Australian stores are now losing millions to an explosive surge in return misconduct, leaving major retailers with little choice but to introduce stricter checks, return fees and tighter return windows that could hurt honest shoppers. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
A landmark global investigation by criminologists at Griffith University, led by Professor Michael Townsley, Dr Andrew Childs and Professor Joseph Clare, has exposed how retail refund processes are being systematically manipulated. <\/p>\n
Surveying 5900 consumers across Australia, the UK, the US and Canada, the landmark ECR Retail Loss study found that while 83 per cent of shoppers do the right thing, a brazen 17 per cent admitted to engaging in return misconduct over the past 12 months. <\/p>\n
Hacks on social media could land you in trouble <\/p>\n
If you scroll through social media, you will likely find content detailing \u201crefund methods\u201d sitting right alongside ordinary videos. <\/p>\n
Short-form videos show step-by-step tactics to get free sneakers, clothes and hi-tech gadgets, presenting illegal fraud as nothing more than a victimless hack. <\/p>\n
Dr Andrew Childs, a cybercrime expert and co-author of the study, explained that social media has played a massive role in bringing return fraud into the mainstream. <\/p>\n
\u201cDifferent platforms are now part of the exact same ecosystem, they just play different roles,\u201d Dr Childs told news.com.au. <\/p>\n
\u201cOn dark web forums, there are still detailed guides, but a lot of those sold on marketplaces weren\u2019t particularly popular because that information was already circulating freely elsewhere.\u201d <\/p>\n
He said many of the hacks presented on mainstream social media platforms begin life on the dark web or more obscure sites like Telegram and Discord.<\/p>\n
\u201cTelegram was much more important for active communities, hosting instructional information as well as paid refunding services,\u201d he said. <\/p>\n
\u201cTikTok was more like the normalisation of refund fraud, making techniques and tactics far more visible and accessible. <\/p>\n
\u201cYou don\u2019t have to go looking for an obscure corner of the dark web or a criminal marketplace, some of this content is sitting right alongside completely ordinary social media posts.\u201d<\/p>\n
From \u2018wardrobing\u2019 to outright theft<\/p>\n
The report divides problematic returns into two categories: opportunistic \u201cabuse\u201d and premeditated criminal \u201cfraud\u201d. <\/p>\n
The most widespread form of abuse is a popular trend called \u201cwardrobing\u201d, where a shopper buys an item with the sole intention of wearing or using it once before taking it back for a full refund. <\/p>\n
A staggering 12 per cent of surveyed consumers admitted to wardrobing in the past year, making it the most common return exploit by far. <\/p>\n
\u201cThere is a clear distinction between abuse and fraud. Something like buying an outfit, wearing it once, and returning it, people rationalise that as just bending the rules,\u201d Dr Childs said. <\/p>\n
\u201cWardrobing is where you buy an outfit, like a dress for an event, wear it just for that occasion, and return it claiming it didn\u2019t fit. You never had any intention of keeping it. <\/p>\n
\u201cIt is within the acceptable bounds of what retailers permit, but what they don\u2019t know is that people are wearing those items to go out to an event.\u201d <\/p>\n
However, the report highlights that the misconduct quickly escalates into outright criminal deception, with 6 per cent of respondents admitting to false \u201cDid Not Arrive\u201d (DNA) claims, a tactic especially rife in food delivery apps, where nearly 50 per cent of reported fraud involves customers lying about non-delivery. <\/p>\n
Meanwhile, 5 per cent admitted to \u201cswitch item\u201d returns, where a cheaper, used or counterfeit item is returned in place of the original purchase. <\/p>\n
Others rely on technical methods like Fake Tracking IDs (FTID), where shipping labels are tampered with so a retailer\u2019s automated system believes a package was returned and lost in transit. <\/p>\n
\u201cWhere you start moving towards criminal fraud is where people do this at scale, or where deliberate deception is used to obtain money or goods,\u201d Dr Childs warned. <\/p>\n
\u201cWith Fake Tracking IDs, offenders manipulate the logistics side of a return so the retailer\u2019s system sees evidence that an item was posted, but package tracking shows it was lost along the way. <\/p>\n
\u201cIn other cases, people return empty boxes or send back packages containing counterfeit goods.\u201d <\/p>\n
Inside the \u2018Refund-as-a-Service\u2019 underworld<\/p>\n
Perhaps the most alarming trend uncovered by researchers is the rise of professionalised \u201cRefund-as-a-Service\u201d (RaaS) operations. <\/p>\n
Everyday shoppers who do not know how to trick a retailer\u2019s system can simply hire a professional refunder online to commit the crime on their behalf. <\/p>\n
\u201cThe more criminal aspect is where we get into Refund-as-a-Service, it is essentially the outsourcing of fraud,\u201d Dr Childs said. <\/p>\n
\u201cInstead of learning how to manipulate a retailer\u2019s systems themselves, a shopper can approach a \u2018professional refunder\u2019 online who carries out the fraudulent return on their behalf. <\/p>\n
\u201cIf successful, the customer keeps the product or gets the refund, and the refunder takes a cut, we saw advertised commissions of 25 to 30 per cent of the order value, as well as flat fees.\u201d He said RaaS syndicates function like legitimate businesses. They run automated customer service bots on Telegram, operate active Discord communities and maintain detailed spreadsheets listing specific Australian retailers and their operational vulnerabilities. <\/p>\n
Dark web expert left stunned <\/p>\n
Dr Childs, whose background is in cybercrime research, admitted he was stunned by how deeply return fraud has merged with major cybercrime markets. <\/p>\n
\u201cI wasn\u2019t anticipating how deeply these return fraud communities on Telegram and the dark web were plugged into the broader cybercrime ecosystem,\u201d Dr Childs said. <\/p>\n
\u201cWe saw discussions about buying \u2018aged\u2019 customer accounts. An account with a legitimate purchase history attracts far less scrutiny when initiating a refund. <\/p>\n
\u201cWe saw the exchange of stolen accounts, data obtained through breaches, fake or synthetic identities, and AI tools.\u201d <\/p>\n
Scammers are even exploiting the property market to pull off their heists. <\/p>\n
\u201cOffenders were using \u2018drop addresses\u2019 for refunds, looking up vacant properties on real estate websites or Airbnb listings and having packages sent there to create distance from their real address,\u201d Dr Childs said.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe speed of these communities is remarkable. If a retailer introduces new packaging or changes delivery processes, people report it back to Telegram, brainstorm workarounds, or simply move on to a new target.\u201d <\/p>\n
Why honest shoppers could pay the price<\/p>\n
The financial toll on retailers is massive. According to the ECR Retail Loss report, processing a single return now costs businesses approximately 27 per cent of the item\u2019s sale price, up from 18 per cent in 2018. <\/p>\n
Combined with billions lost globally to fraudulent claims and landfill waste from unsellable returns, retailers are under immense pressure to fight back. <\/p>\n
The survey revealed that charging return fees and having company investigators review claims were viewed as the two most powerful deterrents against return fraud. <\/p>\n
But researchers caution that blanket crackdowns could backfire on innocent consumers. <\/p>\n
\u201cMost customers aren\u2019t committing return abuse or fraud. If retailers respond indiscriminately by making every return difficult, they impose heavy costs on a really large group of honest shoppers because of a small minority,\u201d Dr Childs warned. <\/p>\n
\u201cOur survey found return fees, shorter return windows and stronger verification are perceived as strong deterrents, but the challenge for retailers is putting friction only where the risk actually sits.\u201d <\/p>\n
Dr Childs said a solution that could keep shoppers and retailers happy is \u201cadaptive friction\u201d, where smart algorithms flag suspicious accounts or high-risk items like expensive electronics, while keeping the process smooth for regular shoppers. <\/p>\n
\u201cWe shouldn\u2019t suddenly need everyone to produce three forms of ID to return a $20 shirt,\u201d Dr Childs said. <\/p>\n
\u201cAdditional verification should target high-value electronics or accounts showing unusual return histories.\u201d <\/p>\n
As stores gear up to protect their bottom line, he said he hopes the days of frictionless, no-questions-asked refunds are not coming to an end.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The golden age of getting a refund is in peril as a shocking report reveals a dark reason…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":898628,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[467331,467295,467320,26455,467353,29279,386113,467334,391652,467299,467349,467385,467322,467311,423991,376730,455931,467344,467357,467340,467312,381261,467291,445110,467305,467308,467307,467319,467316,7814,467309,467318,414561,467294,467368,467384,445160,429263,467313,467367,64,206696,270282,63,135852,99,32092,5794,84522,467361,1791,467354,467365,51521,467369,467302,467386,467356,467382,438280,1115,467342,467376,467364,1116,467296,467337,467298,467321,35770,10664,467333,467359,467360,467297,467362,91361,8280,391356,467370,426264,381862,73053,29705,467347,456358,467366,402109,381654,467380,367025,467323,467328,455202,467372,467338,6622,1861,426710,5948,467306,467375,467293,467310,467317,467350,104765,467358,31045,467339,467383,467348,467301,33509,38639,17574,467327,78124,467343,467373,1314,467324,467378,467336,467332,467300,467352,52217,467341,467303,467335,467290,445116,467381,467304,467379,467377,467371,467346,438114,467345,467363,467315,467374,467292,389444,390512,388083,390748,400663,379294,467325,384331,353050,467355,444226,467326,467329,101,144051,55647,467314,467351,165473,467330],"class_list":["post-898627","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-business","tag-s-automated-system","tag-s-system","tag-refund-methods","tag-26455","tag-5900-consumers","tag-29279","tag-386113","tag-a-brazen-17","tag-a-cheaper","tag-a-clear-distinction","tag-a-criminal-marketplace","tag-a-cybercrime-expert-and-co-author","tag-a-dark-reason","tag-a-dress","tag-a-full-refund","tag-a-lot","tag-a-massive-role","tag-a-package","tag-a-popular-trend","tag-a-refund","tag-a-retailer","tag-a-return","tag-a-shocking-report","tag-a-shopper","tag-a-simple-customer-service-courtesy","tag-a-sinister-new-trend","tag-a-staggering-12","tag-a-tactic","tag-a-victimless-hack","tag-abuse","tag-abuse-and-fraud","tag-active-communities","tag-an-event","tag-an-explosive-surge","tag-an-item","tag-an-obscure-corner","tag-an-old-store","tag-an-outfit","tag-an-underground-criminal-industry","tag-any-intention","tag-au","tag-aussie-retailers","tag-aussie-shoppers","tag-australia","tag-budget-hacks","tag-business","tag-cent","tag-claims","tag-clothes","tag-completely-ordinary-social-media-posts","tag-content","tag-criminal-fraud","tag-criminologists","tag-customers","tag-dark-web-forums","tag-dark-web-syndicates","tag-deliberate-deception","tag-detailed-guides","tag-different-platforms","tag-different-roles","tag-dna","tag-dr-andrew-childs","tag-dr-childs","tag-even-more-coverageaustralian-stores","tag-evidence","tag-fake-tracking-ids","tag-food-delivery-apps","tag-free-sneakers","tag-ftid","tag-griffith-university","tag-hacks","tag-hi-tech-gadgets","tag-honest-shoppers","tag-illegal-fraud","tag-in-a-landmark-global-investigation","tag-instructional-information","tag-item","tag-life","tag-little-choice","tag-mainstream-social-media-platforms","tag-major-retailers","tag-many-aussies","tag-marketplaces","tag-millions","tag-money-or-goods","tag-more-finance-news","tag-more-obscure-sites","tag-nearly-50","tag-news-com-au","tag-non-delivery","tag-offenders","tag-opportunistic-abuse","tag-ordinary-videos","tag-our-new-app","tag-outright-criminal-deception","tag-outright-theftthe-report","tag-part","tag-people","tag-peril","tag-place","tag-premeditated-criminal-fraud","tag-problematic-returns","tag-professor-joseph-clare","tag-professor-michael-townsley","tag-refund-fraud","tag-reported-fraud","tag-respondents","tag-retail-refund-processes","tag-retailers","tag-return-fees","tag-return-fraud","tag-return-misconduct","tag-return-policies","tag-returns","tag-scale","tag-services","tag-shipping-labels","tag-shoppers","tag-short-form-videos","tag-sinister-reason-refunds","tag-social-media","tag-sophisticated-digital-scams","tag-step-by-step-tactics","tag-stricter-checks","tag-surveyed-consumers","tag-technical-methods","tag-techniques-and-tactics","tag-telegram","tag-telegram-and-discord","tag-that-information","tag-that-occasion","tag-the-acceptable-bounds","tag-the-aisles","tag-the-dark-web","tag-the-exact-same-ecosystem","tag-the-golden-age","tag-the-hacks","tag-the-landmark-ecr-retail-loss-study","tag-the-logistics-side","tag-the-mainstream","tag-the-misconduct","tag-the-most-common-return-exploit","tag-the-most-widespread-form","tag-the-normalisation","tag-the-original-purchase","tag-the-past-12-months","tag-the-past-year","tag-the-report","tag-the-retailer","tag-the-right-thing","tag-the-rules","tag-the-sole-intention","tag-the-study","tag-the-uk","tag-the-us-and-canada","tag-this-content","tag-those-items","tag-tighter-return-windows","tag-tiktok","tag-transit","tag-trouble","tag-two-categories","tag-used-or-counterfeit-item","tag-viral-social-media","tag-wardrobing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/898627","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=898627"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/898627\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/898628"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=898627"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=898627"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=898627"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}