{"id":903391,"date":"2026-09-24T06:06:19","date_gmt":"2026-09-24T06:06:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/903391\/"},"modified":"2026-09-24T06:06:19","modified_gmt":"2026-09-24T06:06:19","slug":"quantum-many-body-mixed-phase-space-revealed-by-hybrid-feedback-control","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/903391\/","title":{"rendered":"Quantum many-body mixed phase space revealed by hybrid feedback control"},"content":{"rendered":"

Strogatz, S. H. Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering 2nd edn (Avalon Publishing, 2014).<\/p>\n

Lichtenberg, A. J. & Lieberman, M. A. Regular and Chaotic Dynamics 2nd edn (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013).<\/p>\n

Arnol\u2019d, V. I. Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics 2nd edn (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013).<\/p>\n

Neill, C. et al. Ergodic dynamics and thermalization in an isolated quantum system. Nat. Phys. 12, 1037\u20131041 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Brandino, G. P., Caux, J.-S. & Konik, R. M. Glimmers of a quantum KAM theorem: insights from quantum quenches in one-dimensional Bose gases. Phys. Rev. X 5, 041043 (2015).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bohigas, O., Tomsovic, S. & Ullmo, D. Manifestations of classical phase space structures in quantum mechanics. Phys. Rep. 223, 43\u2013133 (1993).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Deutsch, J. M. Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system. Phys. Rev. A 43, 2046 (1991).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Srednicki, M. Chaos and quantum thermalization. Phys. Rev. E 50, 888 (1994).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Serbyn, M., Abanin, D. A. & Papi\u0107, Z. Quantum many-body scars and weak breaking of ergodicity. Nat. Phys. 17, 675\u2013685 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Moudgalya, S., Bernevig, B. A. & Regnault, N. Quantum many-body scars and Hilbert space fragmentation: a review of exact results. Rep. Progr. Phys. 85, 086501 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chandran, A., Iadecola, T., Khemani, V. & Moessner, R. Quantum many-body scars: a quasiparticle perspective. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 443\u2013469 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bernien, H. et al. Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator. Nature 551, 579\u2013584 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Turner, C. J., Michailidis, A. A., Abanin, D. A., Serbyn, M. & Papic, Z. Weak ergodicity breaking from quantum many-body scars. Nat. Phys. 14, 745\u2013749 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ren, J., Hallam, A., Ying, L. & Papi\u0107, Z. ScarFinder: a detector of optimal scar trajectories in quantum many-body dynamics. PRX Quantum 6, 040332 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kramer, P. & Saraceno, M. (eds) Geometry of the Time-Dependent Variational Principle in Quantum Mechanics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1981).<\/p>\n

Haegeman, J. et al. Time-dependent variational principle for quantum lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 070601 (2011).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ho, W. W., Choi, S., Pichler, H. & Lukin, M. D. Periodic orbits, entanglement, and quantum many-body scars in constrained models: matrix product state approach. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 040603 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hallam, A., Morley, J. G. & Green, A. G. The Lyapunov spectra of quantum thermalisation. Nat. Commun. 10, 2708 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Boscain, U., Sigalotti, M. & Sugny, D. Introduction to the Pontryagin maximum principle for quantum optimal control. PRX Quantum 2, 030203 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Duncan, C. W., Poggi, P. M., Bukov, M., Zinner, N. T. & Campbell, S. Taming quantum systems: a tutorial for using shortcuts-to-adiabaticity, quantum optimal control, and reinforcement learning. PRX Quantum 6, 040201 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Su, W. P., Schrieffer, J. R. & Heeger, A. J. Solitons in polyacetylene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698 (1979).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhang, P. et al. Many-body Hilbert space scarring on a superconducting processor. Nat. Phys. 19, 120\u2013125 (2023).<\/p>\n

Michailidis, A. A., Turner, C. J., Papi\u0107, Z., Abanin, D. A. & Serbyn, M. Slow quantum thermalization and many-body revivals from mixed phase space. Phys. Rev. X 10, 011055 (2020).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Haegeman, J., Mari\u00ebn, M., Osborne, T. J. & Verstraete, F. Geometry of matrix product states: metric, parallel transport, and curvature. J. Math. Phys. 55, 021902 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Varma, A. V., Vardi, A. & Cohen, D. Characterization of hybrid quantum eigenstates in systems with mixed classical phase space. Phys. Rev. E 109, 064207 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Beringer, L., Steinhuber, M., Diego Urbina, J., Richter, K. & Tomsovic, S. Controlling many-body quantum chaos: Bose-Hubbard systems. New J. Phys. 26, 073002 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Heller, E. J. Bound-state eigenfunctions of classically chaotic Hamiltonian systems: scars of periodic orbits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1515 (1984).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Langlett, C. M. et al. Rainbow scars: from area to volume law. Phys. Rev. B 105, L060301 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dong, H. et al. Disorder-tunable entanglement at infinite temperature. Sci. Adv. 9, eadj3822 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Turner, C. J., Desaules, J.-Y., Bull, K. & Papi\u0107, Z. Correspondence principle for many-body scars in ultracold Rydberg atoms. Phys. Rev. X 11, 021021 (2021).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Evrard, B., Pizzi, A., Mistakidis, S. I. & Dag, C. B. Quantum many-body scars from unstable periodic orbits. Phys. Rev. B 110, 144302 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pizzi, A., Kwan, L.-H., Evrard, B., Dag, C. B. & Knolle, J. Genuine quantum scars in many-body spin systems. Nat. Commun. 16, 6722 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ott, E., Grebogi, C. & Yorke, J. A. Controlling chaos. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1196 (1990).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Antoniou, I., Basios, V. & Bosco, F. Probabilistic control of chaos: chaotic maps under control. Comput. Math. Appl. 34, 373\u2013389 (1997).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sierant, P. & Turkeshi, X. Controlling entanglement at absorbing state phase transitions in random circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 120402 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Roy, S., Chalker, J. T., Gornyi, I. V. & Gefen, Y. Measurement-induced steering of quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033347 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Herasymenko, Y., Gornyi, I. & Gefen, Y. Measurement-driven navigation in many-body Hilbert space: active-decision steering. PRX Quantum 4, 020347 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

O\u2019Dea, N., Morningstar, A., Gopalakrishnan, S. & Khemani, V. Entanglement and absorbing-state transitions in interactive quantum dynamics. Phys. Rev. B 109, L020304 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Li, Y., Chen, X. & Fisher, M. P. A. Quantum Zeno effect and the many-body entanglement transition. Phys. Rev. B 98, 205136 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Vasseur, R., Potter, A. C., You, Y.-Z. & Ludwig, A. W. W. Entanglement transitions from holographic random tensor networks. Phys. Rev. B 100, 134203 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Nahum, A., Roy, S., Skinner, B. & Ruhman, J. Measurement and entanglement phase transitions in all-to-all quantum circuits, on quantum trees, and in Landau-Ginsburg theory. PRX Quantum 2, 010352 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ippoliti, M., Gullans, M. J., Gopalakrishnan, S., Huse, D. A. & Khemani, V. Entanglement phase transitions in measurement-only dynamics. Phys. Rev. X 11, 011030 (2021).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Iadecola, T., Ganeshan, S., Pixley, J. H. & Wilson, J. H. Measurement and feedback driven entanglement transition in the probabilistic control of chaos. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 060403 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Iadecola, T., Wilson, J. H. & Pixley, J. Concomitant entanglement and control criticality driven by collective measurements. PRX Quantum 6, 010351 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Doria, P., Calarco, T. & Montangero, S. Optimal control technique for many-body quantum dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 190501 (2011).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jensen, J. H. M., M\u00f8ller, F. S., S\u00f8rensen, J. J. & Sherson, J. F. Achieving fast high-fidelity optimal control of many-body quantum dynamics. Phys. Rev. A 104, 052210 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ljubotina, M., Roos, B., Abanin, D. A. & Serbyn, M. Optimal steering of matrix product states and quantum many-body scars. PRX Quantum 3, 030343 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bukov, M., Day, A. G. R., Sels, D., Weinberg, P., Polkovnikov, A. & Mehta, P. Reinforcement learning in different phases of quantum control. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031086 (2018).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Metz, F. & Bukov, M. Self-correcting quantum many-body control using reinforcement learning with tensor networks. Nat. Mach. Intell. 5, 780\u2013791 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

del Campo, A. Shortcuts to adiabaticity by counterdiabatic driving. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 100502 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sels, D. & Polkovnikov, A. Minimizing irreversible losses in quantum systems by local counterdiabatic driving. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E3909\u2013E3916 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ren, J. Data supporting \u2018Quantum many-body mixed phase space revealed by hybrid feedback control\u2019. Research Data Leeds Repository https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5518\/1890<\/a> (2026).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Strogatz, S. H. Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering 2nd edn (Avalon…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":903392,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24],"tags":[7265,64,63,7264,7269,7268,1325,7263,7266,40782,7267,292,28229,128,7262],"class_list":["post-903391","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-physics","tag-atomic","tag-au","tag-australia","tag-classical-and-continuum-physics","tag-complex-systems","tag-condensed-matter-physics","tag-general","tag-mathematical-and-computational-physics","tag-molecular","tag-nonlinear-phenomena","tag-optical-and-plasma-physics","tag-physics","tag-quantum-simulation","tag-science","tag-theoretical"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/903391","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=903391"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/903391\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/903392"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=903391"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=903391"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=903391"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}