![\"Shamubeel](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/4OHUH52_copyright_image_100297.jpeg\")
<\/p>\nKiwiSaver contribution rates of 6 percent plus 6 percent could mean people have more money to spend in their retirement years than they did when they were working, actuaries say.<\/p>\n
The NZ Society of Actuaries Retirement Income Interest Group has released a report that says a 5 percent plus 5 percent contribution rate is probably the optimum default rate for KiwiSaver.<\/p>\n
Things are going well for New Zealand\u2019s farmers. Shouldn’t everyone else be feeling the benefit? <\/p>\n
No Stupid Questions with Susan Edmunds<\/p>\n
That assumes NZ Super remains available in the same way.<\/p>\n
Group convenor Ian Perera said it was particularly the case that people on lower and median incomes might not need a 12 percent savings rate.<\/p>\n
“Six plus six could end up with them having almost more income, or consumption power, after retirement than before retirement.<\/p>\n
“Often before retirement you’ve got expenses like childcare or whatever that you’re looking after, so you really want to try and smooth things out over your lifetime. That’s why we thought 5 percent plus 5 percent made sense as a default.”<\/p>\n
Nicola Willis answers listeners questions on KiwiSaver policy<\/p>\n
Morning Report<\/p>\n
Individual circumstances would play a part, he said.<\/p>\n
Higher earners might not get to a replacement income level even with the contribution rate at 6 percent plus 6 percent.<\/p>\n
“If you’re on a higher income you should be better able to get financial advice, take care of it yourself.”<\/p>\n
He said people would also be affected by when they withdrew money for a first home. Someone who withdrew any time from their 40s onwards would need to save more money to start building their reserves again.<\/p>\n
He said the group was also concerned that default rates that were too high could prompt more people to suspend their savings entirely.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Simplicity chief economist Shamubeel Eaqub.<\/p>\n
RNZ<\/p>\n
Simplicity chief economist Shamubeel Eaqub said the assumption that NZ Super would not change was doing a lot of work in these calculations.<\/p>\n
He said 12 percent seemed about right.<\/p>\n
“Australia’s at 12, we’re going to get to 12. It feels about right. Is it right for everybody? Of course not. No public policy is right for everybody in a country of five-and-a-half million people. Is it good enough? Yes.”<\/p>\n
Eaqub said people should be open to considering that changes might be made to NZ Super in the future.<\/p>\n
Jo Moir discusses National\u2019s KiwiSaver policy<\/p>\n
Morning Report<\/p>\n
“Regardless of what happens, we should be contemplating a future in which NZ Super is means-tested. That would be the fairest, most likely way it can remain available for those who need it.<\/p>\n
“I would strongly support keeping some form of NZ Super because what we don’t want is people in old age to live without dignity.”<\/p>\n