Bronsoler, A., Doyle, J. J. & Van Reenen, J. M. The impact of healthcare it on clinical quality, productivity and workers. SSRN Electron. J. 14, 23\u201346 (2021).<\/p>\n
Rajpurkar, P., Chen, E., Banerjee, O. & Topol, E. J. AI in health and medicine. Nat. Med. 28, 31\u201338 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Goh, K. H. et al. Artificial intelligence in sepsis early prediction and diagnosis using unstructured data in healthcare. Nat. Commun. 12, 711 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Toma\u0161ev, N. et al. A clinically applicable approach to continuous prediction of future acute kidney injury. Nature 572, 116\u2013119 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Young, A. T., Amara, D., Bhattacharya, A. & Wei, M. L. Patient and general public attitudes towards clinical artificial intelligence: a mixed methods systematic review. Lancet Digit. Health 3, e599\u2013e611 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Logg, J. M., Minson, J. A. & Moore, D. A. Algorithm appreciation: people prefer algorithmic to human judgment. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 151, 90\u2013103 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P. & Massey, C. Algorithm aversion: people erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 144, 114\u2013126 (2015).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Longoni, C., Bonezzi, A. & Morewedge, C. K. Resistance to medical artificial intelligence. J. Consum. Res. 46, 629\u2013650 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Fridman, A., Gershon, R. & Gneezy, A. COVID-19 and vaccine hesitancy: a longitudinal study. PLoS ONE 16, e0250123 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 MacIntyre, C. R., Mahimbo, A., Moa, A. M. & Barnes, M. Influenza vaccine as a coronary intervention for prevention of myocardial infarction. Heart 102, 1953\u20131956 (2016).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Warren-Gash, C., Smeeth, L. & Hayward, A. C. Influenza as a trigger for acute myocardial infarction or death from cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. Lancet Infect. Dis. 9, 601\u2013610 (2009).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 People at increased risk for flu complications. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/flu\/highrisk\/index.htm<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n Goeijenbier, M. et al. Benefits of flu vaccination for persons with diabetes mellitus: a review. Vaccine 35, 5095\u20135101 (2017).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Nichol, K. L. Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccination. Vaccine 26, D17\u2013D22 (2008).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Troeger, C. E. et al. Mortality, morbidity, and hospitalisations due to influenza lower respiratory tract infections, 2017: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Respir. Med. 7, 69\u201389 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Bonezzi, A., Ostinelli, M. & Melzner, J. The human black-box: the illusion of understanding human better than algorithmic decision-making. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 151, 2250\u20132258 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Cadario, R., Longoni, C. & Morewedge, C. K. Understanding, explaining, and utilizing medical artificial intelligence. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 1636\u20131642 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Pezzo, M. V. & Beckstead, J. W. Patients prefer artificial intelligence to a human provider, provided the AI is better than the human: a commentary on Longoni, Bonezzi and Morewedge (2019). Judgm. Decis. Mak. 15, 443\u2013445 (2020).<\/p>\n Adadi, A. & Berrada, M. Peeking inside the black-box: a survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access 6, 52138\u201352160 (2018).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Miller, T. Explanation in artificial intelligence: insights from the social sciences. Artif. Intell. 267, 1\u201338 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Mercado, J. E. et al. Intelligent agent transparency in human-agent teaming for multi-UxV management. Hum. Factors 58, 401\u2013415 (2016).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Stubbs, K., Wettergreen, D. & Hinds, P. J. Autonomy and common ground in human\u2013robot interaction: a field study. IEEE Intell. Syst. 22, 42\u201350 (2007).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Benartzi, S. et al. Should governments invest more in nudging?. Psychol. Sci. 28, 1041\u20131055 (2017).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Patel, M. S., Volpp, K. G. & Asch, D. A. Nudge units to improve the delivery of health care. New Engl. J. Med. 378, 214\u2013216 (2018).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Dai, H. et al. Behavioural nudges increase COVID-19 vaccinations. Nature 597, 404\u2013409 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Milkman, K. L. et al. A megastudy of text-based nudges encouraging patients to get vaccinated at an upcoming doctor\u2019s appointment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, 10\u201312 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Milkman, K. L. et al. A 680,000-person megastudy of nudges to encourage vaccination in pharmacies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2115126119 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Santos, H. C., Goren, A., Chabris, C. F. & Meyer, M. N. Effect of targeted behavioral science messages on COVID-19 vaccination registration among employees of a large health system: a randomized trial. JAMA Netw. Open 4, 5\u20138 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Schneider, F. H. et al. Financial incentives for vaccination do not have negative unintended consequences. Nature 613, 526\u2013533 (2023).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Yokum, D., Lauffenburger, J. C., Ghazinouri, R. & Choudhry, N. K. Letters designed with behavioural science increase influenza vaccination in Medicare beneficiaries. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 743\u2013749 (2018).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Chen, N., Trump, K.-S., Hall, S. & Le, Q. The effect of postcard reminders on vaccinations among the elderly: a block-randomized experiment. Behav. Public Policy 7, 240\u2013265 (2020).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Rabb, N. et al. Evidence from a statewide vaccination RCT shows the limits of nudges. Nature 604, E1\u2013E7 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Szilagyi, P. G. et al. Effect of personalized messages sent by a health system\u2019s patient portal on influenza vaccination rates: a randomized clinical trial. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 37, 615\u2013623 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Modin, D. et al. Effect of electronic nudges on influenza vaccination rate in older adults with cardiovascular disease: prespecified analysis of the NUDGE-FLU trial. Circulation 147, 1345\u20131354 (2023).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Johansen, N. D. et al. Electronic nudges to increase influenza vaccination uptake among patients with heart failure: a prespecified analysis of the NUDGE-FLU trial. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 25, 1450\u20131458 (2023).<\/p>\n Brewer, N. T., Chapman, G. B., Rothman, A. J., Leask, J. & Kempe, A. Increasing vaccination: putting psychological science into action. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 18, 149\u2013207 (2017).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Sheeran, P., Harris, P. R. & Epton, T. Does heightening risk appraisals change people\u2019s intentions and behavior? A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Psychol. Bull. 140, 511\u2013543 (2014).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Motta, M., Sylvester, S., Callaghan, T. & Lunz-Trujillo, K. Encouraging COVID-19 vaccine uptake through effective health communication. Front. Polit. Sci. 3, 630133 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Re\u00f1osa, M. D. C. et al. Nudging toward vaccination: a systematic review. BMJ Glob. Health 6, e006237 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 French, D. P., Cameron, E., Benton, J. S., Deaton, C. & Harvie, M. Can communicating personalised disease risk promote healthy behaviour change? A systematic review of systematic reviews. Ann. Behav. Med. 51, 718\u2013729 (2017).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Schulberg, S. D. et al. Cardiovascular risk communication strategies in primary prevention. A systematic review with narrative synthesis. J. Adv. Nurs. 78, 3116\u20133140 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Brewer, N. T. What works to increase vaccination uptake. Acad. Pediatr. 21, S9\u2013S16 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Tuckerman, J. et al. Short message service reminder nudge for parents and influenza vaccination uptake in children and adolescents with special risk medical conditions. JAMA Pediatr. 177, 337\u2013344 (2023).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Johansen, N. D. et al. Electronic nudges to increase influenza vaccination uptake in Denmark: a nationwide, pragmatic, registry-based, randomised implementation trial. Lancet 401, 1103\u20131114 (2023).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 S\u00e4\u00e4ksvuori, L. et al. Information nudges for influenza vaccination: evidence from a large-scale cluster-randomized controlled trial in Finland. PLoS Med. 19, e1003919 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Wolk, D. M. et al. Prediction of influenza complications: development and validation of a machine learning prediction model to improve and expand the identification of vaccine-hesitant patients at risk of severe influenza complications. J. Clin. Med. 11, 4342 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 La Macchia, S. T., Louis, W. R., Hornsey, M. J. & Leonardelli, G. J. In small we trust: lay theories about small and large groups. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 42, 1321\u20131334 (2016).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Rudert, S. C., Reutner, L., Greifeneder, R. & Walker, M. Faced with exclusion: perceived facial warmth and competence influence moral judgments of social exclusion. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 68, 101\u2013112 (2017).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Clark, J. K., Thiemb, K. C., Hoover, A. E. & Habashi, M. M. Gender stereotypes and intellectual performance: stigma consciousness as a buffer against stereotype validation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 68, 185\u2013191 (2017).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Mann, T. C. & Ferguson, M. J. Reversing implicit first impressions through reinterpretation after a two-day delay. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 68, 122\u2013127 (2017).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Filiz, I., Judek, J. R., Lorenz, M. & Spiwoks, M. The extent of algorithm aversion in decision-making situations with varying gravity. PLoS ONE 18, e0278751 (2023).<\/p>\n Waters, E. A. et al. Translating cancer risk prediction models into personalized cancer risk assessment tools: stumbling blocks and strategies for success. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 29, 2389\u20132394 (2020).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Hasselblad, V. & Hedges, L. V. Meta-analysis of screening and diagnostic tests. Psychol. Bull. 117, 167\u2013178 (1995).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Castelo, N., Bos, M. W. & Lehmann, D. R. Task-dependent algorithm aversion. J. Mark. Res. 56, 809\u2013825 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Saccardo, S. et al. Field testing the transferability of behavioural science knowledge on promoting vaccinations. Nat. Hum. Behav. 8, 878\u2013890 (2024).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 DellaVigna, S. & Linos, E. RCTs to scale: comprehensive evidence from two nudge units. Econometrica 90, 81\u2013116 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Service, O. et al. EAST: four simple ways to apply behavioural insights. Annu. Rev. of Policy Des. 5, 1\u201353 (2017).<\/p>\n Jacobson, M., Chang, T. Y., Shah, M., Pramanik, R. & Shah, S. B. Can financial incentives and other nudges increase COVID-19 vaccinations among the vaccine hesitant? A randomized trial. Vaccine 40, 6235\u20136242 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Campos-Mercade, P. et al. Monetary incentives increase COVID-19 vaccinations. Science 374, 879\u2013882 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Bryan, C. J., Tipton, E. & Yeager, D. S. Behavioural science is unlikely to change the world without a heterogeneity revolution. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 980\u2013989 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Brody, I. et al. Targeting behavioral interventions based on past behavior: evidence from vaccine uptake. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 192, 104465 (2026).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 de Ridder, D., Kroese, F. & van Gestel, L. Nudgeability: mapping conditions of susceptibility to nudge influence. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 17, 346\u2013359 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Chater, N. & Loewenstein, G. The i-frame and the s-frame: how focusing on individual-level solutions has led behavioral public policy astray. Behav. Brain Sci. 46, e147 (2022).<\/p>\n Funk, C., Hefferon, M., Kennedy, B. & Johnson, C. Trust and Mistrust in Americans\u2019 Views of Scientific Experts. https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/science\/2019\/08\/02\/trust-and-mistrust-in-americans-views-of-scientific-experts\/<\/a> (Pew Research Center, 2019).<\/p>\n Pasquini, G., Stocking, G., Kikuchi, E., Pula, I. & Kirzinger, A. Where Do Americans Get Health Information, and What Do They Trust? https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/science\/2026\/04\/07\/where-do-americans-get-health-information-and-what-do-they-trust\/<\/a> (Pew Research Center, 2026).<\/p>\n Saccardo, S. et al. Scaling Nudges: Who Moves and How. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2139\/ssrn.3971192<\/a> (SSRN, 2025).<\/p>\n R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing https:\/\/www.r-project.org<\/a> (2021).<\/p>\n Coppock, A. randomizr: easy-to-use tools for common forms of random assignment and sampling. Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) https:\/\/cran.r-project.org\/web\/packages\/randomizr\/index.html<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n Colling, L. J. bayesplay: the bayes factor playground. R package version 0.9.3. GitHub https:\/\/github.com\/bayesplay\/bayesplay<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n Rich, B. table1: tables of descriptive statistics in HTML. CRAN: Contributed Packages https:\/\/doi.org\/10.32614\/CRAN.package.table1<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Wickham, H. stringr: simple, consistent wrappers for common string operations. Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) https:\/\/cran.r-project.org\/web\/packages\/stringr\/index.html<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n L\u00fcdecke, D. sjPlot: data visualization for statistics in social science. Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) https:\/\/CRAN.R-project.org\/package=sjPlot<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Coppock, A. randomizr: easy-to-use tools for common forms of random assignment and sampling. Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) https:\/\/cran.r-project.org\/web\/packages\/randomizr\/index.html<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Champely, S. pwr: basic functions for power analysis. GitHub https:\/\/github.com\/heliosdrm\/pwr<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n Wickham, H. The split-apply-combine strategy for data analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 40, 1\u201329 (2011).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Sievert, C. Interactive Web-Based Data Visualization with R, Plotly, and Shiny (CRC, 2020).<\/p>\n Rizopoulos, D. ltm: an R package for latent variable modeling and item response theory analyses. J. Stat. Softw. 17, 1\u201325 (2006).<\/p>\n Grolemund, G. & Wickham, H. Dates and times made easy with {lubridate}. J. Stat. Softw. 40, 1\u201325 (2011).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Long, J. A. jtools: analysis and presentation of social scientific data. J. Open Source Softw. 9, 6610 (2024).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Hugh-Jones, D. ggmagnify: create a magnified inset of part of a \u2018Ggplot\u2019 object. GitHub https:\/\/github.com\/hughjonesd\/ggmagnify<\/a> (2026).<\/p>\n Wickham, H. et al. Welcome to the Tidyverse. J. Open Source Softw. 4, 1686 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Lenth, R. V. & Piaskowski, J. emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) https:\/\/cran.r-project.org\/web\/packages\/emmeans\/index.html<\/a> (2026).<\/p>\n Gomila, R. Logistic or linear? Estimating causal effects of experimental treatments on binary outcomes using regression analysis. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 150, 700\u2013709 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Hellevik, O. Linear versus logistic regression when the dependent variable is a dichotomy. Qual. Quant. 43, 59\u201374 (2009).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Wetzels, R. et al. Statistical evidence in experimental psychology: an empirical comparison using 855 t tests. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 6, 291\u2013298 (2011).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Dienes, Z. Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Front. Psychol. 5, 781 (2014).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Bronsoler, A., Doyle, J. J. & Van Reenen, J. M. The impact of healthcare it on clinical quality,…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":919476,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[64,63,37016,17317,37019,1325,137,8707,500,37015,147467,9865,37017,5566,37018,47226],"class_list":["post-919475","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-healthcare","tag-au","tag-australia","tag-behavioral-sciences","tag-communication","tag-experimental-psychology","tag-general","tag-health","tag-health-services","tag-healthcare","tag-human-behaviour","tag-influenza-virus","tag-life-sciences","tag-microeconomics","tag-neurosciences","tag-personality-and-social-psychology","tag-preventive-medicine"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/919475","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=919475"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/919475\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/919476"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=919475"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=919475"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=919475"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n