes<\/a> are both in favour, but that is hardly surprising. As a company, Red Bull naturally has less interest in electrification than some others and it also employs\u00a0Verstappen, the most outspoken driver on this subject.<\/p>\n

Mercedes says it is acting in the best interests of the series and is potentially willing to give up an advantage \u2013 considering the manufacturer is currently leading \u2013 but changing the engine regulations for 2027 could also create development opportunities for the German marque that otherwise would not exist.<\/p>\n

Mercedes does not appear to qualify for\u00a0ADUO, meaning that under stable regulations only its rivals would receive development opportunities while the Silver Arrows would not. Changes to the rules may therefore not be such bad news after all.<\/p>\n

That immediately brings us to one of the manufacturers that has consistently opposed the changes so far: Ferrari. According to the\u00a0FIA, the Scuderia is particularly focused on ADUO and has therefore tried to steer all discussions behind the scenes in that direction.<\/p>\n

The Italian manufacturer is concerned that potential changes for next year could affect the ADUO system, which is currently Ferrari’s main focus. Besides that, the team stresses that the same people responsible for implementing ADUO upgrades would also have to absorb any potential 2027 rule changes.<\/p>\n

\"Ferrari <\/p>\n

Ferrari is opposed to the 2027 regulation tweak<\/p>\n

Photo by: Guido De Bortoli \/ LAT Images via Getty Images<\/p>\n

Although it is understandable to a certain extent that Ferrari is looking at its own competitive position \u2013 wanting development opportunities for itself while preferring Mercedes not to have them \u2013 the Scuderia also needs to look in the mirror.<\/p>\n

Both Ferrari drivers have once again made clear in recent weeks that the current regulations are not what they should be. Charles\u00a0Leclerc<\/a> has repeatedly spoken about qualifying sessions where drivers were effectively punished for pushing harder, while Lewis Hamilton<\/a> said this on Sunday evening:\u00a0\u201cIt\u2019s definitely not second nature, that\u2019s for sure. I think it still continues to be a weird feeling. You go down the power, you open up the SM, and then the power dies like halfway down the straight and the RPM starts dropping. It doesn\u2019t feel what motorsport should be. The engine should be ringing its neck off right to the end of the straight and just pulling and pulling.\u201d<\/p>\n

If Ferrari takes the concerns of drivers, including its own, seriously and genuinely wants to act in the interests of the championship, then it should think about its position ahead of Tuesday\u2019s F1 Commission meeting. But this is a classic example of conflicting interests: the competitive interest versus the interests of F1, despite everybody in the paddock always claiming to prioritise the latter.<\/p>\n

Can the financial concerns of Audi and Honda be solved?<\/p>\n

The second concern is financial in nature. Audi and Honda are worried about additional investments that may be required. On the chassis side, that concern appears solvable. Multiple teams want to carry over this year\u2019s chassis into next season, and team bosses confirmed on Friday that a plan is already on the table: shortening several races by a few laps and limiting the laps to the grid to one per driver<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u201cI don\u2019t think the amount of investment is relevant compared to the size of the sport. So I think, let me put it this way, we should fix it once for all and not have this as a recurring topic”\u00a0Laurent Mekies<\/p>\n

But on the power unit side the situation is more complicated. If adjustments to fuel flow are required, then hardware changes to the engines will also be necessary \u2013 for example because increasing fuel flow would have consequences for reliability.<\/p>\n

Those changes cost money, something Audi is not keen on, partly because the brand from\u00a0Ingolstadt may then have to talk to the wider Volkswagen Group again. The manufacturer with the four rings argues that so much has already been invested into the current power units that new investments just one year later are far from desirable.<\/p>\n

Red Bull team boss Laurent\u00a0Mekies responded that such investments are insignificant if they improve F1 as a whole.<\/p>\n

\"Laurent <\/p>\n

Laurent Mekies, Red Bull Racing Team Principal<\/p>\n

Photo by: Mark Thompson \/ Getty Images<\/p>\n

\u201cI don\u2019t think the amount of investment is relevant compared to the size of the sport,” he said. “So I think, let me put it this way, we should fix it once for all and not have this as a recurring topic.\u201d<\/p>\n

Heading into Tuesday, the key question is whether either of those concerns can be addressed. If Ferrari, Audi and Honda remain opposed for different reasons, then reaching an agreement quickly could become difficult \u2013 or a weaker compromise than the proposed 60-40 split may ultimately emerge, something the drivers would once again be unhappy with.<\/p>\n

But if one of the two concerns can be resolved \u2013 for example through a financial framework \u2013 then the plan already made public in that\u00a0FIA statement may still have a realistic chance of succeeding.<\/p>\n

Once again: political interests play a crucial role on all sides, among both supporters and opponents alike, and that has always been part of the series. But if the drivers collectively believe these changes are necessary to make F1 feel more natural again, then some manufacturers may need to reflect carefully ahead of next week\u2019s meeting.<\/p>\n

\"This <\/p>\n

This is all set to be discussed in an F1 Commission meeting on Tuesday<\/p>\n

Photo by: Sam Bloxham \/ LAT Images via Getty Images<\/p>\n

We want to hear from you!<\/p>\n

Let us know what you would like to see from us in the future.<\/p>\n

Take our survey<\/a><\/p>\n

– The Autosport.com Team<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"While Montreal produced entertaining racing on track, the paddock was dominated by one topic in particular: 2027. Ahead…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":700468,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[573],"tags":[64,63,341090,318989,285603,817,813,816,85,341089],"class_list":["post-700467","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-formula-1","tag-au","tag-australia","tag-but-f1-manufacturers-must-look-in-the-mirror","tag-canadian-gp","tag-circuit-gilles-villeneuve","tag-f1","tag-formula-1","tag-formula1","tag-sports","tag-verstappen-and-sainz-urge-fia-u201cto-be-toughu201d"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/700467","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=700467"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/700467\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/700468"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=700467"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=700467"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=700467"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}