At the risk of being more wrong than before, I wanted to try again before the new campaign. Thus, here are the four stats that I think will define the 2026\u201327 NBA season. <\/p>\n
Offensive rebounds per game![\"Rockets\"](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/01m3wk6arxxyrzh9bnxj.jpg\" "\\"Rockets\\"")
<\/p>\n
The Rockets were the best offensive rebounding team in the NBA last year. | IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect<\/p>\n
Offensive boards are back on the menu. <\/p>\n
The three-point revolution brought on by the Steph Curry Warriors around 10 years ago also came with a notable decline in offensive rebounding. As more players started hanging out behind the three-point line, crashing the offensive glass came with a greater cost to transition defense, and most teams wound up abandoning it entirely as a schematic focus. If the ball bounced their way, great, but otherwise offensive rebounds were just a way for less talented teams to even the odds against better opponents. It was not a critical aspect of winning games at a high level, and as a result the average offensive rebounds per game hovered around 10 for the last decade. <\/p>\n
But no more! Offensive rebounding is becoming more popular again. It\u2019s a renaissance for glass-crashers everywhere. <\/p>\n
Last year there were 11.4 offensive rebounds snatched per game<\/a> across the NBA\u2014the highest mark since 2012! It marked the third consecutive year-over-year increase of offensive boards per game and, notably, racking up those rebounds was a hallmark of good and\/or overperforming teams. Check out the top five: <\/p>\n Team<\/p>\n ORB per game <\/p>\n Wins<\/p>\n Rockets<\/p>\n 15.0<\/p>\n 52<\/p>\n Trail Blazers<\/p>\n 14.1<\/p>\n 42<\/p>\n Pistons<\/p>\n 13.1<\/p>\n 60<\/p>\n Suns<\/p>\n 13.0<\/p>\n 45<\/p>\n Hornets<\/p>\n 12.8<\/p>\n 44<\/p>\n It\u2019s not an automatic path to success and there are many ways to win games beyond racking up offensive rebounds. But with more shots being taken every game than ever before, nabbing your own missed shots is becoming a more valuable way to offset a bad shooting night and win games. <\/p>\n Three-point shots per game <\/p>\n The rise of the three-point shot has been a source of frustration for many NBA fans this decade. What was once a stylistic preference of a few choice teams with good shooters was embraced as a universal truth in basketball. Prioritizing shots beyond the arc is a more sound strategy than going to the rim because three points are worth more than two. The big-picture statistics reflect this trend; the number of three-point attempts per game in the NBA has steadily climbed over the last 14 seasons and increased sharply from 2018 to 2025. <\/p>\n NEXT: The LeBron Era in Philadelphia Has Officially Begun. There Isn\u2019t Hope\u2014Only Expectations<\/a><\/p>\n But the advantage diminishes when everybody is doing it. A plateau was inevitable. Last season NBA teams appeared to hit that plateau. <\/p>\n For only the second time since 2010, the league-wide average for three-point shots per game was down year-over-year, dropping from 37.6 to 37.0. What\u2019s more, being a good three-point shooting team did not automatically mean better production. Of the teams who finished in the top five<\/a> for three-point attempts per game, not a single one also finished in the top five for offensive rating. <\/p>\n Team<\/p>\n 3PA rank<\/p>\n Offensive rating rank<\/p>\n Warriors<\/p>\n 1<\/p>\n 22<\/p>\n Hornets<\/p>\n 2<\/p>\n 8<\/p>\n Trail Blazers<\/p>\n 3<\/p>\n 15<\/p>\n Celtics<\/p>\n 4<\/p>\n 14<\/p>\n Suns<\/p>\n 5<\/p>\n 19<\/p>\n Good outside shooting is a prerequisite to compete in today\u2019s game. But from a shots per game standpoint, the numbers suggest the three-pointer has been maximized. Conclusion: we\u2019ll still see plenty of threes, but the total number won\u2019t creep up the way we\u2019ve consistently seen in the modern NBA. <\/p>\n Fouls per game The NBA saw a big jump in fouls per game last year. | IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect<\/p>\n Down the stretch in 2025, the referees tightened their whistle to a notable degree. It was celebrated by fans, analysts and players alike. Then the 2025\u201326 campaign started and everything had changed, apparently. Officials last year were fast and loose with foul calls, resulting in a significant year-over-year jump that may require an overcorrection this season. <\/p>\n There were 19.9 personal fouls called per game last season, 1.3 more than the previous season. That\u2019s the biggest change year-to-year since foul calls dropped from 20 per game to 18.7 from \u201823 to \u201824. It\u2019s the biggest increase in over 20 years; the \u201804\u2013\u201805 season saw 1.4 more fouls per game than the previous year. <\/p>\n NEXT: Predicting the 2026\u201327 NBA Award Winners: MVP, Rookie of the Year and More<\/a><\/p>\n Nobody wants more fouls called and the NBA is aware they slow down the game to the extent it displeases viewers. What\u2019s more, looking at the year-by-year numbers<\/a> for fouls per game, every time there\u2019s a notable change the following season results in a regression one way or the other. Should the pattern continue we\u2019ll see fewer fouls called over the course of the coming year. It won\u2019t be a massive change but it\u2019ll be noticeable. <\/p>\n Extra possessions per game <\/p>\n Talent rules supreme in the NBA. It always has and always will. But the league is also more talented than ever, which means finding ways to win on the margins is more important than ever. The team with the best player will still win the day quite often. But if the other team is winning in all the little ways with talent nearly as good, they have a fighting chance. Those little ways can serve as equalizers to overcome a talent deficit\u2014or emphasize one. <\/p>\n To identify what those equalizers are in the modern NBA, you have to look at the areas of focus for good teams. What are the smartest minds in basketball behind the winningest organizations directing their players to do? <\/p>\n For our money, it\u2019s three areas: offensive rebounding, forcing turnovers, and limiting their own turnovers. <\/p>\n NEXT: One Reason to Be Excited About Each NBA Team This Season<\/a><\/p>\n Without getting into the stats, it lines up that good teams are prioritizing those areas. Grabbing boards and racking up steals generates extra possessions outside of the standard make-or-miss factor that comes with each shot attempt. They are controllable variables, in other words; no coach can guarantee his players will make every shot, but through scheme he can maximize how many chances his players have to make a shot. It\u2019s a particularly important trait for a championship hopeful to have if they don\u2019t employ one of the very best players in the NBA whose shot-making prowess is so much better than average that the margins don\u2019t matter as much. <\/p>\n The stats seem to back up that theory. The Pistons led the NBA in extra possessions generated per game (offensive rebounds per game plus forced turnovers per game minus turnovers per game) with 14.9 while winning 60 games. The eventual champion Knicks ranked fifth in this stat. On the opposite end, the Bucks trailed 29 teams with only 6.8 extra possessions generated per game. Exceptions are teams like the Nuggets, who enjoy the talents of a singular offensive force in Nikola Joki\u0107 and so can overlook the margins in pursuit of supporting their elite talent. The full ranking can be found at the bottom of this piece. <\/p>\n Like all stats, there isn\u2019t a direct through line from extra possessions generated to winning games. But it\u2019s a common trait among the best teams in the league. Consistently winning the possession battle against opponents usually leads to good things. Generating extra possessions leads to more chances to win. <\/p>\n Every season brings a big-picture trend that the smart basketball minds are focused on. Consider this my own swing at anticipating what that\u2019ll look like this upcoming season. <\/p>\n Extra possessions generated per game, 2025\u201326 (ORB + forced TOs – TOs) <\/p>\n Team<\/p>\n Extra possessions generated<\/p>\n Wins<\/p>\n Pistons<\/p>\n 14.9<\/p>\n 60<\/p>\n Suns<\/p>\n 14.8<\/p>\n 45<\/p>\n Thunder<\/p>\n 13.7<\/p>\n 64<\/p>\n 76ers<\/p>\n 13.6<\/p>\n 45<\/p>\n Knicks<\/p>\n 13.5<\/p>\n 53<\/p>\n Raptors<\/p>\n 13.3<\/p>\n 46<\/p>\n Rockets<\/p>\n 13.1<\/p>\n 52<\/p>\n Heat<\/p>\n 13.1<\/p>\n 43<\/p>\n Hawks<\/p>\n 12.9<\/p>\n 46<\/p>\n Cavaliers<\/p>\n 12.7<\/p>\n 52<\/p>\n Celtics<\/p>\n 12.5<\/p>\n 56<\/p>\n Pelicans<\/p>\n 12.5<\/p>\n 26<\/p>\n Trail Blazers<\/p>\n 12.4<\/p>\n 42<\/p>\n Magic<\/p>\n 11.7<\/p>\n 45<\/p>\n Warriors<\/p>\n 11.6<\/p>\n 37<\/p>\n Grizzlies<\/p>\n 11.6<\/p>\n 25<\/p>\n Timberwolves<\/p>\n 11.3<\/p>\n 49<\/p>\n Kings<\/p>\n 11.2<\/p>\n 22<\/p>\n Jazz<\/p>\n 11.1<\/p>\n 22<\/p>\n Spurs<\/p>\n 10.9<\/p>\n 62<\/p>\n Hornets<\/p>\n 10.1<\/p>\n 44<\/p>\n Clippers<\/p>\n 9.6<\/p>\n 42<\/p>\n Lakers<\/p>\n 9.5<\/p>\n 53<\/p>\n Mavericks<\/p>\n 9.4<\/p>\n 26<\/p>\n Wizards<\/p>\n 9.1<\/p>\n 17<\/p>\n Nets<\/p>\n 9.0<\/p>\n 20<\/p>\n Pacers<\/p>\n 8.8<\/p>\n 19<\/p>\n Nuggets<\/p>\n 8.7<\/p>\n 54<\/p>\n Bulls<\/p>\n 8.1<\/p>\n 31<\/p>\n Bucks<\/p>\n 6.8<\/p>\n 32<\/p>\n Listen to SI\u2019s NBA podcast, Open Floor, below or on Apple<\/a> and Spotify<\/a>. Watch the show on SI\u2019s YouTube channel<\/a>.<\/p>\n![\"Anthony](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/01m3wk9resfxh0h2kswg.jpg\" "\\"Anthony")
<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/assets.minutemediacdn.com\/platform\/google_discover_icon.svg\"){kind=icon}
Add us as a preferred source on Google