It\u2019s the last week of parliament before the winter break, and not a minute too soon; tensions have been running a little high lately.<\/p>\n
The lower house speaker, Milton Dick, has been yeeting MPs mere moments into question time<\/a> and accused Angus Taylor of \u201cdemeaning\u201d the parliament<\/a> by calling Anthony Albanese a liar; Andrew Hastie claimed<\/a> One Nation \u201chas declared war on me, so they shall have war\u201d; Labor has been goading the Coalition and its media \u201ccheer squad\u201d for opposing the budget; the Greens hate Labor\u2019s NDIS bill<\/a>; and people in the Coalition seem to be mad at everyone, including themselves<\/a>.<\/p>\n That\u2019s all to say: there\u2019s a bit still left in store for this last week, and the drama isn\u2019t likely to ease.<\/p>\n First, the pomp and ceremony: Vanuatu\u2019s prime minister, Jotham Napat, and his delegation will visit Parliament House on Monday to meet Albanese. Wednesday brings the annual Midwinter Ball, the black-tie highlight of the parliamentary social calendar.<\/p>\n The off-record event\u2019s traditionally light-hearted speeches from the prime minister and opposition leader have returned mixed recent results; Sussan Ley\u2019s riotously funny address in 2025, joking about \u201cnegotiating with fundamentalists\u201d in the Nationals, came after a few dour examples from Peter Dutton in previous years.<\/p>\n But the last week before a big break is also traditionally a time for last-minute horse trading and long sitting hours<\/a>. MPs and senators might be rushing out of the ball on Wednesday night, or huddling around tables, as votes and negotiations continue.<\/p>\n Sign up for the Breaking News Australia email<\/a><\/p>\n With the first tranche of Labor\u2019s budget measures and tax legislation quickly ushered through parliament<\/a> last week, focus now turns to the rest of their slate. Namely, the unpopular cuts to the national disability insurance scheme and what will come in the next instalment of tax rules, including the carveouts and mop-ups <\/a>Labor has promised.<\/p>\n The Coalition will continue to zero in on the unpopular aspects of Labor\u2019s budget, including the so-called \u201cwidow\u2019s tax\u201d, and accusing the government of presiding over rising inflation and falling living standards. Coalition sources say Taylor will continue to call the government \u201cliars\u201d, sharpening the focus on Albanese personally.<\/p>\n Labor has agreed to Greens demands to hold up the NDIS bill until mid-August while a parliamentary inquiry continues. But scrutiny on the changes, and potential amendments, will be the flavour of the week \u2013 especially if Coalition concerns about the bill, thus far mostly in the margins, slowly come out into the open.<\/p>\n That is, if the Coalition breaks with its recent preference of dealing itself out of all negotiations and consigning itself to parliamentary near-irrelevance.<\/p>\n Taylor was asked last week in a press conference what Australians were getting out of an opposition \u201cconstantly dealing itself out of negotiations\u201d. Specifically, why he had decided not to discuss the tax bill and seek amendments.<\/p>\n It\u2019s not an unprecedented idea. Taylor\u2019s press conference was to discuss news of the Greens having done exactly that; their decision to back Labor\u2019s tax changes in exchange for reforms to their NDIS legislation, which the Greens also say they will never vote for.<\/p>\n The Greens hate the NDIS bill, but the government needed their support on tax. The Coalition hate the tax bill, but the government needs their support on NDIS. Each had a pretty good bargaining chip. The Greens didn\u2019t deal themselves out and instead stayed at the table. Labor can pass its agenda with the Greens, bypassing the Coalition entirely, so the opposition\u2019s default position of \u201cno\u201d without trying to negotiate is curious.<\/p>\n Another question for the Coalition will be its position on Labor\u2019s also-contentious gambling advertising changes, which may be introduced into parliament this week after the short consultation period that followed the draft bill\u2019s unveiling on budget day<\/a>.<\/p>\n Plans to restrict TV and online wagering ads could come, ironically, after a week where more everyday Australians may have been exposed to gambling ads than usual, with SBS coverage of the Fifa World Cup often featuring promotions from a major betting agency (we\u2019ll leave them unnamed here, they\u2019ve had enough exposure).<\/p>\n Labor people close to the discussions have long said that any change would leave at least half the stakeholders unhappy. Harm reduction advocates would say the reforms are too weak, and industry would say they\u2019re too heavy. Possibly both simultaneously.<\/p>\n