{"id":711682,"date":"2026-06-03T02:51:08","date_gmt":"2026-06-03T02:51:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/711682\/"},"modified":"2026-06-03T02:51:08","modified_gmt":"2026-06-03T02:51:08","slug":"democrats-pledge-to-fight-trumps-termination-of-ocean-monitoring-observatories","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/711682\/","title":{"rendered":"Democrats Pledge to Fight Trump\u2019s Termination of Ocean Monitoring Observatories"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"css-ac37hb evys1bk0\">Democrats said Tuesday they intend to fight the Trump administration\u2019s plan to eradicate a deep-ocean observation system critical to understanding climate change and marine ecosystems.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-ac37hb evys1bk0\">The system cost $368 million when it was installed in 2016 but <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2026\/06\/01\/climate\/ocean-observatories-initiative.html\" title=\"\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">now officials want to shut it down<\/a>, which they say would save $48 million in operating costs each year.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-ac37hb evys1bk0\">The National Science Foundation declined to say how much it would cost to remove more than 900 remote ocean instruments that are anchored to the ocean bottom in far-flung locations, including in the Atlantic and Pacific oceans and an area between Greenland and Iceland known as the Irminger Sea.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-ac37hb evys1bk0\">The agency will begin sending ships to begin pulling up the instruments later this month, a process that is expected to take about 15 months. The ocean observation system was designed to operate for at least 25 years, meaning the decision would result in the loss of more than a decade of data.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-ac37hb evys1bk0\">Lawmakers accused the administration of wasting tax dollars in its bid to cripple climate science, which President Trump has derided. They said eliminating the observation system would harm coastal communities that benefit from scientists who use the data to study coastal currents that influence the weather and commercial fisheries along the East Coast.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-ac37hb evys1bk0\">\u201cFor our watermen and farmers and our coastal community residents and businesses, changes in currents and flooding have a major impact on their lives and livelihoods,\u201d Senator Chris Van Hollen, Democrat of Maryland, said in a statement.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-ac37hb evys1bk0\">\u201cDefunding a program that helps researchers and scientists track these conditions is shortsighted and, ultimately, will end up costing American taxpayers more not less,\u201d he said. Mr. Van Hollen, the top Democrat on the Senate appropriations subcommittee that oversees funding for the National Science Foundation, said he would be \u201cfighting back.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-ac37hb evys1bk0\">Senator Edward J. Markey, Democrat of Massachusetts, called the decision \u201ca continuation of the administration\u2019s war on science,\u201d adding that the administration is eliminating a program that Congress has expressly supported for years.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-ac37hb evys1bk0\">The Trump administration has repeatedly tried to shut down the ocean observation system, proposing to cut its funding by 80 percent in both 2025 and again in 2026. Each time, Congress pushed back, restoring the money. As a share of federal discretionary spending, which totals more than $1.6 trillion this year, the program\u2019s annual operating costs are minuscule.<\/p>\n<p>Updated\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>June 2, 2026, 6:55 p.m. ET<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-ac37hb evys1bk0\">\u201cThe Trump administration thinks that burying the data will help them kill our momentum to take climate action,\u201d Mr. Markey said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-ac37hb evys1bk0\">The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-ac37hb evys1bk0\">Scientists and environmental advocates criticized the decision to dismantle the ocean work.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-ac37hb evys1bk0\">\u201cWalking away from a $368-million investment in a state-of-the-art system, a feat of engineering already paid for by the American people, is absolutely myopic,\u201d said Chris Robbins, the associate director of scientific initiatives for Ocean Conservancy, a nonprofit group.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-ac37hb evys1bk0\">Ending the ocean observation system aligns with Project 2025, the conservative blueprint that has forecast much of Mr. Trump\u2019s agenda and criticized federal science for focusing too much federal science funding on climate change. Mr. Trump, who has called climate change a hoax, also has tried to dismantle much of the government\u2019s ability to monitor rising greenhouse gas emissions and study the effects of rising global temperatures on American communities.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-ac37hb evys1bk0\">There has been pushback. On Monday, a federal judge <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/live\/2026\/06\/01\/us\/trump-news\" title=\"\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">thwarted a plan by the administration<\/a> to dismantle the National Center for Atmospheric Research, the world-leading climate research lab based in Colorado. And Congress has refused to go along with the White House\u2019s effort to <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2025\/04\/11\/climate\/noaa-research-budget-cuts.html\" title=\"\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">eliminate the scientific research division<\/a> at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, a move that would mean dropping research on climate and weather patterns.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-ac37hb evys1bk0\">Michael England, a spokesman for the National Science Foundation, said in a statement that the agency is not canceling the umbrella deep-sea program, known as the Ocean Observatories Initiative.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-ac37hb evys1bk0\">He said the move to remove the observation system \u201caligns with N.S.F.\u2019s wider strategy to have a nimbler approach to prioritizing support for evolving scientific priorities and emerging technologies.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Democrats said Tuesday they intend to fight the Trump administration\u2019s plan to eradicate a deep-ocean observation system critical&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":711683,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[64,63,19386,75,4359,92752,77576,128,7086,127521],"class_list":["post-711682","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-environment","tag-au","tag-australia","tag-democratic-party","tag-environment","tag-global-warming","tag-national-science-foundation","tag-oceans-and-seas","tag-science","tag-science-and-technology","tag-united-states-politics-and-government"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/711682","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=711682"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/711682\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/711683"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=711682"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=711682"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=711682"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}