Breadcrumb Trail Links
Allvin is out, is Foote next? Massive questions face the Canucks as they begin construction of a full rebuild
Published Apr 17, 2026 • Last updated 1 hour ago • 10 minute read
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
The season is over but the drama continues. Photo by Patrick Johnston /Patrick JohnstonArticle content
Welcome to Canucks Live. Here, we’ll highlight some of the news that drops daily about the Canucks. Come back throughout the day as we update with all the news you need to know. If you haven’t done so already, sign up for our Canucks Report to get our stories delivered to your inbox every day.
Advertisement 2
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Exclusive articles by top sports columnists Patrick Johnston, Ben Kuzma, J.J. Abrams and others. Plus, Canucks Report, Sports and Headline News newsletters and events.Unlimited online access to The Province and 15 news sites with one account.The Province ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles and comics, including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Exclusive articles by top sports columnists Patrick Johnston, Ben Kuzma, J.J. Abrams and others. Plus, Canucks Report, Sports and Headline News newsletters and events.Unlimited online access to The Province and 15 news sites with one account.The Province ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles and comics, including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one accountShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the commentsEnjoy additional articles per monthGet email updates from your favourite authorsSign In or Create an Account
or
Article content
And so it begins. Patrik Allvin is out as general manager. Is coach Adam Foote next? It seems President Jim Rutherford is safe and will be the one charged with finding an Allvin replacement and make the decision on a new coach if that’s the direction they choose to take.
Article content
Article content
Then there’s the scouts all out of contracts, the draft lottery, wheeling at dealing at the draft, free agency. It’s going to be a busy spring at summer at Rogers Arena, sadly not on the ice. Oh, yeah, and there’s a ticket price increase to navigate too.
The Canucks went out with a whimper getting roiled by the Oilers in Edmonton and gifting the Mall-ers a first-round matchup with the Anaheim Ducks.
Vancouver did the Oilers dirty work this week, beating the Ducks and Kings then rolling over for their rivals. Never mind though, as we all enjoy a sunny spring Friday among the cherry blossoms. It’s -6 in Edmonton this morning and they have snow in the forecast next week.
“Why is the guy who didn’t make the big decisions is being fired by the guy who did?”
Jeff Marek on the Daily Faceoff: There’s a lot of conversation around why Allvin out of anyone walks the plank here?.…I do find it odd, maybe more than a little bit odd: Why the guy who didn’t make the big decisions is being fired by the guy who did. What am I missing here? And also fired for the decisions? What am I missing here?
Advertisement 3
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Is Allvin a scapegoat? Does this mean Rutherford and Foote are staying?
That’s the question Sekeres and Price are asking this morning in the aftermath of Allvin’s firing.
Blake Price: Most of us saw some sort of change coming, he (Allvin) and Adam Foote were prime candidates for change to occur. It’s a little bit curious the two didn’t get fired in tandem. I think it casts a little bit of doubt now as to whether or not Foote is going to get fired? Because why would you have two bad-news day? Why wouldn’t you have one-bad news day?
Patrik Allvin to me was… I mean his era is very undefined. I don’t know that I can put a finger on Patrik Allvin’s tenure here. It feels like Jim Rutherford’s tenure.
This is the problem with these shifting of names, of titles, that has occurred in the National Hockey League where the president has a lot of say in hockey ops as well. This almost just feels like an AGM (assistant general manager) got fired. …It’s a little bit funny I don’t know what influence he necessarily had on the Canucks? Or if he even deserves this?
That’s also the interesting part here… this is Rutherford’s baby? This is Rutherford’s boat. Is it not on him? This season. The failure to become a contender.
Canucks Report
Thanks for signing up!
Article content
Advertisement 4
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Allvin manned the phones in trade talks but Rutherford was one in charge
The Athletic has a joint piece by Thomas Drance and Pierre LeBrun that says Allvin was never able to step outside Rutherford’s shadow
Allvin, 51, had a mixed tenure in Vancouver. While the Canucks had some notable early wins at the draft and when shopping in the bargain bin in unrestricted free agency, they endured a run of poor bets last summer — the Thatcher Demko, Conor Garland and Brock Boeser extensions and the Evander Kane trade among them — and came unglued entirely this season, one which opened with the club harbouring expectations of competing credibly for the Stanley Cup playoffs.
Ultimately, evaluating Allvin’s work with the Canucks is complicated by the fact that he never really stepped out of Rutherford’s shadow. As the Canucks’ general manager, Allvin manned the phones in trade talks. In contrast to some of the other president and general manager setups around the league, however, Allvin’s role in Vancouver was widely viewed throughout the industry as being secondary to Rutherford’s within the Vancouver hockey operations pyramid.
Advertisement 5
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Report cards are in. What’s your feedback?
Patrick Johnston took a turn from the usual report card and offered up season-long marks on the Canucks. Here’s some selected marks but he wants your feedback too, email him at pjohnston@postmedia.com for your thoughts on his grades and how you view the Canucks season.
Marco Rossi. B-
Showed some smart flashes, especially as the season wound to a close. He’s not a guy who will take the game over, but he’s a smart player who is fine as a second-line centre, but on a good team is centring the third line.
Liam Öhgren. C+
Showed some real glimmers down the stretch and proved to be a reliable presence on the wing. Just 8 goals so despite everything still needs to take a big step forward next year.
Led the team in scoring, but with a pitiful total. He was good defensively most nights, but the nights off he was dire. He used to be great. Now he’s fine at best.
Jonathan Lekkerimaki. C
Broke camp with the team because of his offensive talents but struggled a lot and ended up back in the minors. A season-ending injury means we’re now wondering what role he might play next year.
Advertisement 6
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Zeev Buium. C+
Lots of wonderful glimpses of his offensive prowess but lots of defensive struggles. One of many reasons why a new coach is needed.
Marcus Pettersson. C-
Brutal season for the veteran. Openly disappointed by his own play. Needs to re-set and find himself again next season.
Tom Willander. C
Great skater. Some nice moments with the puck. But the defensive end was too often an adventure. Again, would benefit from a new coach.
Thatcher Demko. C+
When he played he was really pretty good. Then he got hurt. Again. How many games will he play under the three-year deal that starts this summer?
Adam Foote. D
Not a total failure but a real struggle this season for him. Chose to change the team’s defensive structure, shifting away from Rick Tocchet’s heavily disciplined system to a read-based setup that left his defenders swirling and exposed most nights. Couldn’t adapt to the struggles. His staff did pull a nice power play unit together by the end of the season. Even before the decision to rebuild came, the Canucks were dragging near the bottom of the league in many categories, including the standings.
Advertisement 7
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
The Edmonton Journal took some glee in looking at the dealings between the Oilers and Canucks, punctuated by last summer’s deal that brought in everyone’s least-favourite Vancouver Canucks.
There’s no argument that Stan Bowman orchestrated a heist from the Vancouver Canucks in the summer of 2024 when he traded a fourth-round pick to bring in Vasily Podkolzin. Podkolzin blossomed into both a power forward and a Top 6 forward in his two years since with the Edmonton Oilers.
I’m also going to suggest that Bowman pulled off another heist last summer, at least from the Oilers’ perspective, when he traded Evander Kane, 34-years-old and on the final year of his $5.125 million per year contract, to the Canucks on June 25, 2025 for a fourth-round pick.
At the time of the trade, Bowman faced a nasty problem with the Oilers. Not only had the salary cap been all but flat for years due to the COVID crisis, but the Oilers faced in 2025-26 paying full value for its three superstar players, Connor McDavid, Leon Draisaitl and Evan Bouchard, with Draisaitl and Bouchard in the first year of their new and expensive deals, Draisaitl at $14 million per year and Bouchard at $10.5 million. Combine that with Darnell Nurse’s costly deal at $9.25 million and McDavid’s bargain contract of $12.5 million per year, and the Oilers were slated to pay 48.4 per cent of their cap hit on four players, more than any Stanley Cup-winning team had paid their top four players in the entire salary cap era of the NHL, 2005-2026.
Advertisement 8
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Faced with such predicaments, Bowman had to find a way to bring in strong new players to replenish the Oilers and bolster the team’s superstar trio — but he had to do so under brutal salary cap constraints.
Trading Kane gave Bowman a path for progress. It wasn’t that Kane had been a bad player for the Oilers. In fact, he’d had a strong 2025 NHL playoffs. And in the 2024 playoffs, Kane standing up and partly nullifying Vancouver’s apex predator Nikita Zadorov had been critical to beating the Canucks in seven games. Kane was also still putting up points at an OK clip. But he was 34 and banged up, having missed the entire 2024-25 regular season. He was no longer likely to be a Top 6 forward on the Oilers, but he was still getting paid like one on his $5.125 million per year deal.
The obvious move was to try to trade Kane and replace him with younger, less expensive players. That was no easy task given Kane’s uniquely menacing quality on the ice, but Bowman needed that $5.125 million in cap space. He got it and a 4th round pick when Vancouver, desperate for the right ingredient to fix their chaotic and crumbling squad, bit on the trade.
Advertisement 9
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
But why I describe this trade as a heist is that Bowman got himself out of a terrible cap crunch and, in the end, he’s been able to build up an impressive and deep group of forwards on the Oilers.
One final thought: just as our assessment of Bowman rests on Edmonton’s playoff performance, so does the trade of Kane. Kane’s real value was always in the playoffs, punishing top d-men like Drew Doughty, Miro Heiskanen and Quinn Hughes with wicked hits, and standing up to the handful of fellow apex predators in the NHL.
Article content
ESPN has all but ignored the Canucks since the NHL returned after the Olympics. But here they lay out their thoughts on the Canucks season and what their off-season looks like.
Vancouver Canucks
Projected cap space: $21.6 million
2026 draft picks: 1st, 1st (MIN), 2nd, 2nd (SJ), 3rd (CBJ), 4th, 5th, 6th, 6th (WSH), 6th (BOS)
What went right? Trading their most valuable player en route to having one of the worst seasons in franchise history. Moving on from Quinn Hughes on Dec. 12 allowed the Canucks to get three young players who could play now and in the future, along with a first-round pick.
Advertisement 10
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Couple that with the fact they’ll finish with the NHL’s worst record and the strongest odds to win the draft lottery, and they are clearly in position to jump-start their rebuild.
What went wrong? Think about the characteristics that come with being the worst team in the NHL. The Canucks displayed many, if not all of them.
They were among the bottom 10 in the NHL in shot-share, scoring chances per 60, high-danger scoring chances per 60 and shots per 60. Their underlying defensive metrics were also challenging, as they were in the bottom 10 in terms of most shots allowed per 60, most scoring chances allowed per 60 and most high-danger chances allowed per 60.
Put it all together and as of April 13, the Canucks were 30th in goals per game (2.56), 32nd in goals against per game (3.81) and their minus-96 goal differential was 35 clear of second-worst mark in the league.
Keys to the off-season: The Canucks have UFAs such as Teddy Blueger and Evander Kane that they can let walk in free agency. But beyond that, hitting a full-on reset could prove challenging. The Canucks have seven players under contract for next season who will have more than three years left on their current deals. It’s a group that includes Elias Pettersson, who will enter the third year of his eight-year contract worth $11.6 million annually.
Advertisement 11
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
It’s possible that the Canucks could seek to sign players they believe can address some of their short-term needs, with the idea they could move on from them before the 2026-27 trade deadline to add to their future draft capital.
Realistic expectation for 2026-27: Unless something drastically changes, the rebuild will continue through 2026-27.
The Athletic graded the Canucks season, with predictable results.
Vancouver Canucks: F
The Canucks won fewer games this season than in any other season in the franchise’s history — that includes the expansion era teams from the early 1970s and the performance of Canucks teams in every lockout or pandemic-abbreviated season. This was a season where the bottom fell out. Where the rebuild became a fact. — Thomas Drance
Check back for more Canucks news throughout the day.
Read More
Canucks’ Patrik Allvin out as GM
Canucks: Boiled 6-1 by the Oilers, here are the season player grades
Article content
Share this article in your social network