{"id":944682,"date":"2026-10-29T03:12:18","date_gmt":"2026-10-29T03:12:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/944682\/"},"modified":"2026-10-29T03:12:18","modified_gmt":"2026-10-29T03:12:18","slug":"free-agent-hitters-who-might-fit-the-giants-new-hitting-profile","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/944682\/","title":{"rendered":"Free agent hitters who might fit the Giants\u2019 new hitting profile"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">Yesterday, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/7711984\/2026\/10\/27\/mlb-free-agents-2026-contract-team-predictions\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">The Athletic put out a list ranking the top 40 free agents with predictions on where each will land<\/a>. The San Francisco Giants were mentioned at least a few times, and the most prominent one was probably Brandon Lowe, who had a tremendous power season in Pittsburgh (35 homers) to go with a triple slash of .260\/.331\/.493 (121 wRC+) \u2014 gosh, the Tampa Bay Rays could\u2019ve used a hitter like him in the World Series. Anyway, rather than examine all the times the Giants were mentioned, it got me thinking about which hitters the team could target.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">I\u2019ve already <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mccoveychronicles.com\/san-francisco-giants-analysis\/112234\/sf-giants-news-analysis-which-free-agent-starting-pitchers-would-be-great-fit-tarik-skubal-no-patrick-sandoval-maybe\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">rundown the<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mccoveychronicles.com\/san-francisco-giants-analysis\/112333\/sf-giants-news-analysis-which-starting-pitchers-could-giants-target-in-trade-bryan-woo-corbin-burnes-reid-detmers-joe-ryan-nah-probably-nobody\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">pitching market<\/a>, but rather than make a tiered analysis of <a href=\"https:\/\/go.skimresources.com\/?id=87443X1797504&amp;xs=1&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mlb.com%2Fnews%2Fmlb-free-agents-2026-2027\" rel=\"sponsored nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">the entire free agent group expected to be available<\/a>, I thought I\u2019d zero in on players who made it through what I think is a pretty reasonable filter, just based on what we\u2019ve learned from this season of Buster Posey\u2019s President of Baseball Operations tenure: contact! The team craves contact! The lineup wants the hit tool, and it\u2019s willing to sacrifice walks for them.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">At first, I thought that put Lowe at a disadvantage with a .260 batting average, but the Giants hit just .245 as a team and the sport hit .244; AND, even <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mccoveychronicles.com\/san-francisco-giants-analysis\/110980\/minasianball-if-you-take-out-all-the-bad-just-how-good-were-the-2026-san-francisco-giants\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">in that famous May through July stretch<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fangraphs.com\/leaders\/major-league?pos=all&amp;stats=bat&amp;lg=all&amp;qual=y&amp;type=8&amp;season=2026&amp;month=1000&amp;season1=2026&amp;ind=0&amp;startdate=2026-05-01&amp;enddate=2026-08-01&amp;sortcol=17&amp;sortdir=default&amp;team=0%2Cts&amp;pagenum=1\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">where the Giants had the 7th-best offense in MLB<\/a>, they hit .256\/.316\/.434, so, it\u2019s not like they\u2019re necessarily focused on Luis Arraez types. So, let\u2019s set the bar at .256 and be scrutinize the position mix a little bit. I think the Giants are set at first, short, third, center and right field. Casey Schmitt and Marcelo Mayer are definitely answers for second base (and left field, in the case of Schmitt), but let\u2019s consider those spots upgradeable, with the upgrade pushing one of these two into a firm position. And, just for fun, since Daniel Susac will be optionable in 2027, I included a catcher.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">And before you stomp into the comments to declare that only you see the wisdom in the Giants aiming to lose another 97 games, please note that there\u2019s no reason for the Giants to do that. They\u2019ve somehow managed to improve their farm system despite spending hundreds of millions of dollars to produce one of the worst professional sports teams in the world today that\u2019s a total disgrace to the fans in the actual city where they play. Yes, it\u2019s improbable for a team to buy a 20-win improvement, but I\u2019d rather the Giants spend their money on baseball talent. And, who knows, maybe it\u2019s not about buying 20 wins. It\u2019s about buying 7 or 8 and expecting some dead cat bounces and some gradual improvements from the younger players \u2014 you know, the same plan as this season lol.<\/p>\n<p>Randy Arozarena \u2014 RHH\/LF\/32<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">2026: .281\/.381\/.484, 10.1 BB%, 21.6 K% (151 wRC+)<br \/>What area of the roster would he improve: Outfield depth<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">A teeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerrible outfield defender (-5 Outs Above Average, -11.7 Defensive Runs Above Average) who posted a career year heading into free agency for the first time. This is a classic STAY AWAY free agent hitter profile of a guy who elevated himself in a platform season but is also on the wrong side of 30. The Giants used to be tempted by these types of guys all the time.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">On the other hand, Arozarena is energetic and a quality hitter. Sort of like a potential best case scenario for Heliot Ramos. But the prior three seasons (which included being traded from Tampa Bay to Seattle) show a player not far off from the contract run of 2026: .237\/.343\/.413, 10.8 BB%, 25.7 K%, 120 wRc+. He will absolutely cost the team a win over the full season because of that terrible defense (he\u2019s averaged -11 Defensive Runs in every full season of his career), but his bat makes up for it.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">If you put him in left, then Schmitt and Mayer become the second base duo or middle infield backups. Arozarena would be the best of the group that\u2019s only Jung Hoo Lee, Jonah Cox, technically Harrison Bader, Scott Bandura, Turner Hill, Grant McCray, etc.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">Still, a Scott Boras client and someone whom Boras-connected media figure Jim Bowden predicts will get a 5 year, $124 million deal (or in that range). I don\u2019t think the Giants would pony up $25 million annually for a hitter who has been 20% better than the league average for his career. He would be a good addition at the right price, and I don\u2019t think that\u2019s necessarily the right price for the Giants.<\/p>\n<p>Mauricio Dubon \u2014 RHH\/LF-CF-SS-2B-3B\/32<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">2026: .276\/.321\/.399, 5.7 BB%, 11.8 K%, (99 wRC+)<br \/>What area of the roster would he improve: Position player depth<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">Compared to Arozarena, the Giants could spend significantly less to get Dubon (Bowden projects 2 years, $16 million) for similar value (both 2+ fWAR players). He is a lot of batting average with little power (career .118 ISO). A scrappy underdog utility guy who is a plus defender up the middle \u2014 +17.1 Defensive Runs Above Average, +19 OAA in Houston last season; +6 in Atlanta this year and that\u2019s with most of the value coming from shortstop and center \u2014 might be the kind of veteran steadying force Tony Vitello could use if the injuries pile up again.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">The depth chart analysis gets a little trickier because he does sort of rain on Jonah Cox\u2019s parade, since he can play second and center. However, it\u2019s important to keep in mind that Cox struck out 65 times in 169 PA (38.5 K%), Casey Schmitt is often hurt, and Marcelo Mayer has yet to prove himself. Even though all the Giants\u2019 top prospects are middle infielders, again, it\u2019s Dubon\u2019s versatility that adds the value and makes him a good fit. Not as a big offseason move, but as a potentially important one \u2014 especially if the Giants fail to upgrade their pitching staff\u2019s stuff and rely again on dudes who pitch to contact.<\/p>\n<p>Seiya Suzuki \u2014 RHH\/RF\/32<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">2026: .270\/.368\/.473, 12.8 BB%, 24.4 K% (134 wRC+)<br \/>What area of the roster would he improve: Outfield depth<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">Probably because the Cubs\u2019 outfield was pretty amazing, Suzuki\u2019s defense numbers this year look great. He\u2019s +5 Outs Above Average and 88th percentile in outfield defense. He\u2019s got some speed (63rd percentile sprint), but mainly, he has a lot of power from the right side. His .204 ISO ranked 33rd among qualified MLB hitters (just slightly ahead of Arozarena\u2019s .203), so, you\u2019d get heaps of power on top of the average.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">Again, because of free agency, he\u2019s on the wrong side of 30, and the projected 5-year deal for $120 million takes him to his age-37 season. Not advisable for a team like the Giants, but he\u2019s closer to 30% above the league average. He\u2019s more like a 3.5-win player to Arozarena\u2019s 2+, so, if you had to choose between just those two guys, Suzuki makes more sense if the money\u2019s about the same.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">Also, except for Petco Park (.691), Suzuki has a .760 or better OPS in all the NL West parks. He\u2019s only played right field in his MLB career, so imagine flipping Jung Hoo Lee to left to put Suzuki in right with Cox\/Dubon\/Gilbert in center.<\/p>\n<p>Brandon Lowe \u2014 LHH\/2B\/32<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">2026: .260\/.331\/.493, 9.5 BB%, 28.8 K% (121 wRC+)<br \/>What area of the roster would he improve: Infield depth<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">There\u2019s probably a version of this post that makes more sense because I break this down by position. With Casey Schmitt and Marcelo Mayer (and, to a lesser extent, Jonah Cox and Gavin Kilen) in mind, the second base group of free agents worth discussing is made up of Luis Arraez, Jazz Chisholm, and Brandon Lowe. All left-handed hitters, by the way.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">Yes, Lowe has played some outfield (160 innings in LF, 171 innings in RF) as well as 1B (155 innings), but he\u2019s basically a second baseman (6,148 innings). He\u2019s also the oldest of the entire bunch of names I\u2019ve mentioned in this blurb. He also has the most power (66 home runs the past two seasons).<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">But like Arozarena, he really picked it up a notch in his final season before free agency. It wasn\u2019t his career year (that was 2021: 39 homers, 136 wRC+ in 615 PA), but it was his best since 2021. It was also a career high in games played (150).<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">Meanwhile, Chisholm had a down year offensively (98 wRc+; career: 108) but his defense was still great, putting him in the zone of the 3.5-4 fWAR player he has been throughout his career. He\u2019s also the youngest of this bunch (29) and steals a lot of bases (171 in 716 career games). He\u2019s just a .245 career hitter and he doesn\u2019t need Ron Washington\u2019s tutelage to improve his defense, but he\u2019s like Arozarena in that he\u2019s a charismatic, fun personality type to add to the mix and coming off a down year there might be some value to be had.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">Or, the Giants could just reunite with Luis Arraez. The only real problem with that is he\u2019s basically second base and first base, that batting average, while good, is basically it. He can be about as valuable as Chisholm.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">If you add any of these players, then Casey Schmitt becomes the de facto left fielder, which I think is probably for the best. He can also be a great fill-in for Matt Chapman for when he gets hurt (as he is entering his IL era).<\/p>\n<p>Austin Hays \u2014 RHH\/LF\/32<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">2026 season: .280\/.305\/.400, 3.8 BB%, 25.7 K% (93 wRC+)<br \/>What area of the roster would he improve: Outfield depth<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">He actually ended the season with the Padres and hit .316\/.344\/.456 in 26 games (61 PA). I mention this because, for his career, he\u2019s a .263\/.313\/.434 hitter (105 wRC+). His career ISO of .171 is just a bit above the league average over the span of his career. The White Sox signed him to a 1-year, $6 million deal before the season and wound up releasing him due to lots of time missed with leg injuries. This would be the depthiest of depth moves for a team that ignored Hays once already in favor of Will Brennan and Jared Oliva. But he fits the contact approach, has been a decent defender at times (according to Statcast) when healthy and has meaningful MLB experience (86 HR in 720 games, All-Star in 2023).<\/p>\n<p>TJ Friedl \u2014 LHH\/CF-LF\/31<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">2026 season: .172\/.255\/.255, 8.1 BB%, 23.2 K% (43 wRC+)<br \/>What area of the roster would he improve: Outfield depth<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">The diminutive (5\u20198\u201d) Pleasanton native got MVP votes in 2023 and heading into 2026 had a career slash of .257\/.344\/.414, a 9.5 BB% and 15.9% strikeout rate (108 wRC+). He\u2019s an okay defender with not as much speed as you\u2019d think \u2014 fast, but not elite \u2014 and his career batted ball profile is suboptimal: 86.9 career exit velocity. The Reds DFA\u2019d him in September.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">But I keep looking at that batting average and that low strikeout rate and I wonder if Hunter Mense could come up with a plan for him and if his age-31 season on the horizon might create a situation where the Giants could get him for a year and for not very much\u2026 just to see if there\u2019s something in there they could unlock. Like Hays, it\u2019s some really good MLB experience. It\u2019s not like the Giants need a lot of experience at every position, but this post isn\u2019t advocating for the Giants to get every player mentioned. Like, if they only added Friedl to the hitting group, you could see the reasons why and projected a modest success because of them.<\/p>\n<p>Ryan Jeffers \u2014 RHH\/C\/30<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">2026 season: .256\/.353\/.461, 12.5 BB%, 17.9 K% (128 wRC+)<br \/>What area of the roster would he improve: Catching depth<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">Now, I\u2019m inclined to believe that Buster Posey can size up a catcher just by looking him in the eye, so, maybe he\u2019s already passed judgment on Ryan Jeffers. But just from an offensive standpoint, he would backstop the lineup in so many ways. Over the past 4 seasons, he\u2019s been about 20% better than the league average albeit in a part-time role (429 games, 1,632 plate appearances). As a catcher, that\u2019s really important. His time as a DH is less important, given the Devers-Eldridge of it all.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">But Bowden\u2019s blurb speaks to the downside risk of signing him:<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup _1bij9g79 _1bij9g78 _1mt21p01\">On the defensive side, he\u2019s an average pitch blocker but doesn\u2019t control the running game well.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">I would think that if you\u2019re a catcher you have to be able to do one of those things really well and, ideally, be at least \u201cokay\u201d doing the other thing. Susac, for example, is 29th percentile in Blocks Above Average, but 80+ percentile for all of Statcast\u2019s other catching metrics (CS Above Avg, Framing, Pop Time). In 2026, Jeffers was 51st in Blocks, third percentile in CS Above Avg, 37th in Framing, and 33 in Pop Time. Even the blocking number is an illusion because it had never been that high before in his career. Unless the team felt like it could coach up some element of his defense, I fear that his inclusion on this list is a folly on my part.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">But what do you think? Should the Giants aim for 95 losses and hope for many more? Or, expect that most of the same hitting group will be as good (for the veterans) or better (for the developing players) if left mostly intact and not worry so much about bringing veteran hitters into the group? Do you think that I\u2019ve misinterpreted that Giants\u2019 emphasis on batting average? What players would you suggest who don\u2019t need to be traded for?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Yesterday, The Athletic put out a list ranking the top 40 free agents with predictions on where each&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":944683,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[558],"tags":[64,63,591,354400,85],"class_list":["post-944682","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-mlb","tag-au","tag-australia","tag-mlb","tag-san-francisco-giants-analysis","tag-sports"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/944682","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=944682"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/944682\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/944683"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=944682"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=944682"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=944682"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}