{"id":789969,"date":"2026-07-09T21:11:13","date_gmt":"2026-07-09T21:11:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/789969\/"},"modified":"2026-07-09T21:11:13","modified_gmt":"2026-07-09T21:11:13","slug":"growing-legal-bill-for-failed-defence-of-controversial-nsw-protest-laws-runs-to-hundreds-of-thousands-of-dollars-new-south-wales-politics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/789969\/","title":{"rendered":"Growing legal bill for failed defence of controversial NSW protest laws runs to hundreds of thousands of dollars | New South Wales politics"},"content":{"rendered":"

The New South Wales<\/a> government has already spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on legal fees to unsuccessfully defend constitutional challenges against protest laws that were expected to be struck down.<\/p>\n

The costs, outlined in documents obtained by Guardian Australia via freedom of information legislation, include $117,455.50 of taxpayers\u2019 money on a single challenge to controversial public assembly restriction declaration (Pard) laws. Those laws were enacted following the Bondi beach terror attack and were in place during a now infamous rally against the Israeli president<\/a>, Isaac Herzog, in February.<\/p>\n

The state\u2019s court of appeal struck down the laws in April<\/a> after finding they impermissibly burdened the implied constitutional right to freedom of political communication. It awarded costs to the plaintiffs, three activist groups, with the total bill to the taxpayer set to rise once they are finalised.<\/p>\n

Sign up for the Breaking News Australia email<\/a><\/p>\n

It was the second time in six months an anti-protest law<\/a> passed by the Minns government was found unconstitutional by a court, after the NSW supreme court struck down an older law that gave police expanded powers to prevent protests near places of worship. The government spent almost $96,400 on barristers and solicitors fees in that case, the documents reveal.<\/p>\n

The law, which was reintroduced with amendments last year, caused friction during a Labor caucus meeting when it was first being legislated.<\/p>\n

Upper house Labor MP Anthony D\u2019Adam had moved a motion to redraft the bill so that it was limited to protests directed at a place of worship, with colleagues Stephen Lawrence and Cameron Murphy warning the current wording could be found to be unconstitutional. The premier, Chris Minns, said in March 2025 the government believed the laws were \u201cconstitutionally sound\u201d.<\/p>\n

Guardian Australia has also obtained NSW police\u2019s costs over two court cases which saw them oppose \u201cform 1\u201d applications to authorise pro-Palestine protests on the Sydney Harbour Bridge and Opera House last year.<\/p>\n

In the first case, which police lost<\/a>, the force spent more than $91,600 on external barristers and solicitors to fight the application. Unlike the NSW government\u2019s costs, the police figures provided to Guardian Australia do not include the cost of employing in-house legal staff.<\/p>\n

In response to questions, a spokesperson for NSW police referred Guardian Australia to a statement made following a August 2025 protest which occurred without major incident<\/a> and was attended by Minns government ministers.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe greatest concern for police during the operation was that of a crowd crush due to the significant numbers of attendees. Police managed this situation in line with public safety,\u201d it said.<\/p>\n

Police spent almost $59,500 on legal fees last October opposing a planned pro-Palestine march to the Sydney Opera House, before the court of appeal sided with police<\/a> against the Palestine Action Group due to \u201cextreme\u201d safety concerns<\/a>.<\/p>\n

In total the NSW government and police have spent at least $305,500 on cases against pro-Palestine groups heard in NSW\u2019s highest courts \u2013 the supreme court and the court of appeal \u2013 and $87,099.29 on cases they successfully contested.<\/p>\n

Josh Lees, organiser for the Palestine Action Group, a party to all five cases, said \u201cthis huge waste of money shows the desperate lengths has been prepared to go to, in order to rip up our democratic rights\u201d.<\/p>\n

skip past newsletter promotion<\/a>Free newsletter | When needed<\/p>\n

Sign up to Breaking News Australia<\/p>\n

Get the most important news as it breaks<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Josh Lees of Palestine Action Group (centre) speaks to media outside the NSW supreme court on 16 April after anti-protest powers rolled out after the Bondi massacre were struck down. Photograph: Dan Himbrechts\/AAP<\/p>\n

The government rushed through the Pard laws to give the police commissioner the power to issue a declaration to ban protesting in a particular area after a suspected terrorist attack.<\/p>\n

Legal experts and civil liberties groups had raised concerns, with Anne Twomey, professor emerita in constitutional law at the University of Sydney, warning<\/a>: \u201cHistory tells us that anti-protest laws rushed through parliament often have an unhappy ending in the courts.\u201d<\/p>\n

In response to questions, a government spokesperson said Labor had \u201cacted to protect the community, maintain social cohesion and ensure people felt safe\u201d following the Bondi terror attack.<\/p>\n

\u201cThese laws played an important role in ensuring there was no conflict on Sydney\u2019s streets, including around Bondi and the CBD, during the visit of a global head of state,\u201d they said.<\/p>\n

The spokesperson said \u201cwhile some of the challenges to these laws have been successful, others have not\u201d, including the challenge to the government\u2019s decision to declare a major event during Herzog\u2019s visit.<\/p>\n

The government also spent $27,600 on an administrative challenge brought by protesters to the use of a major events declaration before the protest against Herzog, winning the case<\/a>. Activist groups have indicated<\/a> they intend to appeal the decision if necessary to see charges against protesters dropped.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The New South Wales government has already spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on legal fees to unsuccessfully…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":789970,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[64,63,44],"class_list":["post-789969","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-australia","tag-au","tag-australia","tag-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/789969","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=789969"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/789969\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/789970"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=789969"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=789969"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=789969"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}