Some would point to the Knicks\u2019 wins and be unconvinced. A good one over Detroit, their most-recent bugaboo, but otherwise just two conquests of Chicago and one against Brooklyn, who are a combined 3-13.\u00a0<\/p>\n
The next 10 days should be illuminating: the Knicks play Cleveland twice, two straight in Toronto and visit Indiana, home of their pre-Pistons bugaboo. New York\u2019s wins have been by six, 13, 14 and 30 points.\u00a0<\/p>\n
In the simplest terms possible: the Knicks spent all summer celebrating, went back to work and have mostly lost games that went down to the wire while generally winning by double-digits. No, they’re not “back” yet. But they were never really that far gone.<\/p>\n
2. SELLING: The Knicks will finish last in two-point shooting<\/p>\n
Last year the Knicks treated two-point shots like a young person who\u2019s come to appreciate the benefits of the occasional vegetable. They were only 19th in attempts and 18th in makes, but finished 10th in two-point accuracy. <\/p>\n
Shots from inside the arc brought them balance and buttressed their threat from three-point range\u2014if you\u2019re good inside the arc, defenses have to adjust, opening up the long-range game. That was one reason the Knicks were fourth in three-point accuracy a year ago. Twos are the roughage that makes the threes flow freely.<\/p>\n
Eight games into this season, they\u2019ve fallen to 12th. One reason: the Knicks have bottomed-out inside the arc, currently third-to-last in two-point tries and dead-last in two-point percentage. <\/p>\n
Last season six Knick regulars were above the league average shooting twos: Mitchell Robinson, Karl-Anthony Towns, OG Anunoby, Mikal Bridges, Josh Hart and Landry Shamet. So far this year the only Knick to do so is KAT. Struggle enough inside the arc and defenses are more than happy to let you, as it has a deleterious effect on the three-point threat.<\/p>\n
Adjusted two-point percentage measures how a player ranks shooting twos compared to a league-average shooter, with 100 meaning average. Look at how far how many Knicks have fallen. The first number is their 2025-2026 adjusted percentage, the second from 2026-2027 and parentheses shows their career percentage.<\/p>\n
OG: 106 \u2192 93 (104)
Hart: 104 \u2192 88 (107)
Shamet: 101 \u2192 87 (91)
Brunson: 95 \u2192 83 (98)
Bridges: 106 \u2192 68 (105)
McBride: 81 \u2192 56 (85)<\/p>\n
Shamet isn\u2019t too far off from his usual efficiency. Brunson\u2019s shot profile is as high in degree of difficulty as anyone in the league; couple that with late offseason wrist surgery and you can see him needing a little time to catch up. Bridges and McBride are the two biggest fallers. Thankfully, the Knicks have the guard depth\u2014and enough time\u2014to trust this trend reverses.<\/p>\n
3. BUYING: Losing Mitchell Robinson hurts\u2014but not where we thought it would<\/p>\n
When the Knicks let Mitchell Robinson leave in free agency, it seemed an obvious misfortune. You don\u2019t lose the best offensive rebounder in the game and not feel it. The Knicks said \u201cMaybe,\u201d then signed Andre Drummond. Last year they were sixth in offensive rebounds; this year they\u2019re fifth. Don\u2019t trust raw data? In 2025-26 the Knicks were fifth in offensive rebounding percentage. This year? Third.<\/p>\n
Where the Knicks may miss Robinson the most is his ability to not get his shot blocked. One reason a team drops from 10th to 30th in two-point accuracy is they get rejected more often. Another is they take shots they can\u2019t possible hope to make.<\/p>\n
Whatever critiques fans may have of Mitch, one thing that man never did was take a shot outside his wheelhouse. He\u2019s not a 70% career shooter by accident: he doesn\u2019t try to write outside the margins. And when defenders are fool enough to test him, they don\u2019t usually stop him. Especially compared to Drummond.<\/p>\n
The numbers below show how many times each player had his shot blocked the past three seasons, including this one; the parentheses measures the rate of that stuffage.<\/p>\n
Mitch \u201827: blocked twice in 151 minutes (every 76 minutes)AD \u201827: six times in 106 (every 18)Mitch \u201826: 10 in 1175 (every 118)AD \u201826: 21 in 1231 (every 58)Mitch \u201825: once in 290 (every 290)AD \u201825: 29 in 751 (every 25)<\/p>\n
Getting back to adjusted shooting, Robinson has been well-above average his whole career. Obviously a lot of that is him recognizing his limits and not testing them; less obvious is how impactful that can be on the rest of the offense. <\/p>\n
Drummond finished below-average the prior two years and has dropped even from that level so far this season. He can’t rise up and just go through other bigs to finish, and whereas Mitch would grab an offensive rebound and dish it straight away if he didn’t have a follow-up available, Drummond\u2014for better and worse\u2014fancies his chances more to score with little hooks, turnarounds, etc. They’re little misses, and he rebounds half of them anyway, but that adds up after a while.<\/p>\n
Does that mean the Knicks are stuck? Doomed to diminished efficiency? Maybe not.<\/p>\n
James Wiseman has a two-point adjusted rate of over 100 his entire (brief) career coming into 2026-2027. He\u2019s off to a slow start, but the sample size is difficult to take a lot out of. But Wiseman is 25, not 33 like AD. <\/p>\n
There will be games, or stretches in games, where the offense inside the arc is struggling. The Knicks might still benefit from adding another young, athletic big man <\/a>to the roster. For now, their best chance at replacing what was lost when losing Robinson may not be their new backup. It might be the backup\u2019s backup<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n 4. BUYING: The Knicks will play at a glacial pace for the rest of all of our lives<\/p>\n You. The person reading is. How old are you? How long have you followed the Knicks?<\/p>\n It doesn\u2019t really matter. However old you are, now that the Knicks are champions there\u2019s only really one constant left that their fans can bond over. For 15 years in a row, a span covering six different head coaches, two interim head coaches, four lead executives, 13 first-round picks and hundreds of different players, there is one thing that never changes.<\/p>\n This year, they\u2019re 27th in pace. They were 27th in 2025-26, too. Before that, they ranked 26th, last, 25th, second-to-last, last, 26th, 17th, 15th, 17th, 26th, 28th, 28th and 26th. The last time the Knicks finished in the top-10 in pace was the year of Linsanity, a.k.a. Renaldo Balkman\u2019s last dance.<\/p>\n In the city that never sleeps, the Knicks are always sleepwalking. <\/p>\n Get Knicks On SI straight to your inbox: sign up for our free newsletter here.<\/a><\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/assets.minutemediacdn.com\/platform\/google_discover_icon.svg\"){kind=icon}
Add us as a preferred source on Google