![\"Introducing](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/1790465770_576_Option-1-1-1.png\")
<\/a><\/a><\/p>\nSebastian:\u00a0I am Sebastian Hassinger. I\u2019m an independent consultant and jack of all trades in quantum. I have been working in quantum for almost a decade now, which shocked me when I realized that when I counted up the years. First with IBM Quantum and then with AWS. And the beginning of 2026, I went independent and started a company called The New Quantum Era, which is sort of a grab bag of all of the projects that I\u2019m working on. How about yourself, Yuval? Tell us a bit about yourself.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0I am Yuval Boger. I\u2019m chief commercial officer of QuEra Computing. We make the world\u2019s best quantum computer. And I\u2019ve been doing this, I only have five years of experience in quantum, but sometimes they feel like two and sometimes they feel like 20.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Same. (laughing) I don\u2019t think that\u2019s gonna change. I have bad news for you. (laughing)<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0I wasn\u2019t part of naming the company QuEra, but I think it does stand for a quantum era. So maybe you should, you have a new book out, right? The new QuEra.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0That\u2019s right. Yeah, The New Quantum Era. So that was originally the name of the podcast that a friend of mine and I started two and a half years ago, three years ago. And really was just, we were both very interested in just trying to get researchers to explain more about what they were doing. Kevin has a background in mathematics, but was not in the quantum industry. I was working with IBM at the time. And yeah, when we first met. And so the podcast was really an excuse to get researchers on to record an interview and ask them, you know, explain to our listeners who are not physicists, neither are we, what it is that you do in conceptual understanding. And then that kind of led into the idea of sort of accumulating more and more of this research and turning it into a narrative. Sort of the way I describe it is the book that I wish I had found when I first started working in quantum because initially it was an extremely steep learning curve and I would have loved to have more of a background of the history of how quantum information science came about, the history of how various modalities of qubits came about and some of the basics of conceptually how quantum computing works and what we hope it\u2019s going to do.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0What do you mean you\u2019re not a physicist? You don\u2019t have a PhD from Harvard?<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0No. No. No, neither do you, I understand. Although you do have a master\u2019s degree. So you have a graduate degree in physics. So you\u2019ve got a head start on me.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0I do, but at QuEra, they barely let me in the door. I mean, A, you don\u2019t have a PhD, and two, it\u2019s not from Harvard or MIT. So I guess it was my charm or my green eyes or something that made the difference.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Well, you\u2019ve got a long career in executive leadership of sort of deep tech though, right? Or like emerging technologies.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0Absolutely. I was a CEO for about 20 years of a couple of deep tech companies and then served as a head of business, chief marketing officer of others. I have five years of experience in quantum computing, a year and a half or so at Classiq, which is a Tel Aviv based software company, and then I went to the dark side, to the vacuum side, right, to QuEra.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0To the very cold side.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0Well, to the room temperature cold side. Well,<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0but the atoms themselves get very cold.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0So, you know, when I first saw your book, thank you very much for sending me a copy. When I first saw your book and you said an outsider\u2019s introduction, I said, well, if he\u2019s an outsider, then I\u2019m a superconducting qubit. I mean, we just said you\u2019ve got 10 years in quantum. What do you mean outsider\u2019s introduction?<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Meaning coming from the outside. I mean, I had a lot of experience, my whole career has been in emerging tech initially with the internet in the early 90s and then the web and then mobile and then open source and big data and machine learning. But when I first encountered quantum computing, it was actually at a Think conference at TJ Watson, the IBM Research Center, and all the luminaries of the time, this is 2017, they were talking about the first 53-qubit machine that IBM was going to launch the following year. And they were talking about the theory and the experimental results and the way they were building these machines, and it sounded like science fiction. It was just so completely, it was the stereotypical mind-blowing moment, right? I mean, I only understood 25% and I\u2019m a pretty bright guy. I\u2019m used to understanding most of what\u2019s going on around me. So it was just, I mean, it was very compelling but it also felt very inaccessible. So, you know, I started, initially I was helping them with the open source strategy \u2019cause they just open sourced Qiskit. So that was relatively understandable for me and accessible. I knew open source, I knew, you know, how to manage community efforts around those things. But I really wanted to get more deeply involved and it took a lot of very generous physicists, answering a lot of really dumb questions for me to even start to feel like I got a grip on what was going on. So that\u2019s what I mean by outsider. I mean, this is the book, as I said, that I wish somebody had written and I\u2019d found it in December 2017 after going to the Think Summit, basically. (laughs)<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0I sympathize with a lot of what you\u2019re saying. When I interviewed at QuEra, came to visit the Boston office, and they showed me, \u201cOh, well, we\u2019ve got these rubidium atoms. We hold them in place using tiny lasers. They\u2019re four microns apart. We shoot lasers, and then we take a photograph and see how they\u2019re doing.\u201d It\u2019s like I came back home and said, \u201cYou know, it\u2019s science fiction until it isn\u2019t.\u201d And then you just see it in your eyes. It is just incredible. It really is. How many times in your career, and does it get more or less over time, do people tell you that a qubit is zero and one at the same time? (both laughing)<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0I do, I sort of, in the book, there\u2019s kind of a running joke to a certain degree of like, this is the kind of explanation that will make physicists sort of turn green and necessarily have steam come out of their ears. I mean, you know, there\u2019s that, and also that entanglement requires faster than light transmission of information. That\u2019s Olivia Lanes from IBM, that\u2019s her most favorite. But you know, Yuval, the other thing was, the one that always grinds my gears is the, it tests all the possibilities at once and then comes up with the right answer. But a few years ago at the Simons Institute, I interviewed Peter Shor and I asked him, how much does that explanation bother you? And he said, well, that\u2019s kind of what it does. (laughing) I mean, this is, I think, I\u2019m guessing, as central to your motivation for what you\u2019ve written as it is to mine, which is, this quantum stuff is so weird and we really don\u2019t have good language and metaphor and analogy to explain it or get an intuitive kind of grasp about it. When I was reading \u201cQuantum Bits,\u201d your collection of comic strips and explainers of all these core concepts in quantum computing, that was the overwhelming sense I got from that, too. It\u2019s like you\u2019re, it felt like a product of your struggle to find ways to explain and make these concepts tangible for people. Am I right?<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0Yeah, let me tell you, let me share the origin story. I mean, actually on the podcast as well. So we\u2019re both fellow podcasters. How many episodes have you done to date?<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Ninety four.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0That\u2019s really good. Come on. Almost up to the century mark.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Yeah, I think we\u2019re planning something really special for the hundred too.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0Well, I should be the one, right? I think I did close to 200 now on the Superposition Guy podcast. And then I had 60 or 70 when I was at Classiq and the Qubit Guy podcast. But actually I\u2019ve been podcasting for probably 20 years. I used to be the VR guy, the virtual reality guy, and then I was the charge guy when we were doing, I was doing wireless charging, and it just became second nature. It\u2019s actually a way for me to do two things. One is to learn. I basically ask the questions that are interesting to me, hoping that they\u2019re interesting to my audience.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Same.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0There\u2019s a story about Steve Jobs that Apple had one customer and that was Steve Jobs and he was sort of the conduit in the entire world. If you made him happy, then he had a good sense. And the other ended up being really good business development tool because once the microphone is off and we\u2019ve already created a relationship, hey, what do you know about QuEra? You know, did you have $42 million lying around? I can sell you a quantum computer. Whatever it is. Do you have Stripe? (both laughing) A payment plan, right? And then on the comics, I always wanted to do, I mean, I don\u2019t know what always is, but it\u2019s been a long time since I wanted to do quantum comics. And I think a couple of years ago, I came up, I was sort of brainstorming with myself and my favorite AI assistant on character names and ended up with this Atomique and Quantessa that I liked. And I couldn\u2019t find any good quantum jokes. I mean, they\u2019re always about, oh, my keys are here and there at the same time. They\u2019re either about the keys or about the cat. And it was like, okay, well, I can\u2019t do anything with that. But then at some point I said, well, actually, maybe they could explain some physics. Maybe they could explain entanglement and superposition and neutral atoms and Rydberg atoms. And ultimately you can find an explanation of what qLDPC code is and cat qubits and what have you.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Oh, it gets really advanced. I mean, at first I thought, well, this would be great for kids, just reading the first few. And it was, you know, the very basic superposition entanglement, which are weird enough and hard enough to explain. But as you say, you get all the way into, you know, past sort of Bell\u2019s inequality into error correction and even specific types of error correction. It was really impressive.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0And then I had to start calibrating. I mean, on one hand I had to calibrate the humor. So it\u2019s not just a wordplay. I\u2019ll tell you a story about German humor in a second. And then when generating the explainers, I absolutely wanted to get away from the simultaneously zero and one and try to see how can I explain that with no equations in a way that\u2019s comprehensible to intelligent non-physicists, right? You gotta be curious, you gotta be able to wanna read, but you don\u2019t have to have not even a graduate degree to get there. And then on the humor, I mean, some of the comics I thought were pretty funny. I used to. And if you can explain, I just sent Scott Aaronson a comic about P not equal NP. And if you can explain that in a comic that, I mean, he knows that much better than I do, of course. But<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Yes. He\u2019s a good judge though. He\u2019s a good judge of accuracy and also humor for that matter. He\u2019s a pretty funny guy.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0So once I was able to start generating comics, I said, you know what, maybe I can do them in other languages. And so I generated a comic in German, just as a test. And I sent it to my German friends and they come back. It\u2019s like, hmm. I said, the German is perfect. The comic is not funny. Okay. The first one, if they said the German is bad, the comic is funny, I could fix that, but how do I do the other way around? So it took a lot of work to be able to generate humor in multiple languages. And so I have examples on the Quantum Bits Comics. I\u2019ve got examples in Italian and French and German and Hebrew. And so we\u2019ll see where that takes us.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0That\u2019s cool. Yeah, I mean, back to entanglement, I liked, not only did you avoid the simultaneously zero one, but you used footwear to explain how entangled particles would behave, which I thought was very imaginative, definitely.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0How long did it take you to put the book together and what was the most difficult part for you?<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Yeah, I mean, so the book has its origin\u2026 I mean, I\u2019d been thinking about it, but then I went to O\u2019Reilly\u2019s sort of unconference, a Foo Camp, it\u2019s like a retreat. O\u2019Reilly Books has, or used to have, I think they\u2019ve gone to more virtual events since COVID. And I met Mike Loukides, who was the VP of content for O\u2019Reilly, and we were just chatting, he was asking me what I was doing, and he said, \u201cI\u2019ve always loved this book called \u2018The Soul of a New Machine\u2019 by Tracy Kidder. It\u2019s an incredible piece of work that follows an engineering team as they built the minicomputers or they built a minicomputer, which is a competitor to IBM and DEC back in the early 80s. It\u2019s really well-written and it really gets at the passion that the technology requires and the creativity and the discipline, which I always found fascinating. So when Mike and I were talking, he said, \u201cOh, you should write a book and call it \u2018The Soul of the New New Machine\u2019.\u201d So he just like, he pulled exactly the right reference out of the air to sort of inspire me. I\u2019m like, okay, that\u2019s a sign. So I started working on the proposal then. And you know, it was hard because it\u2019s a huge topic and every chapter could have been a book really, right? I mean, there\u2019s a chapter on how, you know, quantum physics sort of came together in the 1920s and challenged the ideas of classical physics. And that obviously, there\u2019s entire books written about that by people who are far more deeply experienced and have the expertise than I do. So I think that was the most difficult thing was sort of how do I span all of the parts? \u2018Cause I really did wanna give a broad and relatively shallow introduction so you could get a sense of the whole landscape. And that was what was the most challenging, was just researching all of the different aspects, but then holding back from going too deep into any of them. That was sort of the balancing act. What about yourself?<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0I think your book is sort of the traditional route. You have an editor, you have a publisher. We have a history in the family of self-publishing books. It started, my son in high school was really into investing and he put together this investing for kids book. And we learned how to self publish. And it\u2019s there on Amazon, actually also has comics. But at that time he had someone draw them. And I published a children\u2019s book, a story I wrote for my kids. It\u2019s about a boy who sort of goes through his father\u2019s wardrobe and then tries on his big pants and his suit and his tie. So he learns about sort of big and small and wide.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Nice.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0So we had the experience. So I said, \u201cOh, I could just publish it myself.\u201d I think the challenge was first calibrating the level of explanations, right? And although AI certainly played a big part in helping me put the book together and putting it in the right format and the comics are AI generated. There\u2019s so much human supervision, in this case, my supervision. Is that correct? Is that scientifically accurate? Right. Do I have too many terms or do I have not enough terms? I mean, I could make this a 500 page book or we could make it a shorter one. I actually did make a neutral atom version that we give away at trade shows. And then also the sequence, you know, am I referring to a term that I didn\u2019t define? And that was a challenge. But overall, I think it took me, I mean, obviously this is not my real job. This is more for nights and weekends.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Yeah, same.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0Project, I think it took me about two months to put that together, start to finish.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Wow. That\u2019s very fast, actually. I would have thought it was quite a bit longer. It took me almost two years to write. So I\u2019m obviously slower than you. I did most of my writing on planes too. I found that was the most, \u2019cause I could just block out, don\u2019t get on the wifi, ignore email, and get like three or four or five hours of writing done.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0And the interesting thing is now that, initially I started publishing comics on Quantum Bits Comics. It\u2019s a small website and then putting them, hey, this is Sunday Comics. I\u2019m gonna put them on LinkedIn every Sunday and, you know, Medium and Substack and so on. And after a while I said, \u201cYou know, I should actually make a book out of it.\u201d So it didn\u2019t start as a book, it just started as a collection of a few comics. And then I got a couple of requests to make semi custom or offshoot versions of this. Not exactly the movie rights, not yet. But there is a professor of education who asked to collaborate with me on creating a version for high school kids.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Oh, that\u2019s great.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0It\u2019d be a lot of fun. There\u2019s a quantum summer camp and hopefully we\u2019ll get to use it there. And then a European physics professor that wants to teach quantum at business schools says, oh, you know, could we do this other thing? So I\u2019ve got the next couple of weekends fully planned out.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0That\u2019s great. My hope too is that you know you got tangible evidence that your work is going to lead to you know more people being introduced to the topic and having an easier path into it and potentially finding you know a career even in some aspect of quantum and that\u2019s, that\u2019s I mean, I haven\u2019t, because the book just got released on on the weekend, you know, I haven\u2019t had that that kind of validation yet, but I\u2019m certainly hoping that that will be the case. So it\u2019ll be something that helps people, you know, find their way in.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0You know, you mentioned that history rhymes with the early internet. Do you feel that quantum is progressing faster, slower? Um, how are you thinking about that?<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0That\u2019s a really good question. I think, I mean, I tend to think more in terms of the earliest days of classical computing, right? So the late 40s, early 50s, you\u2019ve got von Neumann at Princeton and ENIAC at Penn, and there have been some, you know, Colossus and Z1, there\u2019ve been some previous sort of examples, but it really starts to get traction post-war. And to turn into something that resembles the industry that we recognize today, it\u2019s really like 40 years, right? It\u2019s sometime in the early 80s, basically, maybe mid 80s. So from that perspective, I think quantum is pretty much on the same track because we\u2019ve got sort of the starter\u2019s pistol at Endicott in 1981, and the sort of beginnings of machines that look like they might be able to do something really interesting in sort of the 2015 to 2020 kind of range. So from that perspective, I think we\u2019re moving along about the same pace as classical computing did. I think that there\u2019s a very strong chance we\u2019re gonna see acceleration soon. I think that the fact that we have the internet and open source software and GPUs and massive amounts of compute in the cloud and storage in the cloud, all of those tools are bound to accelerate the progress overall. Once it\u2019s, I wouldn\u2019t say fully, but once it has emerged from the physics lab and starts turning into a production technology, it\u2019s more of an engineering, you know, design and engineering kind of challenge. I think the thing that holds us back right now holds us back. The challenge that we\u2019re still facing is that there\u2019s fundamental science that we need for all of these modalities to, you know, get better fidelities or get better scale or get faster operations or whatever the particular challenges are. There\u2019s still real physics breakthroughs required. So, yeah, I mean, I think from your perspective, I mean, you\u2019ve been now five years in the industry. QuEra actually moved pretty quickly in that period of time. Is that, I mean, that\u2019s certainly how I feel from the outside. Is that what matches your experience on the inside?<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0Yeah, I think a lot of what you described is absolutely true and in my experience as well. Sometimes I talk with customers and we talk about ChatGPT and ChatGPT being sort of an overnight sensation that was 30 years in the making. Right. Everyone was working on AI and then there was the AI winter and then no one cared about it and then and then all of a sudden, oh, I can actually do this thing and now it\u2019s exploding. So the same is with quantum. Absolutely. You know, if you look at the QuEra computer, there are easily I think at least five Nobel prizes in physics inside it, not by the QuEra team, but you know, whether lasers or tweezers or other things. So accelerating at really an amazing pace. And when I look at QuEra, I sincerely believe that the future is closer than most people think. And that sort of the million or the billion, maybe trillion dollar question is, you know, when can you do, when can you run this or that algorithm? And what we\u2019re seeing is on the other on one hand, the hardware gets better. It used to be, oh, I have a five-qubit machine or a 50. And now QuEra and Harvard, maybe in reverse order, have demonstrated a 3,000-qubit system. And then the algorithms are requiring fewer resources than before. When Professor Shor created his algorithm, he thought it would need a million qubits, give or take. And now you can say, oh, actually, I can run it on 30,000 qubits or something of that nature. So the gap is really narrowing. And the other thing I agree with what you said is that the focus is shifting. It used to be that QuEra\u2019s work was probably 95% science and then 5% everything else. And now there\u2019s so much more engineering and how do we build it in a repeatable way? How do we serve a system? What does the software look like? Not enough to have a lab demo that works for five minutes on a Tuesday morning. You know, and you were at Braket. We are, have been really fortunate to partner with Amazon and our initial machine, Aquila, is now three and a half years on Amazon running 130 hours a week. That\u2019s quite an achievement. And I can tell you, I joined QuEra a week, a month before the Aquila launch.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0That\u2019s right.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0And so I go to the CEO and say, \u201cOkay, reporting for duty. What do you want me to do?\u201d He says, \u201cI\u2019m really busy the next month. We\u2019ve got to launch this thing. Why don\u2019t you go to Pedro and he\u2019ll tell you what to do?\u201d That\u2019s how I started my career at QuEra.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Well, you can\u2019t go too far wrong with Pedro\u2019s advice. He was actually one of the technical reviewers on the book. He very graciously read through an early draft and spotted all the mistakes I was making, correct them. So he\u2019s very generous with his time too.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0So do you really think that neutral atoms are going to win and then they\u2019re going to be overtaken by other modalities?<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0I mean, so you\u2019re referring to the coda. I felt compelled to sort of at the end. I mean, most of the book is history and context for creating, you know, a basis for understanding. But I felt like everybody I was telling about the book or read, you know, early drafts wanted me to tell them. So, so what\u2019s going to happen basically. So I had to add, you know, a section at the end. It\u2019s my best guess based on where the strengths and weaknesses are today. So when I look at neutral atoms, it is clear to me that there\u2019s an advantage that is accumulating for neutral atoms right now around scale and implementation of error correction, right? The incredible experiment that Vladan Vuleti\u0107 and Misha and the rest of their collaborators published for, you know, 48, demonstrating 48 logical qubits. I mean, that was not just logical qubits, but a lot of them, right? Really impressive. And it was, you know, it wasn\u2019t a full life cycle of error correction, but this is now two years ago, two and a half years ago. So there\u2019s been progress since then. So I think there\u2019s a lot of strengths in the platform, but at least at the moment, the biggest weakness is wall clock speed, right? Like the speed of operations. It takes a lot of time to prepare and move the atoms in place and then move them around, shuttle them around with the lasers. That\u2019s a time consuming set of operations. Now, can that be accelerated? Maybe, I don\u2019t know because I\u2019m not inside your R&D labs looking at your secret stuff. If it can and it can be competitive with, you know, superconducting qubits are a thousand times or more faster in terms of their operations. If you can get competitive with that, then maybe that advantage has even more legs. But that\u2019s my read at the moment. And then ultimately, you know, the story that gets us to millions or billions of qubits feels like it has to ultimately rely on either CMOS techniques of fabrication at scale or photonics because of the, you know, the sort of the scale of photons themselves. You can get a ton of photons and the fact they\u2019re less sensitive to heat and other environmental factors. So that was kind of the way I staged it, sort of neutral atoms or atom-based qubits, short-term advantage, superconducting midterm advantage, and then spin and photons in the long term. But I\u2019m sure you see that differently.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0Yeah, let me put on my QuEra hat just for a second.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Yes, please.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0I mean, if you think neutral atoms are slow, we should look at trapped ions. Now that\u2019s really slow. But a couple of things. First, I mean, you mentioned Vladan, Professor Vladan Vuleti\u0107, who\u2019s one of the co-founders of QuEra and our CTO today. We had a partner meeting a year and a half ago. We call it the QuEra Quantum Alliance. We have these partners that work with us and go to market that believe in neutral atoms. And Vladan was giving a guest lecture and I asked him, \u201cHey, Vladan, this sounds great what you\u2019re telling about QuEra and about neutral atoms. Do you think this is really the winning modality?\u201d And at that time, he said, \u201cFor the next five years, I am very confident that neutral atoms is the winning modality. And later, beyond that, I don\u2019t know.\u201d So this was a year and a half ago. Six months ago, I asked him that question again, because we have the annual meeting. So, okay, well, Vladan, last time you told me this, what do you think? And he says, now, based on the recent developments, I feel comfortable about a 10-year timescale.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Excellent.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0And of course, to your question, so first, obviously what matters is time to solution and not clock speed, right?<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Yes.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0And one of the things you see with neutral atoms, you see parallelism, you see super efficient quantum error correction. I mean, there was a paper from the Harvard team, not too long ago that showed that for quantum memory, not yet computation, the ratio between physical qubits and logical qubits is not a thousand to one, it\u2019s two to one.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Wow.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0And so you don\u2019t need a million qubits, right? You don\u2019t need a million qubits.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Right.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0You just need to use the right technology and write error correction code. So you get into that.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0I forgot to ask you about it, is that still LDPC codes?<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0Yes.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Yeah, okay.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0Now, I simplified a little bit. It\u2019s not two to one, it\u2019s like 2000 to 1000. So it\u2019s a little bit more complex than that. So these sort of overcome or compensate. There was also algorithmic fault tolerance that showed that you don\u2019t need to make the syndrome measurements every operation, but every algorithmic block. So there are all these ways that essentially compress the time to solution by orders of magnitude. And then there are the inherent advantages of neutral atoms. You know, all the atoms are identical, room temperature operation, easy to scale, bill of material that\u2019s reasonable and doesn\u2019t feel like a B2 bomber in terms of the cost or size.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Yeah, or an entire data center for just one machine.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0Did you see these LinkedIn posts that someone is converting Central Park into a big data center. That\u2019ll do really well, right?<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Yeah, that\u2019ll\u2026<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0So tell me sort of the, some, you know, just between us, right? The inside story. So how far is the book from your first draft? You know, what did the editor say when he saw the first draft?<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0I\u2019m a weird writer in that I procrastinate and I\u2019m slow and then what I produce is pretty close to a final draft. I do a lot of painful interior work when I\u2019m writing and that goes all the way back to high school. I\u2019ve always been like that. I don\u2019t know why exactly. So what I did was I wrote, I think I wrote two or three full proposals and then scrapped them. And because that was what I was describing at the beginning or earlier on about the trying to come up with the right structure that had enough breadth and not so much depth that it got bogged down. So I kind of, you know, I felt like I was going down rabbit holes in the first two or three proposals and then eventually hit on the structure that\u2019s almost exactly what it is now. And then pretty methodically kicked out sort of first drafts that only needed light revision, no giant rewrites, no big structural changes. So I mean, like I said, for whatever reason, I front load the effort and I do a lot of sort of, you know, hand wringing and I would tear up my hair if I had any left. Maybe that\u2019s where it all went, I don\u2019t know. And then produce something that\u2019s pretty close to final when I do actually manage to get the words on the screen. How about yourself? Do you have a very, like an iterative process? You do a lot, you talked about sort of trying to refine, especially, you know, the combination, the explanation and the humor that seems like a very delicate balance.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0I like to ship stuff. When I was running a virtual reality company, one of the models was, there\u2019s a lab I think in Canada, if I, I hope I still remember the name correctly, it\u2019s a professor Stephen Feiner and he had a rule for his postdocs: every week you\u2019re going to complete an experiment and do something or else you\u2019re gone. So what have you, what do we ship this, what did we ship this week?<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Wow.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0So I work fast. I do work pretty intensely. I do rely on intuition. I mean, even at QuEra, you know, I remember seeing on the internet, these AI generated Lego models of quantum computers. I said, you know what, why don\u2019t we just actually make one? And so we made it and then what else could we do that\u2019s cool on swag? Oh, we use optical tweezers. Let\u2019s make physical tweezers and do that. So I think, yes, QuEra is going to win the quantum race, but I definitely think we are winning the swag race. No one has anything close, right, to that. I did have a good number of iterations on the, actually on the physical aspect. I didn\u2019t want it to feel like a textbook. I didn\u2019t want it to feel like a newspaper, but then you have comics and text, and I didn\u2019t want it to be a thousand page missive. So I experimented with different book sizes and printed it out, read it, oh my God, this is so bad, and this is cringe and this is not. And then of course, with a closed network of family, my family probably are my worst critics, maybe they know me the best. My son, for instance, anytime I said, well, yes, I use AI here and here and here, and this is a really human review. He says, no, no, no, no, that doesn\u2019t work. If it\u2019s not worth time writing on your own, then it\u2019s not worth time reading.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Oh, okay. (LAUGHTER) Yeah. There\u2019s a lot of truth in that. There\u2019s a lot of truth in that. I feel like we\u2019re heading towards a future where AI will generate the majority of the text that we send back and forth and will ingest and summarize the majority of the text that we send back and forth. And maybe it\u2019ll just leave us to write the stuff that we really care about instead of empty fluff. But we can hope. I used, sorry, go ahead.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0It used to be, have your lawyer talk to my lawyer and now have your AI talk to my AI, right?<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Totally, totally, absolutely. Yeah, and I was just gonna say, I used AI to a certain degree, but mostly as a research tool. \u2018Cause I started writing it four years ago, so it was very early on. And what I would refer to it as is like having a conversation with Wikipedia, basically. Because it was, and the arXiv for that matter. I would ask it for examples of X or what\u2019s a good paper for explaining why or whatever. And it would do a sort of short cutting Google search essentially. And then having summarized results with sources that I could trace back. \u2018Cause that was the thing from the very early on stage, I knew that A, the language that would generate would be the kind of stuff that nobody wants to read, really, because you can tell it\u2019s a machine, even the best of it. You can still tell it\u2019s a machine. And B, the biggest risk is hallucination. Coming up with some physicist who doesn\u2019t exist or a theory that doesn\u2019t exist or whatever would have been embarrassing. So I definitely wanted to avoid that.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0Let me ask you a question that I ask my team, the commercial team, when they produce a document or an event or something, you know, I always ask them about the outcome. What do you want the customer to do when they read that? Or how do you want the customer to feel?<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0That\u2019s probably the best question.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0Yeah. So what\u2019s your answer? So what do you want people to walk away after reading your book?<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Yeah, it\u2019s a really good question because, you know, I referenced sort of the feeling I had at Think Summit 2017, it was exhilarating, right? I mean, as bizarre as this stuff is, as hard as it is to wrap your head around it, it\u2019s also so exciting that we\u2019re not only building a better understanding of how the universe works and what is reality and what\u2019s the operating system of the universe, but we\u2019re harnessing it to calculate things for us. It\u2019s like when you really dig into the deeper sort of profundity of what we\u2019re doing, we\u2019re engineering the raw material of the universe or raw energy of the universe into these instantiations that are like the Oracle of Delphi, right? It\u2019s asking the universe for answers and it tells us. Like that\u2019s just, I can\u2019t think of anything more exciting, but I understand how intimidating and confusing and bewildering it can be from the outside. So feeling like that sense of, that scale of wonder and excitement is accessible, even if you\u2019re not a physicist, even if you\u2019re not in one of these labs or able to do the extremely complex math in your head on or around a whiteboard, it\u2019s still something you can access and experience, you know, even at this early stage, you know, before it really gets solved and distilled and packaged and sort of, you know, productized for us, it\u2019s still in this raw exploratory stage that anybody can actually, you know, get involved in and participate in.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0For me, so obviously I wanted it to be accessible, you know, QuEra deals with sophisticated high-end clients and we don\u2019t usually target the, more the entry level. So this book, which is a personal project, I wanted to go a little bit more on the masses. I think the takeaway is that quantum is magical, but it\u2019s not magic.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Yeah, that\u2019s a good way to put it.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0And I hope, one of the things that I did in the book, in the back of the book, there\u2019s actually a glossary. So if you say to yourself, what is a quantum radar? What is a quantum phase estimation? Then you actually say, okay, here\u2019s the page. Let me read half a page of an explainer and see this comic and maybe I\u2019ll get just a little bit better sense of what\u2019s going on. So what\u2019s the sequel, Sebastian?<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Well, the original idea was something along the lines of The Soul of the New Machine. And so we\u2019re in this stage where sometime in the next five years, I feel there\u2019s a very high probability that somebody ships a quantum computer that\u2019s simply not simulatable by classical means because it\u2019s on the order of 50 logical qubits that can all be entangled with one another and two to the 50 is too many states to be able to directly represent. So there is going to be some moment where a machine exists that is the beginning in reality of a new era of quantum information technology. And that\u2019s what I wanna actually sort of, journalistically explore the team and the effort and the competition and the marketplace and the landscape and the public sector efforts and the private sector efforts and the global efforts that are the landscape right now and are going to produce that moment when this machine exists, maybe a QuEra machine.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0Five years? Yeah. I think you\u2019re pessimistic.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Good.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0I do think that the future is much closer than you think.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0That\u2019s great, that\u2019s great. I mean, I\u2019m going off of a public roadmap, so I know there\u2019s private forecasts as well that could be more aggressive. But we should plan to get together when the sequel to each of our books is out. You\u2019ve got your customization and your broadening out for other educational audiences. And I\u2019ve got my part two, which working title is One Perfect Qubit, by the way.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0One Perfect Qubit. I think building habits is a good thing. So podcasting, for instance, has been a habit of mine. So if I haven\u2019t done anything in two weeks, I\u2019m like, ah, something\u2019s wrong. And so actually publishing a comic every week is building a habit. I don\u2019t know about books yet. Sebastian, usually when I end my podcast, I ask people a hypothetical. If you could have dinner with one of the quantum greats, dead or alive, who would that be?<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0That\u2019s a great question. I mean, the first impulse is Feynman just because I\u2019ve read his books. He seems like a very original thinker and somebody who is, you know, brilliant and also brilliant at explaining. And so I think I would go with Feynman. How about yourself?<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0So, you know, Feynman, I published statistics, a histogram of answers, and Feynman, of course, is the lead. The other Feynman story is that I was chatting with Professor John Preskill, and I asked him that question, and he said, and I told him, everyone says, \u201cFeynman,\u201d and, you know, Professor Preskill was a student of Feynman. So, he\u2019s like, \u201cOh, no, I had plenty of dinners with Feynman.\u201d And he said, \u201cOh, actually, I would love to have even one more because to see how, I know how he thinks about that. But not to avoid the question, for me, I think it was probably Einstein. And it took many, many episodes until I heard someone say Einstein. I think you know that when I was really young and even stupider, I thought I was playing the violin and I was studying physics. And I said, yeah, I liked physics very much in high school. I said, you know, maybe I can be the best violinist of the physicists and the best physicist out of the violinists. And then Einstein, you know, he was a great, he was a very, very good violin player. And of course, his physics degrees were pretty good at physics. Pretty good at physics. So that kind of completely ruined my plan. I had to go.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0You could have switched to like French horn or something.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0You know, when I speak with quantum CEOs and they tell me about their modality and how great it is, sometimes you ask them, \u201cOkay, if this is so great, why is not everyone doing it?\u201d And I think, and you know, I think it was the CEO of The Rock that told me, \u201cYou know, I spent 20 years getting to this point and, you know, I sort of, I have forgotten things that most people haven\u2019t even learned yet. And you speak about the French horn, so I still play the violin and I know the notes, but if you ask me to switch to a French horn, that\u2019s not going to work. It is completely different way, completely different modality. Right. Switching modalities for me is not going to work. Well, Sebastian, thank you so much for spending time with me today.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Absolutely. Thanks to you, Yuval. I\u2019m looking forward to hearing the episode of your podcast I\u2019m appearing on, and then you can hear the episode of my podcast you\u2019re appearing on. Where do I get your book? So newquantumera.com, the podcast, the newsletter, the book, and Amazon and anywhere else that you buy your books. How about yours? Say the name of the website.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0So you can certainly buy it on Amazon, Quantum Bits, a comic book guide to quantum computing under my name. You can also go to quantumbitscomics.com\/buy and see both some of the custom editions as well as a link to buying that book.<\/p>\n
Sebastian:\u00a0Excellent. Thank you, Yuval. Talk to you again soon.<\/p>\n
Yuval:\u00a0Bye-bye.<\/p>\n