{"id":914425,"date":"2026-10-03T07:58:17","date_gmt":"2026-10-03T07:58:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/914425\/"},"modified":"2026-10-03T07:58:17","modified_gmt":"2026-10-03T07:58:17","slug":"exclusive-the-former-staffers-influencing-government-on-ai","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/914425\/","title":{"rendered":"Exclusive: The former staffers influencing government on AI"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Anthony Albanese says it\u2019s a lie he doesn\u2019t personally use AI, although for security reasons he cannot say for what. Speaking to The Saturday Paper, the prime minister dismisses Opposition Leader Angus Taylor\u2019s claim that he is out of touch with the technology.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI do use AI. He\u2019s an idiot,\u201d the prime minister said on Thursday, adding: \u201cOne of the challenges here is that you need access to artificial intelligence to engage with some of the risks that are there from artificial intelligence.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere are elements of the emergence of AI that are unique, that present challenges that aren\u2019t the same as business as usual. They aren\u2019t the same as the cybersecurity issues that have been an issue for some time.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Albanese says AI companies are very powerful and the technology is moving very, very fast. \u201cWhich is why we need a response to ensure sovereignty is protected, and to ensure engagement, and that is what we have been doing with companies like Anthropic and OpenAI.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The prime minister is keen to make clear that he has met with AI executives. Most prominently, he signed a non-binding memorandum of understanding with Anthropic chief executive Dario Amodei on\u00a0April 1.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI\u2019ve engaged with international partners,\u201d he says. \u201cI\u2019ve met with companies when they\u2019ve been here in Canberra and in Sydney, including Dario and others.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Observers say these meetings point to the level of lobbying being undertaken by AI companies, borrowing from principles established by big tobacco. In Australia, that has involved hiring multiple Labor-linked staff. In America, it has involved multimillion-dollar donations to an already compliant administration.<\/p>\n<p>Ed Husic, who as former industry minister led the government\u2019s initial response to AI, says there is a huge asymmetry between the resources of the big AI companies and the expertise of government.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe imbalance is massive and, as a result, it\u2019s like pushing against an open door,\u201d he tells The Saturday Paper. \u201cWhat we\u2019re witnessing is nothing more than a shock and awe lobbying approach by US tech, designed to swamp government decision-making.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>An AI strategist who has worked inside and outside government made a similar point: \u201cThe amount of power these people have is incomprehensible \u2026 This isn\u2019t just a product that\u2019s being sold. This is dual-use capability. This is the equivalent of a private company developing nuclear weapons.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>OpenAI established an office in Sydney last December, although its engagement with the government had started earlier. In June 2025, the company\u2019s chief economist, Ronnie Chatterji, a former Biden economic adviser, led a team that went to Canberra to meet government figures and senior bureaucrats. Chief strategy officer Jason Kwon came to parliament in mid September.<\/p>\n<p>Last year, OpenAI hired Kate Pounder to help establish the company in Australia. She left in December. Pounder was the inaugural chief executive of the peak industry body, the Tech Council of Australia, and a former business partner of assistant technology minister Andrew Charlton, who is central to the government\u2019s response to AI.<\/p>\n<p>On Thursday, she was appointed as a commissioner to South Australia\u2019s Royal Commission into Artificial Intelligence, along with Reserve Bank board member Iain Ross and Stanford University machine learning expert Christopher Manning.<\/p>\n<p>Charlton and Pounder founded AlphaBeta Advisors together, an economics firm sold to Accenture before Charlton entered parliament in 2022. Mandala Partners emerged from the advisory and now publishes AI-focused research commissioned by the tech sector.<\/p>\n<p>The Saturday Paper asked Charlton this week about the significant shift in personnel from government to work for the AI companies.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe are focused on Australia\u2019s national interest. It\u2019s not about the personnel,\u201d the assistant minister said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s about making sure that we are clear about what the criteria is for investment. That criteria prioritises Australia and Australians. And if the investment is within that criteria, then we welcome it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In March, Anthropic engaged Labor-aligned government relations and lobbying firm Anacta Strategies. Anacta\u2019s co-founders, Evan Moorhead and David Nelson, are both former senior Labor strategists. Moorhead was also a former Queensland state Labor MP and state secretary. Anacta directors include former ACT Labor secretary Ash van Dijk and former WA Labor chief of staff Craig Comrie. Anacta also represents social media giant TikTok in Australia.<\/p>\n<p>As well as Anacta, Anthropic engaged government relations firm SEC Newgate\u00a0 at the same time. It also hired AI adviser Carolyn Hough, who was appointed to the attorney-general\u2019s reference group on copyright and AI by the Albanese government in 2024, after serving on the Rudd government\u2019s Ministerial Advisory Consultative Group on Cybersafety.<\/p>\n<p>The same month, Amodei met with Albanese and Treasurer Jim Chalmers, just ahead of opening the company\u2019s Sydney office in April.<\/p>\n<p>In June, Peter Anstee took up the lead position at OpenAI\u2019s Asia-Pacific national security policy team. Anstee, a former senior adviser to Malcolm Turnbull and a \u201ctop talent\u201d, according to the former prime minister, was <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au\/news\/technology\/2026\/09\/19\/exclusive-pms-ai-office-has-fewer-10-permanent-staff\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">poached from the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet<\/a>, where he was a first assistant secretary in the department\u2019s national security division. He had previously held a similar position in Home Affairs. Anstee was one of the senior bureaucrats spotted at a Canberra lakeside dinner with Chatterji in June 2025.<\/p>\n<p>About the same time as Anstee went to OpenAI, David Masters moved from Australian software giant Atlassian, where he was global head of public policy, to run Anthropic\u2019s government engagement.<\/p>\n<p>In July, OpenAI engaged Hanbury Strategy and Communications to lobby on its behalf in Australia. It uses Hanbury\u2019s head office in London. The local Hanbury branch is headed by Owen Torpy, the former chief of\u00a0staff to Labor minister Amanda Rishworth, and one of its directors is Annabel Clunies-Ross, a former senior adviser to Liberals Josh Frydenberg, Sussan Ley and Angus Taylor.<\/p>\n<p>In August, Anthropic appointed its general counsel, former US ambassador to Australia Jeffrey Bleich, as its international special envoy, in what is seen as an Australia-centric move.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHe gets Australia,\u201d the AI strategist notes of Bleich. \u201cThere\u2019s a lot of diplomacy that\u2019s needed here. He\u2019s a really good person for what is needed and people respect him. The role didn\u2019t exist. It is fascinating.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The key decision-makers in the Albanese government are the prime minister, along with Chalmers and Charlton, who is the junior minister to Industry Minister Tim Ayres.<\/p>\n<p>Within the Prime Minister\u2019s Office, the lead advisers are the head of policy, Sam Trobe; former Ed Husic senior adviser and AI ethics expert Ellen Broad; and national security adviser Gemma Smyth.<\/p>\n<p>There is also the new Office of AI in the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, headed by Fergus Hanson, which has a coordinating role and is still building staff through secondments from other areas.<\/p>\n<p>The Australian AI Safety Institute is headed by philosopher and air force reservist Kate Conroy, who has a concurrent job introducing \u201cresponsible AI\u201d in air force systems.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTo me it just highlights that vested interests have been having their say behind the scenes.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Until recently, there has been a heavy Treasury lens on AI. The intergenerational report describes AI as having the \u201cpotential to\u00a0drive the biggest economic transformation of our lifetime\u201d and a defining influence that will reshape Australia\u2019s economy over the next 40 years. Treasury, in its submission to the Joint Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence, cites industry estimates suggesting Australia\u2019s data centre pipeline could support more than $150 billion in investment by 2030, the equivalent of 5 per cent of today\u2019s nominal GDP.<\/p>\n<p>After the Medicare breach, however, there has been a change.<\/p>\n<p>OpenAI has apologised for the breach and said it would \u201cdo better for Australia\u201d after it admitted it sent out its agents \u201cwithout the full set of safeguards used in our publicly available products\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>It has committed an expert response team to find and fix weaknesses in Australian agencies and has promised to contribute to efforts to strengthen government cyber defences. Under a directive from Home Affairs, all departments and agencies have been told to take stock of their legacy systems and cyber defences.<\/p>\n<p>Albanese regards the company\u2019s response, including directly from chief executive Sam Altman, as a \u201cpretty comprehensive apology\u201d and points to it leading to subsequent admissions of thousands of sites potentially being affected, including United States government sites.<\/p>\n<p>Independent Senator David Pocock wants far more transparency in the interactions between government and lobbyists and says the breach shows that better, independent safeguards are needed \u2013 and that the government is being pressured covertly. \u201cTo me it just highlights that vested interests have been having their say behind the scenes, and the government goes from announcing an AI Safety Act to saying that we\u00a0don\u2019t need this at all, and our existing regs are fine.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Zeerak Talat, an expert in AI from the University of Edinburgh, says there is a manipulated narrative behind the public statements of AI executives, including after the Medicare hack.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cA lot of this is predicated on saying, \u2018Hey, we\u2019re the good guys who are doing bad things, so that other bad people won\u2019t do it,\u2019\u2009\u201d he says. \u201cLike, \u2018Look at how powerful these things are. No one can control them. You need us on your side, and you need us to be part of this and to bring us into the government and be another layer in the government.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe second part is an exceptionalism argument. That AI is such an exceptional tool that we need exceptional laws for it, rather than considering it as: AI is another tool among many that we regulate through existing regulatory measures.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere\u2019s an assumption here that cybersecurity laws don\u2019t apply to them. This also goes for their use of copyrighted material and so on.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The opposition is criticising Labor for being soft on cybersecurity but also says a fair deal for creatives and journalists is possible as the government negotiates a copyright deal to incentivise AI investment in Australia. Angus Taylor says frontier AI is a must for Australia\u2019s cyber defences.<\/p>\n<p>According to colleagues, Taylor is immersed in the technology and its implications, bringing expertise as a Turnbull-era cybersecurity minister and a former management consultant.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHe\u2019s gone deep on understanding AI and how it works, and he uses it every day,\u201d the Coalition source says.<\/p>\n<p>In Taylor\u2019s AI circle are shadow science, technology and innovation minister Aaron Violi, and frontbenchers Jonno Duniam, Andrew Hastie, James Paterson and Michaelia Cash.<\/p>\n<p>Within the opposition leader\u2019s office, there\u2019s no specific AI lead, but there is top engagement by Taylor\u2019s head of policy, Steve Hamilton, and chief of staff, Sam Riordan.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cPeople underestimate Angus\u2019s grasp of policy detail, particularly in an area where he\u2019s got experience and a background in [it],\u201d the Coalition source says.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAnd then his McKinsey days of getting to first principles and really understanding what\u2019s the opportunity, what are the risks, what are we actually negotiating here \u2013 he\u2019s very sharp in that space.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Coalition figures say the AI companies know a deal needs to be done in parliament with either the opposition or the Greens for the next big AI steps for Australia, including copyright and national standards.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt doesn\u2019t feel as aggressive or as in your face as people would assume,\u201d a senior opposition source tells The Saturday Paper.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s clear that their focus is on the government because they know the decision needs to be made now. You can tell they want to get the government somewhere and then bring us along, but their level is a lot higher.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThey\u2019re talking obviously to Angus and they\u2019re talking to the government.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Lobbying and other AI engagement is expected to ramp up in the next few weeks, with the hearings for the AI committees and the copyright consultations continuing. The government is hoping to release still-to-be-determined national standards before Christmas.<\/p>\n<p>In Australia, neither Anthropic nor OpenAI have reported donations to the major political parties, although that may change when the Australian Electoral Commission\u2019s transparency portal moves to monthly \u201creal-time\u201d disclosures next year.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI would anticipate at some point they would do what a lot of big players do and probably join the business forums of each party and sort of broadly support both,\u201d one MP quipped.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Anthony Albanese says it\u2019s a lie he doesn\u2019t personally use AI, although for security reasons he cannot say&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":914426,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[256,254,255,64,63,105],"class_list":["post-914425","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-artificial-intelligence","tag-ai","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-artificialintelligence","tag-au","tag-australia","tag-technology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/914425","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=914425"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/914425\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/914426"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=914425"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=914425"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=914425"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}