That\u2019s all, folks!<\/p>\n
Thank you for all your brilliant questions and for reading along! Even if yours didn\u2019t get answered, we appreciate getting insights into what readers are interested in hearing more about as we continue our coverage \u2013 Gaby<\/p>\n
I love Guardian readers for getting stuck into crucial topics like El Ni\u00f1o. Thank you for your well-informed questions. Sorry we could not answer them all \u2013 Jon<\/p>\n
Share<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a013.36 EDT<\/p>\n Key events<\/p>\n Is it naive to hope for a climate crisis panacea?<\/p>\n WFL5678<\/a> asks: How naive is it to hope there is some sort of climate crisis panacea to sort all this out? A game-changing discovery\/invention that helps all nations\/individuals be carbon negative?<\/p>\n double quotation markJon says: I can relate to this question, as I have found myself hoping for the same thing at certain points over the past two decades covering this beat. It was one of two useless strategies I adopted to cope psychologically with so much dismal data and depressing scenarios – the other one being the related tendency to hope I might be wrong about all of this because I am a mere journalist – and that someone much smarter than me might either prove my worst fears unfounded or come along with a smart solution.<\/p>\n I have since come to realise that both of these mental crutches were not just worthless but irresponsibly dangerous. Even as early as the 1980s, governments were putting off tough decisions on the climate threat on the grounds that technology and the market would find solutions. Ever since, the same excuse has been used to kick the can further down the road. We are now stuck with a whole bunch of these fake fixes, such as carbon capture and storage or blue hydrogen or carbon credits, all of which are propagated by the fossil fuel industry to extend their business models. <\/p>\n The latest and most damaging of these is the idea that artificial intelligence will find a solution, as long as we have enough data centres. Of course, that means using much more energy and water, which makes the fundamental problem worse. And there is no guarantee we will like the answer thrown up by a machine. What if ChatGPT or Claude or Gini or whatever AI we set up as a guru tells us the most effective climate solution is the extermination of the human race?<\/p>\n No, I think we should steer clear of phony or unproven remedies and stick to tried and trust solutions that climate scientists tell us will be enough – ending fossil fuels, electrifying energy, protecting ecosystems, reforesting, changing diets and reducing waste and excess consumption.<\/p>\n Share<\/a>Will El Ni\u00f1o lead to food price rises?<\/p>\n JakobLW<\/a> asks: The Arabian Spring in 2011 was probably started by food shortage due to high temperatures and droughts. What are possible similar outcomes this and next year? How will El Ni\u00f1o affect food prices next year? Will it cause an economic disaster in 2027 or 2028?<\/p>\n bookishlondonlesbian<\/a> asks: What kind of knock-on effects can we expect from this El Ni\u00f1o after it has ended?<\/p>\n double quotation markGaby says: There are concerns that this strong El Ni\u00f1o will impact agricultural bread baskets where food is grown and the supply chains that deliver around the world, driving both shortages and costs. The World Food Programme is already sounding the alarm, estimating that 274 million people in 45 countries could face food insecurity by the end of next year. Increased risk of hunger will likely impact the most vulnerable populations around the world, and the WFP is pushing for early action to mitigate the worst effects. <\/p>\n But a rise in extreme weather events won\u2019t only wreak havoc on crops, livestock, and food production. It will also add challenges for factories, shipping, and transportation. Global food supply chains are already facing shocks from Donald Trump\u2019s tariffs, the war in Iran, and strain from conditions fueled by the climate crisis. El Ni\u00f1o will add new layers of challenges. A rise in the number and intensity of extreme weather events can wreak havoc on crops, livestock, and food production, but also create problems for factories, shipping, and transportation. \u201cForecasters predict strong intensity by winter, which will likely arrive when supply chains are already stressed by tariff-driven sourcing disruptions, Strait of Hormuz shipping restrictions, and elevated fertilizer costs,\u201d Jonathan Colehower, managing director of supply chain practice at global IT solutions firm UST said during an August interview<\/a> with Reuters on the issue. Maximo Torero, chief economist at the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, has also told reporters <\/a>that global food prices that are already rising because of these geopolitical pressures could climb further. Of course, the dangers posed by El Ni\u00f1o change region-by-region, so some places will be hit harder than others. That means, particular goods may also be affected. Coffee, chocolate, and palm oil are all produced in areas bracing for extreme weather.<\/p>\n Food shortages and droughts linked to climate change is thought to be one factor in the 2011 Arab Spring. Photograph: EGYPT\/REUTERSShare<\/a>What will it take for our leaders to finally see the threat from climate change?<\/p>\n eamonmcc<\/a> asks: What will it take for elites in finance, business and politics to finally publicly admit the game is up and that climate change is the greatest threat humanity we have collectively ever faced?<\/p>\n double quotation markGaby says: I wish I knew the answer. It certainly feels overwhelming to see the escalating threats alongside both inaction and downright denial. One thing I can say is that while the problem is global many solutions are local. Experts have told me time and time again that we must adapt to the extremes caused by the climate crisis while we continue to push for a better future and that happens at the community level. Perhaps a silver lining of this El Ni\u00f1o is it may offer a glimpse of the challenges that will arise as the world warms – and there is still time to prepare.<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a013.09 EDT<\/p>\n Climate change seems to be accelerating – should we worry?<\/p>\n Dormant2<\/a> asks: I\u2019m surprised how suddenly we seem to have gone from small climate effects to very noticeable ones such as this year\u2019s heatwaves and the lateness of the first Atlantic hurricane. Is this an acceleration and is it a worry?<\/p>\n double quotation markJon says: This concerns me enormously. I started to be worried about this in 2023, when sea surface temperatures jolted upwards. The following year – as the trend persisted – I put a similar question to Gavin Schmidt, the director of the Nasa Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York who said scientists were still struggling to explain whether the sudden rise was a blip or an alarming new trend<\/a>.<\/p>\n Since then various explanations have been put forward, including the possibility that the Earth is warming faster because it is losing the heat-reflecting \u201calbedo\u201d effect of white snow and ice at the poles, or the widely-held view that pollution controls have reduced aerosols that previously limited the amount of sunlight reaching the earth\u2019s surface.<\/p>\n Scientific opinion seems to be moving towards an acceptance of the theory that global heating has sped up over the past 15 years. Last year, Zeke Hausfather, an influential climate scientist, said there is now sufficient evidence from multiple sources<\/a> – climate models, ocean heat content, and changes in earth energy imbalance – to \u201ctips the scale toward pretty clear acceleration in recent years.\u201d<\/p>\n Sometimes you can\u2019t help wishing experts are wrong. But I trust climate scientists – who include some of the smartest people on the planet – are trying to find the truth and they are the best guides to what is happening.<\/p>\n \u2018Scientific opinion seems to be moving towards an acceptance of the theory that global heating has sped up over the past 15 years.\u2019 Photograph: Razafindrakoto Mamy Nirina\/AFP\/Getty ImagesShare<\/a>How likely is the AMOC to shut down?<\/p>\n funkymentalist<\/a> asks: Unrelated to El Ni\u00f1o, what is the likelihood of the AMOC (Atlantic meridional overturning circulation) shutting down?<\/p>\n double quotation markJon says: I don\u2019t think these two things are unrelated. Everything is affected by climate breakdown. And both El Ni\u00f1o and the slowdown of AMOC are related to the staggeringly huge amounts (see this article on zettajoules<\/a> which I also referred to above) of extra energy that the oceans are being forced to absorb as a result of greenhouse gas burning. <\/p>\n Quick refresher for any readers who are unfamiliar with this topic: \u201cAmoc, or the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation, is a system of ocean currents that brings heat into the northern Atlantic. Warm surface water from the tropics flows north and releases its heat in the subpolar Atlantic, south of Greenland and west of Britain and Ireland. Then it cools and sinks to a depth of between 2,000m to 3,000 metres before returning south as a cold current. Amoc is one of our planet\u2019s largest heat transport systems, moving the equivalent of 50 times the human energy use, and it has a particularly strong impact on the climate in Europe, affects the ocean\u2019s CO2 uptake and oxygen supply, as well as rainfall patterns in the tropics.\u201d<\/p>\n A collapse of AMOC would be catastrophic for large parts of the world. This was considered a remote likelihood until relatively recently. But recent studies show a much higher risk indeed. AMOC is now at its weakest for 1,600 years. One of the leading experts in the field, Stefan Rahmstorf put it to me in these terms<\/a>: \u201cIt is a question of risk assessment. I compare it to being told that there is a 10% chance of an airplane crashing. Would you get on that plane? I wouldn\u2019t. The disastrous consequences are unacceptable.\u201d<\/p>\n He was speaking to me in 2024. Since then the dangers have increased. My colleague Damian Carrington wrote earlier this year of new AMOC research that \u201cfound an estimated slowdown of 42% to 58% in 2100, a level almost certain to end in collapse.\u201d<\/p>\n There are many areas where climate journalists, scientists and activists feel the urge to pull their hair out in frustration at their inability to close the huge gap in understanding between the dangers we face and the action that governments need to take. For me, this is one of the worst.<\/p>\n Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), which is a major climate system that transports heat around the planet as the temperature and salt content of the water changes. This current prevents the UK and other countries in north-west Europe from having the same icy winters often experienced at the same latitudes in Canada. Photograph: Henrik Egede-Lassen\/Zoomedia\/PAShare<\/a>Why is it called \u2018El Ni\u00f1o\u2019 rather than something like \u2018El Monstruo Gordo\u2019?<\/p>\n Rad_Mobil<\/a> asks: Why is it called \u201cEl Ni\u00f1o\u201d rather than something like \u201cEl Monstruo Gordo\u201d?<\/p>\n double quotation markGaby says: The name \u201cEl Ni\u00f1o\u201d actually harkens back to long before forecasters used the phenomenon to track global weather patterns. Fishermen off the coast of South America began to track unusually warm water that would show up every few years right around Christmas – thus \u201cThe Little Boy\u201d referring to the Christ child in Spanish. Scientists adopted the name, and added \u201cLa Ni\u00f1a\u201d as its counterpart (when sea surface temperatures cool), and together they became ENSO – the El Ni\u00f1o Southern Oscillation. This year, though, feel free to call it \u201cEl Monstruo Gordo!\u201d It\u2019s going to be a big one.<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a013.09 EDT<\/p>\n Will all ocean life eventually be killed off?<\/p>\n BEAR4NATURE<\/a> asks: Assuming that future El Ni\u00f1o events are likely to become more frequent and more intense, primarily caused by additional warming of the Pacific Ocean due to human-caused climate alteration, is it feasible that most or all current oceanic lifeforms might eventually die off over centuries or even decades?<\/p>\n double quotation markJon says: I haven\u2019t heard anyone suggest the total eradication of all lifeforms in the ocean. Even in the previous five great waves of extinction, some forms of ocean life have survived. In fact, I would guess marine life is usually less vulnerable than terrestrial life. But there are unprecedented threats right now in the forms of heat acidity, destratification, a weakening of the biotic pump and the slowdown of currents.<\/p>\n For me, the most shocking statistic of the year is about the heat content of the oceans, which has doubled in the past two decades. That is because the oceans absorb 90% of the excess energy left in the Earth System as a result of human-caused climate disruption (the burning of oil, gas and coal, which has a \u201cgreenhouse effect\u201d that prevents energy from escaping back out into space.<\/p>\n The scale of the energy build-up in the oceans is what knocks me sideways. As I wrote in an earlier story<\/a>:<\/p>\n \u201cThe scientist John Abraham has previously calculated the accumulation of energy in terms of the explosive power of the Little Boy atomic bomb that devastated Hiroshima in 1945. In 2020, he observed that the amount of heat being added to the oceans was equivalent to about five Hiroshima bombs of energy every second. By 2022, this had gone up to seven Hiroshimas every second. Last year, the WMO figures suggest, it was closer to 11 Hiroshima explosions per second.\u201d<\/p>\n Imagine all that extra heat! Some of it accumulating in the depths for centuries. Some of it vomited back out into the atmosphere in the form of an El Ni\u00f1o.<\/p>\n How can ocean life not be affected by that? We know that coral reef systems are dying (or as one expert described it to me \u201cflickering out like lights across the world\u201d) but there must be so many other impacts that cannot yet grasp because humans know almost less about the deep than we do about outer space.<\/p>\n A field of stag-horn coral bleached white on the Great Barrier Reef during a mass bleaching event. \u2018We know that coral reef systems are dying (or as one expert described it to me \u201cflickering out like lights across the world\u201d) but there must be so many other impacts that cannot yet grasp\u2019. Photograph: Brett Monroe Garner\/Getty ImagesShare<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a012.33 EDT<\/p>\n Are ‘Godzilla-level’ warnings all hype?<\/p>\n saltybacon<\/a> asks: Doesn\u2019t the hype, as in \u201cGodzilla-level\u201d just turn a lot of people off the whole issue? Why do the warnings always have to be so over top? And what will be said if very little actually happens away from the norm? Keeping in mind the norm has always been wildfires, floods and storms since time began.<\/p>\n double quotation markGaby says: I hear you – the names can be a little much. These colloquialisms aren\u2019t coming from scientists who are still describing this El Ni\u00f1o as a \u201cvery strong\u201d event. But I think what people who use these terms – whether they are journalists or emergency managers or others in communication roles – are trying to convey is the startling leap we are seeing in the numbers this year. It\u2019s a challenge to balance putting that into perspective, without causing either undue alarm or contributing to messaging fatigue. But here\u2019s what we know: this El Ni\u00f1o is well on its way to being off the charts and it\u2019s expected to strengthen over the next few months. An El Ni\u00f1o is classified by how many degrees Celsius monthly sea surface temperatures in parts of the Pacific warm.<\/p>\n El Ni\u00f1o is declared after that region rises 0.5C above normal. As of 21 September, the daily anomaly in that region reached over 3C – setting a new record. This is alarming because temperatures are exceptionally high – and still climbing. There is of course some nuance needed here. Scientists have had to create a new system to measure these temperatures in recent years because overall the oceans are warmer.<\/p>\n So, to compare the strength of previous El Ni\u00f1os to this one, adjustments are needed. But even adjusting for the underlying warmth, this El Ni\u00f1o is still close to breaking the record overall and is far stronger than any other recorded for this time of year. While there may be places around the world that don\u2019t see the effects as directly, and experience the \u201cnorm,\u201d many places are already being impacted. Marine ecosystems are suffering, and strong storms and coastal erosion are already wreaking havoc.<\/p>\n Colloquialisms like \u2018Gozilla\u2019 aren\u2019t coming from scientists who are still describing this El Ni\u00f1o as a \u2018very strong\u2019 event but what those using these terms are trying to convey is the startling leap we are seeing in the numbers this year. Photograph: Photo 12\/AlamyShare<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a013.36 EDT<\/p>\n How will El Ni\u00f1o affect UK weather this winter?<\/p>\n richie_rich_1973<\/a> asks: What will this El Ni\u00f1o really mean for winter weather in the UK this year?<\/p>\n alistairwick<\/a> asks: What are the expected effects on the UK this year and next? Warmer winter and summer or more chaotic weather? Or both?<\/p>\n DenisLaMinaccia<\/a> asks: With the previous super-sized events resulting in a step up in summer temperatures, should we expect summer 2027 to start sooner and are we now certain that this summer is very likely to be hotter and drier in the UK than in 2025 and 26?<\/p>\n double quotation markJon says: The UK Met Office has warned this El Ni\u00f1o will be the largest in memory and probably the biggest since the 19th century. The impacts will be strongest around its peak, which is expected in November or December. \u201cWe expect the influence of El Ni\u00f1o to start to increase the chances of wetter, stormier conditions for northwest Europe<\/a>, including the UK, in the coming autumn and early winter. But the Met Office has distanced itself from some of the wilder headlines, such as \u201cEl Ni\u00f1o to smash Brits with polar vortex of snow and storms in dire warning.\u201d<\/p>\n Rather more cautiously, its meteorologists observe: \u201cEl Ni\u00f1o can increase the likelihood of wetter, stormier and generally milder conditions in the UK during late autumn and early winter. Later in winter, following the peak of El Ni\u00f1o, the stratospheric polar vortex can become weaker. This may raise the chance of Sudden Stratospheric Warming events, which can increase the potential for cold weather. These are shifts in probability rather than guarantees. El Ni\u00f1o does not determine individual weather events, and the current forecast does not support the suggestion that the UK is about to be \u201csmashed\u201d by widespread snow associated with changes to the polar vortex.\u201d It also doesn\u2019t rule it out, though that may be caution on the part of an organisation that learned the hard way not to completely rule out extreme weather, as anyone old enough to remind Michael Fish and the storm of 1987<\/a> will attest.<\/p>\n In the short term, the UK forecast suggests a drop in temperatures, but no indication of widespread low-level snow across 12 areas. Rain, snow and more powerful El Ni\u00f1o impacts are more likely to come later in the winter.<\/p>\n The Met\u2019s full statement can be found here<\/a>.<\/p>\n The UK Met Office \u2018learned the hard way not to completely rule out extreme weather, as anyone old enough to remind Michael Fish and the storm of 1987 will attest.\u2019 Photograph: Picasa\/BBC WeatherShare<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a013.25 EDT<\/p>\n Is El Ni\u00f1o mostly a maritime based event?<\/p>\n MrsWoo2<\/a> asks: Is El Ni\u00f1o mostly a maritime based event or does it also affect large continental areas?<\/p>\n double quotation markGaby says: El Ni\u00f1o may start in the sea but the ocean and the atmosphere are inextricably linked – and that\u2019s why the climate phenomenon can impact continental areas all over the world. Basically what\u2019s happening is a big transfer of heat. The way climate scientist Daniel Swain describes it, is like the ocean discharging a full battery.<\/p>\n The excess warmth in the Pacific is able to rise to the surface and burp off into the atmosphere. The more heat there is in the atmosphere, the more able it is to absorb moisture. But El Ni\u00f1o events also shift the jet stream – a current of air that encircles the earth that steers some weather systems.<\/p>\n This move changes rain and snow patterns and can leave places less accustomed to those patterns more exposed. Of course it\u2019s all a bit more complicated than that, and there are lots of features in play at once, but that is one of the underlying changes we see that can have a broader impact. El Ni\u00f1o also has the power to raise global temperatures overall, and that can fuel extreme weather.<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a013.09 EDT<\/p>\n How has climate affected this El Ni\u00f1o? Will they get more extreme?<\/p>\n Lilypad3<\/a> asks: How has this El Ni\u00f1o been affected by climate breakdown and how likely is it that the next El Ni\u00f1o will be more extreme?<\/p>\n double quotation markJon says: That is a key question, though disconcertingly scientists are not yet agreed on a definitive answer.<\/p>\n I recently asked<\/a> this to Prof Mat Collins, a climate scientist at the University of Exeter and the author of some of the world\u2019s most important climate reports. He replied: \u201cThe easiest way to think about this is that they (climate change and El Ni\u00f1o) are two separate things that layer on top of each other. So if you\u2019ve already got drought conditions as a result of global warming, then an El Ni\u00f1o is going to exacerbate that. The harder question is how they interact with each other.\u201d<\/p>\n Collins says we don\u2019t yet have the data to prove that climate change makes El Ni\u00f1os more frequent and intense. But that evidence may emerge in the coming decades. He said it was very likely that there will be more extreme El Ni\u00f1os in the future.<\/p>\n One of the world\u2019s most influential climate scientists James Hansen went further in a recent essay<\/a> that states: \u201cThe abnormal El Nino strength is itself likely human-driven.\u201d<\/p>\n My journalistic take on this debate is:<\/p>\n El Ni\u00f1o + climate change = definitely worse than El Ni\u00f1o alone.<\/p>\n And it is also possible that one is feeding back on the other, leading to more frequent and intense El Ni\u00f1os – though this is not yet confirmed by science.<\/p>\n double quotation markGaby says: Even without a direct connection, dangerous tipping points – especially in areas or in eco systems already pushed close to the brink because of global heating – could face further strain due to this year\u2019s El Ni\u00f1o. It could also increase the chances of compounding extremes – weather events that, when combined, create more catastrophe and test response and recovery systems. For example, we can think about the wildfires that are on the rise due to heating and aridity linked to global heating. In areas where El Nino produces greater chances of heavy rain – like in Los Angeles California, which is still recovering from the 2025 tragic firestorm that destroyed more than 16,000 homes and businesses – burn scars will be at greater risk from debris flows and landslides.<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a013.37 EDT<\/p>\n Has forecasting El Ni\u00f1o improved?<\/p>\n ndl4321<\/a> asks: Has the accuracy of forecasting improved significantly in the last decade or do the same margins of error still apply?<\/p>\n PhDistracted<\/a> asks: I\u2019ve been trying to read up on El Ni\u00f1o, but having difficulty finding any other answer than (to expect) \u201cextreme weather\u201d. It appears we\u2019re in truly uncharted waters – is anyone able to properly predict the effects?<\/p>\n double quotation markGaby says: Ni\u00f1o produces more of an underlying signal that can impact global weather systems rather than a direct cause and effect. But forecasters know a great deal about what could take shape but there\u2019s still uncertainty about what exactly will unfold. For example, in California where I am based, El Ni\u00f1os in the past have correlated with much stronger rain storms in the southern part of the state, but it\u2019s unclear when or how many storms will form. El Ni\u00f1o increases the risks, but there are no guarantees.<\/p>\n There are some associations, however, that are stronger than others. Again, going back to California, scientists are fairly confident that sea level rise will have an impact up and down the coast. El Ni\u00f1o has also turned up the dial on the Pacific hurricane season, which is already packing a punch, and will increase global temperatures. But as El Ni\u00f1o strengthens – and especially if it smashes through records as it\u2019s expected to – there is still a fair degree of uncertainty.<\/p>\n The good news is that forecasting has improved since the last El Ni\u00f1o, and scientists are working diligently to build on the technology and capacity to predict extreme weather events sooner and with more accuracy. Unfortunately some of that progress was hampered by the Trump administration\u2019s cuts to federal research, programs, and climate-focused agencies.<\/p>\n Properties in Dana Point, California, were deemed uninhabitable last month after heavy surf generated by Hurricane Marie. A local emergency was declared over coastal erosion. \u2018El Ni\u00f1o has also turned up the dial on the Pacific hurricane season\u2019. Photograph: Mario Tama\/Getty ImagesShare<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a013.10 EDT<\/p>\n Our reporters are live now<\/p>\n Jonathan Watts<\/a>, the Guardian\u2019s global environment writer, and Gabrielle Canon<\/a>, climate and extreme weather correspondent for Guardian US, are live now answering your questions.<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a011.02 EDT<\/p>\n Welcome to the Conversation<\/p>\n This year\u2019s huge El Ni\u00f1o is causing climate chaos around the world. Temperate records have already been broken<\/a>, with extreme heat reported from western Europe<\/a> to California<\/a>. Meanwhile, Bangkok<\/a> is suffering massive flooding and the weather phenomenon is projected to cause a further 450,000 deaths<\/a> globally by February.<\/p>\n Jonathan Watts<\/a>, the Guardian\u2019s global environment writer along with extreme weather reporter Gabrielle Canon<\/a> will be online from 4pm BST (11am EDT) today to answer your questions on the unfolding crisis.<\/p>\n Sign up or sign in<\/a> to join the discussion. Post your questions in the comments below.<\/p>\n