{"id":727158,"date":"2026-06-10T10:09:09","date_gmt":"2026-06-10T10:09:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/727158\/"},"modified":"2026-06-10T10:09:09","modified_gmt":"2026-06-10T10:09:09","slug":"one-nation-senator-tyron-whitten-could-be-in-breach-of-constitution-and-ineligible-to-sit-in-parliament-expert-says-one-nation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/727158\/","title":{"rendered":"One Nation senator Tyron Whitten could be in breach of constitution and ineligible to sit in parliament, expert says | One Nation"},"content":{"rendered":"

Australia\u2019s leading constitutional expert says One Nation<\/a> senator Tyron Whitten could be in breach of section 44 over a family company which has contracts to help build Snowy Hydro.<\/p>\n

Pauline Hanson has rejected claims her senator is ineligible to sit in parliament, noting Snowy Hydro was a public company and not a government department. But Prof Anne Twomey said \u201cthere is a possibility it could be a disqualification\u201d if the high court followed a precedent it set in disqualifying former senator Bob Day over an \u201cindirect\u201d pecuniary interest<\/a>, depending on a number of factors around the timing and details of Whitten\u2019s shares in the company.<\/p>\n

Twomey said Whitten would have a \u201cgood argument\u201d to fight off any disqualification questions, but said the case was not clearcut, and \u201cpossibly\u201d there were issues to address.<\/p>\n

Whitten, elected as a senator for Western Australia at the 2025 poll, had disclosed shareholdings in Whittens Group Pty Ltd and his directorship of trustee company T & A Whitten Holdings Pty Limited on his parliamentary register of interests when entering parliament. The Australian newspaper first reported<\/a> Whittens Group \u2013 a civil construction company the senator founded with his brother \u2013 had been awarded a $75m contract to work on Snowy Hydro.<\/p>\n

Whittens Group\u2019s website states the company was \u201cengaged by Snowy 2.0 Project principal contractor Future Generation Joint Venture\u201d to work on concreting and tunnel work on the project, with the website stating the project duration was \u201cOctober 2024 \u2013 ongoing\u201d.<\/p>\n

Section 44 of the Australian constitution states anyone with \u201cany direct or indirect pecuniary interest in any agreement with the Public Service of the Commonwealth\u201d is ineligible to sit in parliament.<\/p>\n

Corporate records obtained via the Australian Securities and Investments Commission suggest Senator Whitten\u2019s trustee company, T & A Whitten Holdings, held shares in Whittens Group until 29 July 2025 \u2013 after he was elected in May 2025 \u2013 whereupon the shares went to his brother\u2019s company, C & L Whitten Holdings, the only other listed shareholder in Whittens Group.<\/p>\n

Sign up for the Breaking News Australia email<\/a><\/p>\n

In the senator\u2019s first speech to parliament, also on 29 July, he said: \u201cI\u2019m no longer a part of Whittens Group, and I wish my brother and his wife every success in the future.\u201d<\/p>\n

While the senator listed shareholdings in Whittens Group in his initial declaration of interests after the 2025 election, that shareholding was deleted from his register as of 4 June this year. The Australian reported that change came after the newspaper asked his office about the shareholdings on 4 June.<\/p>\n

Whitten\u2019s office was contacted for comment.<\/p>\n

Hanson, in a social media post on Tuesday, criticised Coalition members for raising concerns over Whitten\u2019s eligibility, calling them \u201cgutless\u201d and \u201chypocrites\u201d.<\/p>\n

\"OneOne Nation\u2019s David Farley sworn in as member for Farrer \u2013 video<\/p>\n

\u201cThe fact is, there is no question over Senator Whitten\u2019s eligibility. Snowy Hydro is a public company, not a government department \u2026 I wish the Coalition would put as much effort into working together and fixing the country as they put into trying to take One Nation down,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n

Section 44 eligibility matters are examined by the high court if the parliament votes to refer a matter to the court of disputed returns, or if the court receives a petition within 40 days of election writs being returned.<\/p>\n

While Liberal senators James McGrath and Jonno Duniam have called for Hanson to refer her own senator for legal scrutiny, it is unclear whether the opposition will make such a referral themselves. It is understood Labor will not seek such a referral.<\/p>\n

Twomey, professor emerita at the University of Sydney, said the key issue was whether Whitten\u2019s situation constituted an indirect pecuniary interest in an agreement with the public service. Other factors would include the fact Whittens Group sub-contracted from the main contractor, as well as timing around when Senator Whitten held or disposed of any shares in the company.<\/p>\n

Twomey said while Snowy Hydro is not part of the public service, and was a company separate from the commonwealth, the commonwealth did own shares and fund the company \u2013 meaning any probe would hinge on whether the court takes a \u201cliteral\u201d or \u201cbroad\u201d interpretation of section 44.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf the court took a literal view, he\u2019s in the clear. If it took a broader view about whether he could be influenced by his own private interests with any shareholding, there is a possibility it could be a disqualification,\u201d Twomey said.<\/p>\n

Twomey, who became a prominent commentator on section 44 during the eligibility crisis of 2017<\/a>, said the high court had taken a \u201cbroad view\u201d on pecuniary interests during the case of former senator Day, who was ruled ineligible over an indirect interest <\/a>in the lease of his electorate office by the commonwealth.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Snowy Hydro scheme is a political issue. Parliament can hold government to account on cost blowouts for instance. Parliament could legislate to end or change the way Snowy Hydro works, affecting the financial interests of its contractors and sub contractors,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn the Bob Day case the court took a broad view. It identified the purpose behind the disqualification as being to ensure that members of parliament act in the public interest without their personal financial interests influencing them.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Australia\u2019s leading constitutional expert says One Nation senator Tyron Whitten could be in breach of section 44 over…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":727159,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[64,63,44],"class_list":["post-727158","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-australia","tag-au","tag-australia","tag-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/727158","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=727158"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/727158\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/727159"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=727158"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=727158"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=727158"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}