I recently wrote about why the days of hosting a major tennis event in Montreal might be—and, frankly, need to be—numbered. At the risk of sounding like I’m piling on, I have to say: the Omnium Banque Nationale WTA 1000 event, which began Saturday at Stade IGA, is shaping up to be the messiest installment yet.

I have lived in the neighborhood for five years, and while the tournament has never been perfect in terms of design, planning, or execution, you could at least see the effort. Not this year. This year, it feels like the organizers have thrown in the towel. The writing’s on the wall, and it’s not in cursive—it’s bold and underlined: this venue is no longer suitable for a world-class tennis event.

Let’s start with the fan experience, which should be the heartbeat of any live sporting event. If Saturday’s qualifiers are any indication, that heart is flatlining.

The first thing fans now encounter is a massive metal fence encircling the public park that the stadium calls home. It’s new. It’s ugly. And it’s hostile. In years past, there were multiple, easy entrances into the event. Now, there’s one awkwardly located access point for 95% of attendees—unless you’re holding a top-tier VIP ticket, in which case a separate, streamlined entrance awaits you.

For everyone else, expect to tack on 3,000 extra steps, minimum, as you’re funneled through a confusing new route. The result? Even people simply enjoying the public park are being stopped repeatedly by well-meaning but overburdened volunteers asking, “Is your ticket ready?”—over and over again.

Once inside the grounds, things don’t improve. Gone are familiar sponsors and well-known food stalls like Nespresso. In their place are bland, knockoff concession booths with forgettable names and, worse, forgettable smells. I’ve attended tennis tournaments all over the world—and a decent number of minor league baseball games—and I can safely say I’ve never seen a more uninspired spread of food options. I wouldn’t touch any of it with a borrowed fork.

Making matters worse, the tournament has, for the first time, expanded to two weeks. That means more tennis—great in theory. But in practice, it strains an already maxed-out venue. Most matches are now scheduled on Centre Court and Rogers Court. That’s bad news for anyone holding a $20 grounds pass, which once gave fans access to a full day of competitive matches on outer courts. This year, it’ll mostly get you into the grounds to watch players practice and, perhaps, grab a hot dog you’ll immediately regret.

The pricing logic is similarly out of touch. Despite local inflation and economic fatigue, ticket prices remain steep—well out of reach for the average Montrealer. I predict sparse crowds as the tournament drags on, especially once the marquee names are eliminated.

And while we’re on the topic of gestures that land somewhere between tone-deaf and comical, the tournament has trumpeted a “free viewing stand” in the park—a mini set of bleachers, seating maybe ten people, aimed at those without tickets. Cute idea. Only problem? It’s been locked up since the tournament began. No one can use it. Whether the issue is structural, administrative, or sheer oversight, the result is the same: a symbolic swing and a miss.

Beyond the fences and the food, the biggest issue is that tournament organizers seem more oblivious than ever to the fact that they are operating in the middle of a dense residential neighborhood. On Sunday morning, for example, I was walking my dog when I was startled by the alarms of three black SUVs—vehicles used to shuttle players from their downtown hotels. It was 6:10 a.m. The noise echoed through half a dozen condo buildings. Alarms went off for minutes, waking entire households before coffee, all in the name of elite tennis logistics.

This kind of thoughtless disruption isn’t a one-off. It’s a pattern. From traffic chaos to poorly managed parking, every element of this event seems designed without local residents in mind. As someone who lives nearby and loves tennis—truly loves it and still competes year-round—I’ve reached the point where I find myself asking: why are we still doing this here at this venue? Why not just host an annual lower level WTA 125 or a couple of ITF tournaments and call it good?

Parking, to put it mildly, is a nightmare. Street spots are few and fiercely fought over. Many are designated permit-only spaces for residents who pay the city annually. That leaves little for guests, workers, or out-of-town fans. Add in aggressive drivers (Hi! Welcome to Montreal!), reckless speeds, and long lines of idling cars, and you’ve got two weeks of gridlock misery for anyone who calls this neighborhood home.

All of this adds up to a reality that is increasingly difficult to deny: this tournament has outgrown its setting. STADE IGA is an aging facility in desperate need of a serious overhaul—it still bears the bones of the 1970s and 80s—and the surrounding neighborhood simply isn’t built to accommodate a two-week, high-stakes, international event of this size. Not without dramatically more thoughtful planning and engagement with local stakeholders.

Yes, I sound like someone airing a long list of grievances—and to some extent, I am. But this isn’t about venting. It’s about making a serious point: if Montreal wants to continue hosting top-tier tennis, we need to ask whether we’re doing it the right way, in the right place, with the right infrastructure. Because right now, it feels like we’re swinging wildly and hoping no one notices how badly we’re missing.

About Aron Solomon

A Pulitzer Prize-nominated journalist for his groundbreaking op-ed in The Independent exposing the NFL’s “race-norming” policies, Aron Solomon, JD, is a globally recognized thought leader in law, media, and strategy. As Chief Strategy Officer for AMPLIFY, he leverages his deep expertise to shape the future of legal marketing. Aron has taught entrepreneurship at McGill University and the University of Pennsylvania and was honored as a Fastcase 50 recipient, recognizing him among the world’s top legal innovators. A prolific commentator on law, business, and culture, his insights regularly appear in Newsweek, The Hill, Crunchbase News, and Literary Hub. He has also been featured in The New York Times, Fast Company, Fortune, Forbes, CBS News, CNBC, USA Today, ESPN, TechCrunch, BuzzFeed, Venture Beat and countless other leading global media outlets.