Cappellari, M. et al. The SAURON project – X. The orbital anisotropy of elliptical and lenticular galaxies: revisiting the (V/σ,ϵ) diagram with integral-field stellar kinematics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 379, 418–444 (2007).
Emsellem, E. et al. The ATLAS3D project – III. A census of the stellar angular momentum within the effective radius of early-type galaxies: unveiling the distribution of fast and slow rotators. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 414, 888–912 (2011).
Graham, M. T. et al. SDSS-IV MaNGA: stellar angular momentum of about 2300 galaxies: unveiling the bimodality of massive galaxy properties. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 477, 4711–4737 (2018).
Falcón-Barroso, J. et al. The CALIFA view on stellar angular momentum across the Hubble sequence. Astron. Astrophys. 632, A59 (2019).
Brough, S. et al. The SAMI Galaxy Survey: mass as the driver of the kinematic morphology–density relation in clusters. Astrophys. J. 844, 59 (2017).
Veale, M. et al. The MASSIVE survey – VIII. Stellar velocity dispersion profiles and environmental dependence of early-type galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 473, 5446–5467 (2018).
Cole, J. et al. Stellar kinematics and enviornment at z = 0.8 in the LEGA-C Survey: massive slow rotators are built first in overdense environments. Astrophys. J. Lett. 890, L25 (2020).
Derkenne, C. et al. The MAGPI survey: massive slow rotator population in place by z ~ 0.3. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 531, 4602–4610 (2024).
Muñoz López, C. et al. Stellar angular momentum of intermediate-redshift galaxies in MUSE surveys. Astron. Astrophys. 688, A75 (2024).
Bois, M. et al. The ATLAS3D project – VI. Simulations of binary galaxy mergers and the link with fast rotators, slow rotators and kinematically distinct cores. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 416, 1654–1679 (2011).
Schulze, F. et al. Kinematics of simulated galaxies – I. Connecting dynamical and morphological properties of early-type galaxies at different redshifts. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 480, 4636–4658 (2018).
Khochfar, S. et al. The ATLAS3D project – VIII. Modelling the formation and evolution of fast and slow rotator early-type galaxies within ΛCDM. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 417, 845–862 (2011).
Kimmig, L. C. et al. Blowing out the candle: how to quench galaxies at high redshift—an ensemble of rapid starbursts, AGN feedback, and environment. Astrophys. J. 979, 15 (2025).
Newman, A. B., Belli, S., Ellis, R. S. & Patel, S. G. Resolving quiesent galaxies at z ≳ 2. II. Direct measures of rotational support. Astrophys. J. 862, 126 (2018).
D’Eugenio, F. et al. A fast-rotator post-starburst galaxy quenched by supermassive black-hole feedback at z = 3. Nat. Astron. 8, 1443–1456 (2024).
Pascalau, R. G. et al. When relics were made: vigorous stellar rotation and low dark matter content in the massive ultra-compact galaxy GS-9209 at z = 4.66. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 547, stag210 (2026).
Jarvis, M. J. et al. The VISTA Deep Extragalactic Observations (VIDEO) survey. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 428, 1281–1295 (2013).
Forrest, B. et al. The Massive Ancient Galaxies at z > 3 NEar-infrared (MAGAZ3NE) survey: confirmation of extremely rapid star formation and quenching timescales for massive galaxies in the early Universe. Astrophys. J. 903, 47 (2020).
Forrest, B. et al. MAGAZ3NE: high stellar velocity dispersions for ultramassive quiescent galaxies at z > 3. Astrophys. J. 938, 109 (2022).
Forrest, B. et al. An extremely massive quiescent galaxy at z = 3.493: evidence of insufficiently rapid quenching mechanisms in theoretical models. Astrophys. J. 890, 1 (2020).
Carnall, A. C. et al. A massive quiescent galaxy at redshift 4.658. Nature 619, 716–719 (2023).
Glazebrook, K. et al. A massive galaxy that formed its stars at z ~ 11. Nature 628, 277–281 (2024).
Straatman, C. M. S. et al. The sizes of massive quiescent and star-forming galaxies at z ~ 4 with ZFOURGE and CANDELS. Astrophys. J. Lett. 808, L29 (2015).
Rutherford, T. H. et al. The SAMI Galaxy Survey: using tidal streams and shells to trace the dynamical evolution of massive galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 529, 810–830 (2024).
Sola, E. et al. Low surface brightness structures from annotated deep CFHT images: effects of the host galaxy’s properties and environment. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 541, 3015–3042 (2025).
Ito, K. et al. DeepDive: a deep dive into the physics of the first massive quiescent galaxies in the Universe. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.22642 (2025).
Heckman, T. M. An optical and radio survey of the nuclei of bright galaxies – activity in normal galactic nuclei. Astron. Astrophys. 87, 152–164 (1980).
Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M. & Terlevich, R. Classification parameters for the emission-line spectra of extragalactic objects. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 93, 5–19 (1981).
Agostino, C. J., Salim, S., Ellison, S. L., Bickley, R. W. & Faber, S. M. A new physical picture for active galactic nuclei lacking optical emission lines. Astrophys. J. 943, 174 (2023).
Cappellari, M. Full spectrum fitting with photometry in pPXF: stellar population versus dynamical masses, non-parametric star formation history and metallicity for 3200 LEGA-C galaxies at redshift z ~ 0.8. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 526, 3273–3300 (2023).
Harborne, K. E. et al. Recovering λR and V/σ from seeing-dominated IFS data. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 497, 2018–2038 (2020).
Hubble, E. Extra-galactic nebulae. Contributions from the Mount Wilson Observatory 324, 321–369 (1926).
Turner, O. J. et al. The KMOS Deep Survey (KDS) – I. Dynamical measurements of typical star-forming galaxies at z ~ 3.5. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 471, 1280–1320 (2017).
Méndez-Abreu, J., Simonneau, E., Aguerri, J. A. L. & Corsini, E. M. Structural properties of disk galaxies. Astron. Astrophys. 521, A71 (2010).
Bellovary, J. M. et al. Effects of inclination on measuring velocity dispersion and implications for black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 445, 2667–2676 (2014).
Slob, M. et al. Fast rotators at cosmic noon: stellar kinematics for 15 quiescent galaxies from JWST-SUSPENSE. Astron. Astrophys. 702, A110 (2025).
van Dokkum, P. G. et al. The growth of massive galaxies since z = 2. Astrophys. J. 709, 1018–1041 (2010).
Naab, T. et al. The ATLAS3D project – XXV. Two-dimensional kinematic analysis of simulated galaxies and the cosmological origin of fast and slow rotators. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 444, 3357–3387 (2014).
Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J. & Kereš, D. A cosmological framework for the co evolution of quasars, supermassive black holes, and elliptical galaxies. I. Galaxy mergers and quasar activity. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 175, 356–389 (2008).
van Dokkum, P., Conroy, C., Villaume, A., Brodie, J. & Romanowsky, A. J. The stellar initial mass function in early-type galaxies from absorption line spectroscopy. III. Radial gradients. Astrophys. J. 841, 68 (2017).
La Barbera, F. et al. IMF radial gradients in most massive early-type galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 489, 4090–4110 (2019).
Karademir, G. S. et al. The outer stellar halos of galaxies: how radial merger mass deposition, shells, and streams depend on infall-orbit configurations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 487, 318–332 (2019).
Bezanson, R. et al. The relation between compact, quiescent high-redshift galaxies and massive nearby elliptical galaxies: evidence for hierarchical, inside-out growth. Astrophys. J. 697, 1290–1298 (2009).
Saracco, P. et al. The rapid buildup of massive early-type galaxies: supersolar metallicity, high velocity dispersion, and young age for an early-type galaxy at z = 3.35. Astrophys. J. 905, 40 (2020).
Suess, K. A. et al. Minor merger growth in action: JWST detects faint blue companions around massive quiescent galaxies at 0.5 < z < 3.0. Astrophys. J. Lett. 956, L42 (2023).
Nipoti, C. Evolution of massive quiescent galaxies via envelope accretion. Astron. Astrophys. 697, A74 (2025).
Forbes, D. Assembly pathways and the growth of massive early-type galaxies. Galaxies 5, 27 (2017).
van de Sande, J. et al. the Sami Galaxy Survey: revisiting galaxy classification through high-order stellar kinematics. Astrophys. J. 835, 104 (2017).
Penoyre, Z., Moster, B. P., Sijacki, D. & Genel, S. The origin and evolution of fast and slow rotators in the Illustris simulation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 468, 3883–3906 (2017).
Lagos, C. D. P. et al. Angular momentum evolution of galaxies in EAGLE. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 464, 3850–3870 (2017).
Böker, T. et al. The Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec) on the James Webb Space Telescope: III. Integral-field spectroscopy. Astron. Astrophys. 661, A82 (2022).
Brammer, G. grizli. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/Zenodo.8370018 (2023).
Valentino, F. et al. An atlas of color-selected quiescent galaxies at z > 3 in public JWST fields. Astrophys. J. 947, 20 (2023).
Cappellari, M. Improving the full spectrum fitting method: accurate convolution with Gauss–Hermite functions. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 466, 798–811 (2017).
Vazdekis, A., Koleva, M., Ricciardelli, E., Röck, B. & Falcón-Barroso, J. UV-extended E-MILES stellar population models: young components in massive early-type galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 463, 3409–3436 (2016).
Conroy, C., Gunn, J. E. & White, M. The propagation of uncertainties in stellar population synthesis modeling. I. The relevance of uncertain aspects of stellar evolution and the initial mass function to the derived physical properties of galaxies. Astrophys. J. 699, 486–506 (2009).
Conroy, C. & Gunn, J. E. The propagation of uncertainties in stellar population synthesis modeling. III. Model calibration, comparison, and evaluation. Astrophys. J. 712, 833–857 (2010).
Bruzual, G. & Charlot, S. Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 344, 1000–1028 (2003).
Verro, K. et al. The X-shooter Spectral Library (XSL): Data Release 3. Astron. Astrophys. 660, 1–26 (2022).
Schreiber, C. et al. Jekyll & Hyde: quiescence and extreme obscuration in a pair of massive galaxies 1.5 Gyr after the Big Bang. Astron. Astrophys. 611, A22 (2018).
Cappellari, M. & Copin, Y. Adaptive spatial binning of integral-field spectroscopic data using Voronoi tessellations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 342, 345–354 (2003).
Pasha, I. & Miller, T. B. pysersic: a Python package for determining galaxy structural properties via Bayesian inference, accelerated with jax. J. Open Source Softw. 8, 1–5 (2023).
Bentz, M. C. The NIRSpec IFU point spread function. Res. Notes Am. Astron. Soc. 9, 128 (2025).
Cleri, N. J. et al. Optical strong line ratios cannot distinguish between stellar populations and accreting black holes at high ionization parameters and low metallicities. Astrophys. J. 994, 146 (2025).
Belli, S. et al. KMOS 3D reveals low-level star formation activity in massive quiescent galaxies at 0.7 < z < 2.7. Astrophys. J. 841, 6 (2017).
Kriek, M. et al. The heavy metal survey: star formation constraints and dynamical masses of 21 massive quiescent galaxies at z = 1.3–2.3. Astrophys. J. 966, 36 (2024).
Bugiani, L. et al. Active galactic nucleus feedback in quiescent galaxies at cosmic noon traced by ionized gas emission. Astrophys. J. 981, 25 (2025).
Chang, W. et al. MAGAZ3NE: Dust deficiency in ultramassive quiescent galaxies at 3https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.22844 (2026).
Jarvis, M. et al. The MeerKAT International GHz Tiered Extragalactic Exploration (MIGHTEE) survey. Proc. Sci. 277, 006 (2018).
Hale, C. L. et al. MIGHTEE: the continuum survey Data Release 1. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 536, 2187–2211 (2025).
Rossum, G. Python Tutorial Technical Report CS-R9526 (Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica, 1995).
The Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M. et al. The Astropy Project: sustaining and growing a community-oriented open-source project and the latest major release (v5.0) of the core package. Astrophys. J. 935, 167 (2022).
Hunter, J. D. Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Comput. Sci. Eng. 9, 90–95 (2007).
Harris, C. R. et al. Array programming with NumPy. Nature 585, 357–362 (2020).
Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods 17, 261–272 (2020).
Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., Heisler, C. A. & Trevena, J. Theoretical modeling of starburst galaxies. Astrophys. J. 556, 121–140 (2001).
Kauffmann, G. et al. The host galaxies of active galactic nuclei. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 346, 1055–1077 (2003).
Cappellari, M. Structure and kinematics of early-type galaxies from integral field spectroscopy. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 54, 597–665 (2016).
van de Sande, J. et al. The SAMI galaxy survey: a statistical approach to an optimal classification of stellar kinematics in galaxy surveys. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 505, 3078–3106 (2021).