{"id":710951,"date":"2026-06-02T19:09:12","date_gmt":"2026-06-02T19:09:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/710951\/"},"modified":"2026-06-02T19:09:12","modified_gmt":"2026-06-02T19:09:12","slug":"ndis-overhaul-will-harm-australians-with-disabilities-governments-own-committee-warns-national-disability-insurance-scheme","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/710951\/","title":{"rendered":"NDIS overhaul will \u2018harm\u2019 Australians with disabilities, government\u2019s own committee warns | National disability insurance scheme"},"content":{"rendered":"

The national disability insurance scheme\u2019s proposed overhaul<\/a> will cause \u201cmaterial harm\u201d to Australians with disabilities, undermine its original intentions and hand unprecedented power to the health minister, the federal government\u2019s own reform advisory committee warns.<\/p>\n

The Australian Human Rights Commission has also urged the government to slam the brakes on the potentially \u201cregressive\u201d changes to the NDIS, saying more consultation time was needed to avoid the \u201cclear risk of adverse and unintended human rights impacts\u201d.<\/p>\n

The Albanese government is eager to move ahead with changes that are estimated to remove more than 200,000 people<\/a> from the $50bn-a-year scheme by 2030 in a bid to secure its financial sustainability.<\/p>\n

A Labor-led Senate inquiry is due to deliver its recommendations mid-June after three public hearings.<\/p>\n

But alarm bells are ringing for a number of disability advocacy bodies, human rights groups and government watchdogs as the scale of the changes required to achieve that goal are realised.<\/p>\n

In a submission to a parliamentary inquiry, the NDIS reform advisory committee, made up of disability representatives, admonished the changes, and encouraged the government to re-draft the bill in \u201cgenuine partnership with the disability community\u201d.<\/p>\n

The submission, authored by co-chairs, El Gibbs and Dougie Herd, added the savings could be achieved through focusing on provider integrity, fraud enforcement and pricing reform \u2013 rather than cutting support services for Australians with disabilities.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe community has, repeatedly, asked for that change to be done with us, not to us. The community has not been listened to in the design of this bill,\u201d it said.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe bill in its current form does material harm to current and future participants. It misrepresents the founding intentions of the NDIS. It inverts the [2023 NDIS] review<\/a> on which the government relies. It demolishes the federated joint venture and concentrates unprecedented power in the Commonwealth minister.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is, on the government\u2019s own admission, retrogressive against the rights framework the NDIS Act exists to give effect to. And it has been progressed under a timetable that breaches Australia\u2019s binding obligation to consult.\u201d<\/p>\n

The committee was established in 2025 to advise the federal NDIS minister and state and territory disability ministers about the real-world impacts of any changes to the scheme.<\/p>\n

Sign up for the Breaking News Australia email<\/a><\/p>\n

Some of the proposed changes will allow the NDIS minister, Mark Butler, to progressively reduce social participation budgets<\/a> for participants by 50% and tweak the meaning of permanence<\/a> to restrict NDIS access to participants who can first show they have exhausted \u201call appropriate\u201d treatment options.<\/p>\n

Key to reducing the scheme to about 600,000 participants by 2030 \u2013 the scheme supports about 770,000 people currently \u2013 will be the introduction of a standardised, evidence-based tool to determine a participant\u2019s \u201csubstantially reduced functional capacity\u201d.<\/p>\n

Butler has described the plans as \u201chard decisions\u201d but ultimately \u201cunavoidable and urgent\u201d.<\/p>\n

The Australian Human Rights Commission said a two-week consultation period was \u201cwholly inadequate\u201d and that more time was needed to understand the \u201csignificant implications for people\u2019s rights, lives and livelihoods\u201d.<\/p>\n

Its submission, written by the disability discrimination commissioner, Rosemary Kayess, concluded the NDIS was set up as a \u201chuman rights-based scheme, ensuring that people with disability have access to individualised supports that enable dignity, autonomy, independence and participation in the community\u201d.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe proposed reforms raise significant concerns about the extent to which this framework is being preserved,\u201d Kayess said.<\/p>\n

Advocacy groups in rural and remote areas, such as those supporting Northern Territory communities, are also worried about swiftly passing new laws without considering the impact on some of the country\u2019s most vulnerable.<\/p>\n

The submission from Disability<\/a> Advocacy Service Inc, Integrated Disability Action Inc and Darwin Community Legal Service warned that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participants in regions with limited or no access to mainstream support services would feel the brunt of the impacts.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn the Northern Territory, the consequences of getting this balance wrong are not administrative or procedural,\u201d they wrote.<\/p>\n

\u201cThey are direct and foreseeable impacts on housing stability, health, safety, community participation, and, in some cases, life itself.<\/p>\n

\u201cReform must not proceed on the assumption that unsupported participants will be absorbed by systems that do not yet exist at scale.\u201d<\/p>\n

The bill will also introduce the ability for the NDIS to automate certain administrative decisions.<\/p>\n

The commonwealth ombudsman said improving the efficiency of the NDIS was a \u201cworthwhile goal\u201d but said it needed to be balanced with integrity.<\/p>\n

\u201cAs the robodebt scheme illustrated, efficiency gains are fundamentally flawed if they come at the cost of integrity \u2013 resulting in negative impacts on the people the system is supposed to assist and a significant waste of taxpayer resources spent unravelling a system found to be unfair or unlawful,\u201d the submission said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The national disability insurance scheme\u2019s proposed overhaul will cause \u201cmaterial harm\u201d to Australians with disabilities, undermine its original…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":710952,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[64,63,44],"class_list":["post-710951","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-australia","tag-au","tag-australia","tag-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/710951","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=710951"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/710951\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/710952"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=710951"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=710951"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=710951"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}