![\"CPI](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/CPI-2021-2025.jpg\")
<\/p>\nAfter months of clutching its collective pearls over the allegedly \u201ctight\u201d labour market, the RBA board gets what it wanted: more unemployed people. Michael Pascoe writes.<\/p>\n
Contrary to numerous headlines, there is no surprise about the labour market weakening and unemployment rising, as demonstrated by last week\u2019s ABS numbers. It\u2019s not a surprise because it has been RBA policy.<\/p>\n
Also contrary to various headlines, the RBA doesn\u2019t \u201csuddenly\u201d look late in cutting interest rates. It\u2019s been late for nearly a year, ignoring all the data showing inflation was in retreat, the economy was soft and that an unemployment rate of 4.1 per cent wasn\u2019t causing inflation.<\/p>\n
\u201cBut but but,\u201d the RBA will stutter, \u201cbusiness told us the labour market was tight\u201d. What the RBA failed to grasp is that the labour market hasn\u2019t been too tight, that being a bit tight is actually a fine thing, that competing for labour helps improve productivity by encouraging investment in capital on one hand and winnowing out the least productive enterprises that can\u2019t compete.<\/p>\n
But that\u2019s a bit of the productivity story the business lobby and its media stenographers don\u2019t like to touch. It\u2019s Darwinian and dreadful for the individuals who lose their savings and businesses, but it\u2019s what capitalism requires to work.<\/p>\n
You know all the stories about \u201crecord number of business failures\u201d last year? None of them mentions that there was a greater number of business startups. None of them mention that in a \u201ctight\u201d labour market,<\/p>\n
resources are freed up to be better used elsewhere.<\/p>\n
But I digress.<\/p>\n
Rate cut failure<\/p>\n
The failure to cut rates earlier this month is now obviously embarrassing for the six members of the RBA board, including the Governor, who voted to continue squeezing the economy, thereby weakening it with contractionary monetary policy. It will be more embarrassing if the June quarter CPI comes in as tame as the RBA itself expects.<\/p>\n
There is a certain irony in the \u201cnew improved\u201d Monetary Policy Board\u2019s first outing, with its greater emphasis on communication, producing such a communications blunder.<\/p>\n
If the RBA was prepared to own its mistakes instead of prevaricating, the next meeting\u2019s statement should be headlined \u201cWe Wuz Wrong\u201d, but it won\u2019t be.<\/p>\n
The three members who voted to cut this month, the three who seem to have a better idea of how monetary policy works and where the economy is at, can rightly say \u201cwe told you so\u201d.<\/p>\n
The dangerous question is whether the other six will humbly agree or claim that, no, the rise in unemployment is exactly what they were hoping for as the labour market is \u201dtight\u201d.<\/p>\n
The danger is that the majority will run a metaphorical victory lap at next month\u2019s meeting, pointing to inflation and the labour market being where they want it.<\/p>\n
Lessons not learned<\/p>\n
It\u2019s dangerous because it ignores two high school economic lessons.<\/p>\n
First, that monetary policy works with a long lag. The weaker economy and labour market are the result of rates being tightened and kept tight over the past two years. The ship slows and turns very slowly, so the weakness trend will continue past hitting the target.<\/p>\n
Second, employment is a lagging indicator. The \u201csudden\u201d softness in the employment stats comes months after the economy overall was flashing amber, but the RBA ignored that.<\/p>\n
The RBA\u2019s biggest worry now is that it will overshoot its tight little trimmed mean inflation target on the downside. The ship is very slow to turn.<\/p>\n
That would again seriously damage the bank\u2019s credibility. Michele Bullock could follow Philip Lowe in being a one-term governor.<\/p>\n
The question unsuccessfully dealt with by the board over the past year is why it needed higher unemployment, other than business asking for it. As previously opined, the RBA now goes to considerable effort to monitor multiple indicators under a vague \u201cfull employment\u201d heading to avoid the simple reality of the old NAIRU (non-inflation-accelerating rate of unemployment) it never managed to get right.<\/p>\n
Unemployment rate steady<\/p>\n
As an economist friend noted in frustration, since December 2023, in all but two of 18 months, the unemployment rate has been within 0.1 of 4.0 per cent, as steady as any economic series is likely to be.<\/p>\n
In that time, all serious measures of inflation have plunged. The trimmed mean quarterly CPI is down 1.3 percentage points to 2.9 in March. The monthly trimmed mean CPI is down 1.6 percentage points to 2.4 per cent in May. The wage price index is down by 0.9 percentage points to 3.4 in March.<\/p>\n
I\u2019d go a step further and argue, as I did at the time, that increasing the cash rate by 25 points in November 2023 was a mistake, an unnecessary tightening when the trend was already our friend.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Source: ABS<\/p>\n
With the ABS monthly CPI indicator within the target zone since last August, taking the foot off the monetary brake should have been top of the RBA\u2019s agenda, but the bank instead waited for February for its first tentative move, failed to move again in April and again failed to follow through on the May cut.<\/p>\n
Should the economy do what it\u2019s now expected to do, get weaker,<\/p>\n
nobody on the RBA board can claim the writing wasn\u2019t on the data wall.<\/p>\n
But they will. You know, the old \u201cthe outlook is uncertain\u201d line.<\/p>\n
Reserve Bank board still looking for yesterday\u2019s news<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n
![\"Michael](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Michael-Pascoe-new-200x200.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n